Abstract
This article presents a critical review and analysis of key studies that have been done in science education and other areas on the effects and effectiveness of using diagrams, graphs, photographs, illustrations, and concept maps as adjunct visual aids in the learning of scientific-technical content. It also summarizes and reviews those studies that have students draw diagrams, graphs, maps, and charts to express their understandings of the concepts and relationships that are present in the text they read or/and empirical data provided (i.e., student-generated adjunct visual productions). In general, the research and theory on instructional aids is fragmented and somewhat unsystematic with several flaws and a number of key uncontrolled variables, which actually suppress and mask effects in the studies that have been done. The findings of these studies are compared to relevant literature and empirical research and findings in the areas of cognitive psychology, computer science, neuroscience, and artificial intelligence that help to clarify many of the inconsistencies, contradictions, and lack of effects found for visual (e.g., diagrams and graphs) instructional aids in the science education literature currently and in the past 20 years. A model and a set of criteria and goals for improving research in this area is then described, as visuals are a first step in the process of learning formal (scientific) models, which are most often visually represented. Understanding how students learn formal models is one the outstanding research challenges in the next 20 years, both within and outside of science education.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aberg-Bengtsson L. (1999) Dimensions of performance in the interpretation of diagrams, tables, and maps: Some gender differences in the Swedish scholastic aptitude test. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36: 565–582
Ahsen A. (1992) New surrealism: The liberation of images in consciousness (The literary image). Brandon House, New York
Ashcraft M. (2002) Cognition (3rd ed). Prentice-Hall, New Jersey
Anderson O.R. (1967) The effects of varying structure on the acquisition of science knowledge. Journal of Research on Science Teaching, 5: 361–364
Ates S., Stevens T.J. (2003) Teaching line graphs to tenth grade students having different cognitive development levels by using two different instructional modules. Research in Science & Technological Education, 21: 55–67
Ausubel D. (1976) Educational psychology. Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, New York
Bartlett F.C. (1932) Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge University Press, London, UK
Berg C.A., Phillips D.G. (1994) An investigation of the relationship between logical thinking structures and the ability to construct and interpret line graphs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31: 323–344
Berg C.A., Smith P. (1994) Assessing students’ abilities to construct and interpret line graphs: Disparities between multiple-choice and free-response instruments. Science Education, 78: 527–554
Breuker, J.A. (1984). A theoretical framework for spatial learning strategies. In C. Holley & D. Dansereau (Eds.), Spatial learning strategies (pp. 31–46). New York: Academic Press.
Britton, B.K. & Graesser, A.C. (1996) (Eds.). Models of understanding text. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Byrnes, J.P. (2001). Cognitive development and learning in instructional contexts (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Carifio J. (1978) Sequence, structure, and NP-complete problems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 16(3): 275–278
Carifio, J. (2005, July). Towards a standard integrated information processing/cognitive model of learning. Proceedings of the Eighth International History, Philosophy & Science Teaching Conference, Leeds, England. Available online at http://www.ihpst2005.leeds.ac.uk/papers.htm
Carifio J., Lanza M (1992) On the need to use control vignettes in social science research. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment, and Rehabilitation, 2(3): 28–38
Carifio, J. & Perla, R. (2008). An examination and critique of the theoretical and empirical literature of the use of diagrams, graphs and other visual aids in the learning of scientific-technical content from expository texts and instruction. (Comprehensive and original version of article). Available at http://gse.uml.edu/carifio
Clark J., Paivio A. (1991) Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3: 149–210
Corno L. (1986) The mega-cognitive control components of self-regulated learning. Contemporary Psychology, 11(4): 33–46
Crain, W. (1992). Theories of development: concepts and applications (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Cronbach, L. & Snow, R. (1972). Individual differences in learning abilities as a function of instructional variables. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Dagostino, L. & Carifio, J. (1994). Evaluative reading and literacy: A cognitive view. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
DeVega, M., Intons-Peterson, J., Johnson-Laird, P., Denis, M. & Marschark, M. (1996). Models of visuospatial cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.
Frase L. (1967) Questions as aids to reading: Some research and a theory. American Educational Research Journal, 5: 319–332
Frase L. (1969) Paragraph organization and written materials: The influence of conceptual clustering on the level and organization of recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 60: 393–401
French, G. & Harris, C. (1999). Traumatic incident reduction. New York: CRC Press.
Gagne, R.M. (1965). The conditions of learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Gobert, J.D. & Clement, J.J. (1999). Effects of student-generated diagrams versus student-generated summaries on conceptual understanding of causal dynamic knowledge in plate tectonics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(1), 39–53.
Graesser, A.C., Swamer, S.S., Baggett, W.B., & Sell, M.A. (1996). New models of deep comprehension. In B.K. Britton & A.C. Graesser (Eds.), Models of understanding text (pp. 1–33). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hall, V.C., Bailey, J., & Tillman, C. (1997). Can student generated illustrations be worth ten thousand words? Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(4), 677–681.
Herman, J.L. (1992). Trauma and recovery: The aftermath of violence from domestic abuse to political terror. New York: Basic Books.
Hirsch, E.D., Jr. (2006). The knowledge deficit. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
Hoffman, H. (2004). Virtual reality therapy. Scientific American, August, 53–67.
Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1983). Mental models: Toward a cognitive science oflanguage, inference and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kerlinger, F.N. & Lee, H.B. (2000). Foundations of behavioral research. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt College Publishers.
Kintsch, W. (1986). Learning from text. Cognition & Instruction, 3, 87–108.
Kosslyn, S.M. (1994). Image and brain: The resolution of the imagery debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kunzendorf, R.G. (1981). Individual differences in imagery and autonomic control. Journal of Mental Imagery, 5(2),47-60.
Kunzendorf, R.G. & Wallace, B. (Eds.). (2000). Individual differences in conscious experience. Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins.
Larkin, J.H. & Simon, H.A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11, 65–100.
Levin, J.R., Anglin, G.J., & Carney, R.N. (1987). On empirically validating functions of pictures in prose. In D.W. Willows & H.A. Houghton (Eds.), The psychology of illustration (pp. 51–85). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Linn, M.C. (1978). Influence of cognitive style and training on task requiring the separation of variables schema. Child Development, 49, 874–877.
Linn, M.C., Pulos, S., & Gans, A. (1981). Correlates of formal reasoning: Content and problem effects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 18, 435–447.
Loftus, E. (1997). Creating false memories. Scientific American, 277(3), 70–75.
Mayer R.E. (1989) Systematic thinking fostered by illustrations in scientific text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2): 240–246
Mayer, R.E. (1993). Comprehension of graphics in text: An overview. Learning and Instruction, 3, 239–245.
Mayer, R.E. & Gallini, J.K. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand words? Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 715–726.
Meyer, B.J. (1986). Following the author’s top-level organization: An important skill for reading comprehension. In R.J. Tierney, P.L. Anders, & J.N. Mitchell (Eds.), Understanding readers’ understanding: Theory and practice (pp. 59–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Miller, G. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
Minsky, M. (1988). Society of mind. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Minsky, M. (2006). The emotion machine: Common sense thinking, artificial intelligence, and the future of the human mind. New York, Simon and Schuster.
Minsky, M. & Papert, S. (1988). Perceptrons: Expanded edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mintzes, J., Wandersee, J., & Novack, J. (1997). Teaching science for understanding: A human constructivist view. New York: Academic Press.
Nasser, R. & Carifio, J. (1993). Students misconceptions and errors in solving algebra word problems related to misconceptions in the field of science. Proceedings of Third International Conference on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics (pp. 302–347). Cornell University.
National Research Council. (2002). Scientific Research in Education. Committee on Scientific Principles for Education Research. R.J. Shavelson & L. Towne, (Eds.). Center for Education. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Neisser, U. (1987). Concepts and conceptual development: ecological and Intellectual factors in categorization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
Norman, D.A. (1981). Memory and attention: An introduction to human information processing. New York: Wiley.
Norman, D.A. (1982). Twelve issues for cognitive science. Cognitive Science, 4(1), 1–32.
Page E.B. (1958) Teacher’s comments and student performance: A seventy four classroom experiment in school motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 49: 173–181
Paivo, A. (1986). Mental representation: a dual-coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543–578.
Paris, S. & Paris, A. (2001). Classroom applications of self-regulated learning. Educational Pyschologist, 36(2), 89–101.
Penrose, R. (1991). The emperor’s new mind: Concerning computers, minds, and the laws of physics. New York: Penguin Books.
Perla, R.J. (2006). Use and augmentation of a formal model and theory to develop instructional materials to teach undergraduates about the nature of science, scientific knowledge, and scientific change. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, MA.
Perla, R.J. & Carifio, J. (2005, July). A macro model for developing, validating and evaluating nature of science curricula and instructional materials. Proceedings of the Eighth International History, Philosophy & Science Teaching Conference, Leeds, England. Available at http://www.ihpst2005.leeds.ac.uk/papers.htm
Phillips, F. (2005). The contested nature of empirical research (and why philosophy of education offers little help). Journal of Philosophy of Education, 39(4), 577–597.
Pitt, W. & McCullough, W. (1988). How we know universals: The perception of auditory and visual forms. In E. Feigenbaum & J. Feldman (Eds.), Computers and thought (pp. 217–246). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Polya, G. (1965). How to solve it. New York: Basic Books.
Pozzer, L.L. & Roth, W.M. (2003). Prevalence, function, and structure of photographs in high school biology textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 1089–1114.
Pylyshyn, Z. (1973). What the mind’s eye tells the mind’s brain: A critique of mental imagery. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 1–24.
Pylyshyn, Z. (1984). Computation and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pylyshyn, Z. (1999). Is vision continuous with cognition: The case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 341–523.
Pylysyhyn, Z. (2003). Return of the mental image: Are there really pictures in the brain. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7(3), 113–118.
Roth, W.M. & Bowen, G.M. (1994). Mathematization of experience in a grade 8 open-inquiry environment: An introduction to the representational practices of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 293–318.
Roth, W.M. & Bowen, G.M. (2003). When are graphs worth ten thousand words? An expert-expert study. Cognition and Instruction, 21, 429–473.
Ruiz-Primo, M.R. & Shavelson, R.J. (1996). Problems and issues in the use of concept maps in science assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(6), 596–600.
Schwartz, D.L. (1993). The construction and analogical transfer of symbolic visualization. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(10), 1309–1325.
Schnotz A. (1993) On the relationship between dual coding mental models in graphics comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 3: 247–249
Scruggs T., Mastropieri M. (1989) Reconstructive elaborations: A model for content area learning. American Education Research Journal, 26(2): 311–327
Searleman, A. (2007). Is there such a thing as photographic memory? And if so can it be learned? Mind and Brain, 2(3), 27-28.
Selfridge, O. (1988). Pandemonium: A paradigm for learning. In J. Anderson & E. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Neurocomputing: foundations forresearch (pp. 157–182). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Selfridge, O. & Neisser, U. (1995). Pattern recognition by machines. In Computers and thought (Feigenbaum, E. & Feldman, J., Eds), Cambridge, MIT Press.
Shavelson R.J. (1971) Some aspects of correspondence between content structure and cognitive structure in physics instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(2): 225–234
Shaw, E.L., Padilla, M.J., & McKenzie, D.L. (1983, April). An examination of the graphing abilities of students in grades seven through twelve. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching.
Skinner, B.F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Croft.
Skinner, B.F. (1958). Teaching machines. Science, 128.
Solomon G. (1971). Heuristic models for the generation of aptitude-treatment interactions. Review of Educational Research, Summer, 42(3), 345–358. Images. Nature, 225, 846–849.
Stomeyer C., Potska H. (1970) The detailed texture of eidetic images. Nature, 225: 846–849
Thom, R. (1989). Structural stability and morphogenesis. (D. H. Fowler, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Westview Press.
Thorndike, E.L. (1935). The psychology of wants, interests, and attitudes. New York: D. Appleton-Century Co.
van Dijk, T.A. (1980). Text and context: Explorations in the semantics and pragmatics of discourse. London, UK: Longman.
Van Meter, P. (2001). Drawing construction as a strategy for learning from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 129–140
Wavering, M.J. (1989). Logical reasoning necessary to make line graphs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26, 373–379.
Winograd, E. & Neisser, U. (2006). Affect and accuracy in recall: studies in flashbulb memories. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Zhang, J. & Norman, D. (1995). A representational analysis of numeration systems. Cognition, 57(3), 271–295.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carifio, J., Perla, R.J. A Critique of the Theoretical and Empirical Literature of the Use of Diagrams, Graphs, and Other Visual Aids in the Learning of Scientific-Technical Content from Expository Texts and Instruction. Interchange 40, 403–436 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-009-9102-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-009-9102-7
Keywords
- Visual aids in learning
- student visual productions
- visuals and text in science learning
- visualization and mental imaging
- individual differences in science learning
- cognitive learning theory
- cognitive models and modeling
- diagrams and graphs in science learning
- propositional representation theory
- multimedia learning