Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Toward a robust swallowing detection for an implantable active artificial larynx: a survey

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Total laryngectomy consists in the removal of the larynx and is intended as a curative treatment for laryngeal cancer, but it leaves the patient with no possibility to breathe, talk, and swallow normally anymore. A tracheostomy is created to restore breathing through the throat, but the aero-digestive tracts are permanently separated and the air no longer passes through the nasal tracts, which allowed filtration, warming, humidification, olfaction, and acceleration of the air for better tissue oxygenation. As for phonation restoration, various techniques allow the patient to talk again. The main one consists of a tracheo-esophageal valve prosthesis that makes the air passes from the esophagus to the pharynx, and makes the air vibrate to allow speech through articulation. Finally, swallowing is possible through the original tract as it is now isolated from the trachea. Yet, many methods exist to detect and assess a swallowing, but none is intended as a definitive restoration technique of the natural airway, which would permanently close the tracheostomy and avoid its adverse effects. In addition, these methods are non-invasive and lack detection accuracy. The feasibility of an effective early detection of swallowing would allow to further develop an implantable active artificial larynx and therefore restore the aero-digestive tracts. A previous attempt has been made on an artificial larynx implanted in 2012, but no active detection was included and the system was completely mechanic. This led to residues in the airway because of the imperfect sealing of the mechanism. An active swallowing detection coupled with indwelling measurements would thus likely add a significant reliability on such a system as it would allow to actively close an artificial larynx. So, after a brief explanation of the swallowing mechanism, this survey intends to first provide a detailed consideration of the anatomical region involved in swallowing, with a detection perspective. Second, the swallowing mechanism following total laryngectomy surgery is detailed. Third, the current non-invasive swallowing detection technique and their limitations are discussed. Finally, the previous points are explored with regard to the inherent requirements for the feasibility of an effective swallowing detection for an artificial larynx.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eskander A et al (2018) Decision making in advanced larynx cancer: an evidenced based review. In: Oral oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.09.019

  2. Globocan G (2008) Cancer tomorrow. A tool that predicts the future cancer incidence and mortality burden worldwide from the current estimates up until 2040. https://gco.iarc.fr/tomorrow/home

  3. Marieb EN et al (2012) Human anatomy & physiology. Pearson Education

  4. Hoffmann TK (2021) Total laryngectomy–still cutting-edge?. In: Cancers. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13061405

  5. Stell PM (1975) The first laryngectomy. In: The journal of laryngology & otology. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215100080488

  6. Assimakopoulos D et al (2003) Highlights in the evolution of diagnosis and treatment of laryngeal cancer. In: The laryngoscope. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200303000-00030

  7. Peter WA (1996) The history of laryngology: a centennial celebration. In: Otolaryngology–head and neck surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0194-59989670202-4

  8. Tang CG et al (2015) Voice restoration after total laryngectomy. In: Otolaryngologic clinics of north america. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2015.04.013

  9. Serra A et al (2015) Post-laryngectomy voice rehabilitation with voice prosthesis: 15 years experience of the ENT clinic of university of Catania. Retrospective data analysis and literature review. In: Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica. https://doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-680

  10. Kaye R et al (2017) The electrolarynx: voice restoration after total laryngectomy. In: Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.). https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S133225

  11. Izdebski K et al (1994) Problems with tracheoesophageal fistula voice restoration in totally laryngectomized patients: a review of 95 cases. In: Archives of otolaryngology–head & neck surgery. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1994.01880320042010

  12. Singer S et al (2014) Quality of life before and after total laryngectomy: results of a multicenter prospective cohort study. In: Head & neck. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.23305

  13. Robertson SM, Yeo JCL, Dunnet C, Young D, MacKenzie K (2012) Voice, swallowing, and quality of life after total laryngectomy–results of the west of scotland laryngectomy audit. In: Head & neck. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.21692

  14. Weinstein GS et al (2001) Laryngeal preservation with supracricoid partial laryngectomy results in improved quality of life when compared with total laryngectomy. In: The laryngoscope. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200102000-00001

  15. Krishnan G et al (2017) The current status of human laryngeal transplantation in 2017: a state of the field review. In: The laryngoscope. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.26503

  16. Grajek M et al (2017) First complex allotransplantation of neck organs: larynx, trachea, pharynx, esophagus, thyroid, parathyroid glands, and anterior cervical wall: a case report. In: Annals of surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002262

  17. Farwell DG et al (2013) Laryngotracheal transplantation. In: The laryngoscope. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24053

  18. Strome M et al (2001) Laryngeal transplantation and 40-month follow-up. In: New England journal of medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200105313442204

  19. Lorenz RR et al (2014) Total laryngeal transplant explanted: 14 years of lessons learned. In: Otolaryngology–head and neck surgery. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599813519748

  20. Bewley AF et al (2020) Laryngeal transplantation. In: Advances in neurolaryngology. https://doi.org/10.1159/000456691

  21. Lott DG et al (2010) Aggressive behavior of nonmelanotic skin cancers in solid organ transplant recipients. In: Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0b013e3181ec7228

  22. Potter CPS et al (1998) Laryngectomees’ views on laryngeal transplantation. In: Transplant international. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-2277.1998.tb00832.x

  23. Debry C et al (2014) Laryngeal replacement with an artificial larynx after total laryngectomy: the possibility of restoring larynx functionality in the future. In: Head & neck. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.23621

  24. Debry C et al (2017) Implantation of an artificial larynx after total laryngectomy. In: New England journal of medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1611966

  25. D’Ascanio L et al (2017) More on implantation of an artificial larynx after total laryngectomy. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1701193

  26. Brenet E et al (2020) Évolution du larynx artificiel vers le biologique: réhabilitation laryngée par allogreffe aortique chez la brebis. In: Bulletin de l’Académie Nationale de Médecine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.banm.2020.02.002

  27. Chen J et al (2021) Tissue engineering of the larynx: a contemporary review. In: Journal of clinical laboratory analysis. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23646

  28. Martinod E et al (2018) Feasibility of bioengineered tracheal and bronchial reconstruction using stented aortic matrices. In: JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.4653

  29. Drake R et al (2009) Gray’s anatomy for students E-book. Elsevier health sciences

  30. Walton J et al (2018) Physiology of swallowing. In: Surgery (Oxford). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpsur.2018.08.010

  31. Namasivayam-MacDonald AM et al (2018) A review of swallow timing in the elderly. In: Physiology & behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.10.023

  32. Shaw SM et al (2013) The normal swallow: muscular and neurophysiological control. In: Otolaryngologic clinics of North America. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2013.09.006

  33. Matsuo K et al (2008) Anatomy and physiology of feeding and swallowing: normal and abnormal. In: Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2008.06.001

  34. Ertekin C et al (2003) Neurophysiology of swallowing. In: Clinical neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(03)00237-2

  35. Jean A (2001) Brain stem control of swallowing: neuronal network and cellular mechanisms. In: Physiological reviews. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.2001.81.2.929

  36. Dodds WJ et al (1990) Physiology and radiology of the normal oral and pharyngeal phases of swallowing. In: American journal of roentgenology. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.154.5.2108569

  37. Doty RW et al (1956) An electromyographic analysis of reflex deglutition. In: Journal of neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1956.19.1.44

  38. Park D et al (2017) Normal contractile algorithm of swallowing related muscles revealed by needle EMG and its comparison to videofluoroscopic swallowing study and high resolution manometry studies: a preliminary study. In: Journal of electromyography and kinesiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2017.07.007

  39. Thexton AJ et al (2007) Electromyographic activity during the reflex pharyngeal swallow in the pig: Doty and Bosma (1956) revisited. In: Journal of applied physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00456.2006

  40. Gay T et al (1994) Oral and laryngeal muscle coordination during swallowing. In: The laryngoscope. https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-199403000-00017

  41. Hrycyshyn AW et al (1972) Electromyography of the oral stage of swallowing in man. In: American journal of anatomy. https://doi.org/10.1002/aja.1001330307

  42. Cunningham DP et al (1969) Electromyography of genioglossus and geniohyoid muscles during deglutition. In: The anatomical record

  43. Inokuchi H et al (2016) Electromyography of swallowing with fine wire intramuscular electrodes in healthy human: amplitude difference of selected hyoid muscles. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-015-9655-9

  44. Inokuchi H et al (2014) Electromyography of swallowing with fine wire intramuscular electrodes in healthy human: activation sequence of selected hyoid muscles. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-014-9566-1

  45. Miura Y et al (2009) Effects of taste solutions, carbonation, and cold stimulus on the power frequency content of swallowing submental surface electromyography. In: Chemical senses. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjp005

  46. Palmer PM et al (2005) Effects of a sour bolus on the intramuscular electromyographic (EMG) activity of muscles in the submental region. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-005-0017-x

  47. Palmer Phyllis M et al (2008) Quantitative contributions of the muscles of the tongue, floor-of-mouth, jaw, and velum to tongue-to-palate pressure generation. In: Journal of speech, language, and hearing research. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2008/060)

  48. Huckabee M-L et al (2005) Submental surface electromyographic measurement and pharyngeal pressures during normal and effortful swallowing. In: Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2005.05.005

  49. Ertekin C et al (1995) An electrophysiological investigation of deglutition in man. In: Muscle & nerve. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.880181014

  50. Cock C et al (2017) Modulation of upper esophageal sphincter (UES) relaxation and opening during volume swallowing. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-016-9744-4

  51. Zaretsky E et al (2017) Identification of the most significant electrode positions in electromyographic evaluation of swallowing-related movements in humans. In: European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4288-7

  52. Zhu M et al (2017) Evaluation of normal swallowing functions by using dynamic high-density surface electromyography maps. In: BioMedical engineering online. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-017-0424-x

  53. Stepp Cara E (2012) Surface electromyography for speech and swallowing systems: measurement, analysis, and interpretation. In: Journal of speech, language, and hearing research. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2011/11-0214)

  54. McKeown MJ et al (2002) Non-invasive monitoring of functionally distinct muscle activations during swallowing. In: Clinical neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00007-X

  55. Palmer Phyllis M et al (1999) Contributions of individual muscles to the submental surface electromyogram during swallowing. In: Journal of speech, language, and hearing research. https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4206.1378

  56. Pearson WG et al (2012) Structural analysis of muscles elevating the hyolaryngeal complex. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-011-9392-7

  57. Pearson WG et al (2011) Evaluating the structural properties of suprahyoid muscles and their potential for moving the hyoid. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-010-9315-z

  58. O’Dwyer Nicolas J et al (1981) Procedures for verification of electrode placement in EMG studies of orofacial and mandibular muscles. In: Journal of speech, language, and hearing research. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.2402.273

  59. Hara K et al (2018) Treatment and evaluation of dysphagia rehabilitation especially on suprahyoid muscles as jaw-opening muscles. In: Japanese dental science review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdsr.2018.06.003

  60. Hutcheson KA et al (2017) Expiratory muscle strength training evaluated with simultaneous high-resolution manometry and electromyography. In: The laryngoscope. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.26397

  61. Van Houtte E et al (2013) An examination of surface EMG for the assessment of muscle tension dysphonia. In: Journal of voice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.06.006

  62. Yoshida M et al (2007) Comparison of surface electromyographic (sEMG) activity of submental muscles between the head lift and tongue press exercises as a therapeutic exercise for pharyngeal dysphagia. In: Gerodontology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.2007.00164.x

  63. Yiu Edwin M-L et al (2005) Electromyographic study of motor learning for a voice production task. In: Journal of speech, language, and hearing research. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2005/087a)

  64. Monaco A et al (2008) Surface electromyography pattern of human swallowing. In: BMC oral health. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-8-6

  65. Crary MA et al (2006) Biomechanical correlates of surface electromyography signals obtained during swallowing by healthy adults. In: Journal of speech, language, and hearing research. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2006/015)

  66. Ruiying D et al (2003) The effects of taste and consistency on swallow physiology in younger and older healthy individuals. In: Journal of speech, language, and hearing research. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2003/076)

  67. Sciortino KF et al (2003) Effects of mechanical, cold, gustatory, and combined stimulation to the human anterior faucial pillars. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-002-0076-1

  68. Perlman AL et al (1999) Electromyographic activity from human laryngeal, pharyngeal, and submental muscles during swallowing. In: Journal of applied physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1999.86.5.1663

  69. Pearson WG et al (2013) Evaluating swallowing muscles essential for hyolaryngeal elevation by using muscle functional magnetic resonance imaging. In: International journal of radiation oncology*biology*physics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.07.2370

  70. Okada T et al (2013) Dynamic change in hyoid muscle length associated with trajectory of hyoid bone during swallowing: analysis using 320-row area detector computed tomography. In: Journal of applied physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00467.2013

  71. German RZ et al (2009) Integration of the reflex pharyngeal swallow into rhythmic oral activity in a neurologically intact pig model. In: Journal of neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00100.2009

  72. Thexton AJ et al (2012) EMG activity in hyoid muscles during pig suckling. In: Journal of applied physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00450.2011

  73. Mayerl CJ et al (2021) The contractile patterns, anatomy and physiology of the hyoid musculature change longitudinally through infancy. In: Proceedings of the royal society B: biological sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.0052

  74. Munro RR (1974) Activity of the digastric muscle in swallowing and chewing. In: Journal of dental research. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345740530030401

  75. Munro RR (1972) Coordination of activity of the two bellies of the digastric muscle in basic jaw movements. In: Journal of dental research. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345720510062801

  76. Widmalm S-E et al (1988) Anatomical and electromyographic studies of the digastric muscle. In: Journal of oral rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1988.tb00142.x

  77. Kurt T et al (2006) Electrophysiologic identification and evaluation of stylohyoid and posterior digastricus muscle complex. In: Journal of electromyography and kinesiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2005.06.014

  78. Türp JC et al (2005) Is the posterior belly of the digastric muscle palpable? A qualitative systematic review of the literature. In: Clinical anatomy. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.20104

  79. Kim SD et al (2019) Anatomy and variations of digastric muscle. In: Anatomy & cell biology. https://doi.org/10.5115/acb.2019.52.1.1

  80. De-Ary-Pires B et al (2003) The human digastric muscle: patterns and variations with clinical and surgical correlations. In: Annals of anatomy - anatomischer anzeiger. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0940-9602(03)80110-3

  81. Donner MW et al (1985) Anatomy and physiology of the pharynx. In: Gastrointestinal radiology. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01893103

  82. Sivarao DV et al (2000) Functional anatomy and physiology of the upper esophageal sphincter. In: The american journal of medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9343(99)00337-X

  83. Cook IJ et al (1989) Opening mechanisms of the human upper esophageal sphincter. In: American journal of physiology-gastrointestinal and liver physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.1989.257.5.G748

  84. Ayappa I et al (2003) The upper airway in sleep: physiology of the pharynx. In: Sleep medicine reviews. https://doi.org/10.1053/smrv.2002.0238

  85. Kuna ST et al (1997) Superior pharyngeal constrictor activation in obstructive sleep apnea. In: American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.156.3.9702053

  86. Kuna ST et al (1997) Respiratory-related pharyngeal constrictor muscle activity in normal human adults.. In: American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.155.6.9196107

  87. Perlman Adrienne L et al (1989) Electrical activity from the superior pharyngeal constrictor during reflexive and nonreflexive tasks. In: Journal of speech, language, and hearing research. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3204.749

  88. Basmajian JV et al (1961) Electromyography of the pharyngeal constrictors and levator palati in man. In: The anatomical record. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1091390414

  89. Rowe LD et al (1984) Adaptation in the function of pharyngeal constrictor muscles. In: Otolaryngology–head and neck surgery. https://doi.org/10.1177/019459988409200404

  90. Van Daele DJ et al (2005) Timing of glottic closure during swallowing: a combined electromyographic and endoscopic analysis. In: Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348940511400610

  91. Hammer MJ et al (2014) Evaluating the tongue-hold maneuver using high-resolution manometry and electromyography. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-014-9545-6

  92. Leonard RJ et al (2000) Structural displacements in normal swallowing: a videofluoroscopic study. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004550010017

  93. Kendall KA et al (2000) Timing of events in normal swallowing: a videofluoroscopic study. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004550010004

  94. Stoeckli SJ et al (2003) Interrater reliability of videofluoroscopic swallow evaluation. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-002-0085-0

  95. Knigge MA et al (2014) Implementation of high-resolution manometry in the clinical practice of speech language pathology. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-013-9494-5

  96. Omari TI et al (2011) Reproducibility and agreement of pharyngeal automated impedance manometry with videofluoroscopy. In: Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2011.05.026

  97. Kahrilas PJ et al (2015) The Chicago classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0. In: Neurogastroenterology & motility. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.12477

  98. Rosen SP et al (2017) Pharyngeal swallowing pressures in the base-of-tongue and hypopharynx regions identified with three-dimensional manometry. In: The laryngoscope. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.26483

  99. Winiker K et al (2019) A systematic review of current methodology of high resolution pharyngeal manometry with and without impedance. In: European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-5240-9

  100. Jones CA et al (2018) Methods for measuring swallowing pressure variability using high-resolution manometry. In: Frontiers in applied mathematics and statistics. https://doi.org/10.3389/fams.2018.00023

  101. Omari T et al (2018) High-resolution manometry: what about the pharynx?. In: Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0000000000000491

  102. Cock C et al (2017) Diagnosis of swallowing disorders: how we interpret pharyngeal manometry. In: Current gastroenterology reports. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-017-0552-2

  103. Mielens JD et al (2011) Automated analysis of pharyngeal pressure data obtained with high-resolution manometry. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-010-9320-2

  104. Omari TI et al (2020) High-resolution pharyngeal manometry and impedance: protocols and metrics—recommendations of a high-resolution pharyngeal manometry international working group. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-019-10023-y

  105. Walczak CC et al (2017) Pharyngeal pressure and timing during bolus transit. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-016-9743-5

  106. Mcconnel FMS (1988) Analysis of pressure generation and bolus transit during pharyngeal swallowing. In: The laryngoscope. https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-198801000-00015

  107. Pal A et al (2003) Intrabolus pressure gradient identifies pathological constriction in the upper esophageal sphincter during flow. In: American journal of physiology-gastrointestinal and liver physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.00030.2003

  108. Cock C et al (2018) Systematic review of pharyngeal and esophageal manometry in healthy or dysphagic older persons (>60 years). In: Geriatrics. https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics3040067

  109. Clavé P et al (2015) Dysphagia: current reality and scope of the problem. In: Nature reviews gastroenterology & hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2015.49

  110. Rosen SP et al (2018) Effect of body position on pharyngeal swallowing pressures using high-resolution manometry. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-017-9866-3

  111. Mcculloch TM et al (2010) High-resolution manometry of pharyngeal swallow pressure events associated with head turn and chin tuck. In: Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348941011900602

  112. Aoyagi Y et al (2021) Effect of tongue-hold swallow on pharyngeal contractile properties in healthy individuals. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-020-10217-9

  113. Hoffman MR et al (2012) High-resolution manometry of pharyngeal swallow pressure events associated with effortful swallow and the mendelsohn maneuver. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-011-9385-6

  114. Umeki H et al (2009) Effects of a tongue-holding maneuver during swallowing evaluated by high-resolution manometry. In: Otolaryngology–head and neck surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2009.01.025

  115. Hasegawa M et al (2018) Differential response pattern of oropharyngeal pressure by bolus and dry swallows. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-017-9836-9

  116. Lin T et al (2014) Effect of bolus volume on pharyngeal swallowing assessed by high-resolution manometry. In: Physiology & behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.01.030

  117. Newman R et al (2016) Effect of bolus viscosity on the safety and efficacy of swallowing and the kinematics of the swallow response in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia: white paper by the European society for swallowing disorders (ESSD). In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-016-9696-8

  118. Hoffman MR et al (2010) Pharyngeal swallow adaptations to bolus volume measured with high-resolution manometry. In: The laryngoscope. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.21150

  119. Olszewska E et al (2019) Palatal anatomy for sleep apnea surgery. In: Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology. https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.238

  120. Choi D-Y et al (2014) Anatomical considerations of the longitudinal pharyngeal muscles in relation to their function on the internal surface of pharynx. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-014-9568-z

  121. Cho JH et al (2013) Surgical anatomy of human soft palate. In: The laryngoscope. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24067

  122. Perry J (2011) Anatomy and physiology of the velopharyngeal mechanism. In: Seminars in speech and language. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1277712

  123. Okuda S et al (2008) Morphologic characteristics of palatopharyngeal muscle. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-007-9133-0

  124. Pearson WG et al (2014) Visualising hyolaryngeal mechanics in swallowing using dynamic MRI. In: Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering: imaging & visualization. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681163.2013.846231

  125. Fukino K et al (2021) Anatomy of inferior end of palatopharyngeus: its contribution to upper esophageal sphincter opening. In: European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06437-2

  126. Tigos I et al (1988) The San Venero Roselli pharyngoplasty: an electromyographic study of the palatopharyngeus muscle. The Cleft Palate J 25(4):385–388

    Google Scholar 

  127. Schönmeyr B et al (2014) A review of the tensor veli palatine function and its relevance to palatoplasty. In: Journal of plastic surgery and hand surgery. https://doi.org/10.3109/2000656X.2013.793603

  128. Tachimura T et al (2005) Change in palatoglossus muscle activity in relationto swallowing volume during the transition from the oral phaseto the pharyngeal phase. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-004-0022-5

  129. Tangel DJ et al (1995) Respiratory-related control of palatoglossus and levator palatini muscle activity. In: Journal of applied physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1995.78.2.680

  130. Hamlet SL et al (1992) Velar activity and timing of eustachian tube function in swallowing. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02493474

  131. Honjo I et al (1979) Role of the tensor veli palatini muscle in movement of the soft palate. In: Acta oto-laryngologica. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016487909137152

  132. Fredericka B-B (1976) An electromyographic study of velopharyngeal function in speech. In: Journal of speech and hearing research. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.1902.225

  133. Kuehn DP et al (1982) Relationships between muscle activity and velar position. The Cleft Palate J 19(1):25–35

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. Launois SH et al (1996) Relationship between velopharyngeal dimensions and palatal EMG during progressive hypercapnia. In: Journal of applied physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1996.80.2.478

  135. Shprintzen RJ et al (1974) A three dimensional cinefluoroscopic analysis of velopharyngeal closure during speech and nonspeech activities in normals. The Cleft Palate J 11:412– 428

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Perry A et al (2002) Elevation of the soft palate in speech and swallowing in normal female participants and females with motor neuron disease: an innovative procedure for measuring palatal elevation. In: International journal of language & communication disorders. https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820110116857

  137. Kuehn David P et al (1994) Levator veli palatini muscle activity in relation to intraoral air pressure variation. In: Journal of speech, language, and hearing research. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3706.1260

  138. Nohara K et al (2007) Power spectra analysis of levator veli palatini muscle electromyogram during velopharyngeal closure for swallowing, speech, and blowing. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-006-9066-z

  139. Alper CM et al (2012) Relationship between the electromyographic activity of the paratubal muscles and eustachian tube opening assessed by sonotubometry and videoendoscopy. In: Archives of otolaryngology–head & neck surgery. https://doi.org/10.1001/archoto.2012.1293

  140. Okuno K et al (2013) Influences of swallowing volume and viscosity on regulation of levator veli palatini muscle activity during swallowing. In: Journal of oral rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12071

  141. Tachimura T et al (2006) Change in levator veli palatini muscle activity in relation to swallowing volume during the transition from the oral phase to pharyngeal phase. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-005-9005-4

  142. Kier WM et al (1985) Tongues, tentacles and trunks: the biomechanics of movement in muscular-hydrostats. In: Zoological journal of the linnean society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1985.tb01178.x

  143. Sanders I et al (2013) A three-dimensional atlas of human tongue muscles. In: The anatomical record. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.22711

  144. Felton SM et al (2008) Associating the mesoscale fiber organization of the tongue with local strain rate during swallowing. In: Journal of biomechanics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.01.030

  145. Gaige TA et al (2007) Three dimensional myoarchitecture of the human tongue determined in vivo by diffusion tensor imaging with tractography. In: Journal of magnetic resonance imaging. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21022

  146. Zhang S et al (2012) Real-time magnetic resonance imaging of normal swallowing. In: Journal of magnetic resonance imaging. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.23591

  147. Stone M (1990) A three-dimensional model of tongue movement based on ultrasound and x-ray microbeam data. In: The journal of the acoustical society of america. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.399188

  148. Napadow VJ et al (1999) Biomechanical basis for lingual muscular deformation during swallowing. In: American journal of physiology-gastrointestinal and liver physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.1999.277.3.G695

  149. Napadow VJ et al (1999) Intramural mechanics of the human tongue in association with physiological deformations. In: Journal of biomechanics. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(98)00109-2

  150. Gilbert RJ et al (2007) Anatomical basis of lingual hydrostatic deformation. In: Journal of experimental biology. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.007096

  151. Felton SM et al (2007) Mechanical basis for lingual deformation during the propulsive phase of swallowing as determined by phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging. In: J appl physiol. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01070.2006

  152. Napadow VJ et al (2002) A biomechanical model of sagittal tongue bending. In: Journal of biomechanical engineering. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1503794

  153. Buchaillard SI et al (2008) To what extent does Tagged-MRI technique allow to infer tongue muscles’ activation pattern? A modelling study. In: Interspeech 2008 - 9th annual conference of the international speech communication association. ISCA, pp 2839–2842

  154. Wang Y et al (2013) Identification of tongue muscle fibre group contraction from MR images. In: Computational biomechanics for medicine. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6351-1_16

  155. Orsbon CP et al (2020) XROMM and diceCT reveal a hydraulic mechanism of tongue base retraction in swallowing. In: Scientific reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64935-z

  156. Gassert RB et al (2016) Evaluating muscles underlying tongue base retraction in deglutition using muscular functional magnetic resonance imaging (mfMRI). In: Magnetic resonance imaging. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2015.10.029

  157. Thexton AJ et al (1998) Transition from suckling to drinking at weaning: a kinematic and electromyographic study in miniature pigs. In: Journal of experimental zoology. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-010X(19980401)280:5<327::AID-JEZ2>3.0.CO;2-Q

  158. Eastwood PR et al (2003) Heterogeneous activity of the human genioglossus muscle assessed by multiple bipolar fine-wire electrodes. In: Journal of applied physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01017.2002

  159. Tsukada T et al (2009) Effects of food texture and head posture on oropharyngeal swallowing. In: Journal of applied physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.91295.2008

  160. Ishiwata Y et al (1997) Human jaw–tongue reflex as revealed by intraoral surface recording. In: Journal of oral rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1997.tb00286.x

  161. Lowe A et al (1977) Regulation of genioglossus and masseter muscle activity in man. In: Archives of oral biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(77)90069-3

  162. Cori JM et al (2018) Sleeping tongue: current perspectives of genioglossus control in healthy individuals and patients with obstructive sleep apnea. In: Nature and science of sleep. https://doi.org/10.2147/NSS.S143296

  163. Ofusa W et al (2020) Use of barometric pressure and electromyography measurement techniques to elucidate the mechanisms by which bolus passes from the oral cavity to the oropharynx during swallowing. In: Physiology & behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.113115

  164. Vranish JR et al (2015) A comprehensive assessment of genioglossus electromyographic activity in healthy adults. In: Journal of neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00975.2014

  165. Takahashi S et al (2002) Breathing modes, body positions, and suprahyoid muscle activity. In: Journal of orthodontics. https://doi.org/10.1093/ortho/29.4.307

  166. Pittman LJ et al (2009) Genioglossus and intrinsic electromyographic activities in impeded and unimpeded protrusion tasks. In: Journal of neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.91065.2008

  167. Palmer JB et al (1992) Coordination of mastication and swallowing. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02493469

  168. Lemaire E et al (2021) Risk factors for pharyngocutaneous fistula after total pharyngolaryngectomy. In: Ear, nose & throat journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145561319901035

  169. Balaji A et al (2020) The results of sequential swallowing assessments after total laryngectomy for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal malignancies. In: European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06105-5

  170. Búa BA et al (2018) Voice and swallowing after total laryngectomy. In: Acta oto-laryngologica. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2017.1384056

  171. Coffey M et al (2015) Swallowing after laryngectomy. In: Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0000000000000162

  172. Maclean J et al (2009) Post-laryngectomy: it’s hard to swallow. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-008-9189-5

  173. Dantas RO et al (2005) Proximal esophageal contractions in laryngectomized patients. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-004-0027-0

  174. Balfe DM (1990) Dysphagia after laryngeal surgery: radiologic assessment. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02407390

  175. McConnel FMS et al (1986) Examination of swallowing after total laryngectomy using manofluorography. In: Head & neck surgery. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.2890090103

  176. Welch RW et al (1979) Manometry of the normal upper esophageal sphincter and its alterations in laryngectomy. In: The journal of clinical investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI109372

  177. Maclean J et al (2011) Impact of a laryngectomy and surgical closure technique on swallow biomechanics and dysphagia severity. In: Otolaryngology–head and neck surgery. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599810390906

  178. Zhang T et al (2016) Biomechanics of pharyngeal deglutitive function following total laryngectomy. In: Otolaryngology–head and neck surgery. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599816639249

  179. Lippert D et al (2016) Preliminary evaluation of functional swallow after total laryngectomy using high-resolution manometry. In: Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003489416629978

  180. Coffey MM et al (2018) An investigation of the post-laryngectomy swallow using videofluoroscopy and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-017-9862-7

  181. Hamlet SL et al (1992) Sounds of swallowing following total laryngectomy. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02493450

  182. Morinière S et al (2011) Pharyngeal swallowing sound profile assessed after partial and total laryngectomy. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-010-9322-0

  183. Steele CM (2015) The blind scientists and the elephant of swallowing: a review of instrumental perspectives on swallowing physiology. In: Journal of texture studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtxs.12101

  184. Selamat NA et al (2020) Automatic food intake monitoring based on chewing activity: a survey. In: IEEE access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2978260

  185. Moguel E et al (2019) Systematic literature review of food-intake monitoring in an aging population. In: Sensors. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19153265

  186. Vu T et al (2017) Wearable food intake monitoring technologies: a comprehensive review. In: Computers. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers6010004

  187. Lobo VB et al (2017) A review of devices using modern dietary assessment methods for reducing obesity. In: 2017 International conference on computing, communication and automation (ICCCA). https://doi.org/10.1109/CCAA.2017.8229804

  188. Chowdhury RH et al (2013) Surface electromyography signal processing and classification techniques. In: Sensors. https://doi.org/10.3390/s130912431

  189. Luca CD (2006) Electromyography. In: Encyclopedia of medical devices and instrumentation. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471732877.emd097

  190. Hermens HJ et al (2000) Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. In: Journal of electromyography and kinesiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1050-6411(00)00027-4

  191. Luca CJD (1997) The use of surface electromyography in biomechanics. In: Journal of applied biomechanics. https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.13.2.135

  192. Constantinescu G et al (2018) Evaluation of an automated swallow-detection algorithm using visual biofeedback in healthy adults and head and neck cancer survivors. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-017-9859-2

  193. Crary MA et al (2007) Identification of swallowing events from sEMG signals obtained from healthy adults. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-006-9059-y

  194. Roldan-Vasco S et al (2018) Automatic detection of oral and pharyngeal phases in swallowing using classification algorithms and multichannel EMG. In: Journal of electromyography and kinesiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2018.10.004

  195. Roldan-Vasco S et al (2018) Continuous wavelet transform for muscle activity detection in surface EMG signals during swallowing

  196. Restrepo-Agudelo S et al (2017) Improving surface EMG burst detection in infrahyoid muscles during swallowing using digital filters and discrete wavelet analysis. In: Journal of electromyography and kinesiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2017.05.001

  197. Afkari S (2007) Measuring frequency of spontaneous swallowing. Australasian Phys Eng Sci Med, vol 30.4

  198. Sasaki M et al (2013) Real-time estimation of tongue movement based on suprahyoid muscle activity. In: 2013 35th Annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society (EMBC). https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2013.6610573

  199. Sasaki M et al (2011) Estimation of tongue movement based on suprahyoid muscle activity. In: 2011 International symposium on micro-nanomechatronics and human science. https://doi.org/10.1109/MHS.2011.6102222

  200. Amft O et al (2006) Methods for detection and classification of normal swallowing from muscle activation and sound. In: 2006 Pervasive health conference and workshops. https://doi.org/10.1109/PCTHEALTH.2006.361624

  201. Reddy NP et al (1991) Noninvasive acceleration measurements to characterize the pharyngeal phase of swallowing. In: Journal of biomedical engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-5425(91)90018-3

  202. Hamlet SL et al (1990) Interpreting the sounds of swallowing: fluid flow through the cricopharyngeus. In: Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348949009900916

  203. Mackowiak RC et al (1967) Acoustic profile of deglutition. In: Proceedings of the society for experimental biology and medicine. https://doi.org/10.3181/00379727-125-32300

  204. Hamlet S et al (1994) Stethoscope acoustics and cervical auscultation of swallowing. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00262761

  205. Dudik JM et al (2015) Dysphagia screening: contributions of cervical auscultation signals and modern signal-processing techniques. In: IEEE transactions on human-machine systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2015.2408615

  206. Takahashi K et al (1994) Methodology for detecting swallowing sounds. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00262760

  207. Cichero JA et al (2002) Detection of swallowing sounds: methodology revisited. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-001-0100-x

  208. Lee J et al (2008) Time and time–frequency characterization of dual-axis swallowing accelerometry signals. In: Physiological measurement. https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/29/9/008

  209. Dudik JM et al (2015) A comparative analysis of swallowing accelerometry and sounds during saliva swallows. In: BioMedical engineering online. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-14-3

  210. Pan Q et al (2016) Validation of the optimal site in the neck region for detecting swallowing sounds. In: Journal of oral rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12440

  211. Perlman AL et al (2000) Respiratory and acoustic signals associated with bolus passage during swallowing. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004550010006

  212. Klahn MS et al (1999) Temporal and durational patterns associating respiration and swallowing. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00009594

  213. Selley WG et al (1994) The synchronization of respiration and swallow sounds with videofluoroscopy during swallowing. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00341260

  214. Cichero JA et al (1998) The physiologic cause of swallowing sounds: answers from heart sounds and vocal tract acoustics. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00009548

  215. Perlman AL et al (2005) Bolus location associated with videofluoroscopic and respirodeglutometric events. In: Journal of speech, language, and hearing research. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2005/003)

  216. Morinière S et al (2006) Sound component duration of healthy human pharyngoesophageal swallowing: a gender comparison study. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-006-9023-x

  217. Youmans SR et al (2005) An acoustic profile of normal swallowing. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-005-0013-1

  218. Honda T et al (2016) Characterization of swallowing sound: preliminary investigation of normal subjects. In: Plos one. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168187

  219. Zoratto DCB et al (2010) Hyolaryngeal excursion as the physiological source of swallowing accelerometry signals. In: Physiological measurement. https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/31/6/008

  220. Morinière S et al (2008) Origin of the sound components during pharyngeal swallowing in normal subjects. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-007-9134-z

  221. Coyle JL et al (2020) High-resolution cervical auscultation and data science: new tools to address an old problem. In: American journal of speech-language pathology. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_AJSLP-19-00155

  222. Khalifa Y et al (2021) Upper esophageal sphincter opening segmentation with convolutional recurrent neural networks in high resolution cervical auscultation. In: IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2020.3000057

  223. Sabry A et al (2020) Automatic estimation of laryngeal vestibule closure duration using high-resolution cervical auscultation signals. In: Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_PERSP-20-00073

  224. Mao S et al (2020) Neck sensor-supported hyoid bone movement tracking during swallowing. In: Royal society open science. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.181982

  225. Kurosu A et al (2019) Detection of swallow kinematic events from acoustic high-resolution cervical auscultation signals in patients with stroke. In: Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2018.05.038

  226. Khalifa Y et al (2020) Non-invasive identification of swallows via deep learning in high resolution cervical auscultation recordings. In: Scientific reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65492-1

  227. Miyagi S et al (2020) Classifying dysphagic swallowing sounds with support vector machines. In: Healthcare. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8020103

  228. Santoso LF et al (2019) Applying machine learning algorithms for automatic detection of swallowing from sound. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2019.8857937

  229. Yu C et al (2019) Silent aspiration detection in high resolution cervical auscultations. In: 2019 IEEE EMBS international conference on biomedical health informatics (BHI). https://doi.org/10.1109/BHI.2019.8834576

  230. Dudik JM et al (2018) Deep learning for classification of normal swallows in adults. In: Neurocomputing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2017.12.059

  231. Donohue C et al (2021) Establishing reference values for temporal kinematic swallow events across the lifespan in healthy community dwelling adults using high-resolution cervical auscultation. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-021-10317-0

  232. Orizio C et al (2006) Mechanomyography. In: Wiley encyclopedia of biomedical engineering. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780471740360.ebs0731

  233. Orizio C et al (1996) Surface mechanomyogram reflects muscle fibres twitches summation. In: Journal of biomechanics. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(95)00063-1

  234. Orizio C (1993) Muscle sound: bases for the introduction of a mechanomyographic signal in muscle studies. In: Muscle sound: bases for the introduction of a mechanomyographic signal in muscle studies, vol 21.3, pp 201–243

  235. Talib I et al (2018) Choice of mechanomyography sensors for diverse types of muscle activities. In: Journal of telecommunication, electronic and computer engineering (jtec)

  236. Watakabe M et al (2003) Reliability of the mechanomyogram detected with an accelerometer during voluntary contractions. In: Medical and biological engineering and computing. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02344888

  237. Posatskiy AO et al (2012) The effects of motion artifact on mechanomyography: a comparative study of microphones and accelerometers. In: Journal of electromyography and kinesiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2011.09.004

  238. Alves N et al (2011) Mechanomyography as an access pathway: corporeal contraindications. In: Disability and rehabilitation: assistive technology. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2010.541323

  239. Talib I et al (2019) A review on crosstalk in myographic signals. In: European journal of applied physiology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-018-3994-9

  240. Cè E et al (2015) Novel insights into skeletal muscle function by mechanomyography: from the laboratory to the field. In: Sport sciences for health. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-015-0219-z

  241. Ibitoye MO et al (2014) Mechanomyography and muscle function assessment: a review of current state and prospects. In: Clinical biomechanics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.04.003

  242. Islam MA et al (2013) Mechanomyography sensor development, related signal processing, and applications: a systematic review. In: IEEE sensors journal. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2013.2255982

  243. Lee J et al (2009) Effects of age and stimulus on submental mechanomyography signals during swallowing. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-008-9200-1

  244. Lee J et al (2009) Swallow segmentation with artificial neural networks and multi-sensor fusion. In: Medical engineering & physics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2009.07.001

  245. Constantinescu G et al (2017) Electromyography and mechanomyography signals during swallowing in healthy adults and head and neck cancer survivors. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-016-9742-6

  246. Mialland A et al (2021) Submental mechanomyography (MMG) to characterize the swallowing signature. In: IRBM. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irbm.2021.05.001

  247. Saitoh E et al (2007) Chewing and food consistency: effects on bolus transport and swallow initiation. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-006-9060-5

  248. Martin -HB et al (2007) Delayed initiation of the pharyngeal swallow: normal variability in adult swallows. In: Journal of speech, language, and hearing research. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2007/041)

  249. Stephen JR et al (2005) Bolus location at the initiation of the pharyngeal stage of swallowing in healthy older adults. In: Dysphagia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-005-0023-z

  250. Takasaki K et al (2008) Investigation of pharyngeal swallowing function using high-resolution manometry. In: The laryngoscope. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLG.0b013e31817dfd02

  251. Yildiz KA et al (2020) Interfaces with the peripheral nervous system for the control of a neuroprosthetic limb: a review. In: Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-020-00667-5

  252. Vu PP et al (2020) A regenerative peripheral nerve interface allows real-time control of an artificial hand in upper limb amputees. In: Science translational medicine. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aay2857

  253. Mittal S (2014) A survey of techniques for improving energy efficiency in embedded computing systems. In: International journal of computer aided engineering and technology. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCAET.2014.065419

  254. Songu M et al (2013) Physiology and pathophysiology of sneezing and itching: mechanisms of the symptoms. In: Nasal physiology and pathophysiology of nasal disorders. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37250-6_11

  255. Lang IM et al (2002) Mechanisms of airway protection during retching, vomiting, and swallowing. In: American journal of physiology-gastrointestinal and liver physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.00062.2002

  256. Fath L et al (2020) 18 - Respiratory tissue replacement and regeneration: from larynx to bronchi. In: Biomaterials for organ and tissue regeneration. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102906-0.00012-X

  257. Merenda M et al (2020) Edge machine learning for ai-enabled IoT devices: a review. In: Sensors. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20092533

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research has been carried out with funding from the Région Auvergne Rhône Alpes.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Engineering and Management Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, Gipsa-lab, 38000, Grenoble, France

    Adrien Mialland & Agnès Bonvilain

  2. Institute of Engineering and Management Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Otorhinolaryngology, CHU Grenoble Alpes, 38700, La Tronche, France

    Ihab Atallah

Authors
  1. Adrien Mialland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ihab Atallah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Agnès Bonvilain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adrien Mialland.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mialland, A., Atallah, I. & Bonvilain, A. Toward a robust swallowing detection for an implantable active artificial larynx: a survey. Med Biol Eng Comput 61, 1299–1327 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-023-02772-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-023-02772-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation