Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Agreement of the Apple Watch® and Fitbit Charge® for recording step count and heart rate when exercising in water

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined the association and level of agreement between criterion methods and the Apple Watch 4® and Fitbit Charge 3® for recording step count and heart rate when exercising in water on an aquatic treadmill (ATM). Sixteen healthy participants (13 females and 3 males) volunteered to take part in this study. Participants were submerged in an ATM pool to the level of their xiphoid process and completed 3-min exercise bouts at intensities that corresponded to a comfortable walk, brisk walk, jog, and running. A Polar® T31 chest strap recorded heart rate (HR) and a high-definition digital camera was utilized for recording step count (SC). Significant associations (p < 0.001) were observed between criterion methods and the Apple® (HR: R2 = 0.99 and SC: R2 = 0.87) and Fitbit® (HR: R2 = 0.72 and SC: R2 = 0.83) devices. The mean absolute error and relative error (%) for recording step count were 19.8 (7.4%) in the Apple Watch and 21.4 (8.5%) in the Fitbit and 0.90 (0.76%) in the Apple Watch and 4.2 (3.0%) in the Fitbit for recording heart rate. Both devices displayed a reasonable level of agreement for recording step count and heart rate when exercising in water.

Graphical abstract

Linear regression analysis demonstrating the association between each wearable device and the Apple Watch and Fit Bit Charge for recording step count and heart rate

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fuller D, Colwell E, Low J, Orychock K, Tobin MA, Simango B, et al. (2020) Reliability and validity of commercially available wearable devices for measuring steps, energy expenditure, and heart rate: systematic review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 8(9):e18694.

  2. Bunn JA, Navalta JW, Fountaine CJ, Reece JD. Current state of commercial wearable technology in physical activity monitoring 2015–2017. Int J Exerc Sci. 112018. p. 503–15.

  3. Bai Y, Hibbing P, Mantis C, Welk GJ (2018) Comparative evaluation of heart rate-based monitors: Apple Watch vs Fitbit Charge Hr. J Sports Sci 36(15):1734–1741

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Abt G, Bray J, Benson AC (2018) The validity and inter-device variability of the Apple Watch™ for measuring maximal heart rate. J Sports Sci 36(13):1447–1452

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dooley EE, Golaszewski NM, Bartholomew JB (2017) Estimating accuracy at exercise intensities: a comparative study of self-monitoring heart rate and physical activity wearable devices. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 5(3):e34.

  6. Feehan LM, Geldman J, Sayre EC, Park C, Ezzat AM, Yoo JY, et al. (2018) Accuracy of Fitbit devices: systematic review and narrative syntheses of quantitative data. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 6(8):e10527.

  7. Mühlen JM, Stang J, Lykke Skovgaard E, Judice PB, Molina-Garcia P, Johnston W, et al. (2021) Recommendations for determining the validity of consumer wearable heart rate devices: expert statement and checklist of the interlive network. Br J Sports Med

  8. Johnston W, Judice PB, Molina García P, Mühlen JM, Lykke Skovgaard E, Stang J, et al. (2020) Recommendations for determining the validity of consumer wearable and smartphone step count: expert statement and checklist of the interlive network. Br J Sports Med

  9. Silvers WM, Rutledge ER, Dolny DG (2007) Peak cardiorespiratory responses during aquatic and land treadmill exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 39(6):969–975

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Silvers WM, Bressel E, Dickin DC, Killgore G, Dolny DG (2014) Lower-extremity muscle activity during aquatic and land treadmill running at the same speeds. J Sport Rehabil 23(2):107–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Harrison RA, Hillman M, Bulstrode S (1992) Loading of the lower limb when walking partially immersed: implications for clinical practice. Physiotherapy 78(3):164–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Warburton D, Jamnik VK, Bredin S, Gledhill N (2014) The 2014 physical activity readiness questionnaire for everyone (Par-Q+) and electronic physical activity readiness medical examination (Eparmed-X+). Health & Fitness Journal of Canada 7:80–83

    Google Scholar 

  13. Montes J, Navalta JW (2019) Reliability of the Polar T31 Uncoded heart rate monitor in free motion and treadmill activities. Int J Exerc Sci 12(4):69–76

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Bouts AM, Brackman L, Martin E, Subasic AM, Potkanowicz ES (2018) The accuracy and validity of iOS-based heart rate apps during moderate to high intensity exercise. Int J Exerc Sci 11(7):533–540

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Allen J (2007) Photoplethysmography and its application in clinical physiological measurement. Physiol Meas 28(3):R1-39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bland JM, Altman D (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The lancet 327(8476):307–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Michaels NN, Stevens S, Noven MV, McConnell R, Sherrow KD, Tweddle M (2019) The accuracy of activity monitors on land and in the water: a pilot study. The Journal of Aquatic Physical Therapy 27(1):19–36

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lee M, Lee H, Park S (2018) Accuracy of swimming wearable watches for estimating energy expenditure. International Journal of Applied Sports Sciences 30(1).

  19. Askarian B, Jung K, Chong JW (2019) Monitoring of heart rate from photoplethysmographic signals using a Samsung Galaxy Note8 in underwater environments. Sensors 19(13).

  20. Challoner AV, Ramsay CA (1974) A photoelectric plethysmograph for the measurement of cutaneous blood flow. Phys Med Biol 19(3):317–328

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pietilä J, Mehrang S, Tolonen J, Helander E, Jimison H, Pavel M, et al., editors. Evaluation of the accuracy and reliability for photoplethysmography based heart rate and beat-to-beat detection during daily activities. EMBEC & NBC 2017; 2018 2018//; Singapore: Springer Singapore.

  22. Phan D, Siong LY, Pathirana PN, Seneviratne A, editors. Smartwatch: performance evaluation for long-term heart rate monitoring 2015: IEEE.

  23. Consumer Technology Association. Smartwatch devices unit sales in the United States from 2016 to 2020 (in Millions) [Graph]. In Statista. Retrieved March 17, 2021, from https://www.Statista.Com/Statistics/381696/Wearables-Unit-Sales-Forecast-United-States-by-Category/[Internet].Statista Inc. January 2021.

  24. Hall KS, Hyde ET, Bassett DR, Carlson SA, Carnethon MR, Ekelund U et al (2020) Systematic review of the prospective association of daily step counts with risk of mortality, cardiovascular disease, and dysglycemia. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 17(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kraus WE, Janz KF, Powell KE, Campbell WW, Jakicic JM, Troiano RP et al (2019) Daily step counts for measuring physical activity exposure and its relation to health. Med Sci Sports Exerc 51(6):1206

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Kang M, Marshall SJ, Barreira TV, Lee JO (2009) Effect of pedometer-based physical activity interventions: a meta-analysis. Res Q Exerc Sport 80(3):648–655

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Patel MS, Asch DA, Volpp KG (2015) Wearable devices as facilitators, not drivers, of health behavior change. Jama. 313(5):459–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by St. Lawrence College.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Health Sciences, St. Lawrence College, Kingston, ON, Canada

    Nicholas J. Held, Tyler Mueller & Selina J. Pfoh-MacDonald

  2. Hydrathletics Inc, Kingston, ON, Canada

    Nicholas J. Held

  3. School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queens University, Louise D Acton Building, 31 George St, Kingston, ON, Canada

    Nicholas J. Held

  4. Department of Kinesiology, Langara College, Vancouver, BC, Canada

    Andrew S. Perrotta

Authors
  1. Nicholas J. Held
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrew S. Perrotta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tyler Mueller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Selina J. Pfoh-MacDonald
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

NJH conceived, designed, and collected data. ASP analyzed all data and led the writing of the paper with NJH. TM and SJP assisted in data collection. All the authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas J. Held.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (XLSX 39 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Held, N.J., Perrotta, A.S., Mueller, T. et al. Agreement of the Apple Watch® and Fitbit Charge® for recording step count and heart rate when exercising in water. Med Biol Eng Comput 60, 1323–1331 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-022-02536-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-022-02536-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation