Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Can technology-driven cross-border mergers and acquisitions promote green innovation in emerging market firms? Evidence from China

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Emerging markets face severe ecological and environmental problems in periods of economic and political transition. The existing literature analyses the impact of technology on environmental benefits and the role of technology on the green innovation of enterprises, mostly from the perspective of technology spillover in enterprises in mature markets. Based on a sample of 229 Chinese cross-border mergers and acquisitions (M&As), this paper explores the role of technology-driven cross-border M&As (TDC M&As) in green innovation, finding that TDC M&As have a significant promoting effect on green innovation. A higher degree of ownership concentration positively promotes the relationship between TDC M&As and green innovation in the enterprise. This paper divides enterprises into state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and political connection enterprises, with the nature of SOEs negatively affecting the relationship between TDC M&As and green innovation, the nature of political connections significantly promoting the relationship. Similarly, formal institutional distance negatively interacts with TDC M&As to affect the green innovation of enterprises, while informal distance interacts positively with TDC M&As. This paper has important implications for emerging market enterprises in realising the transformation of the mode of economic growth and achieving harmonious development between enterprises and the environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Ahuja G, Katila R (2001) Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study. Strateg Manag J 22:197–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai C, Lu J, Tao Z (2006) The multitask theory of state enterprise reform: empirical evidence from China. Am Econ Rev 96(2):353–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai C, Kusi-Sarpong S, Sarkis J (2017) An implementation path for green information technology systems in the Ghanaian mining industry. J Clean Prod 164:1105–1123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai Y, Qian Q, Jiao J, Li L, Li F, Yang R (2020) Can environmental innovation benefit from outward foreign direct investment to developed countries? Evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:13790–13808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banalieva ER, Dhanaraj C (2013) Home-region orientation in international expansion strategies. J Int Bus Stud 2:89–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney J (1991) Firm resource and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag 1:99–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol WJ, Baumol WJ, Oates WE, Bawa VS, Bawa WS, Bradford DF (1988) The theory of environmental policy. Cambridge University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley PJ, Clegg LJ, Cross AR, Liu X, Voss H, Zheng P (2007) The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment. J Int Bus Stud 38:499–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen CJ, Huang YF, Lin BW (2012) How firms innovate through R&D internationalization? An S-curve hypothesis. Res Policy 41:1544–1554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen F, Meng Q, Li X (2018) Cross-border post-merger integration and technology innovation: a resource-based view. Econ Model 68:229–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child J, Rodrigues SB (2005) The internationalization of Chinese firms: a case for theoretical extension? Manag Organ Rev 1(3):381–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleff T, Rennings K (1999) Determinants of environmental product and process innovation. Eur Environ 5:191–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm Sci Q 1:128–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui L, Jiang F (2012) State ownership effect on firms’ FDI ownership decisions under institutional pressure: a study of Chinese outward-investing firms. J Int Bus Stud 3:264–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng P (2013) Chinese outward direct investment research: theoretical integration and recommendations. Manag Organ Rev 3:513–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am Sociol Rev 2:147–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning JH (1988) The eclectic paradigm of international production: a restatement and some possible extension. J Int Bus Stud 19(1):1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field LC, Mkrtchyan A (2017) Cross-border M&As and innovative activity of acquiring and target firms. J Financ Econ 123:488–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter M (1985) Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. Am J Sociol 91:481–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanif N, Wu J (2021) Linking ownership acquired in Chinese fifirms to post-acquisition innovation performance: role of institutional distance. Chin Manag Stud 61:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Hao Y, Guo Y, Guo Y, Wu H, Ren S (2020a) Does outward foreign direct investment (OFDI) affect the home country’s environmental quality? The case of China. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 52:109–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao Y, Wu Y, Wu H, Ren S (2020b) How do FDI and technical innovation affect environmental quality? Evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:7835–7850

  • Hitt MA, Ahlstrom D, Dacin TM, Levitas E (2004) The institutional effects on strategic alliance partner selection in transition economies: China vs. Russia. Organ Sci 15(2):173–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hojnik J, Ruzzier M (2016) What drives eco-innovation? A review of an emerging literature. Environ Innov Soc Transit 19:31–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang M, Li M, Liao Z (2021) Do politically connected CEOs promote Chinese listed industrial firms’ green innovation? The mediating role of external governance environments. J Clean Prod 278:123634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huergo E, Jaumandreu J (2004) How does probability of innovation change with firm age. Small Bus Econ 22:193–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt GE (1990) Waste reduction techniques and technologies. In: Freeman H (ed) Hazardous waste minimization. McGraw Hill, New York, pp 25–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymer SH (1976) The international operations of national firms: a study of direct investment. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahanger A (2021) Influence of FDI characteristics on high-quality development of China’s economy. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:18977–18988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang MS, Branzei O, Xia J (2016) DIY: how internationalization shifts the locus of indigenous innovation for Chinese fifirms. J World Bus 51:662–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson J, Vahlne J (1977a) The internationalization process of the firm-a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. J Int Bus Stud 8(1):23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson J, Vahlne JE (1977b) The internationalization process of the firm-a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. J Int Bus Stud 1:23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut B, Singh H (1988) The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. J Int Bus Stud 3:411–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lema A, Lema R (2013) Technology transfer in the clean development mechanism: insights from wind power. Glob Environ Change 1:301–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li DY, Zheng M, Cao CC, Chen XH, Ren SG, Huang M (2017) The impact of legitimacy pressure and corporate profitability on green innovation: evidence from China top 100. J Clean Prod 141:41–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin H, Zeng SX, Ma HY, Chen HQ (2015) How political connections affect corporate environmental performance: the mediating role of green subsidies. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 21:2192–2212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Hao Y, Gao Y (2017) The environmental consequences of domestic and foreign investment: evidence from China. Energy Policy 108:271–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo Y, Tung RL (2007) International expansion of emerging market enterprises: a springboard perspective. J Int Bus Stud 38:481–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macdougall A (1960) The benefits and costs of private investment from abroad: a theoretical approach. Econ Rec 73:13–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mao W, Wang W, Sun H, Luo D (2020) Barriers to implementing the strictest environmental protection institution: a multi-stakeholder perspective from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:39375–39390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mariyakhan K, Mohamued EA, Khan MA, Popp J, Oláh J (2020) Does the level of absorptive capacity matter for carbon intensity? Evidence from the USA and China. Energies 13(407):1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews JA (2006) Dragon multinationals: new players in 21st century globalization. Asia Pac J Manag 23:5–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy KJ, Aalbers HL (2016) Technological acquisitions: the impact of geography on post-acquisition innovative performance. Res Policy 45:818–1832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer JW, Rowan B (1977) Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremonyl. Am J Sociol 2:340–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller SR, Parkhe A (2002) Is there a liability of foreignness in global banking? An empirical test of banks’ x-efficiency. Strateg Manag J 23:55–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miozzo M, DiVito L, Desyllas P (2016) When do acquirers invest in the R&D assets of acquired science-based firms in cross-border acquisitions? The role of technology and capabilities similarity and complementarity. Long Range Plan 49:221e240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash HA (2009) The European Commission’s sustainable consumption and production and sustainable industrial policy action plan. J Clean Prod 17:496–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neugebauer F (2012) EMAS and ISO 14001 in the German industry-complements or substitutes? J Clean Prod 37:249–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North D (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien RM (2007) A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Qual Quant 415:673–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2008) Environmental innovation and global markets. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Palˇciˇc I, Prester J (2020) Impact of advanced manufacturing technologies on green innovation. Sustainability 12:3499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng MW (2001) The resource-based view and international business. J Manag 27:803–829

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizk R, Slimane MB (2018) Modelling the relationship between poverty, environment, and institutions: a panel data study. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:31459–31473

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salancik GR, Pfeffer J (1978) A social information processing approach to job satisfaction. Adm Sci Q 23:224–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar AN (2012) Eco-Innovation: the new frontier of eco-industry and green growth. Lap Lambert Academic Publishing, Saarbrücken

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauerwald S, Peng MW (2013) Informal institutions, shareholder coalitions, and principal -principal conflicts. Asia Pac J Manag 3:853–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwens C, Eiche J, Kabst R (2011) The moderating impact of informal institutional distance and formal institutional risk on SME entry mode choice. J Manage Stud 2:330–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma S, Vredenburg H (1998) Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strateg Manag J 19:729–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh H, Montgomery CA (1987) Corporate acquisitions strategies and economic performance. Strat Manag J 84:377–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strambach S (2017) Combining knowledge bases in transnational sustainability innovation: micro dynamics and institutional change. Econ Geogr 93(5):500–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian H, Wang ZH (2020) Chinese green process innovation in automotive painting: the strategic niche management perspective. Int J Environ Sci Technol 17:993–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin J (1969) A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory. J Money, Credit, Bank 1:15–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsang EWK, Yip PSL (2007) Economic distance and the survival of foreign direct investments. Acad Manag J 505:1156–1168

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschoegl AE (1987) International retail banking as a strategy: an assessment. J Int Bus Stud 18:67–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh JP (1989) Doing a deal: merger and acquisition negotiations and their impact upon target company top management turnover. Strateg Manag J 10:307–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter I, Ugelow JL (1979) Environmental policies in developing countries. Ambio 8:102–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Hong J, Kafouros M, Wright M (2012) Exploring the role of government involvement in outward FDI from emerging economies. J Int Bus Stud 43:655–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang JF, Fei ZC, Chang Q, Fu Y, Li SQ (2019) Energy-saving operation of multistage stochastic manufacturing systems based on fuzzy logic. Int J Simul Model 18:138–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strateg Manag J 5:171–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge J (2009) Introductory econometrics: a modern approach. A Division of Thomson Learning, South-Western

  • Wu H, Hu S (2020) The impact of synergy effect between government subsidies and slack resources on green technology innovation. J Clean Prod 274:122682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wysocki J (2016) Strategic approach to pro-ecological activities of companies. Eur J Serv Manag 18:63–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wysocki J (2021) Innovative green initiatives in the manufacturing SME sector in Poland. Sustainability 13(4):2386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia J, Ma X, Lu JW, Yiu DW (2014) Outward foreign direct investment by emerging market firms: a resource dependence logic. Strateg Manag J 35:1343–1363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie F, Zhang B (2021) Impact of China’s outward foreign direct investment on green total factor productivity in BB belt and road participating countries: a perspective of institutional distance. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:4704–4715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu J, Zhai J (2020) Research on the evaluation of green innovation capability of manufacturing enterprises in innovation network. Sustainability 12:807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu K, Hitt MA, Miller SR (2020) The ownership structure contingency in the sequential international entry mode decision process: family owners and institutional investors in family dominant versus family-influenced firms. J Int Bus Stud 51:151–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z, Ali ST, Ali F, Sarwar Z, Khan MA (2020) Outward foreign direct investment and corporate green innovation: an institutional pressure perspective. S Afr J Bus Manag 51(1):a1883

  • Ye J, Zhao Y, Cui C, Zhao L (2018) Effect of cultural distance on reverse technology spillover from outward FDI: a bane or a boon? Appl Econ Lett 25(10):693–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yiu DW, Lau CM, Bruton GD (2007) International venturing by emerging economy firms: the effects of firm capabilities, home country networks, and corporate Entrepreneurship. J Int Bus Stud 38:519–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer S, Mosakowski E (1997) The dynamics of the liability of foreignness: a global study of survival in financial services. Strateg Manag J 6:439–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Zhou X (2016) Does foreign direct investment lead to lower CO2 emissions? Evidence from a regional analysis in China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 58:943–951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang F, Gallagher KS, Myslikova Z, Narassimhan E, Bhandary RR, Huang P (2021) From fossil to low carbon: the evolution of global public energy innovation. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 12:e734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Jiang J, Ye B, Hou B (2019) Green spillovers of outward foreign direct investment on home countries: evidence from China’s province-level data. J Clean Prod 215:829–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to the Environmental Science and Pollution Research’s editors and anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and careful guidance.

Funding

This study was supported by the project of the National key Social Science Foundation, “Research on the Main Influencing factors and Operation Promotion Mechanism of Creative Asset-seeking Transnational Mergers and Acquisitions” (Grant No. 12AZD034); the National Key Social Science Foundation of China named “Research on Political Risks, Economic Risks, Security Risks, Operational Risks and Countermeasures for the construction of “One Belt and One Road”. (Grant No. 18VDL016).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Economics and Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430070, People’s Republic of China

    Jingjing Li

Authors
  1. Jingjing Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Jingjing Li is responsible for the design, data collection, analysis, writing and translation of the whole article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jingjing Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Yes, I consent for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Ilhan Ozturk

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, J. Can technology-driven cross-border mergers and acquisitions promote green innovation in emerging market firms? Evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 27954–27976 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18154-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18154-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation