Abstract
Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is a fundamental tool for hemodynamic monitoring in critical patients. It allows evaluating the left ventricle’s stroke volume based on the measurement of the velocity-time integral (VTI) of the left ventricle outflow tract (LVOT). However, in the intensive care unit obtaining adequate echocardiographic views may present a challenge. We propose to measure, as a surrogate of the stroke volume, the carotid flow with a novel technique. This is an observational, prospective, and simple blind study, conducted in the intensive care unit of Sanatorio de los Arcos and Hospital Aleman, in Buenos Aires, Argentina. We measured the carotid systodiastolic flow (CSD) VTI and the carotid systolic flow (CS) VTI at the level of the left supraclavicular fossa and we compared it with the LVOT VTI obtained by TTE. We evaluated 43 subjects. Spearman’s correlation coefficient between LVOT VTI and CS VTI was 0.81 (95% CI 0.67–0.89) and between LVOT VTI and CSD VTI was 0.89 (95% CI 0.81–0.94). The Bland–Altman method analysis of the 5-chamber apical window LVOT VTI compared to the CSD VTI showed a bias of − 0.2 (95% CI − 0.82 to 0.43), with a concordance interval between − 4.2 (95% CI − 5.2 to − 3.1) and 3.8 cm (95% CI 2.7 to 4.9). The percentage error was 37.9%. Almost 100% of the values fell within the concordance limits, and no trend was observed in bias across the spectrum of mean variables. Although the CSD VTI could not be interchangeable with the LVOT VTI, it could be considered as its surrogate.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blanco P. Rationale for using the velocity-time integral and the minute distance for assessing the stroke volume and cardiac output in point-of-care settings. Ultrasound J. 2020;12(1):21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-020-00170-x.
Mercado P, Maizel J, Beyls C, Titeca-Beauport D, Joris M, Kontar L, Riviere A, Bonef O, Soupison T, Tribouilloy C, de Cagny B, Slama M. Transthoracic echocardiography: an accurate and precise method for estimating cardiac output in the critically ill patient. Crit Care. 2017;21(1):136. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1737-7.
Wang J, Zhou D, Gao Y, Wu Z, Wang X, Lv C. Effect of VTILVOT variation rate on the assessment of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients. Med (Baltim). 2020;20(47):e22702. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.000000000022702.
Feissel M, Michard F, Mangin I, Ruyer O, Faller JP, Teboul JL. Respiratory changes in aortic blood velocity as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients with septic shock. Chest. 2001;119(3):867–73. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.119.3.867.
Biais M, Vidil L, Sarrabay P, Cottenceau V, Revel P, Sztark F. Changes in stroke volume induced by passive leg raising in spontaneously breathing patients: comparison between echocardiography and Vigileo/FloTrac device. Crit Care. 2009;13(6):R195. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc8195.
Jozwiak M, Depret F, Teboul JL, Alphonsine JE, Lai C, Richard C, Monnet X. Predicting fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients by using combined end-expiratory and end-inspiratory occlusions with echocardiography. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(11):e1131–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000002704.
Muller L, Toumi M, Bousquet PJ, Riu-Poulenc B, Louart G, Candela D, Zoric L, Suehs C, de La Coussaye JE, Molinari N, Lefrant JY. An increase in aortic blood flow after an infusion of 100 ml colloid over 1 minute can predict fluid responsiveness: the mini-fluid challenge study. Anesthesiology. 2011;115(3):541–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e318229a500.
Ma IWY, Caplin JD, Azad A, Wilson C, Fifer MA, Bagchi A, Liteplo AS, Noble VE. Correlation of carotid blood flow and corrected carotid flow time with invasive cardiac output measurements. Crit Ultrasound J. 2017;9(1):10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-017-0065-0.
Peng QY, Zhang LN, Ai ML, Li L, Hu CH, Zhang YX, Liu W, Feng Q, Zou Y, Ai YH, Chinese Critical Ultrasound Study Group. Common carotid artery sonography versus transthoracic echocardiography for cardiac output measurements in intensive care unit patients. J Ultrasound Med. 2017;36(9):1793–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/Jum.14214.
Sidor M, Premachandra L, Hanna B, Nair N, Misra A. Carotid flow as a surrogate for cardiac output measurement in hemodynamically stable participants. J Intensive Care Med. 2020;35(7):650–5.
Abu-Arafeh A, Jordan H, Drummond G. Reporting of method comparison studies: a review of advice, an assessment of current practice, and specific suggestions for future reports. Br J Anaesth. 2016;117:569–75. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aew320.
Polak JF, Alessi-Chinetti JM, Kremkau FW. Doppler velocity estimates of internal carotid artery stenosis: angle correction parallel to the color doppler lumen versus parallel to the artery wall. J Ultrasound Med. 2019;38(12):3211–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.15029.
Gerke O. Reporting standards for a bland–Altman agreement analysis: a review of methodological reviews. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020;10:334. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10050334.
Cristina Gil Martinez. Graphic analysis by Bland–Altman. https://github.com/CristinaGil/Ciencia-de-Datos-R/blob/master/PDF/Analisis_grafico_Bland–Altman.pdf.
Eicke BM, von Schlichting J, Mohr-Ahaly S, Schlosser A, von Bardeleben RS, Krummenauer F, Hopf HC. Lack of association between carotid artery volume blood flow and cardiac output. J Ultrasound Med. 2001;20(12):1293-8; quiz 1300. https://doi.org/10.7863/Jum.2001.20.12.1293.
Cecconi M, De Backer D, Antonelli M, Beale R, Bakker J, Hofer C, Jaeschke R, Mebaza A, Pinsky MR, Teboul JL, Vincent JL, Rhodes A. Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40(12):1795–815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-014-3525-z.
Critchley LA, Critchley JA. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput. 1999;15(2):85–91. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009982611386.
Guarracino F, Ferro B, Morelli A, Bertini P, Baldassarri R, Pinsky MR. Ventricular arterial decoupling in human septic shock. Crit Care. 2014;18(2):R80. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc13842.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr Ezequiel Monteverde for his help in statistical analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: IC; Methodology: IC; Formal analysis: IC; Investigation: IC, VOC, FAS, BTO; Writing – original draft preparation: IC; Writing – review and editing: IC, VOC; Supervision: IC, PMM, FMT.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Cheong, I., Otero Castro, V., Sosa, F.A. et al. Carotid flow as a surrogate of the left ventricular stroke volume. J Clin Monit Comput 37, 661–667 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-022-00938-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-022-00938-7