Abstract
With the rapid development of mining, more and more cities faced the trade-off between ecological protection and large-scale mining. Assessment of production-living-ecological space transformation and land use ecological risk can provide a scientific guidance for land use management and risk control. This paper focused on a resource-based city, Changzhi City in China, using RRM model and elasticity coefficient to analyze the spatiotemporal characteristics of the production-living-ecological space evolution and land use ecological risk change, and measured the responsiveness of land use ecological risk to space transformation. The results showed the following: (1) From 2000 to 2020, production, living, and ecological spaces showed increased, decreased, and stable conditions, respectively. (2) The level of ecological risk showed an increasing trend from 2000 to 2020; the growth rate in the last 10 years was significantly lower than that in the first 10 years which was due to policy induced; the changes of ecological risk levels in each district and county were insignificant. (3) The elasticity coefficient from 2010 to 2020 became significantly less than that of the previous 10 years. The impact of the production-living-ecological space transformation on ecological risk was significantly reduced and the influencing factors of land use ecological risk were more diversified. However, Luzhou District still had a high level of land use ecological risk, which needs to pay more attention and be taken seriously. Our study provided guidance for ecological protection, rational land use, and territory development plan in Changzhi City, and also can be used as a reference in other resource-based cities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data and materials used for this study and how to access are included in Data Sources section in this article.
References
Aubry C, Ramamonjisoa J, Dabat M (2012) Urban agriculture and land use in cities: an approach with the multi-functionality and sustainability concepts in the case of Antananarivo (Madagascar). Land Use Policy 29(2):429–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.08.009
Bagdanavičiūtė I, Valiūnas J (2013) GIS-based land suitability analysis integrating multi-criteria evaluation for the allocation of potential pollution sources. Environ Earth Sci 68(6):1797–1812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-1869-7
Barbier EB, Koch EW, Silliman BR et al (2008) Coastal ecosystem-based management wi-th nonlinear ecological functions and values. Science 319(5861):321–323. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1150349
Chen ZX, Zhou TG, Li HZ et al (2021) Wetland ecological risk assessment of Guangdong-HongKong -Macao Great Bay Area. J Hydroecol 42(5):40–51. https://doi.org/10.15928/j.1674-3075.202104010089
Cui JX, Gu J, Sun JW (2018) The spatial pattern and evolution characteristics of the producti-on, living and ecological space in Hubei Province. China Land Sci 32(8):67–73. https://doi.org/10.11994/zgtdkx.20180723.121720
Dai W, Jiang F, Huang W et al (2018) Study on transition of land use function and ecosystem service value based on the conception of production, living and ecological space: a case study of the Fuzhou New Area. J. Nat. Resour 33(12):2098–2109. https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20171197
Eccles KM, Pauli BD, Chan HM (2019) The use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) for spatial ecological risk assessments: an example from the athabasca oil sands area in Canada. Environ Toxicol Chem 38(12):2797–2810. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.4577
Fan J, Li P (2009) The scientific foundation of major function oriented zoning in China. J Geogr Sci 19(5):515–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-009-0515-0
Gao L, Tao F, Liu RR et al (2022) Multi-scenario simulation and ecological risk analysis of land use based on the PLUS model: a case study of Nanjing. Sustain Cities Soc 85:104055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104055
Guo K, Kuai X, Chen YY et al (2017) Risk assessment of land ecology on a regional scale: application of the relative risk model to the mining city of Daye, China. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 23(3):550–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2016.1255137
Huang JC, Lin HX, Qi XX (2017) A literature review on optimization of spatial development pattern based on ecological-production-living space. Prog Geogr 36(3):378–391
Ji ZX, Xu YQ, Huang A et al (2022) Spatial pattern and evolution characteristics of the pro-duction-living-ecological space in the mountainous area of Northern Hebei Province: A Case Study of Zhangjiakou City. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis 58(1):123–134. https://doi.org/10.13209/j.0479-8023.2021.121
Joerin F, Thérialult M, Musy A (2001) Using GIS and outranking multicriteria analysis for Land-use suitability assessment. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 15(2):153–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810051030487
Kang Q, Guo QX, Ding Y et al (2021) Tradeoffs/synergies analysis of “production-living-ecological” functions in Shanxi province. J Nat Resour 36(5):1195–1207. https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20210509
Kong DY, Chen HG, Wu KS (2021) The evolution of “production-living-ecological” space, eco-environmental effects and its influencing factors in China. J Nat Resour 36(5):1116–1135. https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20210503
Landis WG, Wiegers JA (1997) Design considerations and a suggested approach for regional and comparative ecological risk assessment. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Int J 3(3):287–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039709383685
Li SD (2002) Comparison on conversion of cropland to forest and grassland in the world. World For Res 15(2):22–27. https://doi.org/10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2002.02.004
Li GD, Fang CL (2016) Quantitative function identification and analysis of urban ecological-production-living spaces. Acta Geogr Sin 71:49–65. https://doi.org/10.11821/dlxb201601004
Li X, Yin RM, Fang B et al (2019) Research on the functional zoning and regulation of Jiangsu province’s territorial space based on the “production-living-ecological” function. Resour Environ Yangtze Basin 28(8):1833–1846. https://doi.org/10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201908008
Li K, Mao DH, Li J et al (2020) On the Evolution of Spatial-Temporal Patterns of Production-Living-Ecological Space in Xiangjiang River Basin. J Nat Sci Hunan Normal Univ 43(2):9–19. https://doi.org/10.7612/j.issn.2096-5281.2020.02.002
Liang ZX, Zhao YJ (2010) Study of farmland dynamic change of Changzhi City in Shanxi Province. J Changchun Univ 20(2):23–25
Liu X, Su WC, Wang Z et al (2012) Regional ecological risk assessment of land use in the flooding zone of the three gorges reservoir area based on relative risk model. Acta Sci Circumst 32:248–256. https://doi.org/10.13671/j.hjkxxb.2012.01.032
Liu C, Xu YQ, Sun PL et al (2016) Progress and prospects of multi-functionality of land use research. Prog Geogr 35(9):1087–1099. https://doi.org/10.18306/dlkxjz.2016.09.004
Liu JL, Liu YS, Li YR (2017a) Classification evaluation and spatial-temporal analysis of “prod-uction-living-ecological” spaces in China. Acta Geogr Sin 72(7):1290–1304. https://doi.org/10.11821/dlxb201707013
Liu GB, Shangguan ZP, Yao WY et al (2017b) Ecological effect of ecological engineering in loess plateau. Bull Chin Acad Sci 32(01):11–19. https://doi.org/10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.2017.01.002
Liu JL, Liu YS, Li YR et al (2018) Coupling analysis of rural residential land and rural population in China during 2007–2015. J Nat Resour 33(11):1861–1871. https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20171068
Lovell ST, DeSantis S, Nathan CA et al (2010) Integrating agroecology and landscape multi-functionality in Vermont: an evolving framework to evaluate the design of agroecosystem-ms. Agric Syst 103(5):327–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2010.03.003
Lu Y, Qin F, Chang ZB et al (2017) Regional Ecological Risk Assessment in the Huai River Watershed during 2010–2015. Sustainability 9(12):2231. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122231
Ma LB, Bo J, Li XY et al (2019) Identifying key landscape pattern indices influencing the ecological security of inland river basin: the middle and lower reaches of Shule River Basin as an example. Sci Total Environ 674:424–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.107
Malekmohammadi B, Blouchi LR (2014) Ecological risk assessment of wetland ecosystems using multi-criteria decision making and geographic information system. Ecol Indic 41:133–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.01.038
Mastrangelo ME, Weyland F, Villarino S et al (2014) Concepts and methods for landscape multifunctionality and a unifying framework based on ecosystem services. Landsc Ecol 29(2):345–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-013-9959-9
Montanari A, Londei A, Staniscia B (2014) Can we interpret the evolution of coastal land use conflicts? Using Artificial Neural Networks to model the effects of alternative development policies. Ocean Coast Manag 101:114–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.09.021
Sabir S, Qayyum U, Majeed T (2020) FDI and environmental degradation: the role of political institutions in South Asian countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(26):32544–32553
Saedpanah S, Amanollahi J (2019) Environmental pollution and geo-ecological risk assessment of the Qhorveh mining area in western Iran. Environ Pollut 253:811–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.07.049
Steiner F, McSherry L, Cohen J (2000) Land suitability analysis for the upper Gila River watershed. Landsc Urban Plan 50(4):199–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00093-1
Sui HJ, Song G, Zhang HM (2020) Identification of production-living-ecological space at Keshan County level in main grain producing areas in northern Songnen Plain, China. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng 36:264–271. https://doi.org/10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.19.030
Sun HB, Yang GS, Su WZ et al (2010) Ecological risk assessment of land use in the area along Changjiang river: a case study of Nanjing, China. Acta Ecol Sin 30(20):5616–5625
Vesalon L, Creţan R (2013) Mono-industrialism and the struggle for alternative development: the case of the Rosia Montana project. Tijdschr Econ Soc Geogr 104(5):539–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12035
Wallace RN, Hope BK (2002) Quantitative consideration of ecosystem characteristics in an ecological risk assessement: a case study. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 8(7):1805–1814. https://doi.org/10.1080/20028091056863
Wang H (2021) Regional assessment of human-caused ecological risk in the Poyang Lake Eco-economic Zone using production–living–ecology analysis. PLoS One 16(2):e0246749. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246749
Wang H (2021b) Regional ecological risk assessment with respect to human disturbance in the Poyang lake region (PYLR) using production–living–ecology analysis. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 49(2):449–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-020-01254-w
Wang FC, Wang DC, Zhang LH et al (2018) Spatiotemporal analysis of the dynamic changes in land use ecological risks in the urban agglomeration of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei vegion. Acta Ecol Sin 38:4307–4316. https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb201801300246
Wang J, Bai WQ, Tian GX (2020) A review on ecological risk assessment of land use. J Nat Resour 35:576–585. https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20200306
Wang YX, Liu SK, Lu RC et al (2021) Landscape ecological risk assessment and terrain gradient analysis of Guangxi’s Border Areas in the past 40 years from the “production-living-ecological” space. J Ecol Rural Environ 37(12):1586–1595. https://doi.org/10.19741/j.issn.1673-4831.2021.0336
Wang J, Lv JQ, Zhang WP et al (2022a) Land-use pattern evaluation using GeoSOS-FLUS in national territory spatial planning: a case study of Changzhi City, Shanxi Province. Sustainability 14(21):13752. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142113752
Wang XF, Zhang X, Wang Y et al (2022) Spatial evolution and driving force analysis of ecological -production-living spaces on the Loess Plateau. J Anhui Agric Univ 49(1):112–121. https://doi.org/10.13610/j.cnki.1672-352x.20220325.016
Wu YJ, Yang YZ, Yang L et al (2016) Land spatial development and suitability for city construction based on ecological-living-industrial space: take Ningbo City as an example. Resour Sci 38(11):2072–2081. https://doi.org/10.18402/resci.2016.11.06
Wu J, Bai ZK, Zhao XJ (2020) Research on ecological risk on land use of resource-based cities in process of urbanization. China Min Mag 29(8):60–68. https://doi.org/10.12075/j.issn.1004-4051.2020.08.01
Xu HL, Deng YP (2012) Does foreign direct investment lead to environmental pollution in China? Spatial measurement based on Chinese provincial panel data. Manag World 02:30–43. https://doi.org/10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2012.02.004
Xu Y, Zhong YX, Feng XH et al (2016) Ecological risk pattern of Poyang Lake basin based on land use. Acta Ecol Sin 36(23):7850–7857. https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb201512152507
Yanes A, Botero CM, Arrizabalaga M et al (2019) Methodological proposal for ecological risk assessment of the coastal zone of Antioquia, Colombia. Ecol Eng 130:242–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.12.010
Yang QK, Duan XJ, Wang L et al (2018) Land use transformation based on ecological-production-living spaces and associated eco-environment effects: a case study in the Yangtze River Delta. Sci Geogr Sin 38:97–106. https://doi.org/10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2018.01.011
Yang YY, Bao WK, Liu YS (2020) Coupling coordination analysis of rural production-living-ecological space in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Ecol Indic 117:106512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106512
Zhang SQ (2021) Research on functional quantitative recognition and evolution characteristics of “production-living-ecological” space in the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration. China University of Mining and Technology, Jiangsu, China. https://doi.org/10.27623/d.cnki.gzkyu.2021.000511
Zhao R, Liu XM (2021) Analysis on spatial-temporal changes and driving forces of “production-living-ecological” spaces in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Metropolitan Area. Ecol Econ 37(4):201–208
Zhao Y, Luo ZJ, Cao LP et al (2018) Assessment of ecological risk in Poyang Lake basin based on changes in land use. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis 40(3):635–644. https://doi.org/10.13836/j.jjau.2018082
Zhao Y, Luo ZJ, Li YT et al (2019) Study of the spatial-temporal variation of landscape ecological risk in the upper reaches of the Ganjiang River Basin based on the “PLE-space.” Acta Geogr Sin 39(13):4676–4686. https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb201804040766
Zhao DY, Xiao MZ, Huang CB et al (2021) Land use scenario simulation and ecosystem service management for different regional development models of the Beibu Gulf Area, China. Remote Sens 13(16):3161. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13163161
Zheng Y, Hao RM, Wu XG et al (2021) Research on the spatial pattern optimization of pr-oduction-living-ecological spaces in village based on MCR model. Res Soil Water Conserv 28(5):1–6. https://doi.org/10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.20210412.001
Zhou QG, Zhang XY, Wang ZL (2014) Land use ecological risk evaluation in Three Gorges Reservoir Area based on normal cloud model. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng 30(23):289–297. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2014.23.037
Zhu YY, Yu B, Zeng JX et al (2015) Spatial optimization from three spaces of production, living and ecology in national restricted zones: a case study of Wufeng County in Hubei Province. Econ Geogr 35(04):26–32. https://doi.org/10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2015.04.004
Zhuang DF, Liu JY (1997) Study on the model of regional differentiation of land use degree in China. J Nat Resour 12(02):105–111
Acknowledgements
We sincerely thank the co-authors for their help and cooperation to this study.
Funding
This research was relied on the Changzhi City Territorial Spatial Ecological Restoration Plan (2021–2035) Preparation Project (DHZB-CFW-2021066) and the Changzhi City Territorial Spatial Master Plan Project (2020ZG-38).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, Zhongke Bai; data curation, Juan Wang and Na Qiao; formal analysis, Xiaojing Yang; funding acquisition, Zhongke Bai; investigation, Juan Wang and Na Qiao; methodology, Xiaojing Yang; project administration, Zhongke Bai; resources, Juan Wang and Na Qiao; software, Xiaojing Yang; supervision, Juan Wang and Na Qiao; validation, Xiaojing Yang; visualization, Xiaojing Yang; writing—original draft, Xiaojing Yang; writing—review and editing, Xiaojing Yang.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, X., Wang, J., Qiao, N. et al. Spatiotemporal variation pattern of production-living-ecological space and land use ecological risk and their relationship analysis: a case study of Changzhi City, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 66978–66993 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27169-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27169-w