Abstract
Reading comprehension is essential for students to be successful in school and active participants of society. The ability to understand text is facilitated by text structures which encourage readers’ ability to locate, organize information, and to recall main ideas. To investigate the presence of text structures, an analysis of four Maltese language textbooks and two social studies workbooks, used in fourth and sixth grade in state schools in Malta, was conducted. Two independent reviewers analysed the books using five criteria: overall book structure, task type, text type, text structure, and reading comprehension strategy. Results showed that whereas narrative texts were the most common text type in fourth grade, more emphasis was placed on expository texts in sixth grade. Most books included cause-and-effect and problem-and-solution text structures. Recall of factual information was the predominant reading strategy, with limited exposure to other crucial strategies such as main idea identification. All textbooks gave importance to tasks that required drawings and games representing the child’s understanding of the text. Results indicated a high level of agreement between the raters’ analysis of Maltese language and social studies texts. This research suggests that texts used in the state school curriculum need to be structured in a way that reflects interventions such as the text structure strategy, to encourage main idea selection thereby facilitating comprehension of text.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agius, R. (2012). The development of a literacy assessment battery for Maltese children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Malta, Malta.
Akhondi, M., Malayeri, A. F., & Samad, A. A. (2011). How to teach expository text structure to facilitate reading comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 64(5), 368–372. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.64.5.9.
Allington, P. R., & Johnston, P. (2002). What do we know about exemplary fourth-grade teachers and their classrooms? In C. Roller (Ed.), Learning to teach reading: Setting the research agenda (pp. 150–165). Newark: International Reading Association.
Arfé, B., Mason, L., & Fajardo, I. (2018). Simplifying informational text structure for struggling readers. Reading and Writing, 31(9), 2191–2210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9785-6.
Azzopardi, C. (2008a). Kalejdoskopju 4. Merlin Publishers.
Azzopardi, C. (2008b). Kalejdoskopju 6. Merlin Publishers.
Azzopardi, C., & Zahra, T. (2004). Stilel 4. Merlin Publishers.
Azzopardi, C., & Zahra, T. (2006). Stilel 6. Merlin Publishers.
Beerwinkle, A. L., Wijekumar, K., Walpole, S., & Agius, R. (2018). An analysis of the ecological components within and text structure intervention. Reading and Writing, 31, 2041–2064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9870-5.
Best, R. M., Floyd, R. G., & McNamara, D. (2008). Differential competencies contributing to children’s comprehension of narrative and expository texts. Reading Psychology, 1445(29), 137–164.
Binks-Cantrell, E., Washburn, E. K., Joshi, R. M., & Hougen, M. (2012). Peter effect in the preparation of reading teachers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(6), 526–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2011.601434.
Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2006). Profiles of children with specific reading comprehension difficulties. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 683–696. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709905X67610.
Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2011). Matthew effects in young readers: Reading comprehension and reading experience aid vocabulary development. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(5), 431–443.
Catts, H. W., Adlof, S. M., & Weismer, S. (2006). Language deficits in poor comprehenders: A case for the simple view of reading. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 49(2), 278–293.
Catts, H. W., Hogan, T. P., & Fey, M. E. (2003). Subgrouping poor readers on the basis of individual differences in reading-related abilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36(2), 161–164.
COST Action IS1401 Members. (2018). Textbook analysis’. In Meeting minutes of working group two (November, 2nd ed.). University of Porto: Boardroom.
COST. (2019). IS1401 Strengthening Europe’s capabilities by establishing the European literacy network. Retrieved July 16, 2019, from https://www.cost.eu/actions/IS1401/#tabs|Name:overview.
Countrymeters, (2020). Malta Population. Retrieved May 5, 2020, from https://countrymeters.info/en/Malta#population_2019.
Directorate for Learning and Assessment Programmes. (2020). Primary syllabi. https://curriculum.gov.mt/en/Curriculum/Year-1-to-6/Pages/default.aspx.
Directorate of Quality and Standards in Education. (2014). School development plan handbook. https://education.gov.mt/en/education/qualityassurance/Documents/QAD%20SCHOOL%20IMPROVEMENT/SDP%20handbook%20FINAL%20COPY.pdf.
Dymock, S. (2005). Teaching expository text structure awareness. The Reading Teacher, 59(2), 177–181.
Eason, S. H., Goldberg, L. F., Young, K. M., Geist, M. C., & Cutting, L. E. (2012). Reader-text interaction: How different text and questions types influence cognitive skills needed for reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 515–528. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027182.
Gough, P., & Tunmer, W. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104.
Hall, K. M., Sabey, B. L., & McClellan, M. (2005). Expository text comprehension: Helping primary-grade teachers use expository texts to full advantage. Reading Psychology, 26, 211–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710590962550.
Joshi, R. M., & Aaron, P. G. (2001). The component model of reading: Simple view of reading made a little more complex. Reading Psychology, 21, 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710050084428.
Joshi, R. M., Tao, S., Aaron, P. G., & Quiroz, B. (2012). Cognitive component of componential model of reading applied to different orthographies. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(5), 480–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219411432690.
Kraal, A., Koornneef, A., Saab, W., & Broek, N. (2018). Processing of expository and narrative texts by low- and high-comprehending children. Reading and Writing, 31(9), 2017–2040.
McEwan, E. K. (2007). 40 ways to support struggling readers in content classrooms. Grades 6–12. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
McMaster, K. L., van den Broek, P., Espin, C., White, M. J., Rapp, D. N., Kendeou, P., & Carlson, S. E. (2012). Making the right connections: Differential effects of reading intervention for subgroups of comprehenders. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 100–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.11.017.
Meyer, B. J. F. (1975). Identification of the structure of prose and its implications for the study of reading and memory. Journal of Reading Behaviour, 7, 7–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862967509547120.
Meyer, B. J. F. (1985). Prose analysis: Purposes, procedures, and problems. In B. K. Britten & J. B. Black (Eds.), Understanding expository text: A theoretical and practical handbook for analyzing explanatory text (pp. 11–64). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Meyer, B. J. F., & Freedle, R. O. (1984). Effects of discourse type on recall. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 121–143. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312021001121.
Meyer, B. J. F., & Ray, M. N. (2011). Structure strategy interventions: Increasing reading comprehension of expository text. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(1), 127–152.
Meyer, B. J. F., Wijekumar, K., & Lei, P. (2018). Comparative signalling generated for expository texts by 4th−8th graders: Variations by text structure strategy instruction, comprehension skill and signal word. Reading and Writing, 31, 1937–1968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9871-4.
Ministry for Education and Employment. (2014). A national literacy strategy for all in Malta and Gozo. Retrieved from https://education.gov.mt/en/Documents/Literacy/ENGLISH.pdf.
Ministry for Education and Employment. (2016). Progress in international reading literacy study (PIRLS) 2016. Retrieved from https://curriculum.gov.mt/en/international_studies/Documents/PIRLS_2016_Malta_Report.pdf.
Ministry for Education and Employment. (2018). PISA 2018 program for international student assessment. Ministry for Education and Employment. Retrieved from https://curriculum.gov.mt/en/international_studies/Documents/PISA_2018_Malta_Report.pdf.
Ministry for Education and Employment, Directorate for Quality and Standards in Education Research and Development. (2013). PIRLS 2011 progress in international reading literacy study: Malta report. Retrieved from https://researchandinnovation.gov.mt/en/Documents/PIRLS%202011-%20Malta%20Report.pdf.
Ministry for Education and Employment. (n.d.). Year 4 resources-social studies. Retrieved from https://primarysocialstudies.skola.edu.mt/schoolnet/year4-EN.htm.
Ministry for Education and Employment. (n.d.). Year 6 resources-social studies. Retrieved from https://primarysocialstudies.skola.edu.mt/schoolnet/year6-EN.htm/.
Ministry of Education. (1999). Creating the future together: National minimum curriculum. Retrieved from https://education.gov.mt/en/resources/Documents/Policy%20Documents/national%20minnimun%20curriculum_english.pdf.
Ministry of Education and Employment. (2012). A national curriculum framework for all”. Ministry of Education and Employment. Retrieved from https://education.gov.mt/en/Documents/A%20National%20Curriculum%20Framework%20for%20All%20-%202012.pdf.
Oakhill, J., & Cain, K. (2012). The precursors of reading ability in young readers: Evidence from a four-year longitudinal study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(2), 91–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2010.529219.
Pearson, P. D., Roehler, L. R., Dole, J. A., & Duffy, G. G. (1990). Developing expertise in reading comprehension: What should be taught? How should it be taught? (Technical Report No. 512). Retrieved from https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/17648/ctrstreadtechrepv01990i00512_opt.pdf.
Perfetti, C. A., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading (pp. 227–247). Oxford: Blackwell.
Roehling, J. V., Hebert, M., Nelson, J. R., & Bohaty, J. J. (2017). Text structure strategies for improving expository reading comprehension. Reading Teacher, 71(1), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1590.
Slavin, R., Lake, C., Chambers, B., Cheung, A., & Davis, S. (2009). Effective reading programs for the elementary grades: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 79(4), 1391–1466. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309341374.
Tannenbaum, K. R., Torgesen, J. K., & Wagner, R. K. (2006). Relationships between word knowledge and reading comprehension in third-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(4), 381–398.
UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2019). Malta: Education and literacy. Retrieved from http://uis.unesco.org/country/MT.
Wijekumar, K. (2020). The ‘GIST’ of the reading comprehension problem in grades 4 and 5. Dyslexia. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1647.
Wijekumar, K., Beerwinkle, A., Harris, K., & Graham, S. (2019). Etiology of teacher knowledge and instructional skills for literacy at the upper elementary grades. Annals of dyslexia. An Interdisciplinary Journal of the International Dyslexia Association, 69(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-018-00170-6.
Wijekumar, K. K., Meyer, B. J. F., & Lei, P. (2012). Large-scale randomized controlled trial with 4th graders using intelligent tutoring of the structure strategy to improve nonfiction reading comprehension. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(6), 987–1013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-012-9263-4.
Wijekumar, K., Meyer, B. J. F., Lei, P., Cheng, W., Jil, X., & Joshi, R. M. (2017). Evidence of an intelligent tutoring system as a mindtool to promote strategic memory of expository texts and comprehension with children in grades 4 and 5. Journal of Educational Computing, 55(7), 1022–1048. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117696909.
Wijekumar, K., Meyer, B. J. F., Lei, P., Lin, Y., Johnson, L., Spielvogel, J. A., et al. (2014). Multisite randomized controlled trial examining intelligent tutoring of the structure strategy for fifth-grade readers. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 7(4), 331–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2013.853333.
Williams, J. P. (2018). Text structure instruction: The research is moving forward. Reading and Writing, 31, 1923–1935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9909-7.
Williams, J. P., Pollini, S., Nubla-King, A. M., Snyder, A. E., Garcia, A., Ordynans, J. G., & Atkins, J. G. (2014). An intervention to improve comprehension of cause/effect through expository text structure instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033215.
Acknowledgements
The research has benefited from COST Action IS1401ELN.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Agius, R., Zammit, C. A Text Structure Analysis of Fourth and Sixth Grade Maltese Textbooks. Tech Know Learn 26, 407–428 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09491-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09491-9