Skip to main content
Log in

Estimating Teacher Quality: Comparing Objective and Subjective Measures

  • Best Undergraduate Paper
  • Published:
Atlantic Economic Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Teacher quality is widely considered to be an important contributor towards student academic success. However, there is no universally agreed upon method to measure teacher quality and, often, different measures of teacher quality reveal different information about teachers. This paper examines the academic achievement of Mexican sixth grade students utilizing data from surveys administered to students, teachers, and parents, to assess measures of teacher quality. Two different methods of measuring teacher quality, subjective student evaluations of teachers and objective value-added estimates of teachers’ contribution to students’ academic performance, are identified and compared. The subjective measure of teacher quality is estimated based on student responses to questions about their teachers’ behaviors. The objective measure estimates the change in students’ standardized test scores across two consecutive years that can be attributed to their teachers. Estimates of the relationship between subjective and objective measures of teacher quality indicate that the measures capture similar information, but that discrepancies between the measures also exist. The analysis provides support for comprehensive student and value-added evaluations of teachers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beg, S., Fitzpatrick, A., & Lucas, A. M. (2021). Gender bias in assessments of teacher performance. In AEA Papers and Proceedings, 111, 190–95.

  • Behrman, J., W Parker, S., & Todd, P. E. (2019). Impacts of PROSPERA on Enrollment, School Trajectories, and Learning. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, (9000). https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/377921568051174502/pdf/Impacts-of-PROSPERA-on-Enrollment-School-Trajectories-and-Learning.pdf

  • Burusic, J., Babarovic, T., & Seric, M. (2011). Differences in elementary school achievement between girls and boys: Does the teacher gender play a role? European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27(4), 523–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chetty, R., Friedman, J. N., & Rockoff, J. E. (2014a). Measuring the impacts of teachers II: Teacher value-added and student outcomes in adulthood. American Economic Review, 104(9), 2633–2679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chetty, R., Friedman, J. N., & Rockoff, J. E. (2014b). Measuring the impacts of teachers I: Evaluating bias in teacher value-added estimates. American Economic Review, 104(9), 2593–2632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Hoyos, R., Estrada, R., & Vargas, M. (2018). Predict individual wellbeing through test scores: Evidence from a national assessment in Mexico. Development Bank of Latin America Working Paper, (2018/09). Retrieved December 11, 2022, from https://scioteca.caf.com/bitstream/handle/123456789/1187/predicting-individual-wellbeing-through-test-scores-evidence-froma-national-assesment-in-mexico.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

  • Greimel-Fuhrmann, B., & Geyer, A. (2003). Students’ evaluation of teachers and instructional quality–Analysis of relevant factors based on empirical evaluation research. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(3), 229–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, E. A. (2009). Teacher Deselection. In D. Goldhaber & J. Hannaway (Eds.), Creating a New Teaching Profession (pp. 165–180). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, D. N., Ingle, W. K., & Rutledge, S. A. (2014). How teacher evaluation methods matter for accountability: A comparative analysis of teacher effectiveness ratings by principals and teacher value-added measures. American Educational Research Journal, 51(1), 73–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Instituto Nacional de Evaluacion Educativa. (2009a). Evaluacion Nacional de Logro Academico en Centros Escolares (ENLACE). Retrieved from University of Pennsylvania, Department of Economics. Last accessed April 24, 2022.

  • Instituto Nacional de Evaluacion Educativa. (2009b). Context Questionnaires. Retrieved from University of Pennsylvania, Department of Economics. Last accessed April 24, 2022.

  • Jacob, B. A., & Lefgren, L. (2008). Can principals identify effective teachers? Evidence on subjective performance evaluation in education. Journal of Labor Economics, 26(1), 101–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, T. J., & Staiger, D. O. (2008). Estimating teacher impacts on student achievement: An experimental evaluation (No. w14607). National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved October 31, 2021, from https://www.nber.org/papers/w14607

  • Muralidharan, K., & Sheth, K. (2016). Bridging education gender gaps in developing countries: The role of female teachers. Journal of Human Resources, 51(2), 269–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockoff, J. E., & Speroni, C. (2010). Subjective and objective evaluations of teacher effectiveness. American Economic Review, 100(2), 261–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodin, M., & Rodin, B. (1972). Student evaluations of teachers. Science, 177(4055), 1164–1166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schonert-Reichl, K. A. (2017). Social and emotional learning and teachers. The Future of Children, 27(1), 137–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasey, G. (2021). Enrollment, labor, and effort: An analysis of the educational choices of students In Mexico. Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations, (3830). https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/3830

  • Wentzel, K. R., & Wigfield, A. (1998). Academic and social motivational influences on students’ academic performance. Educational Psychology Review, 10(2), 155–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winters, M. A., Haight, R. C., Swaim, T. T., & Pickering, K. A. (2013). The effect of same-gender teacher assignment on student achievement in the elementary and secondary grades: Evidence from panel data. Economics of Education Review, 34(1), 69–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yunker, P. J., & Yunker, J. A. (2003). Are student evaluations of teaching valid? Evidence from an analytical business core course. Journal of Education for Business, 78(6), 313–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Jere Behrman and Petra Todd for their continued support through the process of conducting this research and am very grateful for their guidance and constructive feedback.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mira G. Potter-Schwartz.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Potter-Schwartz, M.G. Estimating Teacher Quality: Comparing Objective and Subjective Measures. Atl Econ J 50, 159–170 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-022-09759-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-022-09759-0

Keywords

JEL

Navigation