Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

SPF-MHBS: a stress partition constitutive framework for methane hydrate-bearing sediments

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Geotechnica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A constitutive framework based on the concept of stress partition, referred to as SPF-MHBS (stress partition framework for methane hydrate-bearing sediment), is proposed to capture the mechanical behavior of methane hydrate-bearing sediments (MHBS) both with and without methane hydrate (MH) dissociation. Inspired by the effective stress principle, MHBS is treated as a composite material with the sediment matrix and MH as two individual components in SPF-MHBS. The effective stress of MHBS is jointly carried by the sediment matrix and MH under the assumption that the two components are subjected to the same strain. A significant advantage of this approach is that the deformation of MHBS caused by MH phase change can be naturally reflected due to stress transfer between the two components. Within SPF-MHBS, the choice of constitutive model for each of the two components is flexible, depending on test evidence and application purpose. A specific model developed within this framework is calibrated in this study based on a limited number of triaxial tests without MH dissociation. The calibrated model is then used to simulate the mechanical behavior of MHBS under a wide range of conditions, including different MH saturation, temperature, pore pressure, sediment density, and confining pressure, showing good agreement with test results. More importantly, the model is able to appropriately simulate the deformation of MHBS under both heating- and depressurization-induced MH dissociation conditions. All of the simulations of the tests on the same material are conducted using a same set of model parameters, highlighting the general applicability of the model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability statement

The data used in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Ando M (1975) Source mechanisms and tectonic significance of historical earthquakes along the Nankai Trough. Japan Tectonophys 27(2):119–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Been K, Jefferies MG (1985) A state parameter for sands. Géotechnique 35(2):99–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boswell R (2007) Resource potential of methane hydrate coming into focus. J Petrol Sci Eng 56(1–3):9–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Carol I, Rizzi E, Willam K (2001) On the formulation of anisotropic elastic degradation. I. Theory based on a pseudo-logarithmic damage tensor rate. International Journal of Solids and Structures 38(4): 491–518.

  5. Cheng Z, Jeremić B (2009) Numerical modeling and simulation of pile in liquefiable soil. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 29(11–12):1405–1416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Choi JH, Dai S, Lin JS, Seol Y (2018) Multistage triaxial tests on laboratory-formed methane hydrate-bearing sediments. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 123(5):3347–3357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Clayton CRI, Priest JA, Rees EVL (2010) The effects of hydrate cement on the stiffness of some sands. Géotechnique 60(6):435–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dafalias YF, Manzari MT (2004) Simple plasticity sand model accounting for fabric change effects. J Eng Mech 130(6):622–634

    Google Scholar 

  9. De La Fuente M, Vaunat J, Marín-Moreno H (2020) Consolidation of gas hydrate-bearing sediments with hydrate dissociation. In E3S Web of Conferences. EDP Sciences.1

  10. Dejaloud H, Jafarian Y (2017) A micromechanical-based constitutive model for fibrous fine-grained composite soils. Int J Plast 89:150–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Doghri I, Brassart L, Adam L, Gérard JS (2011) A second-moment incremental formulation for the mean-field homogenization of elasto-plastic composites. Int J Plast 27(3):352–371

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Fang H, Shi K, Yu Y (2020) Geomechanical constitutive modelling of gas hydrate-bearing sediments by a state-dependent multishear bounding surface model. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 75:103119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Freij-Ayoub R, Tan C, Clennell B, Tohidi B, Yang J (2007) A wellbore stability model for hydrate bearing sediments. J Petrol Sci Eng 57(1–2):209–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. De La Fuente M, Vaunat J, Marín-Moreno H (2020) A densification mechanism to model the mechanical effect of methane hydrates in sandy sediments. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 44(6):782–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. De La Fuente M, Vaunat J, Marín-Moreno H (2021) Modelling Methane Hydrate Saturation in Pores: Capillary Inhibition Effects. Energies 14(18):5627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hance JJ (2003) Development of a database and assessment of seafloor slope stability based on published literature. Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.

  17. Helgerud MB, Dvorkin J, Nur A, Sakai A, Collett T (1999) Elastic-wave velocity in marine sediments with gas hydrates: Effective medium modeling. Geophys Res Lett 26(13):2021–2024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Huang L, Xu C, Xu J, Zhang X, Xia F (2021) The depressurization of natural gas hydrate in the multi-physics coupling simulation based on a new developed constitutive model. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 95:103963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hyodo M, Li Y, Yoneda J, Nakata Y, Yoshimoto N, Nishimura A (2014) Effects of dissociation on the shear strength and deformation behavior of methane hydrate-bearing sediments. Mar Pet Geol 51(52–62):1

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hyodo M, Li Y, Yoneda J, Nakata Y, Yoshimoto N, Nishimura A, Song Y (2013) Mechanical behavior of gas-saturated methane hydrate-bearing sediments. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth 118(10):5185–5194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hyodo M, Nakata Y, Yoshimoto N, Ebinuma T (2005) Basic research on the mechanical behavior of methane hydrate-sediments mixture. Soils Found 45(1):75–85

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hyodo M, Yoneda J, Yoshimoto N, Nakata Y (2013) Mechanical and dissociation properties of methane hydrate-bearing sand in deep seabed. Soils Found 53(2):299–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hyodo M, Nakata Y, Yoshimoto N, Fukunaga M, Kubo K, Nanjo Y, Matsuo T, Nakamura K (2002) Triaxial compressive strength of methane hydrate. In: The Twelfth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. OnePetro.

  24. Jung JW, Santamarina JC (2012) Hydrate formation and growth in pores. J Cryst Growth 345(1):61–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Klar A, Soga K, Ng MYA (2010) Coupled deformation–flow analysis for methane hydrate extraction. Géotechnique 60(10):765–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Li XS, Dafalias YF (2012) Anisotropic critical state theory: role of fabric. J Eng Mech 138(3):263–275

    Google Scholar 

  27. Li Y, Wang L, Shen S, Liu T, Zhao J, Sun X (2021) Triaxial tests on water-saturated gas hydrate-bearing fine-grained samples of the South China Sea under different drainage conditions. Energy Fuels 35(5):4118–4126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lijith KP, Malagar BR, Singh DN (2019) A comprehensive review on the geomechanical properties of gas hydrate bearing sediments. Mar Pet Geol 104:270–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu J, Wang S, Jiang M, Wu W (2021) A state-dependent hypoplastic model for methane hydrate-bearing sands. Acta Geotech 16(1):77–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu X, Flemings PB (2007) Dynamic multiphase flow model of hydrate formation in marine sediments. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 112(B3).

  31. Madhusudhan BN, Clayton CRI, Priest JA (2019) The effects of hydrate on the strength and stiffness of some sands. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 124(1):65–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Makogon YF, Holditch SA, Makogon TY (2007) Natural gas-hydrates-A potential energy source for the 21st Century. J Petrol Sci Eng 56(1–3):14–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Masui A, Haneda H, Ogata Y, Aoki K (2005) Effects of methane hydrate formation on shear strength of synthetic methane hydrate sediments. In: The Fifteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. OnePetro.

  34. Masui A, Haneda H, Ogata Y, Aoki K (2006) Triaxial Compression test on submarine sediment containing methane hydrate in deep sea off the coast off Japan. In: Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference, Japanese Geotechnical Society

  35. Masui A, Miyazaki K, Haneda H, Aoki K, Ogata Y (2008) Mechanical characteristics of natural and artificial gas hydrate bearing sediments. The 6th International Conference on Gas Hydrates: ICGH 2008, Vancouver, BC (Canada)

  36. Masui A, Miyazaki K, Haneda H, Ogata Y, Aoki K (2008) Mechanical properties of natural gas hydrate bearing sediments retrieved from eastern Nankai trough. In Offshore Technology Conferenc, OnePetro

  37. Miranda CR, Matsuoka T (2008) First-principles study on mechanical properties of CH4 hydrate. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Gas Hydrates.

  38. Miyazaki K, Tenma N, Aoki K, Yamaguchi T (2012) A nonlinear elastic model for triaxial compressive properties of artificial methane-hydrate-bearing sediment samples. Energies 5(10):4057–4075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Moridis G (2014) User's manual of the TOUGH+ CORE code v1. 5: A general-purpose simulator of non-isothermal flow and transport through porous and fractured media

  40. Ng CWW, Baghbanrezvan S, Kadlicek T, Zhou C (2020) A state-dependent constitutive model for methane hydrate-bearing sediments inside the stability region. Géotechnique 70(12):1094–1108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Nguyen L, Fatahi B (2016) Behaviour of clay treated with cement & fibre while capturing cementation degradation and fibre failure–C3F Model. Int J Plast 81:168–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ning F, Yu Y, Kjelstrup S, Vlugt TJ, Glavatskiy K (2012) Mechanical properties of clathrate hydrates: status and perspectives. Energy Environ Sci 5(5):6779–6795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ning F, Wu N, Li S, Zhang K, Yu Y, Liu L, Sun J, Jiang G, Sun C, Chen G (2013) Estimation of in-situ mechanical properties of gas hydrate-bearing sediments from well logging. Pet Explor Devel 40(4):542–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Ohgaki K, Takano K, Sangawa H, Matsubara T, Nakano S (1996) Methane exploitation by carbon dioxide from gas hydrates-phase equilibria for CO2-CH4 mixed hydrate system. J Chem Eng Jpn 29(3):478–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Peng X, Tang S, Hu N, Han J (2016) Determination of the Eshelby tensor in mean-field schemes for evaluation of mechanical properties of elastoplastic composites. Int J Plast 76:147–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Pinkert S, Grozic JLH (2014) Prediction of the mechanical response of hydrate-bearing sands. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth 119(6):4695–4707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Pinkert S, Grozic JLH (2016) Experimental verification of a prediction model for hydrate-bearing sand. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth 121(6):4147–4155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Pinyol N, Vaunat J, Alonso EE (2007) A constitutive model for soft clayey rocks that includes weathering effects. Géotechnique 57(2):137–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Roscoe KH, Schofield A, Wroth AP (1958) On the Yielding of Soils Géotechnique 8(1):22–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Ruppel C (2011) Methane hydrates and the future of natural gas. MITEI Nat Gas Rep, Suppl Pap Methane Hydrates 4:25

    Google Scholar 

  51. Rutqvist J, Moridis GJ, Grover T, Silpngarmlert S, Collett TS, Holdich SA (2012) Coupled multiphase fluid flow and wellbore stability analysis associated with gas production from oceanic hydrate-bearing sediments. J Petrol Sci Eng 92:65–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Schofield AN, Wroth P (1968) Critical state soil mechanics, vol 310. McGraw-hill, London

    Google Scholar 

  53. Shen S, Li Y, Sun X, Wang L, Song Y (2021) Analysis of the mechanical properties of methane hydrate-bearing sands with various pore pressures and confining pressures. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 87:103786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Sloan ED Jr, Koh CA (2007) Clathrate hydrates of natural gases. CRC Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  55. Sun X, Wang L, Luo H, Song Y, Li Y (2019) Numerical modeling for the mechanical behavior of marine gas hydrate-bearing sediments during hydrate production by depressurization. J Petrol Sci Eng 177:971–982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Sánchez M, Gai X, Santamarina JC (2017) A constitutive mechanical model for gas hydrate bearing sediments incorporating inelastic mechanisms. Comput Geotech 84:28–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Taiebat M, Dafalias YF (2008) SANISAND: Simple anisotropic sand plasticity model. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 32(8):915–948

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  58. Taiebat M, Jeremić B, Dafalias YF, Kaynia AM, Cheng Z (2010) Propagation of seismic waves through liquefied soils. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30(4):236–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Terzaghi K (1943) Theoretical soil mechanics. Johnwiley and Sons, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  60. Uchida S, Lin JS, Myshakin EM, Seol Y, Boswell R (2019) Numerical simulations of sand migration during gas production in hydrate-bearing sands interbedded with thin mud layers at site NGHP-02-16. Mar Pet Geol 108:639–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Uchida S, Soga K, Yamamoto K (2012) Critical state soil constitutive model for methane hydrate soil. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Waite WF, Santamarina JC, Cortes DD, Dugan B, Espinoza DN, Germaine J, Jiang J, Jun JW, Kneafsey TJ, Shin H, Soga K, Winters WJ, Yun TS (2009) Physical properties of hydrate‐bearing sediments. Reviews Geophys. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008RG000279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Wang R, Cao W, Xue L, Zhang JM (2021) An anisotropic plasticity model incorporating fabric evolution for monotonic and cyclic behavior of sand. Acta Geotech 16:43–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Wang L, Li Y, Wu P, Shen S, Liu T, Leng S, Chang Y, Zhao J (2020) Physical and mechanical properties of the overburden layer on gas hydrate-bearing sediments of the South China sea. J Petrol Sci Eng 189:107020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Wang L, Sun X, Shen S, Wu P, Liu T, Liu W, Zhao J, Li Y (2021) Undrained triaxial tests on water-saturated methane hydrate–bearing clayey-silty sediments of the South China Sea. Can Geotech J 58(3):351–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Wang Y, Wang R, Zhang JM (2021) Large-scale seismic seafloor stability analysis in the South China Sea. Ocean Eng 235:109334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Wang R, Zhang JM, Wang G (2014) A unified plasticity model for large post-liquefaction shear deformation of sand. Comput Geotech 59:54–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Wang L, Zhao J, Sun X, Wu P, Shen S, Liu T, Li Y (2020) Comprehensive review of geomechanical constitutive models of gas hydrate-bearing sediments. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 88:103755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. White MD, Kneafsey TJ, Seol Y, Waite WF, Uchida S, Lin JS, Myshakin EM, Gai X, Gupta S, Reagan MT, Queiruga AF, Kimoto S (2020) An international code comparison study on coupled thermal, hydrologic and geomechanical processes of natural gas hydrate-bearing sediments. Mar Pet Geol 120(104566):1

    Google Scholar 

  70. Wu Y, Liao J, Zhang W, Cui J (2021) Characterization of stress–dilatancy behavior for methane hydrate-bearing sediments. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 92:104000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2021.104000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Wu J, Ning F, Trinh TT, Kjelstrup S, Vlugt TJ, He J, H B, Skallerud, Zhang Z, (2015) Mechanical instability of monocrystalline and polycrystalline methane hydrates. Nat Commun 6(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Xue L, Yu JK, Pan JH, Wang R, Zhang JM (2021) Three-dimensional anisotropic plasticity model for sand subjected to principal stress value change and axes rotation. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 45(3):353–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Yan C, Cheng Y, Li M, Han Z, Zhang H, Li Q, Teng F, Ding J (2017) Mechanical experiments and constitutive model of natural gas hydrate reservoirs. Int J Hydrogen Energy 42(31):19810–19818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Yang Z, Zhou J, Chen Q, Wan Y, Wei C, Meng X (2020) Triaxial test and constitutive model for hydrate bearing clayey sand. J Yangtze River Sci Res Inst 37(12):139–145 ((in Chinese))

    Google Scholar 

  75. Yao YP, Liu L, Luo T, Tian Y, Zhang JM (2019) Unified hardening (UH) model for clays and sands. Comput Geotech 110:326–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Yoneda J, Masui A, Konno Y, Jin Y, Egawa K, Kida M, Ito T, Nagao J, Tenma N (2015) Mechanical properties of hydrate-bearing turbidite reservoir in the first gas production test site of the Eastern Nankai Trough. Mar Pet Geol 66:471–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Yun TS, Francisca FM, Santamarina JC, Ruppel C (2005) Compressional and shear wave velocities in uncemented sediment containing gas hydrate. Geophysical Research Letters, 32(10).

  78. Zhang X, Xia F, Xu C, Han Y (2019) Stability analysis of near-wellbore reservoirs considering the damage of hydrate-bearing sediments. J Mar Sci Eng 7(4):102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Zhao J, Liu D, Yang M, Song Y (2014) Analysis of heat transfer effects on gas production from methane hydrate by depressurization. Int J Heat Mass Transf 77:529–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Zhao YH, Weng GJ (1996) Plasticity of a two-phase composite with partially debonded inclusions. Int J Plast 12(6):781–804

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  81. Zhou M, Soga K, Yamamoto K (2018) Upscaled anisotropic methane hydrate critical state model for turbidite hydrate-bearing sediments at East Nankai Trough. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth 123(8):6277–6298

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52022046 and No. 52038005) and the State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Hydraulic Engineering (No. 2021-KY-04) for funding this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Hydraulic Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China

    Yuxi Wang, Rui Wang, Jiake Yu & Jian-Min Zhang

  2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China

    Zhen-Yu Yin

Authors
  1. Yuxi Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rui Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jiake Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhen-Yu Yin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jian-Min Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rui Wang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Wang, R., Yu, J. et al. SPF-MHBS: a stress partition constitutive framework for methane hydrate-bearing sediments. Acta Geotech. 18, 1919–1944 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-022-01621-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-022-01621-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation