Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical investigation of the photo-thermal characteristics of a direct absorption solar collector using Monte Carlo and finite volume methods

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, a novel model of photothermal conversion in a direct absorption solar collector based on the Monte Carlo and finite volume methods was built and validated and the temperatures of the novel and traditional solar collectors were compared. The sensitivity of the parameters to the radiative heat loss was investigated. Finally, the radiative heat transfer characteristics were discussed using the radiative exchange factor. The results of this study validated the advantages of the novel solar collector at both the surface and fluid temperatures. Under the conditions used in this study, the maximum temperature difference of the novel solar collector was 30 K, compared with 193 K for the traditional solar collector. Furthermore, the collector was divided into several units along the flow direction. The radiative exchange factor indicated that with an increase in the attenuation coefficient, the percentage of radiation intensity in the total solar radiation absorbed by the corresponding unit increased. Simultaneously, it decreased with an increase in the incident angle and scattering albedo. These results provide a reference for addressing the low efficiency and thermal damage caused by traditional solar collectors at high temperatures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. International Energy Agency. Next Generation Wind and Solar Power — From Cost to Value. International Energy Agency technical report. 2016. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/energy/next-generation-wind-and-solar-power_9789264258969-en

  2. Xiang Y, Xie Z, Furbo S, et al. A comprehensive review on pit thermal energy storage: Technical elements, numerical approaches and recent applications. J Energy Storage, 2022, 55: 105716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Han X, Xu C, Pan X Y, et al. Dynamic analysis of a concentrating photovoltaic/concentrating solar power (CPV/CSP) hybrid system. Sci China Tech Sci, 2019, 62: 1987–1998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. International Energy Agency. World Energy Outlook 2022. International Energy Agency technical report. 2022. https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2022

  5. Silverman T J, Huang H. Solar Energy Technologies Office Multi-Year Program Plan. SETO technical report. 2021. https://www.energy.gov/eere/solar/articles/solar-energy-technologies-office-multi-year-program-plan

  6. Lee J B, Mills B. Numerical investigation of the thermal performance of multistage falling particle receivers at commercial scales. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 2022, 199: 123417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dugaria S, Bortolato M, Del Col D. Modelling of a direct absorption solar receiver using carbon based nanofluids under concentrated solar radiation. Renew Energy, 2018, 128: 495–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bandarra Filho E P, Mendoza O S H, Beicker C L L, et al. Experimental investigation of a silver nanoparticle-based direct absorption solar thermal system. Energy Convers Manage, 2014, 84: 261–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mehos M, Turchi C S, Vidal J, et al. Concentrating Solar Power Gen3 Demonstration Roadmap. NREL technical report. 2017. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy17osti/67464.pdf

  10. Li L, Yu H J, Li Y S, et al. Characteristics of the transient thermal load and deformation of the evacuated receiver in solar parabolic trough collector. Sci China Tech Sci, 2020, 63: 1188–1201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Martinek J, Jape S, Turchi C S. Evaluation of external tubular configurations for a high-temperature chloride molten salt solar receiver operating above 700°C. Sol Energy, 2021, 222: 115–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang W B, Wang B X, Xu J M, et al. High-quality quasi-monochromatic near-field radiative heat transfer designed by adaptive hybrid Bayesian optimization. Sci China Tech Sci, 2022, 65: 2910–2920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sidik N A C, Yazid M N A W M, Samion S. A review on the use of carbon nanotubes nanofluid for energy harvesting system. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 2017, 111: 782–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang X Z, Yu W, Wang L L, et al. Vertical orientation graphene/MXene hybrid phase change materials with anisotropic properties, high enthalpy, and photothermal conversion. Sci China Tech Sci, 2022, 65: 882–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sainz-Mañas M, Bataille F, Caliot C, et al. Direct absorption nano-fluid-based solar collectors for low and medium temperatures. A review. Energy, 2022, 260: 124916

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kumar S, Sharma V, Samantaray M R, et al. Experimental investigation ofa direct absorption solar collector using ultra stable gold plasmonic nanofluid under real outdoor conditions. Renew Energy, 2020, 162: 1958–1969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tong Y, Boldoo T, Ham Mr J, et al. Improvement of photo-thermal energy conversion performance of MWCNT/Fe3O4 hybrid nanofluid compared to Fe3O4 nanofluid. Energy, 2020, 196: 117086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Singh N, Khullar V. On-sun testing of volumetric absorption based concentrating solar collector employing carbon soot nanoparticles laden fluid. Sustain Energy Tech Assess, 2020, 42: 100868

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hooshmand A, Zahmatkesh I, Karami M, et al. Porous foams and nanofluids for thermal performance improvement of a direct absorption solar collector: An experimental study. Env Prog Sustain Energy, 2021, 40: 13684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mehrali M, Ghatkesar M K, Pecnik R. Full-spectrum volumetric solar thermal conversion via graphene/silver hybrid plasmonic nanofluids. Appl Energy, 2018, 224: 103–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Xiong Q, Altnji S, Tayebi T, et al. A comprehensive review on the application of hybrid nanofluids in solar energy collectors. Sustain Energy Tech Assess, 2021, 47: 101341

    Google Scholar 

  22. Struchalin P G, Yunin V S, Kutsenko K V, et al. Performance of a tubular direct absorption solar collector with a carbon-based nano-fluid. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 2021, 179: 121717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhu Y, Li P, Ruan Z, et al. A model and thermal loss evaluation of a direct-absorption solar collector under the influence of radiation. Energy Convers Manage, 2022, 251: 114933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tyagi H, Phelan P, Prasher R. Predicted efficiency of a low-temperature nanofluid-based direct absorption solar collector. J Sol Energy Eng, 2009, 131: 041004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Taylor R A, Phelan P E, Otanicar T P, et al. Applicability of nano-fluids in high flux solar collectors. J Renew Sustain Energy, 2011, 3: 023104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Xu G, Chen W, Deng S, et al. Performance evaluation of a nanofluid-based direct absorption solar collector with parabolic trough concentrator. Nanomaterials, 2015, 5: 2131–2147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cregan V, Myers T G. Modelling the efficiency of a nanofluid direct absorption solar collector. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 2015, 90: 505–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Siavashi M, Ghasemi K, Yousofvand R, et al. Computational analysis of SWCNH nanofluid-based direct absorption solar collector with a metal sheet. Sol Energy, 2018, 170: 252–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ahbabi Saray J, Heyhat M M. Modeling of a direct absorption parabolic trough collector based on using nanofluid: 4E assessment and water-energy nexus analysis. Energy, 2022, 244: 123170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tan H P, Xia X L, Liu L H, et al. Numerical Calculation of Infrared Radiation Properties and Transfer (in Chinese). Harbin: Harbin Institute of Tecnology Publishing Company, 2006. 157–158

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lenert A, Wang E N. Optimization of nanofluid volumetric receivers for solar thermal energy conversion. Sol Energy, 2012, 86: 253–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ansys. Ansys Fluent User’s Guide. 2022

  33. Tao W Q. Numerical Heat Transfer (in Chinese). 2nd ed. Xi’an: Xi’an Jiaotong University Publishing Company, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  34. Modest M F, Mazumder S. Fundamentals of Thermal Radiation. In: Radiative Heat Transfer. Boca Raton: Academic Press, 2022. 1–29

    Google Scholar 

  35. Modest M F, Mazumder S. The Monte Carlo Method for Participating Media. In: Radiative Heat Transfer. Boca Raton: Academic Press, 2022. 737–773

    Google Scholar 

  36. Li S N, Yuan Y, Tan H P. Effects of microlens array orientation errors on plenoptic imaging of flame radiative properties and uncertainty analysis. Sci China Tech Sci, 2021, 64: 2119–2141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang H C, Tan H P, Zhen B. Estimation of ray effect and false scattering in approximate solution method for thermal radiative transfer equation. Numer Heat Transfer Part A-Appl, 2004, 46: 807–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Modest M F, Mazumder S. The Method of Discrete Ordinates (SN-Approximation). In: Radiative Heat Transfer. Boca Raton: Academic Press, 2022. 563–616

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ruan L M, Tan H P, Yan Y Y. A Monte Carlo (MC) method applied to the medium with nongray absorbing-emitting-anisotropic scattering particles and gray approximation. Numer Heat Transfer Part A-Appl, 2002, 42: 253–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Modest M F, Mazumder S. Radiation Combined with Conduction and Convection. In: Radiative Heat Transfer. Boca Raton: Academic Press, 2022. 775–817

    Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang J J, Chen Y W, Liu Y, et al. Experimental investigation on heat transfer characteristics of microcapsule phase change material suspension in array jet impingement. Sci China Tech Sci, 2022, 65: 1634–1645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Huang X, Wang J, Eres G, et al. Thermophysical properties of multi-wall carbon nanotube bundles at elevated temperatures up to 830 K. Carbon, 2011, 49: 1680–1691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Lee S H, Choi T J, Jang S P. Thermal efficiency comparison: Surface-based solar receivers with conventional fluids and volumetric solar receivers with nanofluids. Energy, 2016, 115: 404–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Lee S H, Jang S P. Efficiency of a volumetric receiver using aqueous suspensions of multi-walled carbon nanotubes for absorbing solar thermal energy. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 2015, 80: 58–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuan Yuan.

Additional information

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52041601), Hebei Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. E202203156). Chinese Scholarship Council (Grant No. 202106120167) has also partly funded the research activities—Enabling cooperation of the Harbin Institute of Technology with the Technical University of Denmark. Without their support, the research would not have been possible.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, Y., Li, S., Fan, J. et al. Numerical investigation of the photo-thermal characteristics of a direct absorption solar collector using Monte Carlo and finite volume methods. Sci. China Technol. Sci. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-023-2515-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-023-2515-5

Navigation