Skip to main content
Log in

Modified one-phase-low-pH method for bacteria or enzyme-induced carbonate precipitation for soil improvement

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Geotechnica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the latest developments in biocementation is the use of one-phase-low-pH MICP or EICP method as a more effective and efficient alternative to the traditional two-phase method for the treatment of sandy soil. However, the one-phase-low-pH method has its own limitation. The pH of the solution has to be adjusted before every treatment. In this study, a modified one-phase-low-pH MICP or EICP method is proposed in order to simplify the treatment procedure to improve the efficiency of biotreatment in real constructions. In this method, the low-pH bacteria or urease solution is only used together with the cementation solution (i.e., CaCl2 and urea) for the first treatment and for the subsequent treatment, only cementation solution is used. The test results show that using the modified one-phase-low-pH MICP method with a bacterial solution of a volume ratio of 0.75 is comparable to that using the original one-phase-low-pH method, and 80% of the calcium conversion efficiency can be maintained for up to 5 treatments. However, the modified one-phase-low-pH EICP method may only be used for the first 2 or 3 treatments due to the relatively poor durability of urease enzyme in inducing calcium carbonate during the subsequent injections of cementation solution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abo-El-Enein SA, Ali AH, Talkhan FN, Abdel-Gawwad HA (2012) Utilization of microbial induced calcite precipitation for sand consolidation and mortar crack remediation. HBRC J 8(3):185–192

    Google Scholar 

  2. Al Qabany A, Soga K, Santamarina C (2012) Factors affecting efficiency of microbially induced calcite precipitation. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 138(8):992–1001

    Google Scholar 

  3. Al Qabany A, Soga K (2013) Effect of chemical treatment used in MICP on engineering properties of cemented soils. Géotechnique 63(4):331–339

    Google Scholar 

  4. Almajed A, Khodadadi TH, Kavazanjian EJ (2018) Baseline investigation on enzyme-induced calcium carbonate precipitation. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 144(11):04018081. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Almajed A, Khodadadi TH, Ejr K, Hamdan N (2019) Enzyme induced biocementated sand with high strength at low carbonate content. Sci Rep 9:1135. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-38361-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) (2013) D2166: Standard test method for unconfined compressive strength of cohesive soil. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

  7. Bate B, Cao JN, Zhang C, Hao N (2021) Spectral induced polarization study on enzyme induced carbonate precipitations: influences of size and content on stiffness of a fine sand. Acta Geotech 16:841–857

    Google Scholar 

  8. Blakely RL, Zerner B (1984) Jack bean urease: the first nickel enzyme. J Mol Catal 23:263–292

    Google Scholar 

  9. Burbank M, Weaver T, Lewis R, Williams T, Williams B, Crawford R (2013) Geotechnical tests of sands following bioinduced calcite precipitation catalyzed by indigenous bacteria. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 139(6):928–936

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cheng L, Shahin MA, Chu J (2019) Soil bio-cementation using a new one-phase low-pH injection method. Acta Geotech 14:615–626

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cheng L, Shahin MA, Mujah D (2016) Influence of key environmental conditions on microbially induced cementation for soil stabilization. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 143(1):04016083

    Google Scholar 

  12. Choi SG, Park SS, Wu SF, Chu J (2017) Methods for calcium carbonate content measurement of biocemented soils. J Mater Civ Eng 29(11):06017015

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chu J, Ivanov V, Naeimi M, Stabnikov V, Liu HL (2014) Optimization of calcium-based bioclogging and biocementation of sand. Acta Geotech 9:277–285

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cui MJ, Lai HJ, Hoang T, Chu J (2021) One-phase-low-pH enzyme induced carbonate precipitation (EICP) method for soil improvement. Acta Geotech 16:481–489

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cui MJ, Zheng JJ, Zhang RJ, Lai HJ, Zhang J (2017) Influence of cementation level on the strength behaviour of bio-cemented sand. Acta Geotech 12:971–986

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fujita Y, Ferris FG, Lawson RD, Colwell FS, Smith RW (2000) Subscribed content calcium carbonate precipitation by ureolytic subsurface bacteria. Geomicrobiol J 17(4):305–318

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gao YF, He J, Tang XY, Chu J (2019) Calcium carbonate precipitation catalyzed by soybean urease as an improvement method for fine-grained soil. Soils Found. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2019.03.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ghosh T, Bhaduri S, Montemagno C, Kumar A (2019) Sporosarcina pasteurii can form nanoscale calcium carbonate crystals on cell surface. PLoS ONE 14(1):e0210339

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hamdan N, Kavazanjian EJr, (2016) Enzyme-induced carbonate mineral precipitation for fugitive dust control. Géotechnique 66(7):546–555

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hammes F, Boon N, de Villiers J, Verstraete W, Siciliano SD (2003) Strain-specific ureolytic microbial calcium carbonate precipitation. Appl Environ Microbiol 69(8):4901–4909

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hoang T, Alleman J, Cetin B, Ikuma K, Choi SG (2019) Sand and silty-sand soil stabilization using bacterial enzyme–induced calcite precipitation (BEICP). Can Geotech J 56:808–822

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ismail MA, Joer HA, Randolph MF, Meritt A (2002) Cementation of porous materials using calcite. Géotechnique 52(5):313–324

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ivanov V, Chu J (2008) Applications of microorganisms to geotechnical engineering for bioclogging and biocementation of soil in situ. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 7(2):139–153

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lai HJ, Cui MJ, Wu SF, Yang Y, Chu J (2021) Retarding effect of concentration of cementation solution on biocementation of soil. Acta Geotech 16(5):1457–1472

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lee ML, Ng WS, Tanaka Y (2013) Stress-deformation and compressibility responses of bio-mediated residual soils. Ecol Eng 60:142–149

    Google Scholar 

  26. Liu SY, Yu J, Peng XQ, Cai YY, Tu BX (2020) Preliminary study on repairing tabia cracks by using microbially induced carbonate precipitation. Constr Build Mater 248:118611

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mujah D, Cheng L, Shahin MA (2019) Microstructural and geomechanical study on biocemented sand for optimization of MICP process. J Mater Civ Eng 31(4):04019025

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nafisi A, Safavizadeh S, Montoya BM (2019) Influence of microbe and enzyme-induced treatments on cemented sand shear response. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 145(9):06019008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Nam IH, Chon CM, Jung KY, Choi SG (2015) Calcite precipitation by ureolytic plant (canavalia ensiformis) extracts as effective biomaterials. KSCE J Civ Eng 19(6):1620–1625

    Google Scholar 

  30. Nemati M, Voordouw G (2003) Modification of porous media permeability, using calcium carbonate produced enzymatically in situ. Enzyme Microb Technol 33(5):635–642

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ng WS, Lee ML, Tan CK, Hii SL (2013) Improvements in engineering properties of soils through microbial-induced calcite precipitation. KSCE J Civ Eng 17(4):718–728

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ng WS, Lee ML, Tan CK, Hii SL (2014) Factors affecting improvement in engineering properties of residual soil through microbial-induced calcite precipitation. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 140(5):04014006

    Google Scholar 

  33. Oliveira PJV, Freitas LD, Carmona JPSF (2017) Effect of soil type on the enzymatic calcium carbonate precipitation process used for soil improvement. J Mater Civ Eng 29(4):04016263

    Google Scholar 

  34. Pan XH, Chu J, Yang Y, Cheng L (2020) A new biogrouting method for fine to coarse sand. Acta Geotech 15:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  35. Rong H, Qian CX, Li LZ (2012) Influence of molding process on mechanical properties of sandstone cemented by microbe cement. Constr Build Mater 28(1):238–243

    Google Scholar 

  36. Stocks-Fischer S, Galinat JK, Bang SS (1999) Microbiological precipitation of CaCO3. Soil Biol Biochem 31:1563–1571

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sondi I, Matijević E (2001) Homogeneous precipitation of calcium carbonates by enzyme catalyzed reaction. J Colloid Interf Sci 238:208–214

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sondi I, Škapin SD, Salopek-Sondi B (2008) Biomimetic precipitation of nanostructured colloidal calcite particles by enzyme-catalyzed reaction in the presence of magnesium ions. Cryst Growth Des 8(2):435–441

    Google Scholar 

  39. Southam G (2000) Bacterial surface-mediated mineral formation. In: Lovley DR (ed) Environmental microbe-metal interactions. ASM Press, Washington DC, pp 257–276

    Google Scholar 

  40. Tsesarsky M, Gat D, Ronen Z (2016) Biological aspects of microbial-induced calcite precipitation. Environ Geotech 5(2):69–78

    Google Scholar 

  41. van Paassen LA, Ghose R, van der Linden TJM, van der Star WRL, van Loosdrecht MCM (2010) Quantifying biomediated ground improvement by ureolysis: large-scale biogrout experiment. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 136(12):1721–1728

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wen KJ, Yang Li, Amini F, Li L (2020) Impact of bacteria and urease concentration on precipitation kinetics and crystal morphology of calcium carbonate. Acta Geotech 15:17–27

    Google Scholar 

  43. Whiffin VS, van Paassen LA, Harkes MP (2007) Microbial carbonate precipitation as a soil improvement technique. Geomicrobiol J 24(5):417–423

    Google Scholar 

  44. Wu CZ, Chu J, Cheng L, Wu SF (2019) Biogrouting of aggregates using premixed injection method with or without pH adjustment. J Mater Civ Eng 31(9):06019008

    Google Scholar 

  45. Yasuhara H, Neupane D, Hayashi K, Okamura M (2012) Experiments and predictions of physical properties of sand cemented by enzymatically-induced carbonate precipitation. Soils Found 52(3):539–549

    Google Scholar 

  46. Zhao Q, Li L, Li C, Li MD, Amini F, Zhang HZ (2014) Factors affecting improvement of engineering properties of MICP-treated soil catalyzed by bacteria and urease. J Mater Civ Eng 26(12):04014094

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the financial supports provided through Grant No. MOE2015-T2-2-142 by the Ministry of Education, Singapore, and the Grant No. SMI-2018-MA-02 by the Singapore Maritime Institute which are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian Chu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cui, MJ., Lai, HJ., Hoang, T. et al. Modified one-phase-low-pH method for bacteria or enzyme-induced carbonate precipitation for soil improvement. Acta Geotech. 17, 2931–2941 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-021-01384-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-021-01384-6

Keywords

Navigation