Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Post-Disaster Reproductive Health Outcomes

  • Methodological Notes
  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined methodological issues in studies of disaster-related effects on reproductive health outcomes and fertility among women of reproductive age and infants in the United States (US). We conducted a systematic literature review of 1,635 articles and reports published in peer-reviewed journals or by the government from January 1981 through December 2010. We classified the studies using three exposure types: (1) physical exposure to toxicants; (2) psychological trauma; and (3) general exposure to disaster. Fifteen articles met our inclusion criteria concerning research focus and design. Overall studies pertained to eight different disasters, with most (n = 6) focused on the World Trade Center attack. Only one study examined pregnancy loss, i.e., occurrence of spontaneous abortions post-disaster. Most studies focused on associations between disaster and adverse birth outcomes, but two studies pertained only to post-disaster fertility while another two examined it in addition to adverse birth outcomes. In most studies disaster-affected populations were assumed to have experienced psychological trauma, but exposure to trauma was measured in only four studies. Furthermore, effects of both physical exposure to toxicants and psychological trauma on disaster-affected populations were examined in only one study. Effects on birth outcomes were not consistently demonstrated, and study methodologies varied widely. Even so, these studies suggest an association between disasters and reproductive health and highlight the need for further studies to clarify associations. We postulate that post-disaster surveillance among pregnant women could improve our understanding of effects of disaster on the reproductive health of US pregnant women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Cruz, M, (Ed.) (2008). Natural/environmental disasters. CDC Public Health Readiness Certificate Program; 2008 9/22–25; Atlanta, GA: CDC.

  2. FEMA. (2011). FEMA declared disasters by year or state. [Cited 2011 March 4]; Available from: http://www.fema.gov/news/disaster_totals_annual.fema.

  3. Ross, T., & Lott, N. (2003). A climatology of 1980–2003 extreme weather and climate events, Technical Report No. 2003-01. Ashville, NC: National Climatic Data Center.

  4. Peacock, W. G., Kunreuther, H., Hooke, W. H., Cutter, S. L., Chang, S. E., & Berke, P. R. (2008). Toward a resiliency and vulnerability observatory network: RAVON. 2008 HRRC reports: 08-02R.

  5. Center NCD. (2011). Billion dollar U.S. weather/climate disasters. [Cited 2011 October 20]; Available from: http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/reports/billionz.html.

  6. Cordero, J. F. (1993). The epidemiology of disasters and adverse reproductive outcomes: Lessons learned. Environmental Health Perspectives, 101(Suppl 2), 131–136.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Landrigan, P. J., Forman, J., Galvez, M., Newman, B., Engel, S. M., & Chemtob, C. (2008). Impact of September 11 World Trade Center disaster on children and pregnant women. Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine, 75(2), 129–134.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Callaghan, W. M., Rasmussen, S. A., Jamieson, D. J., Ventura, S. J., Farr, S. L., Sutton, P. D., et al. (2007). Health concerns of women and infants in times of natural disasters: Lessons learned from Hurricane Katrina. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 11(4), 307–311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Buekens, P., Xiong, X., & Harville, E. (2006). Hurricanes and pregnancy. Birth, 33(2), 91–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Harville, E., Xiong, X., & Buekens, P. (2011). Disasters and perinatal health: A systematic review. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 65(11), 713–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cohan, C. L., & Cole, S. W. (2002). Life course transitions and natural disaster: marriage, birth, and divorce following Hurricane Hugo. Journal of Family Psychology, 16(1), 14–25.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rodgers, J. L., St John, C. A., & Coleman, R. (2005). Did fertility go up after the Oklahoma City bombing? An analysis of births in metropolitan counties in Oklahoma, 1990–1999. Demography, 42(4), 675–692.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hamilton, B. E., Sutton, P. D., Mathews, T. J., Martin, J. A., & Ventura, S. J. (2009). The effect of Hurricane Katrina: Births in the US Gulf Coast region, before and after the storm. National Vital Statistics Reports, 58(2), 1–28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tong, V. T., Zotti, M. E., & Hsia, J. (2011). Impact of the Red River catastrophic flood on women giving birth in North Dakota, 1994–2000. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 15, 281–288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. James, L. M., Erickson, J. D., & McClearn, A. B. (1994). Prevalence of birth defects. In L. S. Wilcox & J. S. Marks (Eds.), From data to action: CDC’s public health surveillance for women, infants, and children (pp. 203–216). Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health & Human Services.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Janerich, D. T., Stark, A. D., Greenwald, P., Burnett, W. S., Jacobson, H. I., & McCusker, J. (1981). Increased leukemia, lymphoma, and spontaneous abortion in Western New York following a flood disaster. Public Health Reports, 96(4), 350–356.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Glynn, L. M., Wadhwa, P. D., Dunkel-Schetter, C., Chicz-Demet, A., & Sandman, C. A. (2001). When stress happens matters: Effects of earthquake timing on stress responsivity in pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 184(4), 637–642.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Engel, S. M., Berkowitz, G. S., Wolff, M. S., & Yehuda, R. (2005). Psychological trauma associated with the World Trade Center attacks and its effect on pregnancy outcome. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 19(5), 334–341.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Xiong, X., Harville, E. W., Mattison, D. R., Elkind-Hirsch, K., Pridjian, G., & Buekens, P. (2008). Exposure to Hurricane Katrina, post-traumatic stress disorder and birth outcomes. American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 336(2), 111–115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lipkind, H. S., Curry, A. E., Huynh, M., Thorpe, L. E., & Matte, T. (2010). Birth outcomes among offspring of women exposed to the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 116(4), 917–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gaudino, J. A., Hoyert, D. L., MacDorman, M. F., Gazmarian, J. A., Adams, M., & Kiely, J. L. (1994). Fetal deaths. In L. S. Wilcox & J. S. Marks (Eds.), From data to action: CDC’S public health surveillance for women, infants, and children (pp. 163–178). Atlanta, GA: CDC.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Macdorman, M. F., & Kirmeyer, S. (2009). The challenge of fetal mortality. NCHS Data Brief, 16, 1–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vital Statistics of the United States 1976 Volume II-Mortality Part A (1980) In: US Department of Health and Human Services. (Ed.) Hyattsville, MD, p. Section 3.

  24. Peck, J. D., Leviton, A., & Cowan, L. D. (2010). A review of the epidemiologic evidence concerning the reproductive health effects of caffeine consumption: A 2000–2009 update. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 48, 2549–2576.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Weinberg, C. R., Hertz-Picciotto, I., Baird, D. D., & Wilcox, A. J. (1992). Efficiency and bias in studies of early pregnancy loss. Epidemiology, 3(1), 17–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ventura, S. J., Abma, J. C., Mosher, W. D., & Henshaw, S. K. (2009). Estimated pregnancy rates for the United States, 1990–2005: An update. National Vital Statistics Reports, 58(4), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zahran, S., Snodgrass, J. G., Peek, L., & Weiler, S. (2010). Maternal hurricane exposure and fetal distress risk. Risk Analysis, 30(10), 1591–1601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Berkowitz, G. S., Wolff, M. S., Janevic, T. M., Holzman, I. R., Yehuda, R., & Landrigan, P. J. (2003). The world trade center disaster and intrauterine growth restriction. [Erratum appears in JAMA. 2003 Dec 10;290(22):2943]. JAMA, 290(5), 595–596.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lederman, S. A., Rauh, V., Weiss, L., Stein, J. L., Hoepner, L. A., Becker, M., et al. (2004). The effects of the World Trade Center event on birth outcomes among term deliveries at three lower Manhattan hospitals. Environmental Health Perspectives, 112(17), 1772–1778.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Perera, F. P., Tang, D., Rauh, V., Lester, K., Tsai, W. Y., Tu, Y. H., et al. (2005). Relationships among polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-DNA adducts, proximity to the World Trade Center, and effects on fetal growth. Environmental Health Perspectives, 113(8), 1062–1067.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Perera, F. P., Rauh, V., Whyatt, R. M., Tang, D., Tsai, W. Y., Bernert, J. T., et al. (2005). A summary of recent findings on birth outcomes and developmental effects of prenatal ETS, PAH, and pesticide exposures. Neurotoxicology, 26(4), 573–587.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. IOM. (2007). Preterm birth: Causes, consequences, and prevention. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rice, D. C. (2005). Assessing the effects of environmental toxicant exposure in development epidemiological studies: Issues for risk assessment. Neurotoxicology, 26, 483–489.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Eskenazi, B., Marks, A. R., Catalano, R., Bruckner, T., & Toniolo, P. G. (2007). Low birthweight in New York City and upstate New York following the events of September 11th. Human Reproduction, 22(11), 3013–3020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Harville, E. W., Tran, T., Xiong, X., & Buekens, P. (2010). Population changes, racial/ethnic disparities, and birth outcomes in Louisiana after Hurricane Katrina. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 4, S39–S45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists CoOP. (2005). Inappropriate use of the terms fetal distress and birth asphyxia. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 326. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 106, 1469–1470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Dobie, S. A., Baldwin, L., Rosenblatt, R. A., Fordyce, M. A., Andrilla, C. H. A., & Hart, L. G. (1998). How well do birth certificates describe the pregnancies they report? The Washington state experience with low-risk pregnancies. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 2(3), 145–154.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Tolson, G. C., Barnes, J. M., Gay, G. A., & Kowaleski, J. L. (1991). The 1989 revision of the US standard certificates and reports. Vital and Health Statistics, 4(28), 17.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Statistics NCfH. (2000). Report of the panel to evaluate the US standard certificates. Washington, DC: CDC.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kiely, J. L., Brett, K. M., Yu, S., & Rowley, D. L. (1994). Low birth weight and intrauterine growth retardation. In L. S. Wilcox & J. S. Marks (Eds.), From data to action: CDC’s public health surveillance for women, infants, and children (pp. 185–202). Atlanta, GA: CDC.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Blackmore, C. A., & Rowley, D. L. (1994). Preterm birth. In L. S. Wilcox & J. S. Marks (Eds.), From data to action: CDC’s public health surveillance for women, infants, and children (pp. 179–183). Atlanta, GA: CDC.

    Google Scholar 

  42. David, R. J. (1980). The quality and completeness of birthweight and gestational age data in computerized birth files. American Journal of Public Health, 70(9), 964–973.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. CDC. (2002). Infant mortality and low birth weights among black and white infants–United States, 1980–2000. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 51(27), 589–592.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ananth, C. V., Joseph, K. S., Oyelese, Y., Demissie, K., & Vintzileos, A. M. (2005). Trends in preterm birth and perinatal mortality among singletons: United States, 1989 through 2000. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 105(5 Pt 1), 1084–1091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Horney, J., Zotti, M. E., Williams, A., & Hsia, J. (2012). Cluster sampling with referral to improve the efficiency of estimating unmet needs among pregnant and postpartum women after disasters. Women’s Health Issues, 22–3, e253–e257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Jamieson, D. J., Honein, M. A., Rasmussen, S. A., Williams, J. L., Swerdlow, D. L., Biggerstaff, M. S., et al. (2009). H1N1 2009 influenza virus infection during pregnancy in the USA. Lancet, 374, 451–458.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Mosher, W. D., Martinez, G. M., Chandra, A., Abma, J. C., & Willson, S. J. (2005). Use of contraception and use of family planning services in the United States: 1982–2002. Advance Data. 2005/01/07 ed2004, 1–36.

  48. CDC. (2011). Pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system (PRAMS). CDC [Cited 2011 April 1]; Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/prams/.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Barbara Landreth, CDC Librarian, and Leslie Harrison, MPH, Tonya Stancil, PhD, and Brian Morrow, MA, of the PRAMS team for their assistance with this paper. This publication was supported by funds made available from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Office for Public Health Preparedness and Response.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marianne E. Zotti.

Additional information

The findings and conclusions are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zotti, M.E., Williams, A.M., Robertson, M. et al. Post-Disaster Reproductive Health Outcomes. Matern Child Health J 17, 783–796 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-012-1068-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-012-1068-x

Keywords

Navigation