Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Patients with perceived high-bleeding risk and computerized decision support for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: an AF-ALERT substudy

Piazza: outcomes of high-bleeding risk AF patients

  • Published:
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A perceived increased risk of bleeding is one of the most frequent reasons for withholding anticoagulation for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). We previously conducted a randomized controlled trial of alert-based computerized decision support to increase prescription of anticoagulation in hospitalized patients with AF. To determine the clinical characteristics and outcomes of those patients whose inpatient health care providers received a computer alert, we analyzed all 248 patients in the alert group. Patients for whom providers elected to omit anticoagulation and provided a rationale of a perceived high risk of bleeding were compared with those who were not designated as high-risk. Perceived high risk of bleeding was the most common reason (77%) for omitting anticoagulation. Median HAS-BLED scores were similar in these patients compared with those who were not deemed to have an increased bleeding risk (3 vs. 3, p = 0.44). Despite being categorized as too high-risk for bleeding to receive antithrombotic therapy at the time of the alert, nearly 12% of these patients were ultimately prescribed anticoagulation by 90 days. The frequency of major and clinically-relevant non-major bleeding was similar between the groups. The frequency of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or systemic embolic event was similar in both groups (10.2% vs. 12.4%, p = 0.59). In conclusion, a perceived high risk of bleeding was the most common reason for omission of anticoagulation in patients with AF after a computerized alert. Perceived high risk of bleeding was not reflected in a higher HAS-BLED score.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02339493 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02339493

Graphic Abstract

In a randomized controlled trial of computerized decision support to increase prescription of antithrombotic therapy in hospitalized patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), a perceived high risk of bleeding was the most common reason (77%) for omitting antithrombotic therapy after an on-screen alert. Median HAS-BLED scores were similar in these patients compared with those who were not deemed to have an increased bleeding risk (3 vs. 3, p = 0.44). Despite being categorized as too high-risk for bleeding to receive antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention at the time of the alert, nearly 12% of these patients were ultimately prescribed anticoagulation over the ensuing 90 days.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The authors agree to provide the study data upon request.

Code availability

The authors agree to provide the computerized decision support program language upon request.

Abbreviations

AF:

Atrial fibrillation

BPA:

Best practice advisory

BWH:

Brigham and Women’s Hospital

CDS:

Computerized decision support

DOAC:

Direct oral anticoagulant

EHR:

Electronic health record

ISTH:

International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis

LMWH:

Low-molecular weight heparin

MI:

Myocardial infarction

VTE:

Venous thromboembolism

References

  1. Bassand JP, Accetta G, Al Mahmeed W, Corbalan R, Eikelboom J, Fitzmaurice DA, Fox KAA, Gao H, Goldhaber SZ, Goto S, Haas S, Kayani G, Pieper K, Turpie AGG, van Eickels M, Verheugt FWA, Kakkar AK, Investigators G-A (2018) Risk factors for death, stroke, and bleeding in 28,628 patients from the GARFIELD-AF registry: Rationale for comprehensive management of atrial fibrillation. PLoS ONE 13(1):e0191592. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191592

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Bassand JP, Accetta G, Camm AJ, Cools F, Fitzmaurice DA, Fox KA, Goldhaber SZ, Goto S, Haas S, Hacke W, Kayani G, Mantovani LG, Misselwitz F, Ten Cate H, Turpie AG, Verheugt FW, Kakkar AK, Investigators G-A (2016) Two-year outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation: results from GARFIELD-AF. Eur Heart J 37(38):2882–2889. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw233

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Hess PL, Kim S, Fonarow GC, Thomas L, Singer DE, Freeman JV, Gersh BJ, Ansell J, Kowey PR, Mahaffey KW, Chan PS, Steinberg BA, Peterson ED, Piccini JP, Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation P, Investigators (2017) Absence of oral anticoagulation and subsequent outcomes among outpatients with atrial fibrillation. Am J Med 130(4):449–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.11.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Piazza G, Karipineni N, Goldberg H, Jenkins KL, Goldhaber SZ (2016) Underutilization of anticoagulation for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 67:2444–2446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Steinberg BA, Gao H, Shrader P, Pieper K, Thomas L, Camm AJ, Ezekowitz MD, Fonarow GC, Gersh BJ, Goldhaber S, Haas S, Hacke W, Kowey PR, Ansell J, Mahaffey KW, Naccarelli G, Reiffel JA, Turpie A, Verheugt F, Piccini JP, Kakkar A, Peterson ED, Fox KAA, Garfield AF, Investigators O-A (2017) International trends in clinical characteristics and oral anticoagulation treatment for patients with atrial fibrillation: results from the GARFIELD-AF, ORBIT-AF I, and ORBIT-AF II registries. Am Heart J 194:132–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2017.08.011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Piazza G, Hurwitz S, Harrigan LM, Jenkins KL, Hohlfelder B, Fanikos J, Goldhaber SZ (2018) Anticoagulation and mortality rates among hospitalized patients with atrial fibrillation. TH Open 2(1):e33–e38. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1626732

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Piazza G, Hurwitz S, Galvin CE, Harrigan L, Baklla S, Hohlfelder B, Carroll B, Landman AB, Emani S, Goldhaber SZ (2020) Alert-based computerized decision support for high-risk hospitalized patients with atrial fibrillation not prescribed anticoagulation: a randomized, controlled trial (AF-ALERT). Eur Heart J 41(10):1086–1096. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Camm AJ, Lip GY, De Caterina R, Savelieva I, Atar D, Hohnloser SH, Hindricks G, Kirchhof P, Bax JJ, Baumgartner H, Ceconi C, Dean V, Deaton C, Fagard R, Funck-Brentano C, Hasdai D, Hoes A, Kirchhof P, Knuuti J, Kolh P, McDonagh T, Moulin C, Popescu BA, Reiner Z, Sechtem U, Sirnes PA, Tendera M, Torbicki A, Vahanian A, Windecker S, Vardas P, Al-Attar N, Alfieri O, Angelini A, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Colonna P, De Sutter J, Ernst S, Goette A, Gorenek B, Hatala R, Heidbuchel H, Heldal M, Kristensen SD, Kolh P, Le Heuzey JY, Mavrakis H, Mont L, Filardi PP, Ponikowski P, Prendergast B, Rutten FH, Schotten U, Van Gelder IC, Verheugt FW (2012) 2012 focused update of the ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: an update of the 2010 ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association. Eur Heart J 33(21):2719–2747

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, Ahlsson A, Atar D, Casadei B, Castella M, Diener HC, Heidbuchel H, Hendriks J, Hindricks G, Manolis AS, Oldgren J, Popescu BA, Schotten U, Van Putte B, Vardas P, Authors/Task Force M, Document R (2016) 2016 ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS: the task force for the management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESCEndorsed by the European Stroke Organisation (ESO). Eur Heart J. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw210

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ruff CT, Ansell JE, Becker RC, Benjamin EJ, Deicicchi DJ, Mark Estes NA, Ezekowitz MD, Fanikos J, Fareed J, Garcia D, Giugliano RP, Goldhaber SZ, Granger C, Healey JS, Hull R, Hylek EM, Libby P, Lopes RD, Mahaffey KW, Mega J, Piazza G, Sasahara AA, Sorond FA, Spyropoulos AC, Walenga JM, Weitz JI (2016) North American thrombosis forum, AF action initiative consensus document. Am J Med 129(5 Suppl):S1–S29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.02.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Simoons ML, Chaitman BR, White HD, Joint ESCAAHAWHFTFftUDoMI, Katus HA, Lindahl B, Morrow DA, Clemmensen PM, Johanson P, Hod H, Underwood R, Bax JJ, Bonow RO, Pinto F, Gibbons RJ, Fox KA, Atar D, Newby LK, Galvani M, Hamm CW, Uretsky BF, Steg PG, Wijns W, Bassand JP, Menasche P, Ravkilde J, Ohman EM, Antman EM, Wallentin LC, Armstrong PW, Simoons ML, Januzzi JL, Nieminen MS, Gheorghiade M, Filippatos G, Luepker RV, Fortmann SP, Rosamond WD, Levy D, Wood D, Smith SC, Hu D, Lopez-Sendon JL, Robertson RM, Weaver D, Tendera M, Bove AA, Parkhomenko AN, Vasilieva EJ, Mendis S (2012) Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation 126(16):2020–2035. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e31826e1058

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schulman S, Kearon C (2005) Definition of major bleeding in clinical investigations of antihemostatic medicinal products in non-surgical patients. J Thromb Haemost 3(4):692–694

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. O’Brien EC, Holmes DN, Ansell JE, Allen LA, Hylek E, Kowey PR, Gersh BJ, Fonarow GC, Koller CR, Ezekowitz MD, Mahaffey KW, Chang P, Peterson ED, Piccini JP, Singer DE (2014) Physician practices regarding contraindications to oral anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation: findings from the outcomes registry for better informed treatment of atrial fibrillation (ORBIT-AF) registry. Am Heart J 167(4):601–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2013.12.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Redfors B, Gray WA, Lee RJ, Ellenbogen KA, Bonafede M, Ben-Yehuda O (2017) Patients with atrial fibrillation who are not on anticoagulant treatment due to increased bleeding risk are common and have a high risk of stroke. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 3(12):1369–1376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2017.04.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tchen S, Ryba N, Patel V, Cavanaugh J, Sullivan JB (2020) Validation of bleeding risk prediction scores for patients with major bleeding on direct oral anticoagulants. Ann Pharmacother. https://doi.org/10.1177/1060028020933186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tzeis S, Savvari P, Skiadas I, Patsilinakos S, Stamatelopoulos K, Kourouklis S, Kyrikos S, Tsatiris K, Menegas D, Hahalis G, Giannakoulas G, Group P-As (2020) Right drug, wrong dosage: insights from the PAVE-AF antithrombotic study in older patients with atrial fibrillation. J Thromb Thrombolysis. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-020-02167-8

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Steinberg BA, Greiner MA, Hammill BG, Curtis LH, Benjamin EJ, Heckbert SR, Piccini JP (2015) Contraindications to anticoagulation therapy and eligibility for novel anticoagulants in older patients with atrial fibrillation. Cardiovasc Ther 33(4):177–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-5922.12129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yung D, Kapral MK, Asllani E, Fang J, Lee DS, Investigators of the Registry of the Canadian Stroke N (2012) Reinitiation of anticoagulation after warfarin-associated intracranial hemorrhage and mortality risk: the best practice for reinitiating anticoagulation therapy after intracranial bleeding (BRAIN) study. Can J Cardiol 28(1):33–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2011.10.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Berg DD, Ruff CT, Jarolim P, Giugliano RP, Nordio F, Lanz HJ, Mercuri MF, Antman EM, Braunwald E, Morrow DA (2019) Performance of the ABC scores for assessing the risk of stroke or systemic embolism and bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation in ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48. Circulation 139(6):760–771. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038312

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ruff CT, Giugliano RP, Braunwald E, Hoffman EB, Deenadayalu N, Ezekowitz MD, Camm AJ, Weitz JI, Lewis BS, Parkhomenko A, Yamashita T, Antman EM (2013) Comparison of the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62343-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tsai CT, Liao JN, Chiang CE, Lin YJ, Chang SL, Lo LW, Hu YF, Tuan TC, Chung FP, Chao TF, Lip GYH, Chen SA (2020) Association of ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and other adverse events with warfarin use vs non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant use in patients with atrial fibrillation with a history of intracranial hemorrhage. JAMA Netw Open 3(6):e206424. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.6424

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Escobar C, Borras X, Bover Freire R, Gonzalez-Juanatey C, Morillas M, Munoz AV, Gomez-Doblas JJ (2020) A Delphi consensus on the management of oral anticoagulation in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in Spain: ACOPREFERENCE study. PLoS ONE 15(6):e0231565. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231565

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Vinereanu D, Lopes RD, Bahit MC, Xavier D, Jiang J, Al-Khalidi HR, He W, Xian Y, Ciobanu AO, Kamath DY, Fox KA, Rao MP, Pokorney SD, Berwanger O, Tajer C, de Barros ESPGM, Roettig ML, Huo Y, Granger CB, investigators I-A (2017) A multifaceted intervention to improve treatment with oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation (IMPACT-AF): an international, cluster-randomised trial. Lancet 390(10104):1737–1746. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32165-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported, in part, by an unrestricted research grant from Daiichi Sankyo.

Funding

This investigator-initiated study was funded, in part, by an unrestricted research Grant from Daiichi Sankyo.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors have conceived/designed the study and/or analyzed/interpreted the data, drafted or revised the manuscript for intellectual content, and approved the final submitted manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregory Piazza.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Piazza has received research support from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Bayer, Janssen, Portola, and BTG and consulting fees from Pfizer, Bayer, Janssen, Agile, Amgen and Portola. Dr. Goldhaber has received research support from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, EKOS, a BTG International Company, Johnson & Johnson, and Janssen and consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, and Agile. Drs. Hurwitz and Carroll have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Partners HealthCare System.

Informed consent

The Institutional Review Board waived the requirement of informed consent.

Consent for publication

All authors have approved submission of this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Piazza, G., Hurwitz, S., Carroll, B. et al. Patients with perceived high-bleeding risk and computerized decision support for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: an AF-ALERT substudy. J Thromb Thrombolysis 52, 281–290 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-020-02296-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-020-02296-0

Keywords

Navigation