Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Elasticity measurement on multiple levels of DEA frontiers: an application to agriculture

  • Published:
Journal of Productivity Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, the elasticity of response measures revealing the marginal characteristics of efficient frontiers have been developed and generalized for different types of DEA production technologies. In theory, the elasticity measures can be calculated for the units on the efficient frontier that satisfy a selective radial efficiency assumption. This corresponds to a subset of the evaluated units. In this research, we propose to extend the elasticity measurement to the entire production possibility set (technology) by stratifying the units to different levels of efficient frontiers. The stratification idea is inspired by the commonly known context-dependent DEA based on the exclusion of efficient units at each iteration and obtaining multiple levels of frontiers. We build the proposed methodology on the idea that a DEA technology theoretically consists of several frontiers and calculating elasticity measures on all frontiers may provide additional information on the returns-to-scale (RTS) characteristics of all the units whether they are on the first-level frontier or not. The proposed methodology is presented in an empirical application using the Farm Accountancy Data Network (FADN) data of the agricultural farms operating in the Aegean Region of Turkey. The results reveal that the proposed method enables us to obtain a wider perspective on the RTS characterizations of DEA production technologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Note that this is analogical to excluding the efficient units and therefore it is basically defining \(N^{l + 1} = N^l - E^l\).

  2. Note that this is analogical to excluding the efficient units and the segregated set is identical with \(N^{l + 1} = N^l - E^l\).

References

  • Atici KB, Podinovski VV (2012a) Mixed partial elasticities in constant returns-to-scale production technologies. Eur J Oper Res 220(1):262–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atici KB, Podinovski VV (2012b). A review of data envelopment analysis studies in agriculture. http://fadntool.sggw.pl/Reviews/Downld?file=WP5_LR.pdf

  • Banker RD, Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Thrall RM, Zhu J (2004) Returns to scale in different DEA models. Eur J Oper Res 154:345–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker RD, Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Zhu J (2011) Returns to scale in DEA, In: Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Zhu J, (eds). Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis. 2nd edition. Springer Science + Business Media, New York, 41–70

  • Chambers RG, Färe R (2008) A “calculus” for data envelopment analysis. J Prod Anal 30(3):169–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2020) Agriculture and Rural Development Farm Accountancy Data Network. https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/rica/concept_en.cfm

  • Eurostat Glossary (2020) Annual Work Unit (AWU) https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Glossary:Annual_work_unit_(AWU)

  • Førsund FR, Hjalmarsson L (2004) Calculating scale elasticity in DEA models. J Oper Res Soc 55(10):1023–1038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadjicostas P, Soteriou AC (2006) One-sided elasticities and technical efficiency in multi-output production: a theoretical framework. Eur J Oper Res 168(2):425–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podinovski VV (2009) Production technologies based on combined proportionality assumptions. J Prod Anal 32(1):21–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podinovski VV, Førsund FR (2010) Differential characteristics of efficient frontiers in data envelopment analysis. Oper Res 58(6):1743–1754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podinovski VV, Chambers RG, Atici KB, Deineko ID (2016) Marginal values and returns to scale for nonparametric production frontiers. Oper Res 64(1):236–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiford LM, Zhu J (2003) Context-dependent data envelopment analysis: measuring attractiveness and progress. Omega 31(5):397–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu J (2004) Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking—data envelopment analysis with spreadsheets and DEA Excel Solver. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kazim Baris Atici.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sarac, S.B., Atici, K.B. & Ulucan, A. Elasticity measurement on multiple levels of DEA frontiers: an application to agriculture. J Prod Anal 57, 313–324 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-022-00634-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-022-00634-3

Keywords

Navigation