Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sex ratio imbalance following blastocyst transfer is associated with ICSI but not with IVF: an analysis of 14,892 single embryo transfer cycles

  • Assisted Reproduction Technologies
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Assisted reproductive technology (ART) has an impact on secondary sex ratio (SSR), which is seemed to be elevated after blastocyst transfer (BT) but decreased following ICSI procedure. We aim to assess whether the higher SSR associated with BT could be influenced by fertilization method used.

Methods

All consecutive IVF/ICSI cycles (fresh and frozen) involving single embryo transfer (SET) resulting in a live birth between 2015 and 2019 were retrospective analyzed. Logistic regression was used to model the effect on the SSR of maternal and specific ART characteristics.

Results

Six thousand nine hundred twenty-two women were included with the crude SSR of 54.8%. The impact of BT on SSR is influenced by the fertilization method used. After adjustment for potential confounders, the SSR in the ICSI BT group was significantly higher when compared to ICSI cleavage-stage embryo SET (aOR 1.24; 95% CI 1.10–1.40, P < 0.001). However, this effect was not detected among SBT with IVF treatment (aOR 1.04; 95% CI 0.97–1.12, P = 0.260). Assessing blastocyst morphological parameters, high trophectoderm quality was significantly associated with elevated SSR (aOR 1.76, 95% CI 1.34–2.31 [A vs. C], and aOR 1.28, 95% CI 1.14–1.44 [B vs. C]). No significant difference was shown in expansion, inner cell mass, or days of blastocyst formation between male and female blastocysts.

Conclusions

The impact of BT on SSR could be influenced by the fertilization method used. The higher SSR was observed after BT with ICSI procedures but not with IVF. Interpretation of the findings is limited by the potential for selection and confounding bias.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig.1
Fig.2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bai F, Wang DY, Fan YJ, Qiu J, Wang L, Dai Y, et al. Assisted reproductive technology service availability, efficacy and safety in mainland China: 2016. Hum Reprod. 2020;35:446–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wilson K, Hardy ICW. Statistical analysis of sex ratios: an introduction. In: Hardy ICW, editor. Sex ratios: concepts and research methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002. p. 48–92.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Wu H. Maternal stress and sex ratio at birth in Sweden over two and a half centuries: a retest of the Trivers-Willard hypothesis. Hum Reprod. 2021;36(10):2782–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Maalouf WE, Mincheva MN, Campbell BK, Hardy IC. Effects of assisted reproductive technologies on human sex ratio at birth. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(5):1321–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dean JH, Chapman MG, Sullivan EA. The effect on human sex ratio at birth by assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures - an assessment of babies born following single embryo transfers, Australia and New Zealand, 2002–2006. BJOG. 2010;117:1628–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hentemann M, Briskemyr S, Bertheussen K. Blastocyst transfer and gender: IVF versus ICSI. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2009;26:433–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Luke B, Brown MB, Grainger DA, Baker VL, Ginsburg E, Stern JE. The sex ratio of singleton offspring in assisted-conception pregnancies. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:1579–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bu Z, Chen ZJ, Huang G, Zhang H, Wu Q, Ma Y, et al. Live birth sex ratio after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in China--an analysis of 121,247 babies from 18 centers. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e113522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Narvaez JL, Chang J, Boulet SL, Davies MJ, Kissin DM. Trends and correlates of the sex distribution among U.S. assisted reproductive technology births. Fertil Steril. 2019;112(2):305–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Luna M, Duke M, Copperman A, Grunfeld L, Sandler B, Barritt J. Blastocyst embryo transfer is associated with a sex-ratio imbalance in favor of male offspring. Fertil Steril. 2007;87:519–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Alfarawati S, Fragouli E, Colls P, Stevens J, Gutiérrez-Mateo C, Schoolcraft WB, et al. The relationship between blastocyst morphology, chromosomal abnormality, and embryo gender. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(2):520–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Thomas E, Katja T, Mayer Richard B, Peter O. Quantitative and qualitative trophectoderm grading allows for prediction of live birth and gender. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;331:49–57.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Eaton JL, Hacker MR, Barrett CB, Thornton KL, Penzias AS. Influence of embryo sex on development to the blastocyst stage and euploidy. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(3):936–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhu J, Zhuang X, Chen L, Liu P, Qiao J. Effect of embryo culture media on percentage of males at birth. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:1039–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Weston G, Osianlis T, Catt J, Vollenhoven B. Blastocyst transfer does not cause a sex-ratio imbalance. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:1302–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Csokmay JM, Hill MJ, Cioppettini FV, Miller KA, Scott RT Jr, Frattarelli JL. Live birth sex ratios are not influenced by blastocyst-stage embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:913–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dumoulin JC, Derhaag JG, Bras M, Van Montfoort AP, Kester AD, Evers JL, Geraedts JP, Coonen E. Growth rate of human preimplantation embryos is sex dependent after ICSI but not after IVF. Hum Rep. 2005;2(20):484–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hesketh T, Xing ZW. Abnormal sex ratios in human populations: causes and consequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(36):13271–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Blastocyst culture and transfer in clinical-assisted reproduction: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:667–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Marsh CA, Farr SL, Chang J, Kissin DM, Grainger DA, Posner SF, et al. Trends and factors associated with the day 5 embryo transfer, assisted reproductive technology surveillance, USA, 2001–2009. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:2325–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Glujovsky D, Blake D, Farquhar C, Bardach A. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database of Sys Rev. 2012;7:CD002118.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhou C, Wang XL, Zheng WJ, Zhou XD, Li L, Hesketh T. The high sex ratio in China: what do the Chinese think? J Biosocial Sci. 2012;44:121–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhou X, Yan Z, Therese H. Depression and aggression in never-married men in China: a growing problem. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2012;48:1087–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shi W, Zhang S, Zhao W, Xia X, Wang M, Wang H, et al. Factors related to clinical pregnancy after vitrified-warmed embryo transfer: a retrospective and multivariate logistic regression analysis of 2313 transfer cycles. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(7):1768–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Li M, Ma C, Shi J, et al. Effect of normal sperm morphology rate (NSMR) on clinical outcomes and fertilization methods selection in the ultra-short-term GnRH-a protocol. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2016;32(2):120–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mangoli E, Khalili MA, Talebi AR, et al. Association between early embryo morphokinetics plus transcript levels of sperm apoptotic genes and clinical outcomes in IMSI and ICSI cycles of male factor patients. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020;37(10):2555–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Li M, Wang H, Ma C, Shi J. Transferring two grades I cleavage-stage embryo might not be a good protocol. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2017;33(7):557–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:1155–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hunault CC, Habbema J, Eijkemans M, Collins JA, Evers J, et al. Two new prediction rules for spontaneous pregnancy leading to live birth among subfertile couples, based on the synthesis of three previous models. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:2019–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tarín JJ, García-Pérez MA, Hermenegildo C, Cano A. Changes in sex ratio from fertilization to birth in assisted-reproductive-treatment cycles. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014;23(12):56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Setti AS, Figueira RC, Braga DP, Iaconelli A Jr, Borges E Jr. Gender incidence of intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection-derived embryos: a prospective randomized study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;24(4):420–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Umehara T, Tsujita N, Shimada M. Activation of Toll-like receptor 7/8 encoded by the X chromosome alters sperm motility and provides a novel simple technology for sexing sperm. PLoS Biol. 2019;17(8):e3000398.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hasanen E, Elqusi K, ElTanbouly S, Hussin AE, AlKhadr H, Zaki H, Henkel R, Agarwal A. PICSI vs. MACS for abnormal sperm DNA fragmentation ICSI cases: a prospective randomized trial. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020;37(10):2605–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Dyer S, Chambers GM, de Mouzon J, Nygren KG, Zegers-Hochschild F, Mansour R, et al. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: Assisted Reproductive Technology 2008, 2009 and 2010. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:1588–609.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. De Geyter C, Calhaz-Jorge C, Kupka MS, Wyns C, Mocanu E, Motrenko T, European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), et al. ART in Europe, 2014: results generated from European registries by ESHRE: the European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Hum Reprod. 2018;33(9):1586–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Cirkel C, König IR, Schultze-Mosgau A, Beck E, Neumann K, Griesinger G. The use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection is associated with a shift in the secondary sex ratio. Reprod BioMed Online. 2018;37(6):703–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Assisted Reproduction Center, Northwest Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Xi’An, China

    He Cai, Wenjuan Ren, Hui Wang & Juanzi Shi

Authors
  1. He Cai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wenjuan Ren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hui Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Juanzi Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juanzi Shi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cai, H., Ren, W., Wang, H. et al. Sex ratio imbalance following blastocyst transfer is associated with ICSI but not with IVF: an analysis of 14,892 single embryo transfer cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet 39, 211–218 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-021-02387-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-021-02387-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation