Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Constrained Choice and Ethical Dilemmas in Land Management: Environmental Quality and Food Safety in California Agriculture

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As environmental and conservation efforts increasingly turn towards agricultural landscapes, it is important to understand how land management decisions are made by agricultural producers. While previous studies have explored producer decision-making, many fail to recognize the importance of external structural influences. This paper uses a case study to explore how consolidated markets and increasing corporate power in the food system can constrain producer choice and create ethical dilemmas over land management. Crop growers in the Central Coast region of California face conflicting demands regarding environmental quality and industry imposed food safety standards. A mail survey and personal interviews were used to explore growers’ perceptions and actions regarding these demands. Results indicate that in many cases growers face serious ethical dilemmas and feel pressured by large processing and retail firms to adopt measures they find environmentally destructive and unethical. Future strategies to address environmental issues on agricultural landscapes should consider the economic constraints producers face and the role of large firms in creating production standards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Battershill, M. R. J., & Gilg, A. W. (1997). Socio-economic constraints and environmentally friendly farming in the Southwest of England. Journal of Rural Studies, 13(2), 213–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beretti, M., & Stuart, D. (2008). Food safety and environmental quality impose conflicting demands on Central Coast growers. California Agriculture, 62(2), 68–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodt, S., Klonsky, K., Tourte, L., Duncan, R., Hendricks, L., Ohmart, C., et al. (2004). Influence of farm management style on adoption of biologically integrated farming practices in California. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 19(4), 237--247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, R. L., & Goodman, M. K. (2004). Consuming narratives: The political ecology of ‹alternative’ consumption. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 29(3), 344–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busch, L. (2003). Virgil, vigilance, and voice: Agrifood ethics in an age of globalization. Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics, 16(5), 459–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busch, L., & Bain, C. (2004). New! Improved? The transformation of the global agrifood system. Rural Sociology, 69(3), 321–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caffrey, J., Browne, M., & Typler, T. W. B. (2001). Changes in a California Estuary: A profile of Elkhorn Slough. Moss Landing: Elkhorn Slough Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cary, J. W., & Wilkinson, R. L. (1997). Perceived profitability and farmers’ conservation behaviour. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 48(1), 13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CDC. (2006). Center for Disease Control. Multistate outbreak of E. coli O157 infections, November–December 2006. Retrieved June 15, 2007, from http://www.cdc.gov/ecoli/2006/december/121406.htm.

  • CDHS/FDA. (2007). California Department of Health Services and US Food and Drug Administration. Investigation of an Escherichia coli O157:H7 outbreak associated with dole pre-packaged spinach. Retrieved May 18, 2008, from http://www.dhs.ca.gov/fdb/HTML/Food/EnvInvRpt.htm.

  • Fitzsimmons, M. (1986). The new industrial agriculture—the regional integration of specialty crop production. Economic Geography, 62(4), 334–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J. B., & Magdoff, F. (2000). Leibig, Marx, and the depletion of soil fertility: Relevance for today’s agriculture. In F. Magdoff, J. B. Foster, & F. H. Buttel (Eds.), Hungry for profit: The agribusiness threat to farmers, food, and the environment (pp. 43–60). New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, M. K. (2004). Reading fair trade: Political ecological imaginary and the moral economy of fair trade foods. Political Geography, 23(7), 891–915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorny, J. R., Giclas, H., Gombas, D., & Means, K. (2006). Commodity specific food safety guidelines for the lettuce and leafy greens supply chain. Retrieved on April 25, 2006, from http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~acrobat/lettsup.pdf.

  • Hatanaka, M., Bain, C., & Busch, L. (2005). Third-party certification in the global agrifood system. Food Policy, 30(3), 354–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatanaka, M., & Busch, L. (2008). Third-party certification in the global agrifood system: An objective or socially mediated governance mechanism? Sociologia Ruralis, 48(1), 73–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrickson, M., & James, H. S. (2005). The ethics of constrained choice: How the industrialization of agriculture impacts farming and farmer behavior. Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics, 18(3), 269–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrickson, M. K., & Heffernan, W. D. (2002). Opening spaces through relocalization: Locating potential resistance in the weaknesses of the global food system. Sociologia Ruralis, 42(4), 347–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichs, C. C., & Welsh, R. (2003). The effects of the industrialization of US livestock agriculture on promoting sustainable production practices. Agriculture and Human Values, 20(2), 125–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, J. W., Anderson, B. S., Phillips, B. M., Tjeerdema, R. S., Puckett, H. M., & de Vlaming, V. (1999). Patterns of aquatic toxicity in an agriculturally dominated coastal watershed in California. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 75(1–2), 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, H. S. (2003). On finding solutions to ethical problems in agriculture. Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics, 16(5), 439–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, H. S., & Hendrickson, M. K. (2008). Perceived economic pressures and farmer ethics. Agricultural Economics, 38(3), 349–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A. (2008). Personal Communication. Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board. San Luis Obispo, CA.

  • Knight, M. A. (1997). A political culture of conservation: Citizen action and marine conservation in the Monterey Bay. Dissertation, Santa Cruz: University of California.

  • Korthals, M. (2001). Taking consumers seriously: Two concepts of consumer sovereignty. Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics, 14(2), 201–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LGMA. (2008). Leafy Greens Marketing Agreement. Retrieved on June 2, 2008, from http://caleafygreens.ca.gov/members/resources.asp.

  • Los Huertos, M. (1999). Nitrogen dynamics in vegetative buffer strips receiving nitrogen runoff in Elkhorn Slough Watershed, California. Dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.

  • Lovell, S. T., & Sullivan, W. C. (2006). Environmental benefits of conservation buffers in the United States: Evidence, promise, and open questions. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 112(4), 249–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubell, M. (2004). Collaborative watershed management: A view from the grassroots. Policy Studies Journal, 32(3), 341–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubowski, R., Vesterby, M., Bucholtz, S., Baez, A., & Roberts, M. (2002). Major Uses of Land in the United States, 2002- EIB 14. Economic Research Service. United States Department of Agriculture. Retrieved on April 2, 2008, from www.ers.usda.gov/Publications/EIB14/.

  • McCann, E., Sullivan, S., Erickson, D., & DeYoung, R. (1997). Environmental awareness, economic orientation, and farming practices: A comparison of organic and conventional farmers. Environmental Management, 21(5), 747–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, K., Marsden, T., & Murdoch, J. (2006). Worlds of food: Place, power, and provenence in the food chain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Napier, T. L., Thraen, C. S., & McClaskie, S. L. (1988). Adoption of soil conservation practices by farmers in erosion-prone areas of Ohio- the application of logit modeling. Society & Natural Resources, 1(2), 109–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, L. (1990). Good intentions aside: A managers guide to resolving ethical problems. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NOAA. (1999). Action plan: Agriculture and rural lands, Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary. Monterey, CA: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Water Quality Protection Program for Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary, NOAA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primus Labs. (2008). Ranch Self Audit v. 7.04. Retrieved on July 8, 2008, from http://www.primuslabs.com/psr/fieldfacility.aspx?_Type=1&_MenuID=1.

  • Roff, R. J. (2007). Shopping for change? Neoliberalizing activism and the limits to eating non-GMO. Agriculture and Human Values, 24(4), 511–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sexton, R. J. (2000). Industrialization and consolidation in the US food sector: Implications for competition and welfare. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 82(5), 1087–1104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • State of California. (1997). Department of Conservation, Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA.

  • Stuart, D. (2008). The illusion of control: Industrialized agriculture, nature, and food safety. Agriculture & Human Values, 25(2), 177–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, D., Shennan, C., & Brown, M. (2006). Food Safety and Environmental Protection on the Central Coast: Exploring the Science behind an Apparent Conflict. The Center for Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, University of California Santa Cruz Research Brief #10. Retrieved on July 25, 2008, from http://casfs.ucsc.edu/publications/briefs/index.html.

  • Traore, N., Landry, R., & Amara, N. (1998). On-farm adoption of conservation practices: The role of farm and farmer characteristics, perceptions, and health hazards. Land Economics, 74(1), 114–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Census of Agriculture. (2002). State and County Statistics. Retrieved on January 20, 2007, from http://www.nass.usda.gov/Census_of_Agriculture/index.asp.

  • Upadhyay, B. M., Young, D. L., Wang, H. H., & Wandschneider, P. (2003). How do farmers who adopt multiple conservation practices differ from their neighbors? American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, 18(1), 27–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urban, M. A. (2005). Values and ethical beliefs regarding agricultural drainage in central Illinois, USA. Society & Natural Resources, 18(2), 173–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, J. L. (2005). Eating right here: Moving from consumer to food citizen. Agriculture and Human Values, 22(3), 269–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worrell, R., & Appleby, M. C. (2000). Stewardship of natural resources: Definition, ethical and practical aspects. Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics, 12(3), 263–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrigley, N. (1999). Market rules and spatial outcomes: Insights from the corporate restructuring of US food retailing. Geographical Analysis, 31(3), 288–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrigley, N. (2002). Transforming the corporate landscape of US food retailing: Market power, financial re-engineering and regulation. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 93(1), 62–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Environmental Studies Department, University of California, Santa Cruz, USA

    Diana Stuart

Authors
  1. Diana Stuart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diana Stuart.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stuart, D. Constrained Choice and Ethical Dilemmas in Land Management: Environmental Quality and Food Safety in California Agriculture. J Agric Environ Ethics 22, 53–71 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-008-9129-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-008-9129-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation