Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Driving impact and spatial effect of the digital economy development on carbon emissions in typical cities: a case study of Zhejiang, China

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The digital economy (DE) not only drives economic innovation and development but also has significant environmental effects by promoting lower carbon emissions. To investigate the spatial effects of DE on urban carbon emissions, this study comprehensively measures the level of DE development based on the panel data from 11 typical cities in Zhejiang Province from 2011 to 2020, by comparing analysis using different regression models. The following conclusions are obtained: (1) The total carbon emissions (TC) of Zhejiang cities in general show a fluctuating change trend of first increasing and then slowly decreasing, while carbon emission intensity and carbon emission per capita in general show a fluctuating change trend of decreasing. Cities with high TC are primarily concentrated in the Hangzhou Bay city cluster, accounted for 62 ~ 65% of the province’s carbon emissions. The development of the DE in Zhejiang cities shows steady growth, but there are large differences among cities, with Hangzhou and Ningbo standing out as particularly prominent. (2) There is a significant inverted U-shaped relationship between the DE and the level of carbon emissions in Zhejiang Province. The influence coefficient of the DE on the primary term of TC is 0.613, and the influence coefficient of the quadratic term of TC is − 1.008. (3) In terms of the spatial spillover effect of the DE on carbon emissions, the study finds that compared to the direct effect, the spatial spillover effect is not significant. However, the allocation of transport resources shows a positive spatial spillover effect (increasing carbon emissions, coefficient value is 0.138), while technological progress shows a somewhat negative spatial spillover effect (decreasing carbon emissions, coefficient value is − 0.035). (4) The study also finds that the smart city pilot policy significantly reduces urban carbon emissions. Moreover, the effect of the DE on carbon emissions is confirmed through the significance test of the quadratic term when replacing the geographical and economic distance weight matrices. This indicates that the empirical findings are robust to these tests. Finally, several countermeasures to reduce carbon emissions are proposed from the perspective of DE development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data can be made available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Al-mulali U (2012) Factors affecting CO2 emission in the Middle East: a panel data analysis. Energy 44(1):564–569

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya M, Inekwe JN, Sadorsky P (2020) Consumption-based and territory-based carbon emissions intensity: determinants and forecasting using club convergence across countries. Energy Econ 86:104632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai B, Cui C, Zhang D, Cao L, Wu P, Pang L, ... Dai C (2019) China city-level greenhouse gas emissions inventory in 2015 and uncertainty analysis. Appl Energy 253:113579

  • Chen J, Gao M, Mangla SK, Song M, Wen J (2020) Effects of technological changes on China’s carbon emissions. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 153:119938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen L, Lu Y, Meng Y, Zhao W (2023) Research on the nexus between the digital economy and carbon emissions-evidence at China’s province level. J Clean Prod 413:137484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill SA, Inekwe J, Smyth R, Zhang X (2019) R&D intensity and carbon emissions in the G7: 1870–2014. Energy Econ 80:30–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng R, Zhang A (2022) Research on the impact of urban digital economy development on environmental pollution and its mechanism. South China J Econ 2:18–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding L, Fang X (2022) Spatial–temporal distribution of air-pollution-intensive industries and its social-economic driving mechanism in Zhejiang Province, China: a framework of spatial econometric analysis. Environ Dev Sustain 24(2):1681–1712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding L, Chen K, Hua Y, Dong H, Wu A (2020) Investigating the relationship between the industrial structure and atmospheric environment by an integrated system: a case study of Zhejiang, China. Sustainability 12(3):1278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong F, Hu M, Gao Y, Liu Y, Zhu J, Pan Y (2022) How does digital economy affect carbon emissions? Evidence from global 60 countries. Sci Total Environ 852:158401

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ganapati S, Reddick CG (2018) Prospects and challenges of sharing economy for the public sector. Gov Inf Q 35(1):77–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu J (2022) Sharing economy, technological innovation and carbon emissions: evidence from Chinese cities. J Innov Knowl 7(3):100228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu Z, Xu L, Ma Q et al (2022) Spatio-temporal evolution of carbon emissions in metropolitan areas and its influencing factors: a case study of Zhejiang province. J Nat Resour 37(6):1524–1539

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu J (2023) Synergistic effect of pollution reduction and carbon emission mitigation in the digital economy. J Environ Manag 337:117755

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hua YD, Hu KM, Qiu LY, Dong HA, Ding L, Lo SL (2022) Exploring the interaction relationship between beautiful China-SciTech innovation using coupling coordination and predictive analysis: a case study of Zhejiang. Environ Dev Sustain 24: 12097–12130

  • Hwang YK (2023) The synergy effect through combination of the digital economy and transition to renewable energy on green economic growth: empirical study of 18 Latin American and Caribbean countries. J Clean Prod 418:138146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia R, Shao S, Yang L (2021) High-speed rail and CO2 emissions in urban China: a spatial difference-in-differences approach. Energy Econ 99:105271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang B, Ding L, Fang X (2019) Sustainable development of new urbanization from the perspective of coordination: a new complex system of Urbanization-Technology Innovation and the Atmospheric Environment. Atmosphere 10(11):652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kais S, Sami H (2016) An econometric study of the impact of economic growth and energy use on carbon emissions: panel data evidence from fifty-eight countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 59:1101–1110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Wang J (2022) The dynamic impact of digital economy on carbon emission reduction: evidence city-level empirical data in China. J Clean Prod 351:131570

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Wang W, Wang Y, Qin Y (2017) Industrial structure, technological progress and CO2 emissions in China: analysis based on the STIRPAT framework. Nat Hazards 88:1545–1564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Liu J, Ni P (2021a) The Impact of the digital economy on CO2 emissions: a theoretical and empirical analysis. Sustainability 13(13):7267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Yang X, Ran Q, Wu H, Irfan M, Ahmad M (2021b) Energy structure, digital economy, and carbon emissions: evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(45):64606–64629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Li T, Lu S (2021c) Forecast of urban traffic carbon emission and analysis of influencing factors. Energ Effi 14(8):84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Zhan J, Lv T, Wang S, Pan F (2023) Comprehensive evaluation model of the urban low-carbon passenger transportation structure based on DPSIR. Ecol Ind 146:109849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu M, Zhang X, Zhang M, Feng Y, Liu Y, Wen J, Liu L (2021) Influencing factors of carbon emissions in transportation industry based on CD function and LMDI decomposition model: China as an example. Environ Impact Assess Rev 90:106623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu T, Zhang K (2023) Effects of the digital economy on carbon emissions in China: an analysis based on different innovation paths. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30: 79451–79468

  • Lyu X, Shi A, Wang X (2020) Research on the impact of carbon emission trading system on low-carbon technology innovation. Carbon Manag 11(2):183–193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ma Q, Tariq M, Mahmood H, Khan Z (2022b) The nexus between digital economy and carbon dioxide emissions in China: the moderating role of investments in research and development. Technol Soc 68:101910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma Q, Khan Z, Tariq M, IŞik H, Rjoub H (2022a) Sustainable digital economy and trade adjusted carbon emissions: evidence from China’s provincial data. Econ Res-Ekonomska Istraživanja 35(1): 5469-5485.

  • Miao L, Chen J, Fan T, Lv Y (2022) The impact of digital economy development on carbon emissions: based on panel data analysis of 278 prefecture-level cities. South China Finance 546:45–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Mousavi B, Lopez NSA, Biona JBM, Chiu AS, Blesl M (2017) Driving forces of Iran’s CO2 emissions from energy consumption: an LMDI decomposition approach. Appl Energy 206:804–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan W, Xie T, Wang Z, Ma L (2022) Digital economy: an innovation driver for total factor productivity. J Bus Res 139:303–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi X, Han Y (2023) Research on the evolutionary strategy of carbon market under “dual carbon” goal: from the perspective of dynamic quota allocation. Energy 274:127265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rong P, Zhang Y, Qin Y, Liu G, Liu R (2020) Spatial differentiation of carbon emissions from residential energy consumption: a case study in Kaifeng, China. J Environ Manag 271:110895

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salahuddin M, Alam K (2015) Internet usage, electricity consumption and economic growth in Australia: a time series evidence. Telematics Inform 32(4):862–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Nasreen S, Ahmed K, Hammoudeh S (2017) Trade openness–carbon emissions nexus: the importance of turning points of trade openness for country panels. Energy Econ 61:221–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao S, Zhang K, Dou J (2019) Effects of economic agglomeration on energy saving and emission reduction: theory and empirical evidence from China. Manag World 35(1):36–60+226

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi C, Yu Y, Zhang C, Chen Q (2022) What drives carbon emissions reduction in Beijing? An empirical study based on SDA and SPD. Energy Environ 0958305X221134109

  • Walsh B (2013) The surprisingly large energy footprint of the digital economy. Time Magazine Aug. 14

  • Wang X, Zhong M (2023) Can digital economy reduce carbon emission intensity? Empirical evidence from China’s smart city pilot policies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(18):51749–51769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Zhang H, Ye Y, Su Y, Chen W (2017) Analysis of influencing mechanism of carbon emissions in Guangdong province based on the IO-SDA Model. Trop Geogr 37(1):10–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Liu L, Liao H, Wei Y (2021) Impacts of urbanization on carbon emissions: an empirical analysis from OECD countries. Energy Policy 151:112171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang M, Wang Y, Wu Y, Yue X, Wang M, Hu P (2022) Identifying the spatial heterogeneity in the effects of the construction land scale on carbon emissions: case study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China. Environ Res 212:113397

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wei Y, Zhu X, Li Y, Yao T, Tao Y (2019) Influential factors of national and regional CO2 emission in China based on combined model of DPSIR and PLS-SEM. J Clean Prod 212:698–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y, Ramanathan V, Victor DG (2018) Global warming will happen faster than we think. Nature 564(7734):30–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu W, Zhou J, Liu C (2022) The impact of digital economy on urban carbon emissions: based on the analysis of spatial effects. Geogr Res 41(1):111–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan X, Deng Y, Peng L, Jiang Z (2023) Study on the impact of digital economy development on carbon emission intensity of urban agglomerations and its mechanism. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(12):33142–33159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang F, Shi L, Gao L (2023) Probing CO2 emission in Chengdu based on STRIPAT model and Tapio decoupling. Sustain Cities Soc 89:104309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yi M, Liu Y, Sheng MS, Wen L (2022) Effects of digital economy on carbon emission reduction: new evidence from China. Energy Policy 171:113271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • York R, Rosa EA, Dietz T (2003) STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts. Ecol Econ 46(3):351–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu H, Zhu Q (2023) Impact and mechanism of digital economy on China’s carbon emissions: from the perspective of spatial heterogeneity. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(4):9642–9657

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng G, Guo H, Geng C (2023) Mechanism analysis of influencing factors on financing efficiency of strategic emerging industries under the “dual carbon” background: evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(4):10079–10098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Zheng T (2023) Can dual pilot policy of innovative city and low carbon city promote green lifestyle transformation of residents? J Clean Prod 405:136711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Long R, Chen H, Geng J (2019) A review of China’s road traffic carbon emissions. J Clean Prod 207:569–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Liu X, Wang D, Zhou J (2022b) Digital economy and carbon emission performance: evidence at China’s city level. Energy Policy 165:112927

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Lin H, Li S, Yang E, Ding Y, Bai Y, Zhou Y (2022a) Accurate gas extraction (AGE) under the dual-carbon background: green low-carbon development pathway and prospect. J Clean Prod 377:134372

  • Zhao C, Wang K, Dong X, Dong K (2022) Is smart transportation associated with reduced carbon emissions? The case of China. Energy Econ 105:105715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong Z, Jiang L, Zhou P (2018) Transnational transfer of carbon emissions embodied in trade: characteristics and determinants from a spatial perspective. Energy 147:858–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong K, Fu H, Li T (2022) Can the digital economy facilitate carbon emissions decoupling? an empirical study based on provincial data in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(11):6800

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Zhang J, Hu S (2021a) Regression analysis and driving force model building of CO2 emissions in China. Sci Rep 11(1):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou J, Lan H, Zhao C, Zhou J (2021b) Haze pollution levels, spatial spillover influence, and impacts of the digital economy: empirical evidence from China. Sustainability 13(16):9076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Chen M, Tang Z, Mei Z (2021c) Urbanization, land use change, and carbon emissions: quantitative assessments for city-level carbon emissions in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Sustain Cities Soc 66:102701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou X, Zhou D, Zhao Z, Wang Q (2022) A framework to analyze carbon impacts of digital economy: the case of China. Sustain Prod Consump 31:357–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Major Humanities and Social Sciences Research Projects in Zhejiang Higher Education Institutions (Grant Number: 2023QN131).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Bin Jiang: Data analysis, writing the original manuscript, revising the manuscript, and funding acquisition. Lei Ding: Conceptualization framework and writing original draft. Xuejuan Fang: Design of the research, writing original draft, and supervision. Qiong Zhang: Analysis and explanation results. Yidi Hua: Analysis and explanation results. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xuejuan Fang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

All authors consent to participate in this research.

Consent for publication

All authors consent to publish this research in ESPR if accepted.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 22 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, B., Ding, L., Fang, X. et al. Driving impact and spatial effect of the digital economy development on carbon emissions in typical cities: a case study of Zhejiang, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 106390–106407 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29855-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29855-1

Keywords

Navigation