Abstract
This article investigates the value of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences (HASS) candidates’ prior industry networks and experiences as they intersect with doctoral study, as assessed by a group of HASS PhD graduates. While the phenomenon of industry engagement in PhDs across HASS and STEM is widely recognised, the value of these relationships to the PhD experience is less understood. This is particularly the case in HASS PhDs given the opportunities afforded to this predominantly mature-aged cohort of pre-existing professional networks. In our previous work on this topic, we showed that engaging with industry throughout the HASS PhD research lifecycle is widespread, and that networks may have their genesis prior to commencement and persist into careers post-graduation. In this article, we subject these networks to finer-grained analysis. Based on 16 in-depth interviews, we investigate the value HASS PhD graduates ascribe to their industry networks pre-, during and post-graduation. Our analysis suggests industry engagement during the PhD contributes value in two key ways: by facilitating candidate learning, in the form of research design and data collection related activities, and for knowledge exchange. These insights are further enhanced by development of a novel analytical model that measures the extensiveness, or continuity, of industry engagement across the PhD lifecycle. Comparative analysis reveals a correlation between enduring industry engagement and academic careers post-graduation, suggesting additional value in the form of a highly industry integrated HASS academic labour force. Our findings suggest HASS PhDs can function as an important and hitherto under-recognised industry engagement vector, contributing added value to the research process with multiple potential beneficiaries.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackers, L., Coey, C., Jons, H., Millard, D., Kupiszewski, M., Kupiszewska, D., et al. (2014). Mapping the population, careers, mobilities and impacts of advanced research degree graduates in the Social Sciences and Humanities. http://usir.salford.ac.uk/34678/1/POCARIM%20D12%20FINAL%20REPORT.pdf. Accessed 27 February 2019.
Australian Research Council (2019). Engagement and impact assessment 2018–2019. https://dataportal.arc.gov.au/EI/NationalReport/2018/. Accessed June 12 2019.
Barnacle, R., Cuthbert, D., Schmidt, C., & Batty, C. (2019). HASS PhD graduate careers and knowledge transfer: Uncovering networks, 0, 1-22. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022219870976 Accessed November 9 2019.
Bell, J., Dodgson, M., Field, L., Gough, P., & Spurling, T. (2015). Translating research for economic and social benefit: country comparisons. https://acola.org.au/wp/PDF/SAF09/SAF09%20Full%20report.pdf. Accessed 23 October 2018.
Bentley, P., Bexley, E., & Dollinger, M. (2017). Mapping the external engagement of Australia’s PhD candidates. https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/f39714_e2519e18ec0e4f4ba8ec75c048b100d9.pdf. Accessed June 10 2018.
Brailsford, I. (2010). Motives and aspirations for doctoral study: career, personal, and inter-personal factors in the decision to embark on a history Ph.D. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 5, 15–27.
Cumming, J. (2007). Representing the complexity, diversity and particularity of doctoral enterprise in Australia. The Australian National University,
Cunningham, S., Theilacker, M., Gahan, P., Callan, V., & Rainnie, A. (2016). Skills and capabilities for Australian enterprise innovation. http://acola.org.au/wp/PDF/SAF10/Full%20report.pdf. Accessed 15 October 2017.
Cuthbert, D., & Molla, T. (2015). The politicization of the PhD and the employability of doctoral graduates: An Australian case study in a global context. In D. E. Neubauer & K. Ghazali (Eds.), Technology and workplace skills for the twenty-first century: Asia Pacific universities in the globalized economy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Delamont, S., & Atkinson, P. (2001). Doctoring uncertainty: mastering craft knowledge. Social Studies of Science, 31(1), 87–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631201031001005.
Duke Graduate School (2018). All departments: PhD completion rates. https://gradschool.duke.edu/about/statistics/all-departments-phd-completion-rates. Accessed 5 April 2018.
EPSRC (2014). New EPSRC Centres for doctoral training. https://www.epsrc.ac.uk/files/newsevents/news/cdtsinfographic/. Accessed 27 February 2018.
European Commission (n.d.). Innovative Training Networks. https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/opportunities/topic-details/msca-itn-2020. Accessed 18 December 2019.
European Commission Horiozn 2020 (n.d.). Marie Skłodowska-Curie actions. https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/marie-sklodowska-curie-actions. Accessed 18 December 2019.
Fochler, M., Felt, U., & Müller, R. (2016). Unsustainable growth, hyper-competition, and worth in life science research: narrowing evaluative repertoires in doctoral and postdoctoral scientists’ work and lives. Minerva, 54, 175–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-016-9292-y.
Gardner, S. K. (2010). Contrasting the socialization experiences of doctoral students in high- and low completing departments: a qualitative analysis of disciplinary contexts at one institution. The Journal of Higher Education, 81(1), 61–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2010.11778970.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
Golde, C. M., & Walker, G. E. (2006). Envisioning the future of doctoral education: preparing stewards of the discipline. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Carnegie Essays on the Doctorate.
Guerin, C. (2019). Stories of moving on HASS PhD graduates’ motivations and career trajectories inside and beyond academia. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 1-21, doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022219834448.
Hasgall, A, Saenen, B, Borrell-Damian, L, Van Deynze, F, Seeber, M & Huisman, J 2019, Doctoral education in Europe today: approaches and institutional structures. https://eua-cde.org/downloads/publications/online%20eua%20cde%20survey%2016.01.2019.pdf. Accessed 18 December 2019.
Hayden, M. C., Petrova, M. K., & Wutti, D. (2018). Direct associations with the terminology of knowledge transfer: differences between the social sciences and humanities (SSH) and other scientific disciplines. TRAMES, 22(72/67)(3)), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2018.3.02.
Higgins, S. C., & Daniels, M. (2015). Alternative academics: moving beyond the academy. Journal of Eastern Mediterranean Archaeology & Heritage Studies, 3(3), 238–246.
Holbrook, A., Shaw, K., Scevak, J., Bourke, S., Cantwell, R., & Budd, J. (2014). PhD candidate expectations: exploring mismatch with experience. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 9, 329–346. https://doi.org/10.28945/2078.
Howard, J. H. (2015). Translation of research for economic and social benefit: measures that facilitate transfer of knowledge from publicly funded research organisations to industry. https://www.howardpartners.com.au/assets/john-howard%2D%2D-translation-of-research-for-economic-and-social-benefit%2D%2D-10-nov-2015.pdf. Accessed 24 October 2018.
Hughes, A., Kitson, M., Probert, J., Bullock, A., & Milner, I. (2011). Hidden connections: knowledge exchange between the arts and humanities and the private, public and third sectors. https://www.cbr.cam.ac.uk/fileadmin/user_upload/centre-for-business-research/downloads/special-reports/specialreport-hiddenconnections.pdf. Accessed 7 February 2019.
Hughes, A., Kitson, M., Probert, J., Turner, R., Bullock, A., & Milner, I. (2014). Cultural connections: the role of the arts and humanities in competitveness and local development. https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/fileadmin/user_upload/centre-for-business-research/downloads/special-reports/specialreport-culturalconnections.pdf. Accessed 7 July 2019.
Hughes, A., Lawson, C., Salter, A., Bullock, A., & Hughes, R. B. (2016). The changing state of knowledge exchange: UK academic interactions with external organisations 2005–2015. http://www.ncub.co.uk/index.php?option=com_docman&view=download&category_slug=reports&alias=429-the-changing-state-of-knowledge-exchange&Itemid=2728. Accessed 11 April 2019.
Innovate UK (2018). Knowledge Transfer Partnerships. http://ktp.innovateuk.org/. Accessed 25 October 2018.
Jonker, L. (2016). Ontario’s PhD graduates from 2009: where are they now? http://www.heqco.ca/SiteCollectionDocuments/Ontario%27s-PhD-Graduates-from-2009-ENG.pdf. Accessed 3 February 2018.
Kjellberg, H., Mallard, A., Arjalies, D.-L., Aspers, P., Beljean, S., Bidet, A., et al. (2013). Valuation studies? Our collective two cents. Valuation Studies, 1(1), 11–30. https://doi.org/10.3384/vs.2001-5992.131111.
Klein, H. K., & Rowe, F. (2008). Marshaling the professional experience of doctoral students: a contribution to the practical relevance debate. MIS Quarterly, 32(4), 675–686. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148866.
Lamont, M. (2012). Toward a comparative sociology of valuation and evaluation. Annual Review of Sociology, 38(1), 201–221. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-120022.
Litalien, D., Guay, F., & Morin, A. J. S. (2015). Motivation for Ph.D. studies: scale development and validation. Learning and Individual Differences, 41, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.05.006.
Markuerkiaga, L., Errasti, N., & Igartua, J. I. (2014). Success factors for managing an entrepreneurial university. Industry & Higher Education, August, 233–244, doi:https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2014.0214.
McAlpine, L., & Amundsen, C. (2016). Post-PhD career trajectories: Intentions, decision-making and life aspirations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Pivot.
McAlpine, L., & Austin, N. (2018). Humanities PhD graduates: desperately seeking careers? Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 48(2), 1–19.
McCarthy, M. T. (2017). Promising practices in humanities PhD professional development. http://cgsnet.org/publication-pdf/5049/NEH_NextGen_LessonsLearned.pdf. Accessed June 29 2018.
Mewburn, I., Grant, W. J., Suominen, H., & Kizimchuk, S. (2018). A machine learning analysis of the non-academic employment opportunities for Ph.D graduates in Australia. Higher Education Policy. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-018-0098-4.
Molla, T. M., & Cuthbert, D. (2018). Re-imagining Africa as a knowledge economy: premises and promises of recent higher education development initiatives. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 53, 250–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909616677370.
Moxham, L., Dwyer, T. A., & Reid-Searl, K. (2013). Articulating expectations for PhD candidature upon commencement: ensuring supervisor/student “best fit”. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 35(4), 345–354.
Norton, A., Cherastidtham, I., & Mackey, W. (2018). Mapping Australian higher education 2018. http://www.5050foundation.edu.au/assets/reports/documents/907-Mapping-Australian-higher-education-2018.pdf. Accessed 23 January 2019.
OECD.Stat (2019). Distribution of graduates and entrants by Field. https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx? Accessed 26 February 2019.
Olmos-Peñuela, J., Castro-Martínez, E., & D’Este, P. (2014). Knowledge transfer activities in social sciences and humanities: explaining the interactions of research groups with non-academic agents. Research Policy, 43, 696–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.12.004.
Pearson, M., Cumming, J., Evans, T., Macauley, P., & Ryland, K. (2011). How shall we know them? Capturing the diversity of difference in Australian doctoral candidates and their experiences. Studies in Higher Education, 36(5), 527–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.594591.
Raddon, A., & Sung, J. (2009). The career choices and impact of PhD graduates in the UK: a synthesis review. https://esrc.ukri.org/files/public-engagement/public-dialogues/full-report-phd-graduates-career-choices/. Accessed 16 January 2019.
Robertson, M. J. (2017). Ages and career stages: considerations in providing support for mid-late career stage doctoral students. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(6), 560–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2017.1355261.
School of Graduate Studies University of Toronto (2018). Employed and Engaged: Career Outcomes of Our PhD Graduates, 2000–2015. http://www.sgs.utoronto.ca/about/Pages/10,000-PhDs-Project.aspx. Accessed 12 June 2018.
Skakni, I. (2018). Reasons, motives and motivations for completing a PhD: a typology of doctoral studies as a quest. Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, 9(2), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1108/SGPE-D-18-00004.
Stanford Institutional Research & Decision Support (2018). Stanford PhD alumni employment project. http://web.stanford.edu/dept/pres-provost/irds/phdjobs. Accessed 4 January 2018.
Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur’s quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Thune, T. (2009). Doctoral students on the university–industry interface: a review of the literature. Higher Education, 58, 637–651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9214-0.
UBC Faculty of Graduate & Postdoctoral Studies (2017). UBC PhD Career Outcomes (February 26 2018).
Universities Australia (2016). Clever collaborations: the strong business case for partnering with universities. https://www.universitiesaustralia.edu.au/Media-and-Events/submissions-and-reports/Clever-Collaborations. Accessed 15 January 2019.
University of Cambridge Enterprise (2015). UK University Technology Transfer: Behind the headlines. https://www.enterprise.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Behind-the-headlines.pdf. Accessed 7 February 2019.
University of Copenhagen (2019). The industrial PhD program. https://healthsciences.ku.dk/phd/apply/routes-to-a-phd/industrialphd/. Accessed 18 December 2019.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barnacle, R., Cuthbert, D., Schmidt, C. et al. Vectors of knowledge exchange: the value of industry engagement to HASS PhDs. High Educ 80, 973–987 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00528-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00528-z