Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of Poisson’s Ratio on the Calibration Coefficients of Hole-Drilling Strain-Gauge Method for Measuring Residual Stresses

  • Published:
Strength of Materials Aims and scope

The hole-drilling strain-gauge method is a common residual stress evaluation approach, where the calibration coefficients are one of the main factors affecting their measurement accuracy. However, those coefficients are the constant value for ASTM E837-13a, Standard Test Method for Determining Residual Stresses by the Hole-Drilling Strain-Gauge Method, which does not allow for the Poisson’s ratio effect. The finite element method to calculate the calibration coefficients was first proposed, then the Poisson’s ratio effect on them was studied. The results show that the calibration coefficients \( {\overline{a}}_{jk} \) increase and \( {\overline{b}}_{jk} \) decrease with Poisson’s ratio exhibiting a good linear relationship. The Poisson’s ratio correction factor was introduced to calculate calibration coefficients for any Poisson’s ratio, those values (v0) offer an improvement in the versatility of a given calibration coefficient. The problem of the Poisson’s ratio effect on the calibration coefficients was solved, and their accuracy was improved due to the use of the hole-drilling strain-gauge method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. Totten, M. Howes, and T. Inoue, Handbook of Residual Stress and Deformation of Steel, ASM International, Materials Park, OH (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Shokrieh, Residual Stresses in Composite Materials, Woodhead Publishing Ltd., Cambridge (2014).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Lee, G. Park, C. Park, and H. Kim, “Enhanced ferroelectric properties of Pb(Zr,Ti)O3 films by inducing permanent compressive stress,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 88, No. 7, 072908 (2006).

  4. Z. Wu, J. Zhou, W. Chen, et al. “Effects of residual stress on the electrical properties in PbZr0.52Ti0.48O3 thin films,” J. Sol-Gel Sci. Techn., 75, No. 3, 551–556 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. G. S. Schajer, Practical Residual Stress Measurement Methods, John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex (2013).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. G. S. Schajer, “Hole-drilling residual stress measurements at 75: Origins, advances, opportunities,” Exp. Mech., 50, No. 2, 245–253 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. G. S. Schajer, “Measurement of non-uniform residual stresses using the hole-drilling method. Part I – Stress calculation procedures,” J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 110, 338–343 (1988).

  8. G. S. Schajer, “Measurement of non-uniform residual stresses using the hole-drilling method. Part II – Practical application of the integral method,” J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 110, 344–349 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. ASTM E837-13a, Standard Test Method for Determining Residual Stresses by the Hole-Drilling Strain-Gage Method, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2013

  10. GB/T 31310-2014, Metallic Material – Determination of Residual Stress – Hole Drilling Strain-Gauge Method, Standards Press of China, Beijing (2014).

  11. M. Sebastiani, T. Sui, and A. M. Korsunsky, “Residual stress evaluation at the micro- and nano-scale: Recent advancements of measurement techniques, validation through modelling, and future challenges,” Mater. Design, 118, 204–206 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. A. J. G. Lunt and A. M. Korsunsky, “A review of micro-scale focused ion beam milling and digital image correlation analysis for residual stress evaluation and error estimation,” Surf. Coat. Tech., 283, 373–388 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. J. Everaerts, X. Song, B. Nagarajan, and A. M. Korsunsky, “Evaluation of macro- and microscopic residual stresses in laser shock-peened titanium alloy by FIB-DIC ring-core milling with different core diameters,” Surf. Coat. Tech., 349, 719–724 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. J. Everaerts, E. Salvati, F. Uzun, et al., “Separating macro- (type I) and micro- (type II+III) residual stresses by ring-core FIB-DIC milling and eigenstrain modelling of a plastically bent titanium alloy bar,” Acta Mater., 156, 43–51 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. T. Rickert, “Residual stress measurement by ESPI hole-drilling,” Proc. CIRP, 45, 203–206 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. F. Archie, M. Z. Mughal, M. Sebastiani, et al., “Anisotropic distribution of the micro residual stresses in lath martensite revealed by FIB ring-core milling technique,” Acta. Mater., 150, 327–338 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. V. Pisarev, I. Odintsev, S. Eleonsky, and A. Apalkov, “Residual stress determination by optical interferometric measurements of hole diameter increments,” Opt. Laser. Eng., 110, 437–456 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. C. Lu, Residual Stress Measurement Hole-Drilling Method [in Chinese], Xi ‘an Jiaotong University Press, Xi’an (1991).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Pan.

Additional information

Translated from Problemy Prochnosti, No. 4, pp. 44 – 50, July – August, 2021.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pan, L., Ge, H. & Wang, B. Effects of Poisson’s Ratio on the Calibration Coefficients of Hole-Drilling Strain-Gauge Method for Measuring Residual Stresses. Strength Mater 53, 566–572 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-021-00318-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-021-00318-7

Keywords

Navigation