Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Professional Growth of Physics Teacher-Leaders in a Professional Learning Communities Program: the Context of Inquiry-Based Laboratories

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study presents 3 case studies that examine the processes involved in the professional growth of physics teacher-leaders (TLs) in a national network of professional learning communities (PLCs). This program has been operating since 2012, using a “Fan Model” where the TLs participate in a PLC (TL-PLC) led by a team from the Weizmann Institute of Science, while they simultaneously teach in high school and lead nationwide regional PLCs of physics teachers. The context of the study was inquiry-based laboratories, which are aimed at integrating aspects of authentic research into the high-school physics laboratory. The Interconnected Model of Professional Growth (Clarke and Hollingsworth, Teaching and Teacher Education, 18:947–967, 2002) was extended, adjusted to physics TLs, and used to study the processes involved in the growth of the 3 case studies within different aspects of their practice. Changes in their knowledge, attitudes, and practice, as well as the factors that motivated, contributed to, or inhibited their professional growth, were studied over the course of 3 years. Individual growth pathways were found in each case, as well as similar patterns for all 3. The TL-PLC served as an interactive and supportive learning environment, and the mechanisms of “Enactment” and “Reflection” promoted changes in the TLs’ knowledge, attitudes, and practice. Addressing challenges such as students’ difficulties as well as PLC teachers’ motivation and attitudes enhanced the TLs’ growth as teachers and as PLC leaders. The findings suggest that PLC programs can serve as an effective framework for the professional growth of TLs, as well as for promoting reform initiatives in science education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amador, J. M. (2020). Teacher leaders’ mathematical noticing: Eliciting and analyzing. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(2), 295–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Association of Physics Teachers. (2017). Aspiring to lead: Engaging K-12 teachers as agents of national change in physics education. A report from the AAPT physics master teacher leader task force, College Park, MD.

  • Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beavers, A. (2009). Teachers as learners: Implications of adult education for professional development. Journal of College Teaching & Learning (TLC), 6(7), 25–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Stoll, L., Thomas, S., & Wallace, M. (2005). Creating and sustaining professional learning communities (Research Report 637). London, UK: General Teaching Council for England, Department for Education and Skills.

  • Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borko, H., Koellner, K., & Jacobs, J. (2014). Examining novice TLs’ facilitation of mathematics professional development. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 33, 149–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P. L., Abell, S. K., Demir, A., & Schmidt, F. J. (2006). College science teachers’ views of classroom inquiry. Science Education, 90(5), 784–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butkēviča, A., & Zobena, A. (2017). Teacher leaders as agents of innovation diffusion. In REEP (Rural Environment. Education. Personality). Proceedings 10th International Scientific Conference (pp. 56–62).‏

  • Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 947–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator, 15(3), 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Criswell, B. A., Rushton, G. T., McDonald, S. P., & Gul, T. (2018). A clearer vision: Creating and evolving a model to support the development of science teacher leaders. Research in Science Education, 48(4), 811–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., & Richardson, N. (2009). Research review/teacher learning: What matters? Educational Leadership, 66(5), 46–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DuFour, R. (2004). Schools as learning communities. Educational Leadership, 61(8), 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etkina, E., Karelina, A., Ruibal-Villasenor, M., Rosengrant, D., Jordan, R., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2010). Design and reflection help students develop scientific abilities: Learning in introductory physics laboratories. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(1), 54–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etkina, E., Gregorcic, B., & Vokos, S. (2017). Organizing physics teacher professional education around productive habit development: A way to meet reform challenges. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(1), 010107.‏

  • Even, R. (2008). Facing the challenge of educating educators to work with practicing mathematics teachers. In B. Jaworski & T. Wood (Eds.), The international handbook of mathematics teacher education: The mathematics teacher educator as a developing professional (pp. 57–73). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.

  • Fairman, J. C., & Mackenzie, S. V. (2015). How teacher leaders influence others and understand their leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 18(1), 61–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregson, J. A., & Sturko, P. A. (2007). Teachers as adult learners: Re-conceptualizing professional development. Journal of Adult Education, 36(1), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P., Wineburg, S., & Woolworth, S. (2001). Toward a theory of teacher community. The Teachers College Record, 103, 942–1012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guskey, T. R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15(5), 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, L., Hansson, Ö., Juter, K., & Redfors, A. (2021). Curriculum emphases, mathematics and teaching practices: Swedish upper-secondary physics teachers’ views. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19, 499–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallery, M. (2017). Early-years teachers’ professional upgrading in science: A long-term programme. Research in Science Education, 1–28.‏

  • Klein, E. J., Taylor, M., Munakata, M., Trabona, K., Rahman, Z., & McManus, J. (2018). Navigating teacher leaders’ complex relationships using a distributed leadership framework. Teacher Education Quarterly, 45(2), 89–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klentschy, M. (2008). Developing teacher leaders in science: Attaining and sustaining science reform. Science Educator, 17(2), 57–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koellner, K., Jacobs, J., & Borko, H. (2011). Mathematics professional development: Critical features for developing leadership skills and building teachers’ capacity. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 13(1), 115–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozminski, J., Lewandowski, H., Beverly, N., Lindaas, S., Deardorff, D., Reagan, A., Dietz, R., Tagg, R., Eblen-Zayas, M., Williams, J., Hobbs, R., & Zwickl, B. (2014). AAPT recommendations for the undergraduate physics laboratory curriculum. AAPT.‏

  • Levy, S., Bagno, E., Berger, H., & Eylon, B. S. (2018). Physics Teacher-Leaders' Learning in a National Program of Regional Professional Learning Communities. In Traxler, A., Cao, Y. & Wolf S. (Eds.), Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings, Washington, DC.

  • Levy, S., Bagno, E., Berger, H., & Eylon, B. S. (2020). Motivators, contributors, and inhibitors to physics teacher-leaders' professional development in a program of professional learning communities: The case of a collaborative reading assignment. In Kolikant, Y. B. D., Martinovic, D., & Milner-Bolotin, M. (Eds.), STEM teachers and teaching in the digital era - Professional expectations and advancement in 21st century schools. (pp. 159–184). Springer.

  • Lewthwaite, B. (2006). Constraints and contributors to becoming a science teacher-leader. Science Education, 90(2), 331–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, A., & Miller, L. (2011). Teacher leadership (Vol. 17). John Wiley & Sons.‏

  • Lotter, C., Yow, J. A., & Peters, T. T. (2014). Building a community of practice around inquiry instruction through a professional development program. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lotter, C. R., Thompson, S., Dickenson, T. S., Smiley, W. F., Blue, G., & Rea, M. (2018). The impact of a practice-teaching professional development model on teachers’ inquiry instruction and inquiry efficacy beliefs. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(2), 255–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luft, J. A. (2001). Changing inquiry practices and beliefs: The impact of an inquiry-based professional development programme on beginning and experienced secondary science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 517–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, J. C., Horton, R., Igo, B. L., & Switzer, D. M. (2009). K-12 science and mathematics teachers’ beliefs about and use of inquiry in the classroom. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(3), 575–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, J. C., Smart, J. B., & Alston, D. M. (2017). Inquiry-based instruction: A possible solution to improving student learning of both science concepts and scientific practices. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(5), 777–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meltzer, D. E. (2011). Research on the education of physics teachers. Teacher education in physics: Research, curriculum, and practice, 3–14.‏

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. sage.‏

  • Ministry of Education, (2019). National Physics Education Inspectorate’s report.

  • Mostafa, T., Echazarra, A., & Guillou, H. (2018). The science of teaching science: An exploration of science teaching practices in PISA 2015 (OECD Education Working Papers No. 188). Paris: OECD Publishing.

  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2015). Science teachers learning: Enhancing opportunities, creating supportive contexts. The National Academies Press.

  • National Research Council. (2014). Exploring opportunities for STEM teacher leadership: Summary of a convocation. National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. National Academies Press.

  • Neumerski, C. M. (2013). Rethinking instructional leadership, a review: What do we know about principal, teacher, and coach instructional leadership, and where should we go from here? Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(2), 310–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Yamaguchi, R., & Gallagher, L. P. (2007). What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44(4), 921–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, M. P., Abell, S., Lannin, J., Wang, C. Y., Musikul, K., Barker, D., & Dingman, S. (2007). Effective professional development in science and mathematics education: Teachers’ and facilitators’ views. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(3), 507–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1997). Communities of learners and communities of teachers. Monographs of Mandel Institute, No. 3. Jerusalem: Mandel Foundations.

  • Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2008). Teacher professional learning and development. Ministry of Education, Wellington, New Zealand.‏

  • van Driel, J. H., Meirink, J. A., van Veen, K., & Zwart, R. C. (2012). Current trends and missing links in studies on teacher professional development in science education: A review of design features and quality of research. Studies in Science Education, 48(2), 129–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vescio, V., & Adams, A. (2015). Learning in a professional learning community: The challenge evolves. In D. Scott & E. Hargreaves (Eds.), The Sage handbook of learning (pp. 274–284). SAGE Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. (2020). Compare inquiry-based pedagogical instruction with direct instruction for pre-service science teacher education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(6), 1063–1083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitcomb, J., Borko, H., & Liston, D. (2009). Growing talent. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(3), 207–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wieman, C. (2015). Comparative cognitive task analyses of experimental science and instructional laboratory courses. The Physics Teacher, 53(6), 349–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • York-Barr, J., & Duke, K. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 255–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yow, J. A., Wilkerson, A., & Gay, C. (2020). Mathematics and science teacher leadership understanding through a teacher leadership course. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1–24.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Science Teaching, Weizmann Institute of Science, Herzel St., 234, 76100, Rehovot, Israel

    Smadar Levy, Esther Bagno, Hana Berger & Bat-Sheva Eylon

Authors
  1. Smadar Levy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Esther Bagno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hana Berger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bat-Sheva Eylon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Smadar Levy.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 3

Table 3 TL-PLC meetings in the context of IBLs during the 2014–2015 school year
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Levy, S., Bagno, E., Berger, H. et al. Professional Growth of Physics Teacher-Leaders in a Professional Learning Communities Program: the Context of Inquiry-Based Laboratories. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 20, 1813–1839 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10217-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10217-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation