Skip to main content
Log in

Prospective study of zero-fluoroscopy laser balloon pulmonary vein isolation for the management of atrial fibrillation

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In recent years, there has been increased focus on the development of safe and effective strategies to minimize and ultimately eliminate fluoroscopy use in the electrophysiology lab due to the inherent risks to patients and staff associated with this imaging source. However, studies examining these innovative fluoroless strategies for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using catheters without direct 3D mapping system integration are lacking. We sought to develop a method to perform zero-fluoroscopy laser balloon PVI for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), and to test the safety and efficacy of this approach.

Methods

We developed a standardized method for performing PVI using the X3 laser balloon (LB) system, 3-dimensional electroanatomic mapping (3D-EAM) and intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) in a cohort of patients with symptomatic AF. The primary endpoint of the study was the ability to perform PVI without the use of fluoroscopy. Secondary outcomes were rate of successful transseptal puncture on first attempt, first pass isolation of target PVs, mean procedural time, active laser time to achieve PVI, need for use of supplemental energy sources, and procedural complication rates.

Results

Two hundred consecutive patients undergoing PVI were recruited in the study. In the zero-fluoroscopy group, LB PVI was successfully performed in 100% of participants (n = 100) without the need for fluoroscopy. Transseptal access was achieved in 100% of cases on the first attempt. Successful first pass PVI was achieved in 360 of the 387 pulmonary veins attempted (93%). Mean procedural time was 68.2 ± 16.2 min in the zero-fluoroscopy group versus 67.5 ± 17.0 min in the conventional fluoroscopy group. PVI was able to be achieved in 100% of cases in both groups without need for use of supplemental energy sources. In the zero-fluoroscopy group there were minimal complications, with 3% of all cases having groin complications and 1 patient with a pericardial effusion noted post-procedure which was managed conservatively.

Conclusions

We demonstrated that successful zero-fluoroscopy LB PVI could be performed at a single high-volume center by experienced operators in an effective manner, without significant complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hauptmann M, Daniels RD, Cardis E, et al. epidemiological studies of low-dose ionizing radiation and cancer: summary bias assessment and meta-analysis. JNCI Monographs. 2020;2020(56):188–200. https://doi.org/10.1093/JNCIMONOGRAPHS/LGAA010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Klein LW, Tra Y, Garratt KN, et al. Occupational health hazards of interventional cardiologists in the current decade: results of the 2014 SCAI membership survey. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;86(5):913–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/CCD.25927.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Abbott JD. Controlling radiation exposure in interventional cardiology. Circ:Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7(4):425–8. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001815.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sarkozy A, de Potter T, Heidbuchel H, et al. Occupational radiation exposure in the electrophysiology laboratory with a focus on personnel with reproductive potential and during pregnancy: A European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) consensus document endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS). EP Europace. 2017;19(12):1909–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/EUROPACE/EUX252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Heidbuchel H, Wittkampf FHM, Vano E, et al. Practical ways to reduce radiation dose for patients and staff during device implantations and electrophysiological procedures. EP Europace. 2014;16(7):946–64. https://doi.org/10.1093/EUROPACE/EUT409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Picano E. Sustainability of medical imaging. BMJ. 2004;328(7439):578–80. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.328.7439.578.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Rubenstein DS, Holmes BB, Manfredi JA, McKillop MS, Netzler PC, Ward CC. Aegrescit medendo: orthopedic disability in electrophysiology-call for fluoroscopy elimination—review and commentary. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. Published online March 8, 2022:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10840-022-01173-5/TABLES/1

  8. Sharma PS, Huang HD, Trohman RG, Naperkowski A, Ellenbogen KA, Vijayaraman P. Low Fluoroscopy permanent his bundle pacing using electroanatomic mapping: a feasibility study. Circ:Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. 2019;12(2). https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.118.006967

  9. Ge X, Chen M, Sha Z, et al. Three-dimensional mapping in cardiac implantable electronic device — a feasible and effective alternative to fluoroscopy. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-022-01297-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang H, Serafini N, Rodriguez J, Sharma P, Krishnan K, Trohman R. Near-zero fluoroscopic approach for laser balloon pulmonary vein isolation ablation: a case study. J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2020;11(4):4069–74. https://doi.org/10.19102/ICRM.2020.110402.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Cuellar-Silva JR, Albrecht EM, Sutton BS. Rhythmia zero-fluoroscopy workflow with high-power, short-duration ablation: retrospective analysis of procedural data. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-022-01283-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Falasconi G, Penela D, Soto-Iglesias D, et al. A standardized stepwise zero-fluoroscopy approach with transesophageal echocardiography guidance for atrial fibrillation ablation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-021-01086-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Pani A, Belotti G, Bonanno C, et al. Predictors of zero X-ray ablation for supraventricular tachycardias in a nationwide multicenter experience. Circ:Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. 2018;11(3). https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005592

  14. Alyesh D, Frederick J, Choe W, Sundaram S. Step by step: how to perform a fluoroless cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. Published online May 8, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/JCE.15502

  15. Direct visualization, speed, and flexibility in pulmonary vein isolation using the new HeartLight X3 endoscopic ablation system: interview with Dr. Mohamed Djelmami-Hani. Accessed May 28, 2022. https://www.hmpgloballearningnetwork.com/site/eplab/case-study/direct-visualization-speed-and-flexibility-pulmonary-vein-isolation-using-new.

  16. Dukkipati SR, Neuzil P, Kautzner J, Petru J, Wichterle D, Skoda J, Cihak R, Peichl P, Dello Russo A, Pelargonio G, Tondo C, Natale A, Reddy VY. The durability of pulmonary vein isolation using the visually guided laser balloon catheter: multicenter results of pulmonary vein remapping studies. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9(6):919–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.01.019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chun JKR, Bordignon S, Last J, et al. Cryoballoon versus laserballoon: insights from the first prospective randomized balloon trial in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circ: Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. 2021;14:9294. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.120.009294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Heeger CH, Tiemeyer CM, Phan HL, et al. Rapid pulmonary vein isolation utilizing the third-generation laserballoon – The PhoeniX registry. IJC Heart Vasculature. 2020;29:100576. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJCHA.2020.100576.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Demo H, Aranda C, Razminia M. Fluoroless left atrial access for radiofrequency and cryoballoon ablations using a novel radiofrequency transseptal wire. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022;64:183–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-022-01157-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Li D, Ze F, Yuan Cz. et al. The safety and efficiency of fluoroless site-specific transseptal puncture guided by three-dimensional intracardiac echocardiography. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-022-01298-7

  21. Cha MJ, Lee E, Oh S. Zero-fluoroscopy catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a transitional period experience. J Arrhythmia. 2020;36(6):1061. https://doi.org/10.1002/JOA3.12448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gupta A, Perera T, Ganesan A, et al. Complications of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation a systematic review. Circ: Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. 2013;6(6):1082–8. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000768/-/DC1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Steinbeck G, Sinner MF, Lutz M, Müller-Nurasyid M, Kääb S, Reinecke H. Incidence of complications related to catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter: a nationwide in-hospital analysis of administrative data for Germany in 2014. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(45):4020–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/EURHEARTJ/EHY452.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jamario Skeete.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Institution Review Board (IRB) approval and ethical oversite was provided by the Westside Regional Medical Center IRB. All rules and regulations set forth by the IRB of the governing institution were adhered to.

Informed consent

For inclusion to the study, informed written consent was obtained and uploaded to the patient’s electronic medical record. The data and study materials are available within the article and its online supplementary file.

Conflict of interest

Jamario Skeete reports no disclosures. Henry Huang reports serving as a consultant for Biosense Webster and CardioFocus and receiving research grants from Medtronic and Abbott. David Kenigsberg reports serving as a consultant for CardioFocus.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Skeete, J., Huang, H.D. & Kenigsberg, D. Prospective study of zero-fluoroscopy laser balloon pulmonary vein isolation for the management of atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 66, 1669–1677 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-023-01477-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-023-01477-0

Keywords

Navigation