On Rigid Minimal Spaces

A compact space X is said to be minimal if there exists a map \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$f:X\rightarrow X$$\end{document}f:X→X such that the forward orbit of any point is dense in X. We consider rigid minimal spaces, motivated by recent results of Downarowicz, Snoha and Tywoniuk (J Dyn Differ Equ, 29:243–257, 2017) on spaces with cyclic group of homeomorphisms generated by a minimal homeomorphism, and results of the first author, Clark and Oprocha (Adv Math, 335:261–275, 2018) on spaces in which the square of every homeomorphism is a power of the same minimal homeomorphism. We show that the two classes do not coincide, which gives rise to a new class of spaces that admit minimal homeomorphisms, but no minimal maps. We modify the latter class of examples to show for the first time existence of minimal spaces with degenerate homeomorphism groups. Finally, we give a method of constructing decomposable compact and connected spaces with cyclic group of homeomorphisms, generated by a minimal homeomorphism, answering a question in Downarowicz et al.


Introduction
Given a compact space X , a map f : X → X is said to be minimal if for every x ∈ X the forward orbit { f n (x) : n ∈ N} 1 is dense in X . A compact space is said to be minimal if it admits a minimal map. The best known examples of minimal spaces are the Cantor set, circle S 1 and 2-torus T 2 . The classification of minimal spaces is a well-known open problem in topological dynamics, motivated by the fact that minimal dynamical systems are building blocks for all dynamical systems [4]. Even for manifolds the answer is unkown in dimension This also applies to R-flows, with the still unresolved Gottschalk Conjecture: S 3 does not admit a minimal R-flow. The class of minimal maps contains both invertible and noninvertible elements, and a space may admit both minimal homeomorphisms and minimal noninvertible maps, either one or the other, or none. Auslander and Yorke [2] showed that the Cantor set admits both types of minimal maps, whereas Auslander and Katznelson [1] showed that S 1 does not admit minimal noninvertible maps. Katok [22], and Fathi and Herman [16] showed that every compact connected manifold, which admits a smooth locally free effective action of the circle group, has a smooth minimal diffeomorphism, isotopic to the identity, and so all odd dimensional spheres admit a minimal diffeomorphism. Every manifold that admits a minimal flow admits also minimal homeomorphisms (see e.g. [14]), as well as minimal noninvertible maps [5]. Kozlowski and the first author [6] proved that if a compact manifold of dimension at least 2 admits a minimal homeomorphism, then it admits a minimal noninvertible map. Minimal sets for surface homeomorphisms were classified in [21] and [27]. In [23] Kolyada, Snoha and Trofimchuk constructed minimal noninvertible maps on T 2 (see also [30]). Their result was modified by Bruin, Kolyada and Snoha, who constructed in [7] an example of a minimal 2-dimensional space X , that has the fixed point property for homeomorphisms.
This paper concerns spaces that have very simple homeomorphism groups, and yet they admit minimal maps. This direction of research was motivated by recent results of Downarowicz, Snoha, and Tywoniuk in [12], and the first author, Clark, and Oprocha in [5]. The authors of [12] constructed the first examples of minimal spaces with cyclic homeomorphism groups, generated by a minimal homeomorphism (called Slovak spaces in [12]). Moreover, they showed that some of such spaces do not admit minimal noninvertible maps -the first examples of minimal spaces without minimal noninvertible maps other than the circle. In [5] the authors used an inverse limit approach to construct examples of a space X , such that the homeomorphism group where H + (X ) is cyclic and generated by a minimal homeomorphism, and for every g ∈ H − (X ) we have g 2 ∈ H + (X ) (in [5] called almost Slovak spaces, by reference to [12]). These examples were used in [5] to give a negative answer to the following problem: given two compact spaces X and Y admitting minimal homeomorphism, does the product X × Y admit a minimal homeomorphism as well? In [11,29] the authors improve on this result to show that the product of two compact spaces admitting minimal homeomorphisms does not need to admit any minimal maps. Slovak and almost Slovak spaces give rise to a kind of paradox: the spaces admit homeomorphisms under which all points travel almost everywhere, but at the same time they are so rigid that they admit very few homeomorphisms. In the present paper, by exploiting the methods from [5], in Sect. 4  In Sect. 5, answering Question 2 from [12] we show the existence of Slovak spaces that are decomposable; i.e. they decompose to a union of two distinct proper nondegenerate connected and compact subsets. This contrasts with indecomposability of the previously known examples in [5] and [12]. We conclude this introduction with the following question that arises naturally from our study.

Question 1.1
For what groups G does there exist a minimal connected and compact metric space X , such that the homeomorphism group H(X ) is isomorphic to G? When can X be chosen to be decomposable, or locally connected?
Note that de Groot showed in [8] that every group can be represented as the group of isometries of a connected, locally connected, complete metric space, and if the group is countable then the space can be chosen to be a locally connected metric continuum [9].

Basic Notions and Definitions
Let X be a compact metric space. A continuous map T : X → X is minimal if there is no proper subset M ⊂ X which is nonempty, closed and T -invariant. In other words, T is minimal if the forward orbit {T n (x) : n ∈ N} is dense in X for every point x ∈ X . By O(x) = {T i (x) : i ∈ Z} we denote the orbit (backward and forward) of a point x ∈ X . A continuum is a compact connected nondegenerate metric space. A continuum is decomposable if it is the union of two distinct proper subcontinua. A continuum which is not decomposable is said to be indecomposable. A continuum is hereditarily indecomposable if every subcontinuum is indecomposable. The composant of a point x ∈ X is the union of all proper subcontinua of X containing x. A decomposition D ⊂ P(X ) of a space X is a partition of X to pairwise disjoint nonempty sets. Decomposition D is an upper semicontinuous decomposition if the elements of D are compact and for every D ∈ D and every open set U ⊂ X containing D there exists another open set V ⊂ X containing D such that for every D ∈ D if D ∩ V = ∅ then D ⊂ U . Let π : X → Y be a continuous surjection between two compact metric spaces and let Y denote the set of points y ∈ Y whose fibers π −1 (y) are singletons. Let X = π −1 (Y ) = {x ∈ X : π −1 (π(x)) = x}. If X is dense in X , then π is called almost oneto-one. If {X i } i∈N is a sequence of topological spaces and { f i } i∈N is a sequence of mappings with f i : X i+1 → X i then the inverse limit lim . If a space can be represented as the inverse limit of arcs, then it is said to be arc-like. The pseudo-arc is a topologically unique arc-like hereditarily indecomposable space [3]. Together with the Cantor set, S 1 and all finite sets it forms a family of building blocks for all topologically homogeneous planar compacta [19]. A nondegenerate compact space X is said to be a Slovak space if its group of homeomorphisms is of the form H (X ) = {T n : n ∈ Z}, where T is minimal. A compact metric space X is an almost Slovak space if its homeomorphism group has the following property: where H + (X ) is cyclic and generated by a minimal homeomorphism, and for every g ∈ H − (X ) we have g 2 ∈ H + (X ).

Almost Slovak Spaces From Inverse Limits
We start by recalling the main points of the construction from [5]. In [5, Theorem 3.1] the authors take a minimal homeomorphism (C, h) of the Cantor set C, the minimal suspension (X , f ) of (C, h) guaranteed by [14] and use the methodology from [5, Theorem 2.3] to construct an almost Slovak space Y as an inverse limit of some properly constructed spaces (Y n , γ n ). The method used in the proof of Theorem 2.3 requires applying some perturbations on (X , f ). The points from the orbit O(q) of a chosen point q ∈ X is replaced with a null sequence of arcs to get the almost one-to-one extension (X , H ) of the suspension (X , f ). A continuous map g : [−1, 2] → [−1, 2] is defined as identity outside the interval (0, 1) such that its inverse limit on [0, 1] is the pseudo-arc. The function is then used while defining where the bonding functions are dependent on g on some properly chosen open set. We may see Y 1 as X with the point q removed, and the resulting "hole" compactified by a pseudo-arc. The consecutive spaces Y n for n ≥ 2 are defined analogously, that is in the n-th step we remove the points { f k (q) : k = −n, −n + 1, . . . , n − 1, n} and compactify each hole in the space by a pseudo-arc. The mapping γ n : Y n+1 → Y n is a natural projection, collapsing two pseudo-arcs to two points for every n ∈ N. Those are used to Observe that the natural projection π : Y → X is one-to-one onto every point but the orbit of q, and π −1 ( f i (q)) is the pseudo-arc for every i ∈ Z. In the last part of the proof the authors construct a minimal homeomorphism H Y : Y → Y as follows: and extend the above definition on the points with π −1 (y) ∈ O(q). As a consequence of their construction it follows that all non-singleton fibers π −1 (y) are pseudo-arcs and all those pseudo-arcs are contained in exactly one composant of Y which we denote by W Y . This method can be also used to construct Slovak spaces, for example by choosing g so that the inverse limit with g| [0,1] is homeomorphic to sin(1/x)-curve.

Almost Slovak Spaces That do not Admit Minimal Noninvertible Maps
In this section we shall adapt the approach from the proof of [5, Theorem 3.1], to construct an almost Slovak space Y , which is not Slovak, and then we will show that they do not admit minimal noninvertible maps. Our aim is to construct orientation reversing homeomorphisms on the spaces from [5], and since any such homeomorphism must have a fixed point, we thus obtain almost Slovak spaces which are not Slovak. Recall that the suspension flow ( t ) t∈R over a homeomorphism h : X → X of a compact space X is the flow defined on the space where x and {x} denote the integer and the fractional part of x respectively.
Note that A 2 = id X and A fixes the arc-component of q = (1, 0). Choose α / ∈ Q such that 10 < α < 11. Then α is minimal [14]. We are going to show that there exists a continuum Y , a minimal homeomorphism H : Y → Y , a surjection π : Y → X , and a nonminimal orientation reversing homeomorphism a : Y → Y such that: First, by the proof of [5, Theorem 2.3] (see [5,Remark 2.4]) we obtain a space X ∞ , that is homeomorphic to X , and such that α lifts to a minimal homeomorphism F : X ∞ → X ∞ . The homeomorphism F is semi-conjugate to α , and has a property that there exists and arc I ⊂ X ∞ such that {F k (I )} k∈Z forms a null sequence. The semi-conjugacy is one-toone outside of k∈Z {F k (I )}. We may assume that X ∞ = X and I = {1} × [−2, 2]. Let n : X → X be a map such that: Observe that for each x / ∈ I 0 there exists a natural number N and an open neighborhood V of (1, x), such that f x ) for all (c, x ) ∈ V and n > N . But since a finite number of intial coordinates does not affect the topological structure of an inverse limit space, we see that if ( x 1 , x 2 , x 3 , . . .) ∈ X 0 and x j / ∈ {1} × I 0 for every j ∈ N, then a small neighborhood of x is homeomorphic to 2 × (0, 1). If, on the other hand, x j ∈ I 0 for some (thus all) j ∈ N then which is a unique maximal pseudo-arc embedded in X 0 . In addition, by the above we get a homeomorphism a 0 : X 0 → X 0 which is semi-conjugate to A, such that a 0 | (X 0 \P 0 ) is conjugate to A| (X \{1}×I 0 ) and a 0 | P 0 is conjugate to the natural extension σ g . We may view X 0 as X with I 0 replaced by P 0 . Let ξ 0 : X 0 → X be the projection onto the first coordinate of the inverse limit space lim To define X m+1 we define f (m+1) n : X m → X m as: for j = −m − 1, . . . , m + 1. Furthermore observe that we have a natural projection γ m : X m+1 → X m which maps pseudo-arcs P −m−1 , P m+1 onto arcs ξ −1 m+1 (I −m−1 ) and ξ −1 , where X −1 = X , and let π : Y → X be the projection from the inverse limit space onto the coordinate space X −1 . Observe that π −1 ({1}× I k ) is a pseudoarc for every k ∈ Z and π is one-to-one on Y \ k∈Z π −1 ({1} × I k ). All composants of Y are continuous one-to-one images of the real line, except the composant W = π −1 (C (1,0) ), where C (1,0) is the composant of (1, 0) in X , which contains countably many pseudo-arcs connected by arcs. We define the homeomorphism a : Y → Y by a = (a 0 , a 1 , a 2 , . . .).
Homeomorphism a is well defined since the homeomorphisms (a m : m = 0, 1, . . .) commute with the bonding maps (γ m : m = 0, 1, . . .). Note that a = π −1 • A • π. It follows from the construction that a 2 = id Y since a 2 agrees with id Y on a dense set by the fact that A 2 = id X . Now we argue that the homeomorphism a : Y → Y is nonminimal. But this is easy to see, since a(π −1 ({1} × I 0 )) = π −1 ({1} × I 0 ) and because π −1 ({1} × I 0 ) is a pseudo-arc that has the fixed point property [17] it follows that a has a fixed point.
Next we define the homeomorphism H : Y → Y . Since we have we argue analogously as in the proof of [5, Theorem 3.1] to get a minimal homomorphism H that is an almost one-to-one extension of F, and the proof is complete.
Now we shall show that the above almost Slovak spaces, in fact all constructed in [5, Theorem 3.1], do not admit minimal noninvertible maps.

Theorem 3.2 Every minimal map on Y is a homeomorphism.
Proof Let F : Y → Y be the generator of the homeomorphism group H (Y ) and G : Y → Y be a continuous minimal noninvertible surjection, fixed once and for all. We start with the following straightforward observations, which we include for completness. Proof (of Claim 3.3) Assume that G(K ) = Y and K is mapped by G to two different composants K 1 = K 2 . Since every composant in Y is connected and G is continuous it holds that K 1 ∩ K 2 = ∅. However, since Y is an indecomposable continuum, it consists of pairwise disjoint composants, therefore K 1 = K 2 .

Claim 3.4
Let W be the special composant of Y , that contains a null sequence of pseudo-arcs.
Proof (of Claim 3.4) Let K denote the family of pathwise connected composants of Y . It consists of all composants of Y but W . Each composant in K is dense in Y while path components of W are not dense. G(K ) = Y for any K ∈ K since Y is not pathwise connected. Also G(W ) = Y since W has no dense path components. Hence for any K ∈ K we have G(K ) ∈ K which implies that G −1 (W ) = W and, by surjectivity, G(W ) = W .
By (I n ) n∈Z denote the path components of W , keeping in mind that every pair of consecutive arcs I n and I n+1 is joined by a pseudo-arc P n . Let C(k 1 , k 2 ) = k 2 n=k 1 I n ∪ P n for extended integers −∞ ≤ k 1 ≤ k 2 ≤ ∞. In particular W = C(−∞, ∞), and for any integers k 1 , k 2 the continuum C(k 1 , k 2 ) is arc-like. Note that even though an arc cannot be mapped onto a pseudo-arc, the converse does not hold, see [15]. In fact the pseudo-arc can be mapped onto any set homeomorphic to C(k 1 , k 2 ), where k 1 , k 2 ∈ Z. This makes our considerations more delicate then for Slovak spaces in the proof of [12,Lemma 6].
If G| W is orientation reversing (i.e. lim r →±∞ G(r ) = ∓∞), then since a one-to-one image of W compactified by −∞ and ∞ becomes an arc-like continuum, with G extending to this compactification by setting G(−∞) = ∞, G(∞) = −∞, and arc-like continua have the fixed point property [17], G| W must have a fixed point. Therefore we may assume that G preserves orientation. Now note that if G(I n )∩ P m = ∅ for some n, m ∈ Z then G(I n )∩ P m is a single point, as an arc cannot be mapped onto any nondegenerate subcontinuum of the pseudoarc (the latter contains no locally connected continua). In addition, since {P k } k∈Z forms a null sequence we must have lim |k|→∞ diam(G(P k )) = 0. Therefore there exists an N ∈ N such that for all |k| > N there exists an integer m k such that G (C(k, k)) ⊆ B k (C(m k , m k )), where lim |n|→∞ k = 0 (where B k (C(m k , m k )) denotes an k -neighborhood of C(m k , m k )).
If there exists an m 0 ∈ Z such that, either for all k > N we have m k = k + m 0 , or for all k < −N we have m k = k + m 0 , then G agrees with F m 0 on a dense set (this follows from the fact that arc-like continua have a coincidence point property [26,Theorem 12.29], and the fact that −k−1 n=−∞ P n as well as ∞ n=k+1 P n are dense in Y ), and so G = F m 0 , contradicting noninvertibility of G. Thus, there exists a positive integer M such that for infinitely many k (|k| > M) we must have m k = m k+1 . Therefore there exists a k 0 > M such that G(C(−k 0 , k 0 )) ⊂ C(−k 0 , k 0 ). Since C(−k 0 , k 0 ) is arc-like, it follows that G has a fixed point in C(−k 0 , k 0 ) which contradicts minimality and the proof is complete.

Theorem 3.5 There exist minimal spaces without minimal noninvertible maps, that are neither S 1 nor Slovak.
Proof This is a consequence of Theorems 3.1 and 3.2.

Minimal Spaces with Degenerate Homeomorphism Groups
Theorem 4.1 There exist uncountably many minimal spaces with degenerate homeomorphism groups. In addition, for any real number r ≥ 0 there exists such a space that admits a minimal map with topological entropy r .
Proof We modify the construction of the space Y from [5, Theorem 3.1] (so the one described in the present paper in Sect. 2.2 and adapted in the proof of Theorem 3.1) in the following way. Let ψ : [0, 1] → [0, 1] be a piecewise linear map defined by: (4.1) is a 3-fold Knaster continuum [28], which has two endpoints, (0, 0, . . .) and (1, 1, . . .) Note that Theorem 3.1. from [5] still holds with such a modification and as an outcome we obtain a continuum Z. Again, there is a special composant W of Z, that contains a family of nowhere locally connected continua {L n } n∈Z such that L n = K n ∪ P n , where K n and P n are the 3-fold Knaster continuum and the pseudo-arc respectively, for each n ∈ Z. Let {o n } = K n ∩ P n for each n ∈ Z. It follows from Theorem 3.1. in [5] that Z is an almost Slovak space. In addition Z does not admit an orientation reversing homeomorphism, so Z is in fact a Slovak space that carries a minimal homeomorphism G, generating the homeomorphism group of Z. We will modify Z to obtain a space that admits no minimal homeomorphism. It follows again from Theorem 3.1 in [5] that G(o n ) = o n+1 for all n ∈ Z. For every n ∈ N and every pseudo-arc P n ⊂ W we choose a proper subpseudo-arc p n ⊂ P n as follows. Let p 0 ⊂ P 0 be a pseudo-arc such that p 0 ∩ K 0 = {o 0 } and p n = G n ( p 0 ) for each n ≥ 0. Since the pseudo-arcs { p n } n≥0 form a null sequence, we can shrink each p n to the point o n (n ≥ 0) to obtain a new space Z on which we have a map G which is semi-conjugate to the map G on Z, with semi-conjugacy given by the quotient map π : Z → Z , with π( p n ) = o n for all n ≥ 0, see the diagram below.
Note that G is minimal, as a factor of the minimal homeomorphism G. However G is not invertible at π( p 0 ). For each n ∈ Z we again have that π(L n ) is a one-point union of the 3-fold Knaster continuum π(K n ) and the pseudo-arc π(P n ), with the common point π(o n ) = π( p n ) for each n ≥ 0. The fact that π(P n ), for each n ≥ 0, is a pseudo-arc follows from Theorem 4 in [3], since π(P n ) = P n / p n for all n ≥ 0. Now suppose that H : Z → Z is a homeomorphism. Then H (π(K n )) = π(K n+k ), H (π(P n )) = π(P n+k ) and so H (π(o n )) = π(o n+k ) for some k ∈ Z. But then π(G k (o n )) = H (π(o n )) for all n < 0. Since {π(o n )} n<0 is dense in Z (because (o n ) n<0 forms a dense orbit of a minimal homeomorphism G in Z ), and any map is uniquely determined on a dense set, it follows that π • G j = H • π for some j ≥ 0. Consequently H is noninvertible at π(o 0 ) = π( p 0 ) unless j = 0. This shows that H = id Z and completes the proof. The construction yields uncountably many nonhomeomorphic examples, as we can start with any minimal suspension. For any real number r ≥ 0, this minimal suspension can be chosen so that the topological entropy of the generating homeomorphism G : Z → Z, and thus G , is precisely r (cf. Theorem 5 in [12]).

On Indecomposability of Slovak Spaces
In this section we answer the following question from [12] in the negative. Proof We start by proving (D1). Let X be a Slovak space obtained from an irrational flow by α, and Y be a Slovak space obtained from an irrational flow by β on a 2-adic solenoid, by the Fig. 1 The sets W X × W Y (left) and π(W X × W Y ) (right), where S is the one-point union of the 3-fold Knaster continuum and pseudo-arc, and A is an arc same method as Z in Sect. 4, where α and β are two irrationals that are rationally independent.
In particular, both X and Y contain a special composant that contains a null sequence of the one-point unions of the 3-fold Knaster continuum and the pseudo-arc, which forms an orbit of the generating minimal homeomorphism. Let W X and W Y be the special composants of X and Y respectively, and h X , h Y be the minimal generating homeomorphisms for the respective Slovak spaces. Consider the space Z = X × Y and note that it is a decomposable continuum, as any product of continua is decomposable [20]. Note also that (h X , h Y ) is a minimal homeomorphism of Z . However Z is not Slovak, since it admits nonminimal homeomorphisms of the form (id X , h n Y ) and (h n X , id Y ) for n ∈ Z. We are going to "kill" such homeomorphisms. Consider the subset W X × W Y of Z . This set contains a "chessboard" of special "rectangles" S n,m that are Cartesian squares of the one-point union of the Knaster continuum and the pseudo-arc (there is a natural correspondence with Z 2 by considering the set of times of the initial flows {(nα, mβ) : (n, m) ∈ Z 2 }). There are other "rectangles" that are either homeomorphic to a 2-disk, or to a Cartesian product of an arc with the one-point union of the Knaster continuum and pseudo-arc; see the left picture on Fig. 1. Let us consider the family S = {S n,n : n ∈ Z}, of rectangles on the main diagonal, and an equivalence relation: x ≡ y iff x, y ∈ S n,n for some n ∈ Z.
Since S forms a null sequence, the quotient space Z = Z / ≡ is a metric continuum, by Proposition 2 and Proposition 3 on p. 13-14 in [10].
It is easy to see that Z is decomposable, since if A ∪ B = Z with A, B two distinct proper subcontinua of Z then π(A) ∪ π(B) = Z , where π : Z → Z is the quotient map. If π(A) = π(B) then ((A \ B) ∪ (B \ A)) ⊂ S, and since Z \ S is dense it follows that A and B are dense in Z , and thus A = B = Z which leads to a contradiction. We argue similarly if π(A) ⊂ π(B) or π(B) ⊂ π(A), since then π(B) = Z or π(A) = Z respectively. These contradictions show that Z is decomposable.
Note that the homeomorphism H = π • (h X , h Y ) • π −1 is minimal on Z , as factors of minimal maps are minimal. Now we shall show that H is a generator of the homeomorphism group of Z . By the same arguments as in the proof of Theorem 3.2 in [5], any homeomorphism of Z is of the form (h X , h j Y ), for some , j ∈ Z. Consequently, without loss of generality, we may assume that if = j then j = 0 or = 0. Suppose by contradiction that there exists a homeomorphism G : Z → Z such that G = H k for all k ∈ Z. Let C X = W X be a composant of X . Then G is a translation on π(C X ×W Y ), since this set is homeomorphic with C X ×W Y (by the fact that π| (C X ×W Y ) is a homeomorphism). Then π •(id X , h j Y )(v) = G•π(v) for each v ∈ C X × W Y and some j ∈ Z. But since C X × W Y is dense in X × Y we must have But since (id X , h j Y )(S n,n ) = S n,n+ j , for the point s = π(S n,n ) and the nondegenerate continuum S = π(S n,n+ j ) we get G(s) = S, unless j = 0, a contradiction. Arguing the same way with W X × C Y , where C Y = W Y is a composant of Y we get that = 0 and so G = id Z which is again a contradiction. So the homeomorphism group of Z is {H k : k ∈ Z} and the proof is complete. Since we have uncountably many choices for α and β, there exist uncountably many spaces with the desired properties.
The proofs for (D2) and (D3) are analogous, by combining with the results of Sects. 3 and 4.

Remark 5.3
We could have constructed X and Y that contain a null sequence of sin(1/x)curves instead of Knaster continua with pseudo-arcs in the above proof, and use the same arguments thereafter. Starting with analogous Slovak spaces from [12] would also suffice.