Skip to main content
Log in

Bacillus thuringiensis endotoxin production: a systematic review of the past 10 years

  • Review
  • Published:
World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) is one of the most promising biological control agents used commercially. Its products can contribute to reducing ecological and environmental problems associated with the use of chemical pesticides. Among the limiting factors of using Bt as bioinsecticide are the costs and ensuring its biological activity, which may vary according to the strain and culture conditions. This systematic review aimed to collect state-of-the-art information on the production of Bt endotoxins and to score the methodological feasibility of the data obtained, thus highlighting possible incoherencies. In order to consolidate recent findings and guide future studies, a total of 47 original articles from the last 10 years was analysed, with special attention being given to corroborating data, identifying inconsistencies and suggesting future adjustments so as to increase data reliability. With a maximum score of 8 points, three production parameters were classified on the following scale: preferable (score: 2), adequate (score: 1) and inadequate (score: 0), and another two parameter were classified as adequate (score: 1) or inadequate (score: 0). No article scored more than 6 out of the maximum of 8, thus reflecting the need for more detailed studies regarding Bt endotoxin production. The lack of standardization of methods and units of measurement also have made a comparison of results and an overall analysis difficult. Standards are suggested in the present study. The inclusion of bioassays and quantifying toxin via alkaline dilution are strongly recommended for studies of this nature, along with LC50 expressed in mg/L. Sixteen articles (34%) did not use either of these suggested methods, which indicates the need for further supporting studies. These findings reinforce the need for robust studies in this area, which could include the development of more affordable and effective bioinsecticides, thus increasing their competitiveness against insecticides derived from unsustainable sources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

Dra. Ana Porto and Dr. José Manoel Duarte Neto are grateful to CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development) for her “Bolsa Produtividade em Pesquisa” (Research Productivity Grant), 305719/2016-5, and his pos-doctorate Grant, 152774/2018-1. Dra. Maria Carolina de Albuquerque Wanderley to FACEPE (Foundation of Support to Science and Technology of Pernambuco) for her “Bolsa de Fixação de Pesquisador” (Researcher Grant) BFP Also, Túlio Freire da Silva to FACEPE for his master’s scholarship, IBPG-0475-5.05/17. This study was supported by Dra. Ana Porto FACEPE’s Projeto Institucional Pesquisador Visitante (Visitor Researcher Institutional Project) Grant, SIN-0156-5.01/17, and CNPq’s Universal MCTIC Grant (426192/2018-4).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Lúcia F. Porto.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Duarte Neto, J.M.W., Wanderley, M.C.d.A., da Silva, T.A.F. et al. Bacillus thuringiensis endotoxin production: a systematic review of the past 10 years. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 36, 128 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-020-02904-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-020-02904-4

Keywords

Navigation