Abstract
In Pānini’s grammar of Sanskrit one finds the Śivasūtras, a table which defines the natural classes of phonological segments in Sanskrit by intervals. We present a formal argument which shows that, using his representation method, Pānini’s way of ordering the phonological segments to represent the natural classes is optimal. The argument is based on a strictly set-theoretical point of view depending only on the set of natural classes and does not explicitly take into account the phonological features of the segments, which are, however, implicitly given in the way a language clusters its phonological inventory. The key idea is to link the graph of the Hasse-diagram of the set of natural classes closed under intersection to Śivasūtra-style representations of the classes. Moreover, the argument is so general that it allows one to decide for each set of sets whether it can be represented with Pānini’s method. Actually, Pānini had to modify the set of natural classes to define it by the Śivasūtras (the segment h plays a special role). We show that this modification was necessary and, in fact, the best possible modification. We discuss how every set of classes can be modified in such a way that it can be defined in a Śivasūtra-style representation.1
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bloomfield, L., 1929, “Review of Liebich, Konkordanz Pāini-Candra,” Language 5, 267–276.
Diestel, R., 1997, Graph Theory, New York: Springer.
Ganter, B. and R. Wille, 1999, Formal Concept Analysis. Mathematical Foundations, Berlin: Springe.
Hall, T.A., 2000, Phonologie. Eine Einführung, Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.
Kiparsky, P., 1991, “Economy and the construction of the Śivasūtras”. in Pāninian Studies, M.M. Deshpande and S. Bhate, eds., Michigan: Ann Arbor.
Kiparsky, P., 1994, “Pāninian linguistics,” in The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Vol. 6, R.E. Asher, ed., Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Kornai, A., 1993, “The generative power of feature geometry,” Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 8, 37–46.
Staal, F.J., 1962, “A method of linguistic description,” Language 38, 1–10.
Wurzel, W.U., 1981, “Phonologie: Segmentale Struktur,” pp. 898–990 in Grundzüge einer deutschen Grammatik, K.E. Heidolph, W. Flüamig, and W. Motsch, eds., Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Petersen, W. A Mathematical Analysis of Pānini’s Śivasūtras . J Logic Lang Inf 13, 471–489 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-004-2117-7
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-004-2117-7