Ulva as potential stimulant and attractant for a valuable sea urchin species: a chemosensory study

The green seaweed Ulva is close to becoming popular due to its suitability as potential feedstock production and for food items. However, there is a general lack of studies on the aversion or acceptability of this alga by marine organisms, particularly on its role as a chemoattractant and/or phagostimulant activity. Here we tested the effect of Ulva compressa and other biochemicals as potential chemostimulating compounds for a valuable sea urchin species, Paracentrotus lividus, selected as model species for our tests. Sea urchins’ chemical sensitivity was estimated by analysing movements of spines, pedicellariae, tube feet, and individual locomotion using an innovative bioassay. Our results showed that all forms of Ulva (fresh, defrosted, and fragmented) resulted in an effective stimulus, evoking in sea urchins strong responses with robust activation of spines and tube feet, where the defrosted one was the most stimulating. Among the amino acids tested, glycine, alanine, and glutamine produced a significant response, highlighting for the latter a concentration–response relationship. Sea urchins responded to glucose, not to fructose and sucrose. Spirulina resulted as the most effective stimulus, acting in a dose-dependent manner. Major results indicate the role of Ulva as a chemostimulant and strongly attractant for such herbivore species. From an applied point of view, the presence of potential Ulva’s feed-related compounds, acting as chemoattractants (to reduce food searching time) and/or feeding stimulants (to stimulate ingestion), would improve the several applications of Ulva in the formulation of the feeds for sustainable aquaculture.


Introduction
The boosting of sustainable aquaculture for aquatic plants will play a key role in the future of human and animal feeds production, agriculture biofertilizers, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, emerging packaging, and waste treatment (Pereira, 2016;Cai et al 2021). The margin on economic growth for this industry is mainly relevant in Europe, which contributes only 0.8% of world seaweed production (Cai et al 2021).
Regarding this challenge, the green algae belonging to the genus Ulva (Chlorophyta) have been identified as one of the most suitable candidates for sustainable mariculture and are currently under the attention of the international scientific community generating many expectations (Cai et al 2021;COST Action 20106). The members of Ulvaceae are widely distributed in coastal marine ecosystems, where they provide nutrients and habitat for a variety of invertebrates and fish species. At the same time, they have the capacity to grow rapidly in response to eutrophication, resulting in massive nuisance blooms (Škaloud et al. 2018). The use of Ulva species may cover a wide range of products, from human food, animal feed and food ingredients to chemical constituents and, on a broader view, environmental benefits and ecosystem services (Campbell et al. 2019). However, citizen appreciation of Ulva and its usefulness in human diets, especially in western countries, must be further investigated and validated. On the other hand, its use in the feed industry and aquaculture, specifically in echinoculture, is already considered a primary ingredient or a supplement included in prepared diets (Van Alstyne et al. 2001;Akakabe and Kajiwara 2008;Cyrus et al. 2015;Etwarysing 1 3 et al. 2017;Prato et al. 2018;Shpigel et al. 2018;Kwon et al. 2021). In the context of new feed formulation, which considers Ulva as a biomass source, one of the unknown aspects is whether the target farmed species appreciate this green alga. The primary concern is whether Ulva's biochemical components or trace elements cause a chemical stimulus or chemoattraction to farmed species.
In general, animals can perceive and respond to chemical cues in all environments, including aquatic habitats, where changes in behaviour after the detection of waterborne molecules have been extensively documented for many species and in many behavioural contexts (Bargmann 2006;Kamio and Derby 2017;Mollo et al. 2017).
Sea urchins are generalist herbivores that can have a key role in either structuring or altering benthic macroalgal communities (Lawrence 2013). They are slow-moving, broadcast-spawning marine invertebrates that rely on chemical signals to produce appropriate behavioural responses, such as avoidance of predators, spatial orientation, identification of suitable habitats, localization of potential food sources, and conspecific mates (Lawrence 2013). Pioneering studies have shown that sea urchins may trigger the activation of spines, tube feet, and pedicellariae in conspecifics (Snyder and Snyder 1970;Campbell 1983). For instance, it is known that Strongylocentrotus sp. is attracted by algae recognized as food (Vadas 1977), while Lytechinus variegatus can orient to chemicals emanating from potential food resources over distance, even under turbulent water flow conditions (Pisut 2004). Sea urchins have been reported to respond to distant feeding stimuli with upstream orientation, using odour-guided rheotaxis for chemtrail navigation and odour source localization (Atema 2012). In this respect, their slow speed may facilitate temporal sampling of chemical cues, and the widely distributed array of chemosensory organs may enhance spatial resolution (Weissburg 2000).
Sea urchins, like other echinoderms, also use chemicals in fine-tuning breeding aggregations and spawning synchrony strategies to increase the probability of gamete encounter in animals with external fertilization (Mercier and Hamel 2009;Reuter and Levitan 2010). Despite the broad chemical sensitivity of both larvae and adults of sea urchins, chemoreceptive organs have yet to be identified with certainty. Based on behavioural and histological studies, three main systems have been reported to respond to chemical cues: the "spine system", the tube feet, and the pedicellariae, with responses ranging from simple, local reflex reactions of these systems, to fully coordinated chemotaxis, in which the whole animal moves toward or away from a stimulus source (Sloan and Campbell 1982;Campbell et al. 2001). Sea urchin chemoreceptors belong to the family of the G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), and their high number-up to several hundred-is comparable with that identified in many other animals, thus suggesting that sea urchins possess a sophisticated chemosensory system (Burke et al. 2006;Raible et al. 2006).
In this study, we considered the Mediterranean sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus as a model species to investigate chemosensory responses to a set of Ulva-related stimuli. Moreover, since chemical sensitivity does not necessarily imply positive (attractive) or negative (repulsive) chemotaxis, we also aimed to ascertain if sea urchins are attracted by Ulva.
The main questions regard the identification of the proper form in which these macroalgae should be used as the primary feed, and then the identification of its biochemical compound that can cause chemical stimulation or chemoattraction towards the model species.
To address these questions we carried out a series of trials that considered the following stimuli: fresh, defrosted, and freeze-dried Ulva (Ulva compressa), seawater conditioned with urchins fed with fresh Ulva, and seawater conditioned with faeces from urchins fed with fresh Ulva. Among biochemical compounds, we considered three sugars and six amino acids. Finally, the blue-green alga Spirulina (Arthrospira platensis) was considered as a reference stimulus as it was tested in a previous investigation on the attractant response of sea urchins (Solari et al. 2021a). Under the assumption that any of these substances could be stimulant and, therefore, could subsequently be considered as a potential food source, we analysed by means of an animal bioassay the behavioural responses of sea urchins in terms of their locomotion and movement of spines, pedicellariae, and tube feet.

Animal collection and rearing conditions
Wild specimens of Paracentrotus lividus (n = 100) measuring 30 mm in test diameter (corresponding to the third age class) were collected at a depth of about 5 m from the south coast of Sardinia (Italy). Prior to the experiments, the sea urchins were acclimated for two weeks in Plexiglas tanks containing about 60 L of natural, aerated seawater (SW) at 20 ± 0.5 °C, 34‰ salinity, and a 12 h light/12 h dark photoperiodic regime. According to a previous protocol adopted by Pusceddu et al. (2021), animals were fed with Ulva three times a week; uneaten food and/or faecal material were removed every 2 days along a partial (less than 10%) water exchange. The sea urchins were not fed for 48 h preceding the experiments to prevent any potential adaptation of their chemoreceptor neurons (CRNs) to chemical stimulation. All experiments were carried out in full accordance with the EU Directive 2010/63/EU.

Stimuli and supply protocol
Experiments were performed considering the following sets of stimuli: Ulva-, amino acids-, sugars-, and spirulinabased experiments. The Ulva biomass was collected during the late spring season (May to June 2022) from a coastal lagoon located in the Gulf of Cagliari on the southern part of Sardinia, Italy (Santa Gilla 39° 13.760'N; 9° 4.761'E). The biomass collection was carried out using manual harvesting, and it was washed with seawater to remove unwanted debris and stored in sterile plastic bags. Morphological characterization was carried out in the laboratory for species identification (Ulva compressa, hereafter referred to as Ulva) using an inverted light microscope (Olympus CKX41, Japan) (Malavasi et al. 2020).
Fresh, defrosted, and fragmented Ulva cultured waters were considered as stimuli at 10 mg mL −1 . Cultured waters were obtained leaving Ulva for 24 h in an aerated photobioreactor containing static seawater (hereafter SW). Freeze-dried Ulva was prepared by suspending the relative amount of 10 mg mL −1 in SW and filtered (Whatman Filter Paper, Sigma-Aldrich, Italy). Moreover, faeces from Ulva-fed sea urchins (1 mg mL −1 of faeces obtained from specimens fed with 10 mg mL −1 of fresh biomass) were also considered as stimulants.
Among the amino acids, we considered the essential ones (methionine, valine) and non-essential ones (alanine, glycine, glutamine, serine) chosen as the most abundant (weight ratio) from the biochemical composition of Ulva (Prato et al. 2018), in order to ascertain if the stimulating effects of Ulva could be attributable, at least in part, to its single components of the amino acid fraction. Among sugars, glucose, fructose, and sucrose were tested as stimuli. All amino acids and sugars were first dissolved in SW at 10 -1 mol L −1 and were then stored frozen as stock solutions.
On the day of the experiments, stock solutions were thawed and serially diluted in SW to 10 -3 , 10 -5 mol L −1 so that each compound was supplied at the three increasing concentrations 10 -5 , 10 -3 , and 10 -1 mol L −1 to obtain a dose-response relationship. These concentrations were chosen according to those previously adopted to build dose-response curves following stimulation with the same compounds in other aquatic invertebrates (Solari et al. 2015(Solari et al. , 2017(Solari et al. , 2021b. Spirulina (Arthrospira platensis) was prepared by suspending the finely hashed power in SW at a final concentration of 5 mg mL −1 . This preparation was then filtered (Whatman Filter Paper, Sigma-Aldrich, Italy) to remove any particulate which could mechanically stimulate the sea urchins. Then, the Spirulina-containing solution was serially diluted in SW to be used at 1, 0.1, and 0.01 mg mL −1 .
During this stimulation sequence, the water was not replaced (i.e., stepwise stimulations were used, according to Solari et al. 2015Solari et al. , 2021a.

Sea urchin bioassay
Sea urchins were independently exposed to stimuli according to the procedure adopted by Solari et al. (2021a, b). The experimental rack consisted of a small rectangular Plexiglas tank containing about 350 mL seawater, which was connected to two different channels of a peristaltic pump (Gilson, Minipuls Evolution) operating at a flow rate of 10 mL min −1 and thus ensuring a constant flow within the tank. The inflow and outflow terminals allow the SW and chemical stimuli to be delivered into and removed from the tank. The outflow terminal was connected to a secondary tank for waste collection. At the beginning of each test, animals were immersed in the experimental tank and allowed to acclimatize until becoming motionless, typically within 15 min. Before the stimulus supply, the response of each animal to the same aliquot of seawater (blank Control) was monitored for 5 min.
Stimuli were added to the tank for 1 min by switching the inflow terminal from seawater to a different reservoir, and each sea urchin was allowed 4 min to respond, starting from the time the stimulus entered the experimental tank (typically 45 s after switching). During this time, the SW flow rate was maintained at 10 mL min −1 . This time frame was selected because of previous observations on dye diffusion in the experimental tank. Dye tests were also performed to verify the effectiveness of the perfusion/stimulation device. Trials were video-recorded for later analysis, using a colour digital camera (Samsung SMX-F34, Korea) mounted above the experimental tank. Video recordings were analysed by an independent observer blind to the experimental treatment.
The behavioural response was determined by measuring the movement rate of spines, tube feet, and the fully coordinated locomotion, if any, by which the whole animal moves toward or away from the outlet of the stimulus supply. A single sea urchin was tested for only one compound to satisfy the assumption of independence of data for statistical analysis, while at the end of each experiment, every sea urchin was returned to the holding tank.

Detection of sea urchin movements
All visible movements of the sea urchin spines and tube feet, as well as the fully coordinated locomotory activity, when present, of the whole animal within the experimental tank, were captured by means of video recordings followed by a frame-to-frame computer analysis of the movements, according to the procedure adopted by Middleton et al. (2006) and Solari et al. (2021a, b). Briefly, this approach produces an "urchinogram" in which the movements at several sites and levels on the same animal can be recorded and compared. The video recordings were converted to a resolution of 640 × 480 pixels at 5 frames s −1 (300 frames min −1 ) so that each frame could account for the instantaneous "movement state" of the sea urchin at 200 ms intervals. Each video was analysed using a custom program (AviLine, http:// biolp c22. york. ac. uk/ droso phila/ ovary/) while the computer mouse was used to overlay lines on the video frames so that each line crossed the light/dark boundary between the animal (dark) and the background (clear). We adopted a grid with a total of 22 (13 vertical + 9 horizontal) evenly spaced lines to cover the entire area of the experimental tank everywhere the animal moved. The mean square difference in light intensity (MSD) at each point of the lines in the grid between successive pairs of frames was plotted during the whole experiment. Therefore, the movements of the dark animal on the clear background generated changes in pixel intensity along the lines, which was used as an index of the movement rate of spines, tube feet, and locomotion of each sea urchin. Recording the MSD provides great sensitivity and good discrimination of movement, as it considers the change in every pixel along the line.
This analysis protocol recorded the displacement in the focus plane, but any movement in the vertical direction was not measured. Data were saved in a Microsoft Excel format and mean peak height and intervals between peaks were calculated. For each frame, the sum of values for all lines was calculated, to pick all movements of the spine, tube feet, and whole animal anywhere within the experimental tank. In this way, the amplitude of the sea urchin movements could be evaluated before and after the supply of the different stimuli. Data were normalized to be compared to SW condition (SW = 100% of response).

Detection of Ulva attractiveness
The experimental system consisted of ten circular plastic tanks (30 cm in diameter, 8 cm high), each with an area of 0.07 m 2 , containing 4 L of SW at 20 ± 0.5 °C and 34‰ salinity. In accordance with a procedure already used by Pusceddu et al. (2021), sea urchins (n = 10) were individually exposed to fresh Ulva (one individual at a time in each experimental tank). Animals were starved for 48 h preceding the experiments. Fresh Ulva (about 500 mg each) was inserted into two ceramic filter rings for each tank to prevent algal floating. The two Ulva-containing rings were positioned along the tank's outer edge, alternating with the other two empty rings (acting as a Control), following a radial arrangement ( Supplementary Fig. 1). The sea urchin was then placed in the center of the tank allowing 1 h to respond. Individual movement in the experimental tank was recorded by a colour digital camera (Samsung SMX-F34, Samsung, Korea) supported by an aluminum framework and positioned 60 cm above the tank, with an aerial view of the experimental arena. The detection system has the following measurable parameters for the Ulva attractiveness: a) the percentage of tested animals that visit Ulva within 1 h and remained in contact with it for at least 10 min; b) distance and time (min) travelled (mm) to find Ulva substrate; c) mean speed (mm min −1 ), determined as the ratio between the time to the target and the actual distance moved to reach it and; d) tortuosity of the sea urchin's route to the Ulva substrate, determined as the ratio between the distance (mm) to the item and the shorter distance (mm) from the center of the tank and the targeted item.

Data analysis
A paired t-test was used to evaluate the effect of each form of Ulva on the behavioural response of sea urchins, while the effects of different concentrations of the other tested compounds were evaluated by one-way repeated measures ANOVA. Post-hoc comparisons were performed using Dunnett's test to assess significant differences between each stimulus concentration and the relative blank (Control) mean. When data did not conform to a normal distribution (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for goodness of fit), Friedman's test was used for comparisons of repeated measures, followed by Dunn's post hoc test.
All statistical analyses were carried out by using the Prism program (GraphPad Software, USA). Differences were considered significant for p ≤ 0.05.

Results
After being acclimatized in the experimental tank, the sea urchins became motionless and displayed only negligible basal activity, consisting of slow oscillations of a few spines and limited movements of tube feet. Conversely, when exposed to a stimulating compound, sea urchins started a typical response characterized at first by an increase in spine movements, coupled with a marked enhancement in tube feet projectivity. This behaviour often culminated in a coordinated locomotory activity of the whole animal within the experimental tank. All these responses were considered together as an index of the chemical sensitivity of sea urchins toward a stimulus, according to what was previously reported by Campbell et al. (2001).
All forms of Ulva resulted in an effective stimulus, evoking a robust activation of spines and tube feet in the sea urchins (Fig. 1). In detail, compared to the Control, the increase in animal response ranged from 132.4 ± 6.4%, following stimulation with fresh Ulva, up to 169.7 ± 9.3% after the supply of defrosted one, which therefore resulted in the most stimulating form of the algae (MSD for the Control was 95201 ± 1894 in the case of fresh and 96978 ± 2339 for the defrosted Ulva, 100% of the response). As shown in the same figure, the sea urchins were also sensitive to the faeces from Ulva-fed animals, showing an increase in the movement rate of 147 ± 7.9%, with respect to the Control (MSD was 93231 ± 2487).
Results of the attractiveness test show that fresh Ulva evokes positive rheotaxis in P. lividus. In fact, all tested animals found the algal substrate and remained in contact with it for at least 10 min, covering a mean distance of 255.96 ± 45.01 mm in a mean time of 18.51 ± 4.46 min ( Table 1). The tested amino acids elicited different responses (Fig. 2). Non-essential amino acids, methionine, and valine failed to stimulate the sea urchins' response, regardless of the tested concentration. Conversely, among the essential amino acids, alanine and glycine were both stimulating with respect to the Control, but only at the highest tested concentration (10 -1 mol L −1 ; Fig. 2). In fact, they increased the sea urchin response to 130.6 ± 8.3% and 160.7 ± 14.8%, respectively (MSD for the Control was 97679 ± 2301 and 95684 ± 1994, respectively for alanine and glycine). In the same way, glutamine turned out to be a stimulating amino acid, by Fig. 1 Normalized movement rate of sea urchins, recorded as mean square difference in light intensity (summed peak heights for each preparation during a 2-min stimulation) ± se (vertical bars), following supply of seawater (SW) conditioned with fresh, defrosted, freezedried (Dry) and fragmented Ulva and with faeces from Ulva-fed sea urchins, compared to SW (100% of response, dashed line). *** and **** indicate significant differences for p < 0.001 and p < 0.0001, respectively (paired t-test) with respect to SW. Values are presented as means ± standard errors (vertical bars). The number of sea urchins tested for each stimulus is indicated in brackets Table 1 Results of the tests conducted to assess the degree of attractiveness exerted by Ulva on the sea urchin P. lividus

Fig. 2
Normalized movement rate of sea urchins, recorded as mean square difference in light intensity (summed peak heights for each preparation during a 2-min stimulation) ± se (vertical bars), following supply of the essential amino acids methionine and valine and the non-essential amino acids alanine, glycine, glutamine and serine, compared to seawater (SW = 100% of response, dashed line). **, *** and **** indicate significant differences for p < 0.01, p < 0.001 and p < 0.0001, respectively (Dunnett's multiple comparison test subsequent to One-way ANOVA for valine and alanine; Dunn's multiple comparison test subsequent to the Friedman test for methionine, glycine, glutamine and serine) with respect to SW. Values are presented as means ± standard errors (vertical bars). The number of sea urchins tested for each amino acid is indicated in brackets increasing the sea urchin movement rate to 123.7 ± 6.1% and 142.5 ± 7.5%, compared to Control (MSD = 94002 ± 1826), when used at a concentration of 10 -3 and 10 -1 mol L −1 , respectively. Conversely, no significant changes in the movement rate were detected when the animals were presented with the essential amino acid serine, regardless the tested concentration.
As for the sugars (Fig. 3), the sea urchins were completely insensitive to fructose, while they responded to its isomer glucose, which significantly enhanced the movement rate of the animals to 113.3 ± 4.3, 120.6 ± 6.3 and 136.1 ± 10.4% with respect to the Control (MSD = 95738 ± 3598) at the three concentration 10 -5 , 10 -3 and 10 -1 mol L −1 , respectively. As shown in the same figure, the disaccharide sucrose never affected the movement rate of the sea urchins at any tested concentration. Finally, Spirulina showed high stimulating effectiveness, affecting the sea urchins' motility in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 4). In fact, even if the lowest dose (0.01 mg mL −1 ) was ineffective compared to the Control (MSD = 102,959 ± 3423), at 0.1 mg mL −1 the blue-green algae evoked an increase in movement rate of the animals to 133.5 ± 5.5%, and further increased their response to 202.6 5 ± 9.1% when tested at 1 mg mL-1. At the highest dose (5 mg mL −1 ), the algae enhanced the animal movement rate up to 184.8 ± 7.6% with respect to Control, but this response did not statistically differ from that detected at 1 mg mL −1 .

Discussion
Based on the assumption that the overall movements of spines, pedicellariae, and tube feet could be classified as a behavioural indicator of chemical detection for a sea urchin Fig. 3 Normalized movement rate of sea urchins, recorded as mean square difference in light intensity (summed peak heights for each preparation during a 2-min stimulation) ± se (vertical bars), following supply of the monosaccharides fructose and glucose and the disaccharide sucrose, compared to seawater (SW = 100% of response, dashed line). * indicates significant differences for p < 0.05 (Dunnett's multiple comparison test subsequent to One-way ANOVA) with respect to SW. The number of sea urchins tested for each amino acid is indicated in brackets Fig. 4 Normalized movement rate of sea urchins, recorded as mean square difference in light intensity (summed peak heights for each preparation during a 2-min stimulation) ± se (vertical bars), following supply of Spirulina, compared to seawater (SW = 100% of response, dashed line). ** and *** indicate significant differences for p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively Dunnett's multiple comparison test subsequent to One-way ANOVA) with respect to SW. Filled boxes indicate significant differences between a concentration and the next lower (p < 0.05; Tukey's multiple comparison test subsequent to One-way ANOVA). Data were obtained from 15 sea urchins species, we investigated such responses under the stimuli of Ulva and Ulva-related compounds. We used a bioassay, already validated for sea urchins, in response to chemical stimulation (Solari et al. 2021a, b). On the basis of our experiments, this green alga was found to be a stimulant and attractant for the Mediterranean sea urchin P. lividus. This behaviour has already been demonstrated by previous research on other invertebrates and other sea urchins species (Sakata et al. 1985;Akakabe and Kajiwara 2008;Cyrus et al. 2015;Etwarysing et al. 2017;Kwon et al. 2021).
Our results have highlighted that all forms of Ulva, fresh, defrosted, and fragmented Ulva cultured water, resulting in an effective stimulus, evoking strong responses in sea urchins with robust activation of spines and tube feet. Among the different Ulva tested, the defrosted one was the most stimulating. This result is particularly interesting because it highlights how the post-harvested storage method of this macroalgae can affect the chemostimulatory properties and, almost certainly, its ingestion in our model species. The benefit of using defrosted Ulva under rearing conditions is that such a process does not alter the shape and consistency of this algae, as it occurs instead when processing the biomass using freeze-drying and fragmentation. Moreover, such biomass shows similar stability in the water as the fresh biomass, unlike observed with commonly "pelleted" prepared diets (Secci et al. 2020). In addition, a problem facing the use of wild Ulva in feed applications at the Mediterranean latitudes is that its harvesting is generally seasonal. Thus, seaweed must therefore be preserved and stored to supply year-round production processes. Nevertheless, we acknowledge that the cost of this kind of storage must be considered and evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
Speculatively, we can affirm that from the observations in our farming facility during the routinary feeding processes of reared sea urchins fed with Ulva biomass, the amount of uneaten defrosted Ulva is lower or absent in respect of the fresh ones (Secci et al. 2020), thus confirming its role not only as an attractant substratum but also as phagostimulant.
Freezing is one of the most popular means of long-term food storage, including macroalgae, allowing better preservation of the taste, texture, and nutritional value of foods than any other preservation technology (Choi et al. 2012). Indeed, by transforming most of the liquid water into ice, freezing greatly slows the physical and biochemical changes involved in food deterioration, together with the growth and reproduction of spoilage microorganisms. In general, seaweed processed with a freeze/thaw cycle increases protein precipitation and doubles the total protein yield (Kadam et al. 2015;Abdollahia et al. 2019;Obluchinskaya and Daurtseva 2020). Indeed, freezing causes the formation of crystals inside the cell and cell membranes to rupture, leading to the release of intracellular fluid. Thus, the freeze-thaw process can facilitate the release of phagostimulants in the water. Similarly, the high response observed in our experiments from urchins exposed to fragmented and freeze-dried Ulva could be driven by the substances released into the water following the transformation of the biomass.
Although drying processes can alter the levels of certain natural nutrients in seaweed (Wong and Cheung 2001;Choi et al. 2012), this mechanism was not observed when the freeze-dried Ulva was used in our trials. On the other hand, when the freeze-dried spirulina was used, it resulted as the most effective stimulus, acting in a dose-dependent manner. The response to spirulina should be further investigated to identify if the strong activation of the tube feet, pedicellaria, and spines is an attractive or repulsive response. Recent studies confirmed several benefits of Spirulina-enriched diets which improved gonadic growth and gamete production in P. lividus (Cirino et al. 2017) and enhanced the content of astaxanthin, a carotenoid with antioxidant properties and beneficial effects for various degenerative diseases, in the egg of Arbacia lixula (Galasso et al. 2018).
Of the other compounds tested, sea urchins responded to glucose, but not to its isomer fructose, while sucrose resulted ineffective. Among the amino acids tested, glycine and glutamine at the highest dosages, and alanine, produced a significant response highlighting a concentration-response relationship.
This study indicates that the P. lividus exhibits a chemosensory selectivity towards different trophic stimuli, indicating that the response is not related to the nutritional value of a single compound. The ability of this species to selectively detect some components rather than others might have an ecological meaning. New studies using two-choice treatments (Campbell et al. 2001) could help to identify the role of Ulva in the animal's feeding choice (and the ingestion rate), in our case the sea urchin P. lividus, but also other reared species.