Abstract
Buildings account for a significant portion of energy consumption, and occupants’ behaviour plays a crucial role in conserving energy. While previous research has delved into factors affecting the energy conservation behaviour of occupants, the specific interactions and the influence conduction paths remain ambiguous. Moreover, the importance of stakeholders in energy conservation has often been overlooked. This study aims to explore the stakeholder-related factors and their interaction network based on social network analysis. A unique aspect of this research is its focus on the interaction network among factors from the perspective of stakeholders, extending the application of social network analysis in novel ways. The findings propose that policies and regulations guide occupants’ attention to energy conservation behaviour and information feedback mainly serves as a means of communication, providing a channel for the transmission of information from other factors. Government supervision has become a key means for the government to promote energy-saving behavior among occupants due to the widest influence and the shortest transmission path, with policies and regulations being the critical construct to the suppliers and occupants. Besides, the executors play a crucial intermediary role, and are the primary responsible individuals for accelerating the occupants’ access to external energy-saving information. This research uncovers the interaction network of stakeholder-related factors and provides practical implications for various stakeholders to encourage occupants’ energy conservation behaviour.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated during and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available to protect study participant privacy but are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Aaltonen, K., & Kujala, J. (2010). A project lifecycle perspective on stakeholder influence strategies in global projects. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 26(4), 381–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2010.09.001
Abbasi, S., & Choukolaei, H. A. (2023). A systematic review of green supply chain network design literature focusing on carbon policy. Decision Analytics Journal, 6, 100189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100189
Abbasi, S., & Erdebilli, B. (2023). Green closed-loop SUPPLY chain networks’ response to various carbon policies during COVID-19. Sustainability, 15, su15043677. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043677
Abbasi, S., Daneshmand-Mehr, M., & Ghane Kanafi, A. (2022a). Designing sustainable recovery network of end-of-life product during the COVID-19 pandemic: A real and applied case study. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2022, 6967088. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6967088
Abbasi, S., Daneshmand-Mehr, M., & Ghane Kanafi, A. (2022b). Green closed-loop supply chain network design during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic: A case study in the Iranian automotive industry. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 28, 69–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-022-09863-0
Abbasi, S., Khalili, H. A., Daneshmand-Mehr, M., & Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, M. (2022c). Performance measurement of the sustainable supply chain during the COVID-19 pandemic: A real-life case study. Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences, 47, 327–358. https://doi.org/10.2478/fcds-2022-0018
Abrahamse, W., & Steg, L. (2009). How do socio-demographic and psychological factors relate to households’ direct and indirect energy use and savings?. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(5), 711–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2009.05.006
Abrahamse, W., & Steg, L. (2011). Factors related to household energy use and intention to reduce it: The role of psychological and socio-demographic variables. Human Ecology Review, 18(1), 30–40. <Go to ISI>://WOS:000292808900003
Ahmat Zainuri, N., Abd-Rahman, N., Halim, L., Chan, M. Y., & Mohd Bazari, N. N. (2022). Measuring pro-environmental behavior triggered by environmental values. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(23), 16013. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316013
Al Mamun, A., Hayat, N., Mohiuddin, M., Salameh, A. A., Ali, M. H., & Zainol, N. R. (2022). Modelling the significance of value-belief-norm theory in predicting workplace energy conservation behaviour. Frontiers in Energy Research, 10, 940595. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2022.940595
Ali, M. R., Shafiq, M., & Andejany, M. (2021). Determinants of consumers’ intentions towards the purchase of energy efficient appliances in Pakistan: An extended model of the theory of planned behavior. Sustainability, 13(2), 565. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020565
Arnaboldi, V., Conti, M., Passarella, A., Pezzoni, F., & Ieee. (2012, 2012 Sept 03-05). Analysis of Ego Network Structure in Online Social Networks. [Proceedings of 2012 ase/ieee international conference on privacy, security, risk and trust and 2012 ase/ieee international conference on social computing (socialcom/passat 2012)]. ASE/IEEE International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust / ASE/IEEE International Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom/PASSAT), Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Assaad, R., & El-adaway, I. H. (2020). Enhancing the knowledge of construction business failure: A social network analysis approach. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(6), 04020052. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001831
Bandura, A. (1998). Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory. Psychology & Health, 13(4), 623–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870449808407422
Belaid, F., & Garcia, T. (2016). Understanding the spectrum of residential energy-saving behaviours: French evidence using disaggregated data. Energy Economics, 57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.05.006
Belaid, F., & Joumni, H. (2020). Behavioral attitudes towards energy saving: Empirical evidence from France. Energy Policy, 140, 111406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111406
Bunn, R., Burman, E., Warne, J., Bull, J., & Field, J. (2023). Tracking building operational energy and carbon emissions using S-curve trajectories-a prototype tool. Building Services Engineering Research & Technology, 44(2), 135–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/01436244221145392
Camacho, L., Pasco, M., Banks, M., Pasco, R., Almanzar, M., Rodriguez Tejeda, A., Amoo, A., & Rosima, N. (2023). Understanding employees’ energy saving in the workplace: DR and the Philippines’ Realities. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16, 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16010049
Canova, L., & Manganelli, A. M. (2020). Energy-saving behaviours in workplaces: Application of an extended model of the theory of planned behaviour. Europes Journal of Psychology, 16(3), 384–400. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v16i3.1893
Chatzigeorgiou, I. M., & Andreou, G. T. (2021). A systematic review on feedback research for residential energy behavior change through mobile and web interfaces. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 135, 110187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110187
Chen, Z., & Liu, Y. (2020). The effects of leadership and reward policy on employees’ electricity saving behaviors: An empirical study in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(6), 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17062019
Chui, W. S., & Wai, C. W. (2015, May 07–08). Gamification: A Novel Approach for Facilities Manager to Foster Energy-Saving Behaviour. [Innovation vision 2020: From regional development sustainability to global economic growth, vol i-vi]. 25th International-Business-Information-Management-Association Conference, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Ciarapica, F., Bevilacqua, M., & Antomarioni, S. (2019). An approach based on association rules and social network analysis for managing environmental risk: A case study from a process industry. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 128, 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2019.05.037
Conradie, P. D., De Ruyck, O., Saldien, J., & Ponnet, K. (2021). Who wants to join a renewable energy community in Flanders? Applying an extended model of Theory of Planned Behaviour to understand intent to participate. Energy Policy, 151, 112121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112121
Dehghan, H., & Amin-Naseri, M. R. (2022). A simulation-based optimization model to determine optimal electricity prices under various scenarios considering stakeholders’ objectives. Energy, 238, 121853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121853
Delmas, M. A., Fischlein, M., & Asensio, O. I. (2013). Information strategies and energy conservation behavior: A meta-analysis of experimental studies from 1975 to 2012. Energy Policy, 61, 729–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.109
Ding, Z., Wang, G., Liu, Z., & Long, R. (2017). Research on differences in the factors influencing the energy-saving behavior of urban and rural residents in China-A case study of Jiangsu Province. Energy Policy, 100, 252–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.10.013
Ding, Z., Hu, T., Li, M., Xu, X., & Zou, P. X. W. (2019). Agent-based model for simulating building energy management in student residences. Energy and Buildings, 198, 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.05.053
Du, J., & Pan, W. (2021). Examining energy saving behaviors in student dormitories using an expanded theory of planned behavior. Habitat International, 107, 102308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102308
Du, J., Pan, W., & Yu, C. (2020). In-situ monitoring of occupant behavior in residential buildings - a timely review. Energy and Buildings, 212, 109811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.109811
Duan, H., He, B., Song, J., Li, W., & Liu, Z. (2023). Preference of consumers for higher-grade energy-saving appliances in hierarchical Chinese cities. Journal of Environmental Management, 345, 118806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118806
Dumitru, A., De Gregorio, E., Bonnes, M., Bonaiuto, M., Carrus, G., Garcia-Mira, R., & Maricchiolo, F. (2016). Low carbon energy behaviors in the workplace: A qualitative study in Italy and Spain. Energy Research & Social Science, 13, 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.005
Duong, C. D. (2023). Using a unified model of TPB, NAM and SOBC to understand students’ energy-saving behaviors: Moderation role of group-level factors and media publicity. International Journal of Energy Sector Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijesm-09-2022-0017
Ennett, S. T., Bauman, K. E., Hussong, A., Faris, R., Foshee, V. A., Cai, L., & DuRant, R. H. (2006). The peer context of adolescent substance use: Findings from social network analysis. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 16(2), 159–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2006.00127.x
Fathalizadeh, A., Hosseini, M. R., Silvius, A. J. G., Rahimian, A., Martek, I., & Edwards, D. J. (2021). Barriers impeding sustainable project management: A Social Network Analysis of the Iranian construction sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 318, 128405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128405
Frederiks, E. R., Stenner, K., & Hobman, E. V. (2015). The socio-demographic and psychological predictors of residential energy consumption: A comprehensive review. Energies, 8(1), 573–609. https://doi.org/10.3390/en8010573
Garces, E., van Blommestien, K., Anthony, J., & Hillegas-Elting, J. (2016, Sept 04–08). Identification of Experts using Social Network Analysis (SNA). Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology [Portland international conference on management of engineering and technology (picmet 2016): Technology management for social innovation]. Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), Honolulu, HI.
Guo, L., & Zhang, B. (2019). Mining structural influence to analyze relationships in social network. Physica a-Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 523, 301–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.02.005
Harputlugil, T., & de Wilde, P. (2021). The interaction between humans and buildings for energy efficiency: A critical review. Energy Research & Social Science, 71, 101828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101828
Hebert-Beirne, J., Camenga, D. R., James, A. S., Brady, S. S., Newman, D. K., Burgio, K. L., et al. (2021). Social processes informing toileting behavior among adolescent and adult women: Social cognitive theory as an interpretative lens. Qualitative Health Research, 31(3), 430–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732320979168
Hong, J., She, Y., Wang, S., & Dora, M. (2019). Impact of psychological factors on energy-saving behavior: Moderating role of government subsidy policy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 232, 154–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.321
Hori, S., Kondo, K., Nogata, D., & Ben, H. (2013). The determinants of household energy-saving behavior: Survey and comparison in five major Asian cities. Energy Policy, 52, 354–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.043
Huo, T., Ma, Y., Xu, L., Feng, W., & Cai, W. (2022). Carbon emissions in China’s urban residential building sector through 2060: A dynamic scenario simulation. Energy, 254, 124395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124395
IEA. (2022). Tracking Buildings 2022. International Energy Agency.
Is, H., & Tuncer, T. (2019). Interaction-Based Behavioral Analysis of Twitter Social Network Accounts. Applied Sciences-Basel, 9(20), 4448. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9204448
Iweka, O., Liu, S., Shukla, A., & Yan, D. (2019). Energy and behaviour at home: A review of intervention methods and practices. Energy Research & Social Science, 57, 101238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101238
Khansari, N., & Hewitt, E. (2020). Incorporating an agent-based decision tool to better understand occupant pathways to GHG reductions in NYC buildings. Cities, 97, 102503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102503
Kumar, P., Caggiano, H., Cuite, C., Andrews, C. J., Felder, F. A., Shwom, R., Floress, K., Ahamed, S., & Schelly, C. (2022). Behaving or not? Explaining energy conservation via identity, values, and awareness in U.S. suburban homes. Energy Research & Social Science, 92, 102805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102805
Le-Anh, T., Nguyen, M. D., Nguyen, T. T., & Duong, K. T. (2023). Energy saving intention and behavior under behavioral reasoning perspectives. Energy Efficiency, 16(2), 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-023-10092-x
Li, H., Wang, Z.-H., & Zhang, B. (2023). How social interaction induce energy-saving behaviors in buildings: Interpersonal & passive interactions v.s. public & active interactions. Energy Economics, 118, 106515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106515
Lin, H.-Y., & Hsu, M.-H. (2015). Using social cognitive theory to investigate green consumer behavio. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(5), 326–343. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1820
Littlecott, H. J., Moore, G. F., Gallagher, H. C., & Murphy, S. (2019). From complex interventions to complex systems: Using social network analysis to understand school engagement with health and wellbeing. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(10), 1694. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16101694
Liu, X., Zou, Y., & Wu, J. (2018). Factors Influencing Public-Sphere Pro-Environmental Behavior among Mongolian College Students: A Test of Value-Belief-Norm Theory. Sustainability, 10(5), 1384. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051384
Liu, K., Liu, Y. M., Kou, Y. Y., Yang, X. X., & Hu, G. Z. (2023). Formation mechanism for collaborative behaviour among stakeholders in megaprojects based on the theory of planned behaviour. Building Research and Information. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2023.2188444
Long, R., Wang, J., Chen, H., Li, Q., Wu, M., & Tan-Soo, J.-S. (2023). Applying multilevel structural equation modeling to energy-saving behavior: The interaction of individual- and city-level factors. Energy Policy, 174, 113423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113423
Lu, A.-W., Chang, Y.-H., & Wu, H.-H. (2021). Analyzing Service Quality and Satisfaction by Multivariate Analysis of Variance: A Case of Taiwan Tobacco and Liquor Corporation. International Journal of Information Systems in the Service Sector, 13(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijisss.2021100101
Mukai, T., Nishio, K.-I., Komatsu, H., & Sasaki, M. (2022). What effect does feedback have on energy conservation? Comparing previous household usage, neighbourhood usage, and social norms in Japan. Energy Research & Social Science, 86, 102430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102430
Nahiduzzaman, K. M., Abdallah, A. S., Moradzadeh, A., Shotorbani, A. M., Hewage, K., & Sadiq, R. (2023). Impacts of tariffs on energy conscious behavior with respect to household attributes in Saudi Arabia. Energies, 16(3), 1458. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16031458
Nie, H., Vasseur, V., Fan, Y., & Xu, J. (2019). Exploring reasons behind careful-use, energy-saving behaviours in residential sector based on the theory of planned behaviour: Evidence from Changchun, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 230, 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.101
O’Neill, T. A. (2017). An Overview of Interrater Agreement on Likert Scales for Researchers and Practitioners. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 777. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00777
Okpalike, C., Okeke, F. O., Ezema, E. C., Oforji, P. I., & Igwe, A. E. (2021). Effects of renovation on ventilation and energy saving in residential building. Civil Engineering Journal-Tehran, 7, 124–134. https://doi.org/10.28991/CEJ-SP2021-07-09
Park, C., Lin, I. C., Grant, J. L., Dultz, L. A., Johnson, D., Jeter, S., Abdelfattah, K., Luk, S., Cripps, M., & Dumas, R. P. (2022). Monthly trauma training and simulation are associated with improved resident skill and leadership. Journal of Trauma Nursing, 29(1), 29–33. https://doi.org/10.1097/jtn.0000000000000632
Pioppi, B., Piselli, C., Crisanti, C., & Pisello, A. L. (2020). Human-centric green building design: The energy saving potential of occupants’ behaviour enhancement in the office environment. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 13(6), 621–644. https://doi.org/10.1080/19401493.2020.1810321
Poruschi, L., & Ambrey, C. L. (2016). On the confluence of city living, energy saving behaviours and direct residential energy consumption. Environmental Science & Policy, 66, 334–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.07.003
Pothitou, M., Hanna, R. F., & Chalvatzis, K. J. (2016). Environmental knowledge, pro-environmental behaviour and energy savings in households: An empirical study. Applied Energy, 184, 1217–1229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.017
Rizzi, F., Annunziata, E., Contini, M., & Frey, M. (2020). On the effect of exposure to information and self-benefit appeals on consumer’s intention to perform pro-environmental behaviours: A focus on energy conservation behaviour. Journal of Cleaner Production, 270, 122039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122039
Rowley, T. J. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 887–910. https://doi.org/10.2307/259248
Ru, X., Wang, S., & Yan, S. (2018). Exploring the effects of normative factors and perceived behavioral control on individual’s energy-saving intention: An empirical study in eastern China. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 134, 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.03.001
Ruokamo, E., Merilainen, T., Karhinen, S., Raiha, J., Suur-Uski, P., Timonen, L., & Svento, R. (2022). The effect of information nudges on energy saving: Observations from a randomized field experiment in Finland. Energy Policy, 161, 112731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112731
Sangroya, D., & Nayak, J. K. (2017). Factors influencing buying behaviour of green energy consumer. Journal of Cleaner Production, 151, 393–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.010
Scherbaum, C. A., Popovich, P. M., & Finlinson, S. (2008). Exploring individual-level factors related to employee energy-conservation behaviors at work. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(3), 818–835. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00328.x
Shafiei, A., & Maleksaeidi, H. (2020). Pro-environmental behavior of university students: Application of protection motivation theory. Global Ecology and Conservation, 22, e00908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e00908
Shen, M., Lu, Y., Kua, H. W., & Cui, Q. (2020a). Eco-feedback delivering methods and psychological attributes shaping household energy consumption: Evidence from intervention program in Hangzhou, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 265, 121755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121755
Shen, M., Lu, Y., Wei, K. H., & Cui, Q. (2020b). Prediction of household electricity consumption and effectiveness of concerted intervention strategies based on occupant behaviour and personality traits. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 127, 109839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109839
Shi, D., Wang, L., & Wang, Z. (2019). What affects individual energy conservation behavior: Personal habits, external conditions or values? An empirical study based on a survey of college students. Energy Policy, 128, 150–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.12.061
Sun, M., Gao, X. K., Jing, X. D., & Cheng, F. (2023). The influence of internal and external factors on the purchase intention of carbon-labeled products. Journal of Cleaner Production, 419, 138272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138272
Szostek, D. (2021). Employee Behaviors toward Using and Saving Energy at Work. The Impact of Personality Traits. Energies, 14(12), 3404. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14123404
Tabassum, S., Pereira, F. S. F., Fernandes, S., & Gama, J. (2018). Social network analysis: An overview. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 8(5), e1256. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1256
Tahiri, F. E., Chikh, K., & Khafallah, M. (2021). Optimal management energy system and control strategies for isolated hybrid solar-wind-battery-diesel power system.
Tang, Z., Warkentin, M., & Wu, L. (2019). Understanding employees’ energy saving behavior from the perspective of stimulus-organism-responses. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 140, 216–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.09.030
Testa, F., Cosic, A., & Iraldo, F. (2016). Determining factors of curtailment and purchasing energy related behaviours. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 3810–3819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.134
Tian, S. J., & Chang, S. Y. (2020). An agent-based model of household energy consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242(12), 118378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118378
Tian, H., & Liu, X. (2022). Pro-Environmental Behavior Research: Theoretical Progress and Future Directions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(11), 6721. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116721
Trotta, G. (2018). Factors affecting energy-saving behaviours and energy efficiency investments in British households. Energy Policy, 114, 529–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.12.042
van Mierlo, H., Vermunt, J. K., & Rutte, C. G. (2009). Composing Group-Level Constructs From Individual-Level Survey Data. Organizational Research Methods, 12(2), 368–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428107309322
Varela-Candamio, L., Novo-Corti, I., & Garcia-Alvarez, M. T. (2018). The importance of environmental education in the determinants of green behavior: A meta-analysis approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 1565–1578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.214
Vesely, S., Klockner, C. A., Carrus, G., Tiberio, L., Caffaro, F., Biresselioglu, M. E., Kollmann, A. C., & Sinea, A. C. (2022). Norms, prices, and commitment: A comprehensive overview of field experiments in the energy domain and treatment effect moderators. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 967318. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.967318
Wang, B., Wang, X., Guo, D., Zhang, B., & Wang, Z. (2018). Analysis of factors influencing residents’ habitual energy-saving behaviour based on NAM and TPB models: Egoism or altruism? Energy Policy, 116, 68–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.01.055
Wang, J., Zhu, J., Ding, Z., Zou, P. X. W., & Li, J. (2019). Typical energy-related behaviors and gender difference for cooling energy consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 238, 117846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117846
Wang, Q.-C., Xie, K.-X., Liu, X., Shen, G. Q. P., Wei, H.-H., & Liu, T.-Y. (2021). Psychological Drivers of Hotel Guests’ Energy-Saving Behaviours-Empirical Research Based on the Extended Theory of Planned Behaviour. Buildings, 11(9), 401. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11090401
Wang, Q.-C., Ren, Y.-T., Liu, X., Chang, R.-D., & Zuo, J. (2023). Exploring the heterogeneity in drivers of energy-saving behaviours among hotel guests: Insights from the theory of planned behaviour and personality profiles. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 99, 107012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2022.107012
Wong-Parodi, G., Krishnamurti, T., Gluck, J., & Agarwal, Y. (2019). Encouraging energy conservation at work: A field study testing social norm feedback and awareness of monitoring. Energy Policy, 130, 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.03.028
Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). SOCIAL COGNITIVE THEORY OF ORGANIZATIONAL MANAGEMENT. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 361–384. https://doi.org/10.2307/258173
Xie, C., Ding, H., Zhang, H., Yuan, J., Su, S., & Tang, M. (2021). Exploring the psychological mechanism underlying the relationship between organizational interventions and employees’ energy-saving behaviors. Energy Policy, 156, 112411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112411
Xu, Q., Lu, Y., Hwang, B.-G., & Kua, H. W. (2021a). Reducing residential energy consumption through a marketized behavioral intervention: The approach of Household Energy Saving Option (HESO). Energy and Buildings, 232, 110621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110621
Xu, X., Xiao, B., & Li, C. Z. (2021b). Analysis of critical factors and their interactions influencing individual’s energy conservation behavior in the workplace: A case study in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 286, 124955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124955
Xu, X., Xiao, B., & Li, C. Z. (2021c). Stakeholders’ power over the impact issues of building energy performance gap: A two-mode social network analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 289, 125623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125623
Xu, D. Y., Wang, J. C., Zhao, W. H., & Zhang, X. (2023). Pricing policies for green energy-saving product adoption and government subsidy. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05414-2
Yang, R., Yue, C., Li, J., Zhu, J., Chen, H., & Wei, J. (2020). The Influence of Information Intervention Cognition on College Students’ Energy-Saving Behavior Intentions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), 1659. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051659
Yang, M., Chen, H., Long, R., & Yang, J. (2022). The impact of different regulation policies on promoting green consumption behavior based on social network modeling. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 32, 468–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.05.007
Ye, N., Zhang, X., Zhang, M., Atherley, J., & Hou, L. (2021). Could visual cues moderate the normative influence in promoting energy conservation? A perspective from the construal level. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 174, 105808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105808
Yee, C. H., Al-Mulali, U., & Ling, G. M. (2021). Intention towards renewable energy investments in Malaysia: Extending theory of planned behaviour. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15737-x
Yip, W. S., & To, S. (2021). Identification of stakeholder related barriers in sustainable manufacturing using Social Network Analysis. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 1903–1917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.04.018
Yuan, M., Li, Z., Li, X., & Luo, X. (2021). Managing stakeholder-associated risks and their interactions in the life cycle of prefabricated building projects: A social network analysis approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 323, 129102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129102
Yue, T., Long, R., Chen, H., Liu, J., Liu, H., & Gu, Y. (2020). Energy-saving behavior of urban residents in China: A multi-agent simulation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252, 119623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119623
Yue, T., Li, M., Wang, Q., Long, R., Chen, H., Liu, J., & Chen, F. (2023). Will residents’ energy-conservation behavior be continued under perception of behavior outcome? The moderating role of attribution style. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 189, 106745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106745
Zhang, C.-Y., Yu, B., Wang, J.-W., & Wei, Y.-M. (2018a). Impact factors of household energy-saving behavior: An empirical study of Shandong Province in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 185, 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.303
Zhang, Y., Bai, X., Mills, F. P., & Pezzey, J. C. V. (2018b). Rethinking the role of occupant behavior in building energy performance: A review. Energy and Buildings, 172, 279–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.05.017
Zhang, C. Q., Zha, D. L., Jiang, P. S., Wang, F., Yang, G. L., Salman, M., & Wu, Q. (2023a). The effect of customized information feedback on individual electricity saving behavior: Evidence from a field experiment in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 193, 122602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122602
Zhang, J., Yan, Z., Bi, W., Ni, P., Lei, F., Yao, S., & Lang, J. (2023b). Prediction and scenario simulation of the carbon emissions of public buildings in the operation stage based on an energy audit in Xi’an, China. Energy Policy, 173, 113396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113396
Zhao, S., Song, Q., & Wang, C. (2019a). Characterizing the Energy-Saving Behaviors, Attitudes and Awareness of University Students in Macau. Sustainability, 11(22), 6341. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226341
Zhao, X., Cheng, H., Zhao, H., Jiang, L., & Xue, B. (2019b). Survey on the households’ energy-saving behaviors and influencing factors in the rural loess hilly region of China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 230, 547–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.385
Zhao, N., Xia, T., Yu, T., & Liu, C. (2020). Subsidy-Related Deception Behavior in Energy-Saving Products Based on Game Theory. Frontiers in Energy Research, 7, 154. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2019.00154
Zhu, J., Alam, M. M., Ding, Z., Ekambaram, P., Li, J., & Wang, J. (2021a). The influence of group-level factors on individual energy-saving behaviors in a shared space: The case of shared residences. Journal of Cleaner Production, 311, 127560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127560
Zhu, J., Zhao, X., Zhu, T., & Li, L. (2021b). Which factors determine students’ water-saving behaviors? Evidence from China colleges. Urban Water Journal, 18(10), 860–872. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062x.2021.1943459
Zhu, J., Alam, M. M., Liu, R., Wang, J., Ding, Z., & Ekambaram, P. (2023). Evaluating the effect of normative feedback on energy conservation in a shared space. Energy and Buildings, 284, 112862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.112862
Zohar, D., & Tenne-Gazit, O. (2008). Transformational leadership and group interaction as climate antecedents: A social network analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 744–757. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.744
Acknowledgements
We express our sincere gratitude to the professionals who participated in the questionnaire survey.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
We ensure that consent was obtained for the questionnaire survey and interview with humans. And the privacy rights of human subjects must always be observed.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix A
See Table 7.
Appendix B. Questionnaire on Factors Affecting ECBO
Dear friends,
It is appreciated to fill out the questionnaire on factors affecting the energy conservation behaviour of occupants (ECBO). The private information you have completed is only for academic study, and will not be disclosed to the public. Thank you very much for your support and cooperation!
This questionnaire is divided into two parts. The first part is your private information, and the second part is the degree of the factors affecting ECBO. Following the importance of each factor, you should tick in the corresponding space with a single election. The degree of importance is divided into “very unimportant”(1), “unimportant”(2), “average”(3), “important”(4), and “very important”(5).
Part 1:
-
1.
Nature of work:
□ Government □ Community management agency.
□ Home appliance supply enterprises □ Students.
-
2.
Years of experience in your work:
□ Below 5 years □ 5 years-10 years □ Above 10 years.
Part 2:
Please fill in the information according to your work experience and the actual situation in life. Please make a comparison between the scores after completing the questionnaire to ensure the differences between the factors. Meanwhile, the meaning of each factor is explained in advance (Table 8).
Appendix C. Interviews on the interaction of factors for stakeholders
Dear friend,
It is appreciated to involve in the interview on factors affecting the energy conservation behaviour of occupants (ECBO). The private information you have completed is only for academic study, and will not be disclosed to the public. Thank you very much for your support and cooperation!
This questionnaire is divided into two parts. The first part is to know about more your private information, and the second part is to acquire the degree of interaction between factors affecting ECBO through our explanation and inquiry.
Part 1:
-
1.
Nature of work:
□ Government □ Community management agency.
□ Home appliance supply enterprises □ Students.
-
2.
Years of experience in your work:
□ Below 5 years □ 5 years-10 years □ Above 10 years.
-
3.
What is the content in your work?
Part 2:
Dear friend,
In this section, we will proceed with inquiries regarding the degree of influence between factors. Firstly, we will provide you with a detailed explanation of the specific meanings of the 15 factors listed in the Table 9, ensuring your comprehension of the definitions of both factors and stakeholders. Subsequently, I will inquire about the following two types of questions in a general sense (take F1 as an example): (1) Does factor “policies and regulations” have an impact on “government supervision”? (2) What is the impact level of “policies and regulations” on “government supervision”, if it exists? The two questions are quantified using a five-point Likert scale, in which “0” indicates no impact while "5" indicates a significant impact. You are only required to answer based on your professional experience and thoughts, without taking into consideration other factors. Finally, based on your responses, we will document the degree of influence between factors in the table and kindly request your confirmation on the consistency between the recorded information and your answers. By completing the aforementioned steps, the interview portion of this section comes to a close. We sincerely appreciate your active participation!
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, YR., Zuo, J., Pan, M. et al. Analysis of stakeholder-associated factors and their interactions in energy conservation behaviour of occupants: evidence from network analysis. Environ Dev Sustain (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04782-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04782-4