Skip to main content
Log in

Organizational Capacity and Organizational Ambition in Nonprofit and Voluntary Sports Clubs

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research measures organizational capacity and organizational ambition in nonprofit and voluntary sports clubs. The organizational capacity dimensions of Hall et al.’s (The capacity to serve: A qualitative study of the challenges facing Canada’s nonprofit and voluntary organizations, 2003) multidimensional framework are completed with corresponding dimensions reflecting organizational ambition, and the human resources dimension is further detailed. Each dimension is adapted to be applicable in a sports clubs setting, resulting in the following organizational ambition and capacity dimensions: human resources (board, coaches, volunteers, youth coaches), accommodation, management, financing, and external orientation. Data obtained from a sample of 585 Flemish sports clubs were analyzed using exploratory factor analysis, revealing five types of sports clubs that are labeled ‘ambition,’ ‘coaches,’ ‘volunteers,’ ‘management,’ and ‘accommodation deficiency.’ The findings support the use of a multidimensional framework based on the dimensions organizational capacity and organizational ambition, and the usefulness of distinguishing among four types of volunteers.

Resume

Les présentes recherches mesurent la capacité et l’ambition organisationnelles dans les clubs de sport à but non lucratif et bénévoles. Les dimensions de la capacité organisationnelle du cadre multidimensionnel de Hall et al. (2003) sont complétées par des dimensions correspondantes qui reflètent l’ambition des organisations, et la dimension des ressources humaines est décrite plus en détail. Chaque dimension est adaptée pour être applicable dans le cadre d’un club sportif, entraînant les dimensions d’ambition et de capacité organisationnelles suivantes: ressources humaines (conseil d’administration, entraîneurs, bénévoles, entraîneurs des jeunes), hébergement, gestion, financement et orientation externe. Les données obtenues à partir d’un échantillon de 585 clubs sportifs flamands ont été analysées à l’aide d’une analyse factorielle exploratoire, révélant cinq types de clubs sportifs intitulés «ambition» , «entraîneurs» , «bénévoles» , «gestion» et «hébergement insuffisant». Les résultats soutiennent l’utilisation d’un cadre multidimensionnel basé sur la capacité organisationnelle des dimensions et l’ambition de l’organisation, ainsi que l’utilité de distinguer quatre types de bénévoles.

Zusammenfassung

Im Zuge dieser Forschungsarbeit werden die organisatorische Kapazität und die organisatorische Ambition in gemeinnützigen und ehrenamtlichen Sportvereinen gemessen. Die organisatorischen Kapazitätsdimensionen des multidimensionalen Rahmens gemäß Hall et al. (2003) werden durch entsprechende Dimensionen ergänzt, die die organisatorische Ambition reflektieren, und es wird im Einzelnen auf die Dimension der menschlichen Ressourcen eingegangen. Jede Dimension wird entsprechend angepasst, um auf Sportvereine Anwendung zu finden, was zu folgenden organisatorischen Ambitions- und Kapazitätsdimensionen führt: menschliche Ressourcen (Vorstand, Trainer, ehrenamtliche Mitarbeiter, Jugendtrainer), Räumlichkeiten, Management, Finanzierung und externe Orientierung. Mittels der exploratorischen Faktorenanalyse wurden die Daten aus einer Stichprobe von 585 flämischen Sportvereinen analysiert, wobei fünf Arten von Sportvereinen herausgestellt wurden, die wie folgt bezeichnet werden: „Ambition“, „Trainer“, „ehrenamtliche Mitarbeiter“, „Management“und „Mangel an Räumlichkeiten“. Die Ergebnisse unterstützen die Verwendung eines multidimensionalen Rahmens beruhend auf den Dimensionen organisatorische Kapazität und organisatorische Ambition und bekräftigen die Nützlichkeit, zwischen vier Arten von ehrenamtlichen Mitarbeitern zu unterscheiden.

Resumen

La presente investigación mide la capacidad y la ambición organizativas en los clubes deportivos voluntarios y sin ánimo de lucro. Las dimensiones de la capacidad organizativa del marco multidimensional de Hall et al. (2003) se completan con las dimensiones correspondientes que reflejan la ambición organizativa, y se detalla adicionalmente la dimensión de recursos humanos. Cada dimensión se adapta para que sea aplicable en un escenario de club deportivo, dando lugar a las siguientes dimensiones de capacidad y ambición organizativas: recursos humanos (consejo, entrenadores, voluntarios, entrenadores juveniles), alojamiento, gestión, financiación y orientación externa. Se analizaron los datos obtenidos de una muestra de 585 clubes deportivos de Flandes utilizando análisis exploratorio de factores, revelando cinco tipos de clubes deportivos que se etiquetan como “ambición”, “entrenadores”, “voluntarios”, “gestión” y “deficiencia de alojamiento”. Los hallazgos apoyan el uso de un marco multidimensional basado en la capacidad y ambición organizativas de las dimensiones, y la utilidad de distinguir entre cuatro tipos de voluntarios.

本文对非盈利和自发性体育社团的组织容量和组织理想进行了衡量。Hall等人(2003)的多维框架中的组织容量包括了组织理想所对应的维度,并进一步细化了人力资源的对应维度。 这些方面均可适用于了体育社团的设置,于是便引出了随后的组织理想和容量维度:人力资源(董事会、教练、志愿者、青训教练)、膳食住宿、管理、财务和外部导向。我们运用探索性因子分析对弗兰德585个体育社团的数据进行了分析,发现可将体育俱乐部分为“理想型”、“教练型”、“志愿者型”、“管理型”和“膳宿缺乏型”。其结果支持了在组织容量和组织理想的基础上多维度框架的使用,并肯定了对四种志愿者进行区别的益处。

يقيس هذا البحث القدرة التنظيمية والطموح التنظيمي في الأندية الرياضية الغير ربحية والتطوعية. أبعاد القدرة التنظيمية ل(Hall et al.’s) في (2003) يتم إكمال إطار متعدد الأبعاد مع أبعاد مقابلة يعكس الطموح التنظيمي، وبعد الموارد البشرية بمزيد من التفاصيل. ويتم تكييف كل بعد ليكون قابل للتطبيق في إعداد الأندية الرياضية، مما أدى إلى الطموح التنظيمي و أبعاد القدرة التالي: الموارد البشرية (المجلس ٬المدربين ٬المتطوعين ٬المدربين الشباب)، السكن، الإدارة، التمويل، والتوجيه الخارجي. تم تحليل البيانات التي تم الحصول عليها من عينة من 585 من النوادي الرياضية الفلمنكية بإستخدام تحليل عامل إستكشافي، كشف عن خمسة أنواع من النوادي الرياضية التي تحمل ‘اسم الطموح’،’ المدربين ‘،’ المتطوعين ‘،’ إدارة ‘، و ‘نقص السكن’. النتائج تدعم إستخدام إطار متعدد الأبعاد يقوم على أبعاد القدرة التنظيمية والطموح التنظيمي، ومدى فائدة التمييز بين أربعة أنواع من المتطوعين.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, A., & Deane, J. (2009). Exploring formal and informal dimensions of sports volunteering in England. European Sport Management Quarterly, 9(2), 119–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babiak, K. (2007). Determinants of interorganizational relationships: The case of a Canadian Nonprofit Sport Organization. Journal of Sport Management, 21(3), 338–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balduck, A., Van Rossem, A., & Buelens, M. (2010). Identifying competencies of volunteer board members of Community Sports Clubs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(2), 213–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birley, S., & Muzyka, D. (2000). Mastering Entrepreneurship: Your single source guide to becoming a master of entrepreneurship. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers, T. (2013). Using critical realism: A new perspective on control of volunteers in sport clubs. European Sport Management Quarterly, 13(1), 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, B., Harris, M., & Young, P. (2005). Building the capacity of the voluntary nonprofit sector: Challenges of theory and practice. International Journal of Public Administration, 28, 869–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaskin, R. (2001). Building community capacity: A definitional framework and case studies from a comprehensive community initiative. Urban Affairs Review, 36, 291–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuskelly, G. (2004). Volunteer retention in community sport organizations. European Sport Management Quarterly, 4, 59–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuskelly, G., Hoye, R., & Auld, C. (2006a). Working with volunteers in sport. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuskelly, G., Taylor, T., Hoye, R., & Darcy, S. (2006b). Volunteer management practices and volunteer retentions: A human resource management approach. Sport Management Review, 9, 141–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Knop, P., Van Hoecke, J., & De Bosscher, V. (2004). Quality management in sport clubs. Sport Management Review, 7, 57–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, P., & Kidd, B. (2003). Realizing the expectations: Youth, character, and community in Canadian sport. In Canadian Centre for Ethics in Sport (Ed.) (The sport we want: Essays on current issues in community sport in Canada ed., pp. 25–44). Ottawa, CA: Canadian Centre for Ethics in Sport.

  • Eisenhardt, K., & Martin, J. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisinger, P. (2002). Organizational capacity and organizational effectiveness among street-level food assistance programs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31, 115–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enjolras, B. (2002). The commercialization of voluntary sport organizations in Norway. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31(3), 352–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahlén, J. (2005). Organizational structures in sport clubs: Exploring the relationship between individual perceptions and organizational positions. The Sport Journal, 8(3), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrand, A., & McCarthy, S. (2008). Marketing the sports organisation: Building networks and relationships. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Glickman, N. J., & Servon, L. J. (1998). More than bricks and sticks: Five components of community development corporation capacity. Housing Policy Debate, 9, 497–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glickman, N. J., & Servon, L. J. (2003). By the numbers: Measuring community development corporations’ capacity. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22(3), 240–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gumulka, G., Barr, C., Lasby, D., & Brownlee, B. (2005). Understanding the capacity of sports and recreation organizations. www.sportmatters.ca/Images/Voluntary%20sector/2Understanding_Capacity_of_Sports_&_Rec%20Report.pdf. Accessed 27 June 2014.

  • Hair, J. F. J., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M. H., Andrukow, A., Barr, C., Brock, K., de Wit, M., Embuldeniya, D., et al. (2003). The capacity to serve: A qualitative study of the challenges facing Canada’s nonprofit and voluntary organizations. Toronto: Canadian Centre for Philanthropy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, D., Alexaki, A., Bennett-Lartey, S., Brice, K., Campilan, D., Carden, F., et al. (2003). Evaluating capacity development: Experiences from research and development organizations around the world. The Hague, NL: International Service for National Agricultural Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglis, S. (1994). Exploring volunteer board member and executive director nodds: Importance and fulfillment. Journal of Applied Recreation Research, 19, 171–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M., Chelladurai, P., & Trail, G. (2007). A model of volunteer retention in youth sport. Journal of Sport Management, 21, 151–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M., Zhang, J. J., & Connaughton, D. P. (2010). Comparison of Volunteer Motivations in Different Youth Sport Organizations. European Sport Management Quarterly, 10(3), 343–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLean, J., Cousens, L., & Barnes, M. (2011). Look who’s linked with whom: A case study of one community basketball network. Journal of Sport Management, 25(6), 562–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misener, K., & Doherty, A. (2009). A case study of organizational capacity in nonprofit community sport. Journal of Sport Management, 23(4), 457–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, P. (2006). Study on capacity, change and performance: The concept of capacity. http://www.ecdpm.org/dcc/capacitystudy.

  • Morris, M. H., Webb, J. W., & Franklin, R. J. (2011). Understanding the Manifestation of Entrepreneurial Orientation in the Nonprofit Context. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(5), 947–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, A., Breen, J., & Ali, S. (2003). Small business growth: intention, ability, and opportunity. Journal of Small Business Management, 41(4), 417–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, G., Taylor, P., James, M., Holmes, K., King, L., & Garrett, R. (2005). Pressures on the UK voluntary sport sector. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 16(1), 33–50.

  • Nye, N., & Glickman, N. J. (2000). Working together: Building capacity for community development. Housing Policy Debate, 11(1), 163–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. S., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rampersad, H. K. (2006). Personal balanced scorecard: The way to individual happiness, personal integrity, and organizational effectiveness. Tata McGraw-Hill: Information Age Pub Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, T., Egli, B., & Nagel, S. (2013). Continue or terminate? Determinants of long-term volunteering in sports clubs. European Sport Management Quarterly, 13(1), 32–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, T., & Nagel, S. (2013). Who will volunteer? Analysing individual and structural factors of volunteering in Swiss sports clubs. European Journal of Sport Science, 13(6), 707–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seippel, O. (2002). Volunteers and Professionals in Norwegian Sport Organizations. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 13(3), 253–270.

  • Sharpe, E. K. (2006). Resources at the grassroots of recreation: Organizational capacity and quality of experience in a community sport organization. Leisure Sciences, 28(4), 385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shilbury, D., & Moore, K. A. (2006). A study of organizational effectiveness for national Olympic sporting organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(1), 5–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slack, T., & Hinings, B. (1992). Understanding change in national sport organizations: An integration of theoretical perspectives. Journal of Sport Management, 6, 114–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steen-Johnsen, K. (2008). Networks and the organization of identity: The case of Norwegian snowboarding. European Sport Management Quarterly, 8(4), 337–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, T., Darcy, S., Hoye, R., & Cuskelly, G. (2006). Using psychological contract theory to explore issues in effective volunteer management. European Sport Management Quarterly, 6(2), 123–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiel, A., & Mayer, J. (2009). Characteristics of voluntary sports clubs management: A sociological perspective. European Sport Management Quarterly, 9(1), 81–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timar, T. (1994). Federal education policy and practice—building organizational capacity through chapter 1. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16(1), 51–66.

  • Vos, S., Breesch, D., & Scheerder, J. (2012). Undeclared work in non-profit sports clubs: A mixed method approach for assessing the size and motives. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23(4), 846–869.

  • Walker, C., & Weinheimer, M. (1998). Community development in the 1990s. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, S., Newland, B. L., & Green, B. C. (2011). More than motivation: Reconsidering volunteer management tools. Journal of Sport Management, 25(5), 391–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westhead, P. (1997). Ambitions, external environment and strategic factor differences between family and non-family companies. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 9(2), 127–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wicker, P. (Ed.). (2009). Price elasticity in sport clubs. Measurement and empirical findings. Saarbrücken: SVH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicker, P., & Breuer, C. (2010). Analysis of problems using data mining techniques—findings from sports clubs in Germany. European Journal for Sport and Society, 7(2), 131–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicker, P., & Breuer, C. (2011). Scarcity of resources in German non-profit sport clubs. Sport Management Review, 14, 188–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wicker, P., & Breuer, C. (2013). Understanding the Importance of Organizational Resources to Explain Organizational Problems: Evidence from Nonprofit Sport Clubs in Germany. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 24(2), 461–484.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. L. Balduck.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Balduck, A.L., Lucidarme, S., Marlier, M. et al. Organizational Capacity and Organizational Ambition in Nonprofit and Voluntary Sports Clubs. Voluntas 26, 2023–2043 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-014-9502-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-014-9502-x

Keywords

Navigation