Abstract
Landfill of waste biomass not only poses a threat to environmental protection but also leads to a great waste of biomass resources. Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) has been considered a promising method to convert the wet biomass into hydrochar, a high-value-added product with multiple application potentials. The cabbage waste, typical wet waste biomass with a huge production per year, was hydrothermally carbonized under 190 °C and 260 °C, respectively. The results indicated that the majority of nutrients from feedstock were dissolved in spent liquor during HTC, with only a few amounts retained on hydrochar. Temperature showed a more significant impact on hydrochar properties than retention time, which enables hydrochar to be potentially used as a soil conditioner. Particularly, the hydrochar produced at 190 °C could improve plant nutrition in the short term, while that produced at 260 °C may benefit in C sequestration. Moreover, the hydrochar dominated by meso/macropores (> 90%) would be conducive to the storage of plant-available water. But both BTX and VOCs may release during hydrochar application; thus, further field experiments are needed to test the environmental risks of hydrochar when applied as a soil amendment.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets used or analyzed during the current study are available on reasonable request.
References
Abel S, Peters A, Trinks S, Schonsky H, Facklam M, Wessolek G (2013) Impact of biochar and hydrochar addition on water retention and water repellency of sandy soil. Geoderma 202–203:183–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.03.003
Bargmann I, Rillig MC, Kruse A, Greef JM, Kücke M (2014) Effects of hydrochar application on the dynamics of soluble nitrogen in soils and on plant availability. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 177:48–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201300069
Basso D, Patuzzi F, Castello D, Baratieri M, Rada EC, Weiss-Hortala E, Fiori L (2016) Agro-industrial waste to solid biofuel through hydrothermal carbonization. Waste Manage 47:114–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.05.013
Cervera-Mata A, Lara L, Fernández-Arteaga A, Rufián-Henares JÁ, Delgado G (2021) Washed hydrochar from spent coffee grounds: A second generation of coffee residues. Evaluation Organic Amendment Waste Manage 120:322–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.11.041
Chen XJ, Lin QM, He RD, Zhao XR, Li GT (2017) Hydrochar production from watermelon peel by hydrothermal carbonization. Bioresour Technol 241:236–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.04.012
Chen XJ, Lin QM, Muhammad R, Zhao XR, Li GT (2019) Steam explosion of crop straws improves the characteristics of biochar as a soil amendment. J Integr Agric 18(7):1486–1495. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(19)62573-6
Cheng CH, Lehmann J, Engelhard MH (2008) Natural oxidation of black carbon in soils: Changes in molecular form and surface charge along a climosequence. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 72:1598–1610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2008.01.010
Dhaouadi F, Sellaoui L, Hernández-Hernández LE, Bonilla-Petriciolet A, Mendoza-Castillo DI, Reynel-Ávila HE, González-Ponce HA, Taamalli S, Louis F, Lamine AB (2021) Preparation of an avocado seed hydrochar and its application as heavy metal adsorbent: Properties and advanced statistical physics modeling. Chem Eng J 419:129472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.129472
Eibisch N, Helfrich M, Don A, Mikutta R, Kruse A, Ellerbrock R, Flessa H (2013) Properties and degradability of hydrothermal carbonization products. J Environ Qual 42:1565–1573. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2013.02.0045
Falco C, Caballero FP, Babonneau F, Gervais C, Laurent G, Titirici MM, Baccile N (2011) Hydrothermal carbon from biomass: Structural differences between hydrothermal and pyrolyzed carbons via 13C solid state NMR. Langmuir 27:14460–14471. https://doi.org/10.1021/la202361p
FAOStat (2017) Food loss and waste database. Available via URL: http://www.fao.org/platform-food-loss-waste/flw-data/en/. Accessed Aug 3 2021
Fornes F, Belda RM (2017) Acidification with nitric acid improves chemical characteristics and reduces phytotoxicity of alkaline chars. J Environ Manage 191:237–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.01.026
González-Arias J, Carnicero A, Sánchez ME, Martínez EJ, López R, Cara-Jiménez J (2021) Management of off-specification compost by using co-hydrothermal carbonization with olive tree pruning. Assessing energy potential of hydrochar. Waste Manage 124:224–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.01.026
Hitzl M, Mendez A, Owsianiak M, Renz M (2018) Making hydrochar suitable for agricultural soil: A thermal treatment to remove organic phytotoxic compounds. J Environ Chem Eng 6:7029–7034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2018.10.064
Huang R, Tang Y (2016) Evolution of phosphorus complexation and mineralogy during (hydro) thermal treatments of activated and anaerobically digested sludge: Insights from sequential extraction and P K-edge XANES. Water Res 100:439–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.05.029
Jain A, Balasubramanian R, Srinivasan MP (2016) Hydrothermal conversion of biomass waste to activated carbon with high porosity: A review. Chem Eng J 283:789–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.08.014
Jeong CY, Dodla SK, Wang JJ (2016) Fundamental and molecular composition characteristics of biochars produced from sugarcane and rice crop residues and by-products. Chemosphere 142:4–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.05.084
Kambo HS, Dutta A (2015) A comparative review of biochar and hydrochar in terms of production, physico-chemical properties and applications. Renew Sust Energ Rev 45:359–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.050
Kim JK, Choi SR, Lee J, Park S-Y, Song SY, Na J, Kim SW, Kim S-J, Nou I-S, Lee YH, Park SU, Kim H (2013) Metabolic differentiation of diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella (L.)) resistance in cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.ssp. capitata). J Agric Food Chem 61:11222–11230. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf403441t
Kumar M, Oyedun AO, Kumar A (2018) A review on the current status of various hydrothermal technologies on biomass feedstock. Renew Sust Energ Rev 81:1742–1770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.270
Lawrinenko M, Jing DP, Banik C, Laird DA (2017) Aluminum and iron biomass pretreatment impacts on biochar anion exchange capacity. Carbon 118:422–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.03.056
Lee J, Lee K, Sohn D, Kim YM, Park KY (2018) Hydrothermal carbonization of lipid extracted algae for hydrochar production and feasibility of using hydrochar as a solid fuel. Energy 153:913–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.04.112
Lei Q, Kannan S, Raghavan V (2021) Uncatalyzed and acid-aided microwave hydrothermal carbonization of orange peel waste. Waste Manage 126:106–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.02.058
Libra JA, Ro KS, Kammann C, Funke A, Berge ND, Neubauer Y, Titirici MM, Fuhner C, Bens O, Kern J, Emmerich KH (2011) Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass residuals: a comparative review of the chemistry, processes and applications of wet and dry pyrolysis. Biofuels 2:71–106. https://doi.org/10.4155/bfs.10.81
Lu YD, Levine RB, Savage PE (2015) Fatty acids for nutraceuticals and biofuels from hydrothermal carbonization of microalgae. Ind Eng Chem Res 54:4066–4071. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie503448u
Malghani S, Jüschke E, Baumert J, Thuille A, Antonietti M, Trumbore S, Gleixner G (2015) Carbon sequestration potential of hydrothermal carbonization char (hydrochar) in two contrasting soils; results of a 1-year field study. Biol Fertil Soils 51:123–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-014-0980-1
National Bureau of Statistics of China (2020) Available via URL: https://data.stats.gov.cn/english/easyquery.htm?cn=C01. Accessed Aug 3 2021
Nzediegwu C, Naeth MA, Chang SX (2021) Carbonization temperature and feedstock type interactively affect chemical, fuel, and surface properties of hydrochars. Bioresour Technol 330:124976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124976
OHair J, Jin Q, Yu DJ, Wu J, Wang HJ, Zhou SP, Huang HB (2021) Non-sterile fermentation of food waste using thermophilic and alkaliphilic Bacillus licheniformis YNP5-TSU for 2,3-butanediol production. Waste Manage 120:248–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.11.029
Olszewski MP, Arauzo PJ, Wądrzyk M, Kruse A (2019) Py-GC-MS of hydrochars produced from brewer’s spent grains. J Anal Appl Pyrol 140:255–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2019.04.002
Pauletto PS, Moreno-Pérez J, Hernández-Hernández LE, Bonilla-Petriciolet A, Dotto GL, Salau NPG (2020) Novel biochar and hydrochar for the adsorption of 2-nitrophenol from aqueous solutions: An approach using the PVSDM model. Chemosphere 269:128748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128748
Pecchi M, Baratieri M, Goldfarb JL, Maag AR (2022) Effect of solvent and feedstock selection on primary and secondary chars produced via hydrothermal carbonization of food wastes. Bioresour Technol 348:126799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.126799
Röhrdanz M, Rebling T, Ohlert J, Jasper J, Greve T, Buchwald R, Frieling P, Wark M (2016) Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass from landscape management-Influence of process parameters on soil properties of hydrochars. J Environ Manage 173:72–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.03.006
Sabio E, Alvarez-Murillo A, Roman S, Ledesma B (2016) Conversion of tomato-peel waste into solid fuel by hydrothermal carbonization: Influence of the processing variables. Waste Manage 47:122–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.04.016
Šamec D, Pavlović I, Salopek-Sondi B (2016) White cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata f. alba): botanical, phytochemical and pharmacological overview. Phytochem Rev 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11101-016-9454-4
Schimmelpfennig S, Glaser B (2012) One step forward toward characterization: some important material properties to distinguish biochars. J Environ Qual 41:1001–1013. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2011.0146
Sewu DD, Boakye P, Woo SH (2017) Highly efficient adsorption of cationic dye by biochar produced with Korean cabbage waste. Bioresour Technol 224:206–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.11.009
Shen D, Liu G, Zhao J, Xue J, Guan S, Xiao R (2015) Thermo-chemical conversion of lignin to aromatic compounds: Effect of lignin source and reaction temperature. J Anal Appl Pyrol 112:56–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2015.02.022
Susanti RF, Arie AA, Kristianto H, Erico M, Kevin G, Devianto H (2019) Activated carbon from citric acid catalyzed hydrothermal carbonization and chemical activation of salacca peel as potential electrode for lithium-ion capacitor’s cathode. Ionics 25:3915–3925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-019-02904-x
Wagner A, Kaupenjohann M (2014) Suitability of biochars (pyro- and hydrochars) for metal immobilization on former sewage-field soils. Eur J Soil Sci 65:139–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12090
Wang TF, Zhai YB, Zhu Y, Peng C, Xu BB, Wang T, Li CT, Zeng GM (2018) Influence of temperature on nitrogen fate during hydrothermal carbonization of food waste. Bioresour Technol 247:182–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.076
Wilk M, Magdziarz A, Jayaraman K, Szymańska-Chargot M, Gőkalp I (2019) Hydrothermal carbonization characteristics of sewage sludge and lignocellulosic biomass. A comparative study. Biomass Bioenergy 120:166–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.11.016Gerightsandcontent
Wu S, Zhang Y, Tan Q, Sun X, Wei W, Hu C (2020) Biochar is superior to lime in improving acidic soil properties and fruit quality of Satsuma mandarin. Sci Total Environ 714:136722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136722
Yue Y, Lin QM, Xu YQ, Li GT, Zhao XR (2017) Slow pyrolysis as a measure for rapidly treating cow manure and the biochar characteristics. J Anal Appl Pyrol 124:355–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2017.01.008
Zhang YH, Qin JD, Yi YL (2021) Biochar and hydrochar derived from freshwater sludge: Characterization and possible applications. Sci Total Environ 763:144550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144550
Zhang ZK, Zhu ZY, Shen BX, Liu L (2019) Insight into biochar and hydrochar production and applications: A review. Energy 171:581–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.035
Zhou XN, Lu Y, Huang L, Zhang Q, Wang XY, Zhu JY (2021) Effect of pH on volatile fatty acid production and the microbial community during anaerobic digestion of Chinese cabbage waste. Bioresour Technol 336:125338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125338
Funding
This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 42107032, 41371243).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Qimei Lin and Jinhong Zhang contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, investigation, data curation, and formal analysis were performed by Xuejiao Chen and Jinhong Zhang. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Xuejiao Chen. Guitong Li, Xiaorong Zhao, and Qimei Lin commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Zhihong Xu
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, X., Zhang, J., Lin, Q. et al. Dispose of Chinese cabbage waste via hydrothermal carbonization: hydrochar characterization and its potential as a soil amendment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 4592–4602 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22359-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22359-4