This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Barreto, L. P., Rodrigues, A. A. D., de Oliveira, G. C. B., de Almeida, L. T. G., Felix, M. A. C., Silva, P. S., Quadros, A. L., Macedo, A. M., & Mortimer, E. F. (2021). The use of different translation devices to analyze knowledge-building in a university chemistry classroom. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09969-z.
Bazerman, C. (2004). Intertextualities: Volosinov, Bakhtin, literary theory, and literacy studies. In A. F. Ball & S. Warshauer Freedman (Eds.), Bakhtinian perspectives on language, literacy, and learning (pp. 53–65). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Bloome, D., Carter, S., Christian, B., Otto, S., & Shuart-Faris, N. (2005). Discourse analysis and the study of classroom language and literacy events: A microethnographic approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bloome, D., Beierle, M., Grigorenko, M., & Goldman, S. (2009). Learning over time: Uses of intercontextuality, collective memories, and classroom chronotopes in the construction of learning opportunities in a ninth-grade language arts classroom. Language and Education, 23, 313–334.
Castanheira, M. L., Crawford, T., Dixon, C. N., & Green, J. L. (2001). Interactional ethnography: An approach to studying the social construction of literate practices. Linguistics and Education, 11(4), 353–400.
Colley, C., & Windschitl, M. (2021). A tool for visualizing and inquiring into whole-class sensemaking discussions. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09962-6.
Convertini, J. (2021). An interdisciplinary approach to investigate preschool children’s implicit inferential reasoning in scientific activities. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09957-3.
Criswell, B. A., Rushton, G. T., & Shah, L. (2021). Exploring the form and the function: A review of science discourse frameworks in the service of research and practice. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09959-1.
Franco, L. G., & Munford, D. (2021). The hourglass approach: Analysing science classroom discursive interactions through an intercontextual lens. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09976-0.
Gee, J. P. (2014). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York: Routledge.
Green, J. L. & Harker J. O. (1988) (Eds.). Multiple perspective analyses of classroom discourse, Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Green, J. L. & Wallat, C. (1981) (Eds.). Ethnography and language in educational settings: Vol. 5. Advances in discourses processes. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.
Kelly, G. J. (2014). Discourse practices in science learning and teaching. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education, volume 2 (pp. 321–336). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kelly, G. J., & Green, J. (1998). The social nature of knowing: Toward a sociocultural perspective on conceptual change and knowledge construction. In B. Guzzetti & C. Hynd (Eds.), Perspectives on conceptual change: Multiple ways to understand knowing and learning in a complex world (pp. 145–181). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kelly, G. J., & Green, J. (Eds.). (2019). Theory and methods for sociocultural research in science and engineering education. New York, NY: Routledge.
Knain, K., Fredlund, T., & Furberg, A. (2021). Exploring student reasoning and representation construction in school science through the lenses of social semiotics and interaction analysis. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09975-1.
Maeng, S. (2021). Explicating epistemic process in elementary students’ language use by practical epistemology and discourse register analyses. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09974-2.
Martin, J., Xu, L., & Seah, L. H. (2021). Discourse analysis and multimodal meaning making in a science Classroom: Meta-Methodological Insights from Three Theoretical Perspectives. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09961-7.
Rigotti, E., & Greco, S. (2019). Inference in argumentation: A topical approach to argument schemes. New York: Springer.
Sandoval, W. A., Kawasaki, J., & Clark, H. F. (2021). Characterizing science classroom discourse across scales. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09953-7.
Strike, K. A. (1974). On the expressive potential of behaviorist language. American Educational Research Journal, 11, 103–120.
Wickman, P.-O., & Östman, L. (2002). Learning as discourse change: A sociocultural mechanism. Science Education, 86, 601–623.
Wieselmann, J. R., Keratithamkul, K., Dare, E. A., Ring-Whalen, E. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2021). Discourse analysis in integrated STEM activities: Methods for examining power and positioning in small group interactions. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09950-w.
Wilmes, S., & Siry, C. (2021). Multimodal interaction analysis: A powerful tool for examining plurilingual students’ engagement in science practices. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09977-z.
Wortham, S., & Reyes, A. (2015). Discourse analysis beyond the speech event. New York: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kelly, G.J. Theory, Methods, and Expressive Potential of Discourse Studies in Science Education. Res Sci Educ 51, 225–233 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09984-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09984-0