Skip to main content
Log in

SCA-GANomaly: an unsupervised anomaly detection model of high-speed railway catenary components

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the rapid development of high-speed railways, the safety inspection requirements for supporting devices of high-speed railway catenary components have become increasingly stringent. Currently, defect detection tasks for catenary equipment heavily rely on manual judgment, which is labor-intensive, inefficient, and prone to missing defects. Furthermore, high-speed railway catenary components present a myriad of challenges, including varying sizes, multiple defect types, and a limited number of defects. This complexity makes it difficult to address these issues using a single approach, and Few-Shot defect detection tasks are particularly challenging to achieve using deep learning methods. In this article, we propose a novel SCA-GANomaly model based on the GANomaly network, specifically designed to overcome the challenges of few-shot defect detection by utilizing only normal high-speed railway catenary images for training. The model incorporates selective skip connections and hybrid attention mechanisms, and the loss function is optimized using Earth Mover(EM) Distance, effectively improving image reconstruction and enhancing training stability for high-speed railway catenary images. We conduct comprehensive experiments and evaluations on three types of components: Insulators, Oblique Bracing Wires(OBW), and Puller bolts. The results demonstrate the excellent generalization capabilities of our proposed model, significantly outperforming the GANomaly model in terms of defect detection performance. Specifically, the AUC values for Insulator defect detection increased by 0.15, OBW defect detection by 0.10, and Puller bolts defect detection by 0.12.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The dataset used in this study contains sensitive information and therefore its data are subject to strict confidentiality. To maintain the confidentiality and security of the data, we are unable to share access to this dataset publicly.

References

  1. Han Y, Liu Z, Han Z, Yang HM (2014) Fracture detection of ear pieces of catenary support devices of high-speed railway based on SIFT feature matching. J China Railway Soc 36(2):31–36

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang G, Liu Z, Han Y, Han Z (2017) Loss fault detection for auxiliary catenary wire of high-speed railway catenary wire holder. J China Railway Soc 39(5):40–46

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yang H (2017) Detection of catenary insulator cracks and positioning supports based on image processing (Master's thesis, Southwest Jiaotong University). https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=La2KlAOQ31R0Uxrc-d2RShCIJlYb-0EzHq6pjtNtxNSJsEDaayU0zONwYGur9Bl_TgZ98_jTknT66jjh_-P1VwIjHvGVuOjHVmU9ejg5BEDYN2zf7CbrmpkrvfSxn9ALCdiUtXi4PZ4=&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS. Accessed 28 Aug 2023

  4. Tan, P, Li, XF, Xu, JM, Ma, JE, Wang, FJ, Ding, J, ... Ning, Y (2020) Catenary insulator defect detection based on contour features and gray similarity matching. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A, 21(1), 64–73 https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A1900341

  5. Chen J, Liu Z, Wang H, Nunez A, Han Z (2018) Automatic Defect Detection of Fasteners on the Catenary Support Device Using Deep Convolutional Neural Network. IEEE Trans Instrument Measurement 67(2):257–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhong J, Liu Z, Han Z, Han Y, Zhang W (2018) A CNN-based defect inspection method for catenary split pins in high-speed railway. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 68(8):2849–2860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cui J, Wu Y, Qin Y, Hou R (2020) Defect detection for catenary sling based on image processing and deep learning method. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Electrical and Information Technologies for Rail Transportation (EITRT) 2019: Rail Transportation Information Processing and Operational Management Technologies. Springer, Singapore, pp 675–683. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2914-6_64

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Han Y, Liu Z, Lyu Y, Liu K, Li C, Zhang W (2020) Deep learning-based visual ensemble method for high-speed railway catenary clevis fracture detection. Neurocomputing 396:556–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu W, Anguelov D, Erhan D, Szegedy C, Reed S, Fu CY, Berg AC (2016) SSD: Single shot multibox detector. In: Computer Vision–ECCV 2016: 14th European Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 11–14, 2016, Proceedings, Part I 14. Springer International Publishing, pp 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46448-0_2

  10. Redmon J, Farhadi A (2018) Yolov3: An incremental improvement. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.02767. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1804.02767

  11. Bochkovskiy A, Wang CY, Liao HYM (2020) Yolov4: Optimal speed and accuracy of object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.10934. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2004.10934

  12. Ge Z, Liu S, Wang F, Li Z, Sun J (2021) Yolox: Exceeding yolo series in 2021. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.08430. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2107.08430

  13. Li C, Li L, Jiang H, Weng K, Geng Y, Li L, ..., Wei X (2022) YOLOv6: A single-stage object detection framework for industrial applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.02976. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2209.02976

  14. Wang CY, Bochkovskiy A, Liao HYM (2023) YOLOv7: Trainable bag-of-freebies sets new state-of-the-art for real-time object detectors. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp 7464–7475. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR52729.2023.00721

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Girshick R (2015) Fast r-cnn. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pp 1440–1448. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2015.169

  16. Ren S, He K, Girshick R, Sun J (2017) Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 39(06):1137–1149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Breunig MM, Kriegel HP, Ng RT, Sander J (2000) LOF: identifying density-based local outliers. In: Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data 29(2):93–104. https://doi.org/10.1145/335191.335388

  18. Liu FT, Ting KM, Zhou ZH (2008) Isolation forest. In: 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. IEEE, pp 413–422. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDM.2008.17

  19. Maćkiewicz A, Ratajczak W (1993) Principal components analysis (PCA). Comput Geosci 19(3):303–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pinaya WHL, Vieira S, Garcia-Dias R, Mechelli A (2020) Autoencoders. In: Machine learning. Academic Press, pp 193–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815739-8.00011-0

  21. Hinton G, Vinyals O, Dean J (2015) Distilling the knowledge in a neural network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.02531. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1503.02531

  22. Xing P, Li Z (2022) Asymmetric distillation post-segmentation method for image anomaly detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.10495. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2210.10495

  23. Reynolds, DA (2009) Gaussian mixture models. Encyclopedia of biometrics, 741(659–663) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73003-5_196

  24. Kingma DP, Welling M (2013) Auto-encoding variational bayes. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6114. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1312.6114

  25. Goodfellow, I, Pouget-Abadie, J, Mirza, M, Xu, B, Warde-Farley, D, Ozair, S, ... , Bengio, Y (2014) Generative adversarial nets. Advances in neural information processing systems, 27

  26. Schlegl, T, Seeböck, P, Waldstein, SM, Schmidt-Erfurth, U, Langs, G (2017) Unsupervised anomaly detection with generative adversarial networks to guide marker discovery. In International conference on information processing in medical imaging (pp. 146–157). Cham: Springer International Publishing https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59050-9_12

  27. Zenati H, Foo CS, Lecouat B, Manek G, Chandrasekhar VR (2018) Efficient gan-based anomaly detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.06222. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1802.06222

  28. Akcay S, Atapour-Abarghouei A, Breckon TP (2019) Ganomaly: Semi-supervised anomaly detection via adversarial training. In: Computer Vision–ACCV 2018: 14th Asian Conference on Computer Vision, Perth, Australia, December 2–6, 2018, Revised Selected Papers, Part III 14. Springer International Publishing, pp 622–637. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20893-6_39

  29. Chen Q (2021) Research on detection and defect identification algorithms of high-speed railway catenary components (Master's thesis, Zhejiang University). https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=La2KlAOQ31Q3C8T0dXTsYVSg89kqlLQ-WW76jRZ_4WndE0LCrfHReH3c2BjQ4Da_d3eCzOVv2idPLdDuB4qdY_PMHWycuLa-o6bXEK-Ra2lbESpWj52TPDmZk_OjhsjA9_f_63xGu0U=&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS. Accessed 26 Aug 2023

  30. Akçay S, Atapour-Abarghouei A, Breckon TP (2019) Skip-ganomaly: Skip connected and adversarially trained encoder-decoder anomaly detection. In: 2019 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). IEEE, pp 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2019.8851808

  31. Zhang B (2022) Research on status detection algorithm of key components of high-speed railway catenary based on deep learning (Master's thesis, Shijiazhuang Railway University). https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=La2KlAOQ31QR0QZZx4P0f-BWTVJ3_VzpjZmzCOJhaTc7PlMMG1XahqFB6c8Cx3f2cT-AkLrY2jT6SBrZwuQ2GPlTfzUqNHk6hLSPPdEz15t0-XNZvHa5uQycrgEUMWpNtIAFtAL5vHQ=&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS. Accessed 26 Aug 2023

  32. Wang, Q, Zhou, X, Wang, C, Liu, Z, Huang, J, Zhou, Y, ... Cheng, JZ (2019) WGAN-based synthetic minority over-sampling technique: Improving semantic fine-grained classification for lung nodules in CT images. IEEE Access, 7, 18450–18463 https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2896409

  33. Hu J, Shen L, Albanie S, Sun G, Wu E (2020) Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 42(8):2011–2023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Woo, S, Park, J, Lee, JY, Kweon, IS (2018) Cbam: Convolutional block attention module. In Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV) (pp. 3–19) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01234-2_1

  35. Tang H, Yuan C, Li Z, Tang J (2022) Learning attention-guided pyramidal features for few-shot fine-grained recognition. Pattern Recogn 130:108792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Liu Y, Shao Z, Hoffmann N (2021) Global attention mechanism: retain information to enhance channel-spatial interactions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.05561. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2112.05561

  37. Vaswani, A, Shazeer, N, Parmar, N, Uszkoreit, J, Jones, L, Gomez, AN, ... Polosukhin, I (2017) Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30

  38. Roth K, Pemula L, Zepeda J, Schölkopf B, Brox T, Gehler P (2022) Towards total recall in industrial anomaly detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp 14318–14328. https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01392

  39. Rudolph M, Wehrbein T, Rosenhahn B, Wandt B (2022) Fully convolutional cross-scale-flows for image-based defect detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, pp 1088–1097. https://doi.org/10.1109/WACV51458.2022.00189

  40. Zavrtanik V, Kristan M, Skočaj D (2021) Draem-a discriminatively trained reconstruction embedding for surface anomaly detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp 8330–8339. https://doi.org/10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00822

  41. Defard, T, Setkov, A, Loesch, A, Audigier, R (2021) Padim: a patch distribution modeling framework for anomaly detection and localization. In International Conference on Pattern Recognition (pp. 475–489). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68799-1_35

  42. Deng H, Li X (2022) Anomaly detection via reverse distillation from one-class embedding. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp 9737–9746. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.00951

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the 2022 Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation Project (2022JJ60075): Research on Transient Protection Technology and Application of Rail Transit Based on Dynamic Load Characteristics.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qijie Zou.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, S., Zou, Q. & Gao, B. SCA-GANomaly: an unsupervised anomaly detection model of high-speed railway catenary components. Multimed Tools Appl (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-024-19011-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-024-19011-3

Keywords

Navigation