New evidence for the unique coexistence of two subfamilies of clawed perissodactyls (Mammalia, Chalicotheriidae) in the Upper Miocene of Romania and the Eastern Mediterranean

Chalicotheres are a peculiar group of large herbivorous mammals, closely related to extant tapirs, rhinoceroses, and horses, but with large claws instead of hooves. The family Chalicotheriidae consists of two subfamilies, the Schizotheriinae and the Chalicotheriinae. Herein we present chalicothere remains from the Upper Miocene locality of Pogana 1 in Romania, identifying the schizotheriine Ancylotherium pentelicum and an indeterminate chalicotheriine that were both found in the same stratigraphic layer. Thus, the Pogana 1 locality represents one of the very few confirmed cases of the co-occurrence of the two subfamilies within one fossiliferous horizon in the same fossil site. A detailed review of all localities where the two subfamilies have been reported to co-occur shows that this is a rare phenomenon that is almost exclusively observed in the Turolian of the Balkan-Iranian zoogeographical province. This is probably due to provincial differences in the palaeoenvironment. The data presented here support the hypothesis of a diverse mosaic environment in the Balkan-Iranian province with both closed environments and open habitats that was able to sustain a rich and diverse large mammal fauna.


Introduction
Chalicotheres first appeared in the Eocene and survived until the Pleistocene (Coombs 1989;Coombs and Cote 2010).In the Neogene, they reached their highest diversification and geographical distribution, with representatives of this group being found in North America, all over Eurasia, and Africa.During this time frame, they were especially successful in Eurasia, with the presence of both subfamilies, the Schizotheriinae and the Chalicotheriinae (Heissig 1999;Chen 2008).
The Schizotheriinae first appeared in the Oligocene in Asia and North America (Coombs 1989;Li et al. 2022), whereas the first Chalicotheriinae are known from the Early Miocene of Asia and Africa (Coombs 1989;Coombs and Cote 2010).
In North America, only one of the two subfamilies is known, the Schizotheriinae.In Africa, both subfamilies occur, but they are separated by an approximately 4 millionyear long time gap (Coombs 1989;Coombs and Cote 2010).Only in Eurasia, both subfamilies existed in the same time frame of over 20 million years (Early Miocene to Early Pleistocene), though there are only few localities where both have been reported together (Coombs 1989).
The potential coexistence of the two subfamilies, Schizotheriinae and Chalicotheriinae, has been a matter of discussion for many years.Some researchers have even argued that they were not able to coexist in the same environment due to their potentially similar ecology and that the few reports of coexistence are due to some kind of sampling bias (Bonis et al. 1995).Others have supported the idea that the reported cases of co-occurrence are valid and suggested that their ability to coexist is related to differences in their preferred habitats and diets (Coombs 1989;Koufos 2012).Chalicotheriinae have lower crowned teeth and much longer forelimbs compared to their hindlimbs and are traditionally seen as forest-dwellers (Zapfe 1979;Coombs 1989).Schizotheriinae on the other hand, have higher crowned teeth and the difference in their limb proportions is not as prominent, with proportions similar to those of extant okapis, which might have enabled them to also survive in more open or patchy habitats (Schaub 1943;Coombs 1983;Coombs and Cote 2010).These differences in their anatomy have led to the idea of different preferred habitats that affected their potential coexistence (Coombs 1989;Giaourtsakis and Koufos 2009;Koufos 2012).
In this study, we describe new chalicothere material from the Upper Miocene locality Pogana 1 (Romania), which yields both a schizotheriine and a chalicotheriine from the same horizon.Thus, this locality is one of the few cases where the coexistence of both subfamilies can be verified.Additionally, the palaeobiogeography of both subfamilies, together with a review of all localities with occurrences of both subfamilies is included here and their implications for the palaeoenvironmental reconstruction of the Balkan-Iranian province are discussed.

Geological setting
The Upper Miocene locality of Pogana 1 (Romania) has yielded three specimens of chalicotheres, which were all found in the same layer (Fig. 1), within the open sand pit located 15 km north of Bârlad town and south of Pogana village (Vaslui County), on the western slope of Vii Hill ('Dealul Vii') (Ursachi 2016).
The sedimentary deposits exposed in the Pogana area (Romania) belong to the Scythian Platform (Săndulescu 1984) and, more specifically, to the westernmost area of this platform, the so-called "Bârlad Platform" (sensu Ionesi 1994).Here, only deposits of Khersonian -Maeotian age crop out.
The Maeotian succession includes the volcanic cinerites of Nuţasca-Ruseni, as shown by Jeanrenaud (1971).These layers are excellent marker horizons that can be easily identified in the field, in both the deltaic and brackish facies areas of the Maeotian deposits.The Maeotian sediments in the region were mainly deposited in a fluvial environment.The lower part of the Maeotian succession is composed of brown andesitic tuffs in paragenesis with cinerites, which are gradually replaced by yellow greenish cineritic/tuffic sands.So far, three cineritic layers have been described.The upper part of the Maeotian deposits comprises complex alternations of fine yellow sands, which are poorly sorted, as well as layers of clays and silts.Some sands show intercalations of lenticular sandstones which reach a diameter of 2.5 m, as identified on the Studineț and Tutova Valleys (near the Perieni locality).The upper member also includes some sandy layers with accumulations of the bivalve Unio wetzleri.The open sand pit Pogana 1, is situated well above the cineritic sands and sandstones.The geological section of Pogana 1 comprises a basal yellow sand of 2 m thickness, covered by sands with trough cross-bedding and convolute beddings.These sands are covered unconformably by coarse sands with angular mud-clasts with extensive crossstratification, followed by yellow sands with ripple-cross lamination and horizontal bedding covered by a green mudstone.The vertebrate remains, including the herein studied specimens, were collected from these lens-like deposits in the coarse sands (Fig. 1).

Description
Specimen MVP-SN-PG-63 is a well-preserved proximal phalanx.The surface of the bone is somewhat damaged.The bone belonged to an adult individual as is demonstrated by the fully fused proximal epiphysis.It is not possible to determine the exact digit to which this phalanx belonged.The proximal articular facet for the metapodial is ovally heart-shaped, wider than long, and rather shallow, with a small incision in the middle of its proximo-ventral border.It is large and placed obliquely to the proximo-distal axis of the phalanx, towards the dorsal side of the bone, forming an acute angle (α in Fig. 2f).The ventral side of the bone bears well-developed tuberosities in its proximal part that act as areas for muscle attachments.Distally the phalanx slightly narrows.The distal articular facet for the middle phalanx is placed obliquely, almost entirely towards the ventral side of the bone, forming an acute angle to the proximo-distal axis of the bone.The bilateral keels of the distal articulation are slightly asymmetrical.

Comparison
Specimen MVP-SN-PG-63 represents a typical proximal phalanx of a chalicotheriid.Its proximal articular facet for the metapodial is proximo-dorsal oriented, whereas the distal facet for the middle phalanx is placed more ventrally.It differs from proximal phalanges of chalicotheriines, like Anisodon grande, in being somewhat thicker dorsoventral (Fig. 3a, d) and having a more obliquely placed proximal articular facet.The morphology of MVP-SN-PG-63 differs from phalanges of the schizotheriine Metaschizotherium fraasi in having a relatively narrower proximal epiphysis (Fahlke and Coombs 2009).It is much more similar to phalanges of Ancylotherium pentelicum, where the proximal articular facet is also more obliquely placed (Fig. 3a-c) and the proximal phalanx is in general less flattened (Roussiakis and Theodorou 2001).Ancylotherium pentelicum is well known from the Upper Miocene deposits of the Eastern Mediterranean (Giaourtsakis and Koufos 2009;Kampouridis et al. 2022) and its presence in Pogana 1 has already been confirmed by Codrea et al. (2019).Nonetheless, thus far, no proximal phalanx of the pes belonging to Ancylotherium pentelicum has been described.Roussiakis and Theodorou (2001), while observing some morphological and metrical differences in their sample of 10 proximal phalanges from Pikermi and Halmyropotamos, were unable to differentiate between phalanges of the manus and the pes.Schaub (1943) described the forelimb of Ancylotherium pentelicum in much detail, including proximal phalanges from the Late Miocene localities of Pikermi and Samos in Greece.Based on these descriptions it was possible to identify four proximal phalanges from Pikermi housed in the Natural History Museum in Vienna, Austria (NHMW) as belonging to the pes.The proximal phalanx of the second digit of the manus fuses with the middle phalanx and forms the duplex bone (Schaub 1943;Coombs and Rothschild 1999;Roussiakis and Theodorou 2001) in contrast to the phalanges of the pes, which do not fuse.The proximal phalanges of the third and fourth digits of the manus of Ancylotherium pentelicum are relatively similar and are generally larger, more elongated, and have less developed tuberosities in the proximal part on their ventral side than the proximal phalanges of the pes in Ancylotherium pentelicum.(Zapfe 1979: fig. 94).Abbreviation: α, angle formed by the proximal articular facet and the long axis of the shaft.Not to same scale Based on the metric comparison (Fig. 4) the Pogana 1 specimen is smaller than the proximal phalanges of third and fourth digits of the manus of Ancylotherium pentelicum from the Late Miocene localities Pikermi and Samos (Schaub 1943) and larger than the proximal phalanges of the pes of Anisodon grande from the Middle Miocene locality Devínska Nová Ves (Zapfe 1979).Its dimensions fit perfectly within the size range of the measured proximal phalanges of the pes of Ancylotherium pentelicum from Pikermi (Fig. 4; Table 1).These overlap with the lower part of the size range of the proximal phalanges of the manus of Anisodon grande based on the measurements of Zapfe (1979), but they differ morphologically (Fig. 3).In both MVP-SN-PG-63 and the phalanges of the pes of Ancylotherium pentelicum on the posterior side the tuberosities in the proximal part are very large, whereas in the phalanges of the manus of Anisodon grande they are not as prominent, also the angle between the proximal articular facet and the shaft of the bone is smaller in MVP-SN-PG-63 and the phalanges of the pes of Ancylotherium pentelicum than in the phalanges of the manus of Anisodon grande (Fig. 3).Therefore, MVP-SN-PG-63 can be assigned to Ancylotherium pentelicum.It should be taken into account that Ancylotherium pentelicum has been suggested to exhibit a strong sexual size dimorphism (Kampouridis et al. 2022).Although the presence of size dimorphism in the phalanges has not been confirmed yet and might prove difficult, this complicates the identification of the exact digit within the manus or pes of an isolated phalanx.Nonetheless, based on its small size (maximal length = 66 mm) and distinct morphology, MVP-SN-PG-63 is herein identified as a proximal phalanx of the pes of Ancylotherium pentelicum.

Description
Specimen MVP-SN-PG-64 is a partial left calcaneum.It is very damaged and missing much of its sustentaculum tali and articular facets for the astragalus, only the calcaneal sustentacular facet remains.The dorsal part of its shaft is also broken, and the tuber calcis is somewhat damaged, though its posteromedial portion is preserved, showing that it did not continue any further.Dorsally, a large sustentacular facet is visible on the sustentaculum tali, for the articulation of the astragalus.This articular facet is anteroposteriorly oriented and almost parallel to the shaft of the calcaneum, forming only a slight angle (γ in Fig. 5).In ventral view, a ridge is visible, that extends from the distal end of the shaft to the lateral edge of the sustentaculum tali.However, both its beginning and end are not preserved, due to damage to the bone.The shaft seems rather straight and widens posteriorly towards the tuber calcis.The ventral side of the shaft features a relatively rugose surface for muscle attachments.The shaft and the sustentaculum tali form an acute, almost right angle.Schaub (1943: p. 26) for the manus and original data (Table 1) for the pes.Measurements of Anisodon grande from Devínska Nová Ves in Slovakia are from Zapfe (1979)

Comparison
Specimen MVP-SN-PG-64 is rather badly preserved, but some comments about its taxonomic attribution are possible.The comparisons (see Fig. 6) are based mainly on the descriptions and illustrations of the chalicotheriine Anisodon grande from the Middle Miocene of Devínska Nová Ves (Slowakia) made by Zapfe (1979).Additionally, a chalicotheriine calcaneum from the Late Miocene (Vallesian) of Charmoille (Switzerland) originally described as Chalicotherium goldfussi by Schaefer and Zapfe (1971) is used.The identification of this specimen was mainly based on its contemporaneous age to the type locality of Chalicotherium goldfussi, Eppelsheim (Germany).However, there is no calcaneum of this species known from its type locality, therefore we refer to this specimen as "Chalicotherium goldfussi".Lastly, the comparison includes the calcaneum of the schizotheriine Ancylotherium pentelicum from the Late Miocene (Turolian) of Pikermi (Greece).
The calcaneal sustentacular facet of the Pogana 1 specimen is oriented almost parallel to the shaft of the calcaneum as in the Chalicotheriinae Anisodon grande from Devínska Nová Ves (Slovakia) and "Chalicotherium goldfussi" from Charmoille (Switzerland), whereas in the schizotheriine Ancylotherium pentelicum from Pikermi (Greece), it is almost horizontal (Zapfe 1979;Roussiakis and Theodorou 2001).In the Pogana 1 specimen, the sustentaculum tali, although its tip is broken, seems to form a slightly acute angle (β in Fig. 6b), more similar to those in the chalicotheriines "Chalicotherium goldfussi" (β in Fig. 6d) and Anisodon grande (β in Fig. 6F), whereas in the schizotheriine Ancylotherium pentelicum, this angle is obtuse (β in Fig. 6h).Thus, specimen MVP-SN-PG-64 can be assigned to a member of the Chalicotheriinae.
MVP-SN-PG-64 seems to differ from both Chalicotherium goldfussi and Anisodon grande, the two best-known representatives of this group during the Miocene in Europe.Anisodon grande has a narrow and much more elongated shaft and the calcaneal sustentacular facet is smaller.Thus, the Pogana 1 specimen does not belong to Anisodon grande.The "Chalicotherium goldfussi" calcaneum from Charmoille has a wider shaft and a bigger sustentacular facet, more similar to the Pogana 1 specimen.Though, specimen MVP-SN-PG-64 differs from the calcaneum of "Chalicotherium goldfussi" from Charmoille in having a prominent ridge on the ventral side of the sustentaculum tali.Moreover, in the calcaneum of "Chalicotherium goldfussi" from Charmoille, the postero-medial edge of the sustentaculum tali is projecting much more posteriorly compared with Anisodon grande; however, this portion is not preserved in the Pogana 1 specimen.Furthermore, for other chalicotheriines from the Turolian of the Balkan peninsula such as Kalimantsia bulgarica (Bulgaria) and Anisodon macedonicus (Greece) the postcranium, including the calcaneum, is completely unknown (Bonis et al. 1995;Geraads et al. 2001Geraads et al. , 2006)).It is not possible to compare these taxa and identify the specimen any further.Therefore, specimen MVP-SN-PG-64 will be referred to as Chalicotheriinae indet.

Discussion
Coexistence of the Chalicotheriinae and Schizotheriinae has been documented only in a few localities in Eurasia (Coombs 1989).In North America, the geologically oldest chalicothere remains are known from the Eocene and belong to taxa like Eomoropus, with the first Schizotheriinae arriving in the Miocene (Coombs 1989).Schizotheriinae are well documented in the Neogene deposits of North America, with the genera Moropus and Tylocephalonyx having been studied in detail (Holland and Peterson 1914;Coombs 1978aCoombs , 1979)).Chalicotheriinae have never been reported and probably never made it into the New World (Coombs 1989;Coombs and Cote 2010).
In Africa, chalicotheriines first appeared in the Early Miocene with Winamia (Coombs and Cote 2010; Pickford Asia has been considered the centre for the diversification of the chalicotheres, with three genera described from the Eocene, Eomoropus, Grangeria, and Litolophus (Coombs 1989;Bai 2008;Bai et al. 2010).The first representative of the Chalicotheriidae appeared during the Oligocene in Eurasia with the schizotheriine genus Schizotherium (Coombs 1978b).During the Early Miocene, the Chalicotheriinae first appeared in Asia with the species "Chalicotherium" pilgrimi (Coombs 1989).Both subfamilies are well documented during the Late Miocene and finally became extinct in the Pleistocene (Fahlke et al. 2013).

Palaeobiogeographical review
So far, the co-occurrence of members of both subfamilies has only been reported from Eurasia (Coombs 1989).Except for one locality from the Pleistocene of China all localities with both subfamilies present are found in the Neogene of Eurasia (Figs. 7-8).As mentioned by Bonis et al. (1999), however, many of these reports of co-occurrence may represent cases of sampling bias by accidentally mixing material from different localities and/or horizons.This is especially the case for historical collections of fossils that were excavated in the 19th or the beginning of the 20th century, and therefore might not be evidence for the coexistence of the two subfamilies.The Upper Miocene deposits in Pogana 1 (Romania) yield one of the few certain cases, where material of a schizotheriine (Ancylotherium pentelicum) was found along with material of a chalicotheriine (Chalicotheriinae indet.) in the same fossiliferous horizon.To highlight the importance of this record we provide a review of all published cases of co-occurrence of the two groups and reassess the available data in order to identify the localities where the coexistence of the two subfamilies is certain.
Early Miocene: So far, only two potential co-occurrences have been reported from the Early Miocene, both from Asia (Fig. 7).The first possible case is from the Early Miocene of the Lanzhou Basin, where Qiu et al. (1998) reported a schizotheriine mandible, of the new species Phyllotillon huangheensis (now referred to as Borissiakia huangheensis sensu Li et al. 2022), from the locality GL9503.He also described two skulls and a mandible of an indeterminate chalicotheriine from another locality, GL9516.Even though the two taxa were found in the same stratigraphic layer, a white sandstone in the lower part of the Middle Member of the Xianshuihe Formation, they were found at different fossil sites (Qiu et al. 1998) and therefore it remains unclear if the two species actually coexisted.The second locality is found in the Bugti Hills in Pakistan, where both, the schizotheriine Phyllotillon naricus and the chalicotheriine "Chalicotherium" pilgrimi, have been reported from the Lower Miocene deposits (Colbert 1935;Welcomme et al. 2001;Antoine et al. 2013).But the exact stratigraphic context of these finds is unclear.Nonetheless, two distinct species of chalicotheres are found together in the fossiliferous level 4 (= Q), more specifically in the fossil site Kumbi 4F (Antoine pers. comm.).Thus, Kumbi 4F in the Bugti Hills is the only Early Miocene locality where two distinct chalicotheres are documented together.
Middle Miocene: During the Middle Miocene, there are four reports of co-occurrences of both subfamilies.At the Middle Miocene locality of La Grive St.-Alban in France one of the earliest occurrences of a chalicotheriine in Europe is found (referred to as Chalicotherium goldfussi by Anquetin et al. 2007).Additionally, a schizotheriine (Koenigswald 1932) is also known from this locality, for which the species Phyllotillon grivensis was erected (Mein and Ginsburg 2002).Though its taxonomic status is still discussed, it could represent the earliest Ancylotherium (see Coombs 2009;Fahlke and Coombs 2009).However, it must be noted that the name La Grive St.-Alban refers to a number of Middle Miocene fissures.The old excavations, the site of which was named "fente A", have yielded material of both the chalicotheriine and the schizotheriine (Depéret 1892;Koenigswald 1932).However, it is not possible to clarify if the material is truly contemporaneous.Furthermore, Mein and Ginsburg (2002) only identified the schizotheriine Phyllotillon grivensis in their material from La Grive St.-Alban.
Two other Middle Miocene localities that have been reported to yield both subfamilies are Thannhausen and Stätzling in Germany.In both localities, the schizotheriine Metaschizotherium has been found (Metaschizotherium sp. in Thannhausen and Metaschizotherium bavaricum in Stätzling) along with a chalicotheriine, possibly Anisodon (Fahlke and Coombs 2009).Both localities are found in the Upper Freshwater Molasse in Southern Germany.The fossils from Thannhausen were collected by Georg Geisselmann, the owner of the sand and gravel pit where the fossils originate from, who noted that the fossils come from different levels, mainly from the base of a fine sand (Dehm 1980).Regarding Stätzling, its main fauna is recovered from the upper sand and gravel layers, while the lower stratigraphic horizons have also yielded fossils (Dehm 1980).It cannot be verified whether the chalicotheriines and the schizotheriines were found in the same horizons.Therefore, their co-occurrence in Thannhausen and Stätzling cannot be considered as certain.
The last Middle Miocene locality that yielded fossils of both subfamilies is Tunggur in China.The chalicotheriine there was described as a new species, Chalicotherium brevirostris (Colbert 1934;Liu and Zhang 2012).However, Tunggur is not a name for a specific fossil site, but characterises a wider area; therefore, it remains unknown whether the schizotheriine and the chalicotheriine were found at the same exact locality and horizon.Thereby, the Middle Miocene does not include any certain case of coexistence of the two subfamilies, due to the lack of stratigraphic information.This highlights the importance of future chalicothere finds from stratigraphically controlled excavations.
Late Miocene: This is the only sub-epoch with as many as eight reported localities where both subfamilies were found together.All of these fossil sites are located in the Greco-Iranian zoogeographical province (sensu Bonis et al. 1992), herein referred to as the Balkan-Iranian zoogeographical province that includes Southeast Europe, and Anatolia as far as Iran, following Spassov et al. (2018).
Pikermi is one of the most famous localities from the Upper Miocene in Eurasia (Roussiakis et al. 2019).It has been excavated for well over a century (Wagner 1848; Gaudry 1862; Roussiakis et al. 2019).The first excavations took place between the middle of the 19 th and the beginning of the twentieth century (Wagner 1848; Gaudry and Lartet 1856; Gaudry 1862).The material collected during this time all came from sediments exposed by the river that Fig. 8 Map with the fossiliferous localities at which it has been suggested that both Schizotheriinae and Chalicotheriinae occurred together during the Late Miocene.Empty symbols represent localities that are not considered herein as certain cases for the co-occurrence of the two subfamilies, whereas filled symbols represent localities that are herein considered as certain cases runs through the town of Pikermi.Several fossil sites were excavated within the river, but their exact location or stratigraphic correlation is not known.Based on new data, these fossil sites should span the time frame of 7.33 to 7.29 Ma (Böhme et al. 2017).In the 1970s, new excavations were carried out in younger horizons (7.17 Ma; Böhme et al. 2017) very close to the classical Pikermi sites (Symeonidis 1973;Symeonidis et al. 1973), this fossil site is now known as Chomateri.The classical Pikermi area is the type locality of Ancylotherium pentelicum.Despite being well represented in the old collections of Pikermi, Ancylotherium pentelicum has not been reported yet from Chomateri (Symeonidis 1973;Roussiakis and Theodorou 2001;Tsoukala 2022).On the other hand, chalicotheriine material that was originally assigned to Chalicotherium goldfussi has been reported from both the classical locality of Pikermi (Butler 1965), as well as Chomateri (Symeonidis 1973).Nonetheless, the coexistence of these two species in Pikermi is uncertain and, although very likely, it should be treated with caution (Roussiakis and Theodorou 2001).Currently, new excavations are taking place in Pikermi (Theodorou et al. 2010;Roussiakis et al. 2014) which are focussed on the exact stratigraphy and taphonomy of the fossil sites and may solve this question.
In southwestern Bulgaria three localities (Fig. 8) are known with remains of both subfamilies (Geraads et al. 2001(Geraads et al. , 2006;;Boev 2017;Spassov et al. 2019).The first locality, Kalimantsi, includes several fossil sites that are of Turolian age (Spassov et al. 2006;Böhme et al. 2018).One of these, Kalimantsi-Pehtsava, has yielded an almost complete chalicothere skull (K-631), the type of the chalicotheriine Kalimantsia bulgarica (Geraads et al. 2001).At the same fossil site an astragalus (K-608) of the schizotheriine Ancylotherium pentelicum was found (Geraads et al. 2001(Geraads et al. , 2006)).Close to Kalimantsi, the second locality, Hadjidimovo is situated, which is also of Turolian age (Hristova et al. 2003;Böhme et al. 2018).In this area as well, more than one fossil site has been discovered, of which Hadjidimovo-1 is the richest one.Here several postcranial elements assigned to Chalicotherium ?sp.cf.C. goldfussi were found, along with several dental and postcranial elements as well as a partial juvenile skull of Ancylotherium pentelicum (Geraads et al. 2001(Geraads et al. , 2006)).Gorna Sushitsa is the third locality from the Upper Miocene of southwestern Bulgaria.Its stratigraphy was recently re-evaluated (Böhme et al. 2018) and a detailed study of its faunal assemblages was published by Spassov et al. (2019).In total, 14 fossiliferous horizons with vertebrates were identified.Both the schizotheriine Ancylotherium pentelicum and the chalicotheriine Anisodon sp. are known, but they were found in different horizons (Spassov et al. 2019), e.g., Ancylotherium was found at the fossil site GS7, with an age of 7.41 Ma, whereas Anisodon was found at GS4 and GS10, with ages of 7.38 Ma and 7.36 Ma (Spassov et al. 2019).Thus, there is an age difference between the occurrences of the schizotheriine Ancylotherium and the chalicotheriine Anisodon of at least 30,000 years.Despite the fact that this time frame is geologically speaking only a very short time period, there is no definite proof and we do not consider the Gorna Sushitsa locality as evidence for the co-occurrence of both subfamilies.
In North Macedonia co-occurrences of both subfamilies have been reported from three localities (Fig. 8).Almost half a century ago, the palaeontologist Risto Garevski studied the Late Miocene 'Pikermi-fauna' from the area around Veles in North Macedonia.The localities in this region were lumped together under the name 'Titov Veles' (Spassov et al. 2018).Karaslari, is the most diverse vertebrate locality in North Macedonia, with 22 mammalian species (Spassov et al. 2018).Garevski (1974) described a skull of Ancylotherium pentelicum from Karaslari.Additionally, Garevski and Zapfe (1983) described a chalicothere mandible, which they attributed to Chalicotherium goldfussi, from the same locality.Recently, Spassov et al. (2018) re-evaluated the Late Miocene faunal assemblages from North Macedonia and confirmed the existence of Ancylotherium pentelicum in Karaslari, attributing further material to this species, while referring the chalicotheriine mandible to Anisodon sp., following the assignment of Anquetin et al. (2007).The second locality in North Macedonia is Kiro Kuchuk, which has yielded 17 mammalian taxa (Spassov et al. 2018).There is only one third upper molar of an indeterminate chalicotheriine (Spassov et al. 2018), but several specimens of Ancylotherium pentelicum, including upper and lower jaw fragments and a remarkable, articulated hindlimb (Spassov et al. 2018).The third locality, Prevalets, is also situated in the area of Veles in North Macedonia and has also yielded a typical diverse Late Miocene fauna.This fauna was first described by Schlosser (1921), who included Nestoritherium pentelici (today known as Ancylotherium pentelicum) in the faunal list.Spassov et al. (2018) described two associated upper teeth of an indeterminate chalicotheriine from Prevalets that were collected by R. Garevski decades after the first description of Schlosser (1921).Spassov et al. (2018) did not mention any Ancylotherium therefore the occurrence of this taxon in Prevalets is unproven and their co-occurrence is uncertain.
In Turkey, only one locality, Akkaşdaği from the Turolian, is known where both subfamilies are recorded (Fig. 8).Three chalicotheriid specimens have been described from there, a maxilla of a juvenile individual, a duplex bone of the second digit of the manus, and a calcaneum.This material was initially identified as the schizotheriine Ancylotherium pentelicum (Saraç and Sen 2005).However, the morphology of the squared, low-crowned teeth of the juvenile maxilla (AK2-293) from Akkaşdaği differs from that of Ancylotherium pentelicum or other schizotheriines (Fahlke et al. 2013;Spassov et al. 2018).Therefore, it most likely belongs to an anisodont chalicotheriine (sensu Coombs and Göhlich 2019), based on the squared, low-crowned teeth.This maxilla was found in the same bone pocket as the calcaneum (AK2-438) that most definitely belongs to Ancylotherium pentelicum (Saraç and Sen 2005).Thus, Akkaşdaği is the only locality in Anatolia where the co-occurrence of both, a schizotheriine and a chalicotheriine can be confirmed.
Overall, six Upper Miocene fossil sites have definitely yielded material from both subfamilies (Fig. 8).These localities are Pogana 1 (Romania), Kalimantsi-Pehtsava, Hadjidimovo-1 (Bulgaria), Karaslari, Kiro Kuchuk (North Macedonia), and Akkaşdaği (Turkey) (Fig. 8).Interestingly, the schizotheriine taxon is consistently identified as Ancylotherium pentelicum, which is the only schizotheriine taxon from the Turolian of the Balkan-Iranian province.However, the chalicotheriine material is much more difficult to determine, due to its complicated taxonomic history and fragmentary remains and the existence of up to three different taxa has been suggested (see also Bonis et al. 1992;Anquetin et al. 2007).
Pliocene: After the Late Miocene, chalicotheres became extinct in Europe, but survived in Africa and Asia (Chen 2008;Coombs and Cote 2010).In the Pliocene, there has been only one report of the two subfamilies appearing together, and that is from the locality of Duikang in China (Fig. 7), with the genera Hesperotherium and Ancylotherium (Deng et al. 2011).However, the skull and associated mandible, based on which the chalicotheriine Hesperotherium was identified in Duikang, were later revised by Chen et al. (2012) and assigned to Ancylotherium sp. and therefore only this schizotheriine is present in Duikang.

Pleistocene:
From the Pleistocene only one locality is known that has yielded both chalicothere subfamilies, which is Huangjiawan in the Shaanxi Province in China (Fig. 7).Its fauna is of Early Pleistocene age and has yielded both the schizotheriine Ancylotherium sp., based on a maxilla that preserves the P4-M2, and the chalicotheriine Hesperotherium sinense (also known as Nestoritheriun sinense), based on a maxilla preserving P4-M3 and an almost complete mandible (Li and Deng 2003).Hesperotherium sinense is the most commonly identified chalicothere during this period.On the other hand, Ancylotherium sp. in Huangjiawan is the latest known occurrence of Schizotheriinae in Eurasia.The identification of this specimen as a schizotheriine was also confirmed by Chen et al. (2012), although stating that its taxonomic status is still controversial and the generic attribution is uncertain.Thereby, the Early Pleistocene locality of Huangjiawan is the only post-Neogene locality where both subfamilies have been reported together this far and is thus the youngest case of such a co-occurrence.

Distribution summary:
The review of the co-occurrence of both subfamilies demonstrates that it is a rare phenomenon, which is almost exclusively observed in the Upper Miocene of the Balkan-Iranian province.There is only one case from the Early Miocene, in the Bugti Hills in Pakistan (Colbert 1935), and one from the Early Pleistocene, at the locality Huangjiawan in China (Li and Deng 2003).In the Late Miocene, there is a large disparity in the distribution of the two subfamilies of chalicotheres.During the Vallesian, Chalicotheriinae are found in several localities across Europe, such as Eppelsheim (Germany), Can Llobateres and Vallès Penedès (Spain) (Coombs 1989;Morales et al. 1999), but Schizotheriinae are extremely rare, with only two occurrences of Ancylotherium in Europe, in Los Valles de Fuentidueña in Spain and Pentalophos-1 in Greece (Koufos 2012).On the other hand, during the Turolian Schizotheriinae are almost completely absent in Central and Western Europe, in contrast to Chalicotheriinae (Bonis 1999;Giaourtsakis and Koufos 2009;Fahlke et al. 2013).Similarly, in Eastern Asia Chalicotheriinae seem to be more common than Schizotheriinae (Chen 2008;Chen et al. 2012).The Balkan-Iranian zoogeographical province has yielded a significant number of fossil sites with occurrences of both subfamilies, with the schizotheriine Ancylotherium pentelicum being the most common representative of the family, during the Turolian age.Bonis et al. (1999) argued that both subfamilies were unable to coexist and that the few recorded co-occurrences were doubtful and probably due to the accidental mixing of material from different fossil sites (Geraads et al. 2001).Herein we show that there are six localities where the cooccurrence of both subfamilies can be undisputedly verified: 1, Pogana 1 in Romania, 2, Kalimantsi-Pehtsava, 3, Hadjidimovo-1 in Bulgaria, 4, Karaslari, 5, Kiro Kuchuk in North Macedonia and 6, Akkaşdaği in Turkey (Fig. 8).Notably, almost all of them are found in the western part of the Balkan-Iranian zoogeographical province during the Turolian age (Geraads et al. 2001(Geraads et al. , 2006;;Saraç and Sen 2005;Spassov et al. 2018Spassov et al. , 2019)).The distribution of chalicotheres is most probably controlled by the environment, which was characterised by open grasslands that were dominated by C3 plants during this time (e.g., Fortelius et al. 2014;Böhme et al. 2017).During this time period, however, the expansion of C4 plants took place, which was mainly driven by a trend towards cooler and more arid climate in the Late Miocene (Tzanova et al. 2015;Herbert et al. 2016;Kaya et al. 2018;Böhme et al. 2021).This, along with other regional changes in the environment most likely affected the potential for coexistence of the two subfamilies.However, it has to be noted that chalicotheres are very rare faunal elements in the vast majority of vertebrate localities.Our knowledge of the occurrence of more than one species in one locality is very likely to be affected by this rarity.

Palaeoenvironment
The ecology as well as locomotion of Chalicotheriidae have repeatedly been discussed (e.g., Cuvier 1823;Kaup 1833;Schaub 1943;Zapfe 1979;Schulz et al. 2007;Schulz and Fahlke 2009;Semprebon et al. 2011).Both subfamilies possibly preferred different habitats, indicated by morphological differences in their teeth and limb proportions.The Chalicotheriinae have shorter tooth crown heights and forelimbs that are much longer than the hindlimbs, an unusual condition also found in extant gorillas.The teeth of Schizotheriinae have higher crowns and their limb proportions are closer to those of other ungulates (Coombs and Cote 2010).Chalicotheriinae are traditionally regarded as browsers, feeding on soft leaves, whereas Schizotheriinae, with their higher tooth crowns, are adjusted to a more abrasive diet.Recent micro-and mesowear analyses of the wear pattern of teeth of chalicotheres revealed that the European representatives of Chalicotherium and Anisodon included probably hard fruits, seeds, or nuts in their diet, whereas Ancylotherium pentelicum mainly fed on leaves, but also consumed bark and twigs (Semprebon et al. 2011).Furthermore, Semprebon et al. ( 2011) mentioned that regional habitat differences may have been more important, concerning the diet of chalicotheres, than the phylogenetic relationship, since the schizotheriine Metaschizotherium from the Middle Miocene showed meso-and microwear patterns similar to the contemporaneous chalicotheriine Anisodon grande, which also lived in Europe.
The possible ecological differences among chalicotheres might explain the rarity of co-occurrence in one locality and horizon.The fact that during the Turolian age the schizotheriine Ancylotherium pentelicum is frequently found alongside a chalicotheriine in the western part of the Balkan-Iranian zoogeographical province might be interpreted as an ecological indicator.It is known that there were considerable palaeogeographical and palaeoclimatic changes in this area during the Turolian, but the impact of these changes on the habitats is still debated (e.g., Solounias et al. 1999;Kaya et al. 2018;Denk et al. 2018;Fortelius et al. 2019).A global trend of cooling and drying has been documented for the Late Miocene, with its peak in the Messinian stage (Herbert et al. 2016).In the Eastern Mediterranean specifically, an important trend of cooling and aridification has been observed during the latest Tortonian and earliest Messinian (Mertz-Kraus et al. 2008;Kontakiotis et al. 2019).Furthermore, changes in the sea-level of the Paratethys affected the climate in the wider area and most probably shaped the habitats of the Balkan-Iranian zoogeographical province (Butiseacă et al. 2021;Böhme et al. 2021;Palcu et al. 2021), for which a savannah-like palaeoenvironment has been reconstructed (Abel 1922;Bonis et al. 1992;Böhme et al. 2017;Kaya et al. 2018;Fortelius et al. 2019).Despite the fact that some researchers have argued against this hypothesis, based on the faunal and floral composition (Solounias et al. 1999;Denk et al. 2018), the landscape was marked by the existence of open grasslands with the gradual expansion of C4 plants (Cerling et al. 1993;Tzanova et al. 2015).
Overall, it seems that the palaeoenvironment in the Eastern Mediterranean was rather diverse with more local fluctuations of the environmental conditions that controlled the mammalian communities of the Late Miocene (Kostopoulos 2009).An abundance of vertebrate localities in this region exposes a high disparity in the faunal composition regarding the large mammals, even though they are geographically and stratigraphically very restricted (Koufos et al. 2005;Kostopoulos 2009;Koufos 2013).Many studies have investigated this disparity and suggested that climatic changes, migration events, geographical boundaries, or a combination of these factors have affected the composition of the large mammal fauna (e.g., Bonis et al. 1992;Koufos et al. 2005;Kostopoulos 2009;Böhme et al. 2021).This demonstrates the complexity of the faunal assemblages of the Balkan-Iranian zoogeographical province, also known as the "Pikermian Biome", which was named after the oldest and most famous fossil locality in the region (Solounias et al. 1999).
The chalicotheres that lived during the Turolian in the Balkan-Iranian zoogeographical province also reflect the complexity of habitats.Up to three different species of chalicotheriines have been reported from geographically closely situated fossil localities and probably had rather similar dietary preferences (Bonis et al. 1995;Geraads et al. 2001).Furthermore, our results show that the chalicotheriines were able to coexist with the single schizotheriine species known from the area during this time, Ancylotherium pentelicum (Giaourtsakis and Koufos 2009;Coombs 2013;Kampouridis et al. 2022;Geraads et al. 2007), in at least six different localities in the western part of the Balkan-Iranian zoogeographical province (Fig. 8).This was probably possible because these animals exploited different food sources.Our results also support the notion of a dynamic palaeoenvironment in this region that included both closed and open habitats in close proximity in the Balkan-Iranian zoogeographical province.This supported a variety of ecological niches, which allowed animals even with similar dietary needs to coexist in the same geographical area without having to compete for food resources.

Conclusion
The Upper Miocene locality of Pogana 1 has yielded three specimens that belong to Chalicotheriidae.Two specimens, a previously described distal phalanx and the herein described proximal phalanx, belong to the schizotheriine Ancylotherium pentelicum, the most typical representative of this family during the Upper Miocene of the Balkan-Iranian zoogeographical province.The third specimen, a partial calcaneum, is herein assigned to Chalicotheriinae indet.The chalicotheriine calcaneum was found in the same fossil site and horizon as the Ancylotherium pentelicum material.Thus, Pogana is one of the few certain cases where the cooccurrence of Schizotheriinae and Chalicotheriinae in a single locality and horizon is confirmed.In total, six out of eight such cases are found in the Balkan-Iranian zoogeographical province during the Late Miocene, all of Turolian age.Recent studies have suggested that representatives of the two subfamilies may have had rather similar dietary preferences.Therefore, their frequent co-occurrence in the Turolian of the Balkan-Iranian zoogeographical province, in contrast to their separate occurrences at almost any other time period supports the notion of a rich mosaic environment that included both closed forest and more open environments.It also indicates that the co-occurrence of Schizotheriinae and Chalicotheriinae might have been controlled by provincial changes in the environment.

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Geological setting of Pogana 1 (Romania): a. Location of the Pogana 1 locality on the geological map.b.Position of the fossil Chalicotheriidae finds, in a simplified litho-sedimentological pro-

Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Morphological comparison of proximal phalanges of Chalicotheriidae.a. proximal phalanx of the pes of Ancylotherium pentelicum (MVP-SN-PG-63) from the Upper Miocene of Pogana 1 in Romania, in left lateral view.b. proximal phalanx of the pes of Ancylotherium pentelicum (NHMW 2019/0098/0013) from the Upper Miocene of Pikermi in Greece, in left lateral view.c. proximal phalanx of digit III of the manus of Ancylotherium pentelicum (NHMW 2019/0098/0016,

Fig. 4
Fig. 4 Metric comparison of proximal phalanges of Chalicotheriidae.The black dot represents the proximal phalanx of the pes of Ancylotherium pentelicum (MVP-SN-PG-63) from the Upper Miocene locality Pogana 1 in Romania.Measurements of Ancylotherium pentelicum from Pikermi and Samos in Greece are fromSchaub (1943: p. 26)   for the manus and original data (Table1) for the pes.Measurements of Anisodon grande from Devínska Nová Ves in Slovakia are fromZapfe (1979)

Fig. 5
Fig. 5 Calcaneum of Chalicotheriinae indet.(MVP-SN-PG-64) from the Upper Miocene of Pogana 1 in Romania in dorsal (a-b), ventral (c-d), medial (e-f) and posterior (g-h) view.Abbreviations: β, angle formed by the sustentaculum tali and the long axis of the shaft in ven-

Fig. 7
Fig. 7 Map with the fossiliferous localities at which it has been suggested that both Schizotheriinae and Chalicotheriinae occurred during the Neogene and Quaternary.Empty symbols represent localities

Table 1
Measurements (in mm) of the proximal phalanx of the pes of Ancylotherium pentelicum from the Upper Miocene of Pogana 1 (Romania) and Pikermi (Greece).Abbreviations: Lmax, maximal