Skip to main content
Log in

Introgression of anthracnose resistance into the background of locally adapted common bean landraces

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Adequate knowledge, access and introgression of genetic diversity available in cultivated and wild relatives are pre-requisites for widening the genetic base of cultivars to sustain genetic improvement. An attempt was made to screen anthracnose resistance in 33 indigenous and exotic accessions of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) belonging to primary, secondary, tertiary and quaternary gene pools including three popular and widely cultivated landraces of North-Western Indian Himalayas. The cultivated and wild species of common bean were introgressed into the backgrounds of landraces, which resulted in the development of 22 crosses comprising 6 each of intra and interspecific crosses with P. vulgaris and P. coccineus, 3 with P. acutifolius, 2 with P. lunatus and 5 backcrosses. The hybridity of these crosses was confirmed using morphological and molecular markers. The interspecific crosses of P. vulgaris × P. coccineus, P. vulgaris × P. acutifolius and P. vulgaris × P. lunatus were attempted for the first time in India using in-vitro approaches. Further hybrid plants were grown to maturity following embryo rescue protocol, but all showed different developmental abnormalities. The overall establishment of successful hybrids and their complete development was the maximum in cross of Bhaderwah Local × Poonch Local (18.28%) and the minimum in Bhaderwah Local × IC258276 and Bhaderwah Local × IC328372 (0.5%). The results of the present study revealed that wild relatives of common bean viz. P. coccineus, P. acutifolius and P. lunatus are an excellent source of resistance against anthracnose, which can be exploited for diversification of cultivated gene pool. These resistant genetic resources could also be shared among common bean researchers in the country or elsewhere under Standard Material Transfer Agreement for strengthening ongoing crop improvement programmes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anuradf-Aglilak JA, Jackscin MT (1988) Attempts at inter-specific hybridization between Phaseolus vulgaris L. and P. acutifolius A. Gray Using Embryo Rescue Plant Breed 10:173–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Balasubramanian P, Faiz AAV, Hucl P (2003) Barriers to inter-specific hybridization in Phaseolus backcrosses. Physiol Plant (In press)

  • Bitocchi E, Bellucci E, Giardini A, Rau D, Rodriguez M, Biagetti Attene G, Nanni L, Papa R (2013) Molecular analysis of the parallel domestication of the common bean in Mesoamerican and the Andes. New Phytol 197:300–331

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Busogoro JP, Jijakli MH, Lepoivre P (1999) Identification of a novel source of resistance to angular leaf spot disease of common beans within the secondary gene pool. Plant Breed 118:417–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kour B, Kour G, Kaul S, Dhar MK (2012) Screening of Phaseolus vulgaris cultivars growing in various areas of Jammu and Kashmir for anthracnose resistance. Int J Sci Res Publ 2(6):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahuku GS, Jara CE, Cajiao C, Beebe S (2002) Sources of resistance to Colletotrichum lindemuthianum in the secondary gene pool of Phaseolus vulgaris and in crosses of primary and secondary gene pools. Plant Dis 86:1383–1387

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manrique A, Manrique A, Nakahodo J (1993) Yield and biological nitrogen fixation of common bean in Peru. Plant Soil 152:87–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammed A (2013) An overview of distribution, biology and the management of common bean anthracnose. J Plant Pathol Microbiol 4:193

    Google Scholar 

  • Morishige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassay with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol Plant 15:473–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukankusi CM, Omongi W, Sebuliba S, Musoke S, Acam C (2018) Characterization of P. coccineus interspecific germplasm accessions for disease resistance, grain market class and yield attributes. African Crop Sci J 26:117–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okon SM, Ociepa T (2018) Effectiveness of new sources of resistance against oat powdery mildew identified in A. sterilis. J Plant Dis Protect 125:505–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pathania A, Sharma SK, Sharma PN (2014) Common bean. In: Singh M, Bisht IS, Dutta M (eds.) Broadening the genetic base of grain legumes. Springer pp. 11-50

  • Rana JC, Sharma TR, Tyagi RK, Chahota RK, Gautam NK, Singh M, Sharma PN, Ojha SN (2015) Characterization of 4274 accessions of common bean germplasm conserved in Indian gene bank for phenological, morphological and agricultural traits. Euphytica. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-015-1406-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rashid KA, Smart JP, Haq N (1987) Hybridization in Genus Vigna. Proc 2nd Int Symp, Bangkok, Thailand, pp. 205–214

  • Reichert JM, Rodrigues MF, Awe GO, Riquelme UFB, Kaiser DR, Reinert DJ (2015) Common bean in highly variable weather conditions, on sandy soils, and food security in a Subtropical environment. Food Energy Secur 4:219–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saghai-Maroof MA, Soliman KM, Jorgensen RA, Allard RW (1984) Ribosomal DNA spacer length polymorphism in barley: mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:1757–1761

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmutz J, McClean PE, Mamidi S, Wu GA, Cannon SB, Grimwood J (2014) A reference genome for common bean and genome wide analysis of dual domestications. Nat Genet 46:707–713

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schoonhoven A, Pastor-Corrales MA (1987) In: Standard System for the Evaluation of Bean Germplasm. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical, Cali, Colombia, pp 25–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Shao FM (1980) Studies on bean anthracnose in southern highlands of Tanzania. MSc Agriculture Thesis, University of Dares Saalam, pp. 188

  • Sharma PN, Diaz LM, Blair MW (2013) Genetic diversity of two Indian common bean germplasm collections based on morphological and microsatellite markers. Plant Genet Res 11:121–130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh SP (2001) Broadening the genetic base of common bean cultivars: a review. Crop Sci 41:1659–1675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh SP, Teran H, Schwartz HF, Otto K, Lema M (2009) Introgressing white mold resistance from Phaseolus species of the secondary gene pool into common bean. Crop Sci 49:1629–1637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smartt J (1970) Inter-specific hybridization between cultivated American species of the genus Phaseolus. Euphytica 19:480–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urrea C, Miklas PN, Beaver S (1999) Inheritance of resistance to commonbacterial blight in four tepary bean lines. J Am Soc Hort Sci 124:24–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wester RE, Marth PC (1999) Some effects of a growth regulator mixture in controlled cross pollination of lima beans. Proc Amer Soc Hort Sci 53:315–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Zizumbo D, Payro C, de la Cruz E, Delgado-Valerio PG (2005) Population structure and evolutionary dynamics of wild- weedy- domesticated complexes of common bean in a Mesoamerican region. Crop Sci 35:1073–1083

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), Department of Science & Technology, Govt. of India for providing grant in aid to undertake this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanjeev Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, S., Singh, M., Malhotra, N. et al. Introgression of anthracnose resistance into the background of locally adapted common bean landraces. Euphytica 217, 52 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-021-02784-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-021-02784-1

Keywords

Navigation