Abstract
Runoff estimation is of immense importance in hydrological analysis for water resource planning and management. The developing countries cannot afford to establish a large number of gauging sites due to huge initial and operating expenditures. Hydrological modelling is an alternative solution to simulate the catchment response to extreme events under climate change for taking preventive measures. The hydrological models have their own leads and constraints, so because of limited hydrological data availability of the catchment, wavelet neural network (WNN), artificial neural network, adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system, and Mike-11 Nedbor Afstromnings models were used in this study. These models were calibrated and validated using daily rainfall and runoff observations taken at Hamp Pandariya gauging station on Hamp river in the Chhattisgarh state of India. A comparative study of these models was carried out to investigate their performance, efficiency, and suitability for daily runoff simulation in Hamp Pandariya catchment and found suitable in simulating the hydrological response of the catchment and predicting runoff with a high degree of accuracy. The performance of these models was evaluated and compared with the aid of multiple goodness of fit criteria including coefficient of determinations (r2), Nash–Sutcliffe model efficiency index (NS), root mean square error, and water balance for model calibration and validation. These parameters indicated good agreement between observed and simulated runoff in terms of time to peak, discharge rate, daily and accumulated runoff volume, and shape of the hydrograph. The WNN was found the most appropriate model for future application due to Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NS) of 97% and 98% in calibration and validation, respectively, and the coefficient of determination as 99% both in calibration and validation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adamowski, J., & Sun, K. (2010). Development of a coupled wavelet transform and neural network method for flow forecasting of non-perennial rivers in semi-arid watersheds. Journal of Hydrology, 390(1–2), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.06.033
Asokan, S. M., & Dutta, D. (2008). Analysis of water resources in the Mahanadi River Basin, India under projected climate conditions. Hydrological Processes: an International Journal, 22(18), 3589–3603. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6962
Bhattacharya, B., & Solomatine, D. P. (2003). Neural networks and M5 model trees in modeling water level-discharge relationship for an Indian river. In ESANN (pp. 407–412).
Galkate, R., Thomas, T., Jaiswal, R. K., & Singh, S. (2014). CS/AR-1/2014: Water availability study and supply demand analysis in Kharun sub-basin of Seonath basin in Chhattisgarh state. National Institute of Hydrology.
Garcia-Pintado, J., Mason, D. C., Dance, S. L., Cloke, H. L., Neal, J. C., Freer, J., & Bates, P. D. (2015). Satellite-supported flood forecasting in river networks: A real case study. Journal of Hydrology, 523, 706–724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.01.084
Ghose, D. K., Panda, S. S., & Swain, P. C. (2013). Prediction and optimization of runoff via ANFIS and GA. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 52(2), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2013.01.001
Goyal, M. K., & Surampalli, R. Y. (2018). Impact of climate change on water resources in India. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 144(7), 04018054. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001394
Hadiani, R. (2015). Analysis of rainfall-runoff neuron input model with artificial neural network for simulation for availability of discharge at bah Bolon watershed. Procedia Engineering, 125, 150–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.022
Henriksen, H. J., Troldborg, L., Nyegaard, P., Sonnenborg, T. O., Refsgaard, J. C., & Madsen, B. (2003). Methodology for construction, calibration and validation of a national hydrological model for Denmark. Journal of Hydrology, 280(1), 52–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00186-0
Jadhao, A. K., & Tripathi, M. P. (2009). Prediction of runoff for small watershed using GIUH_CAL model and GIS approach in Chhattisgarh. International Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 2(2), 310–314.
Jain, A., Sudheer, K. P., & Srinivasulu, S. (2004). Identification of physical processes inherent in artificial neural network rainfall runoff models. Hydrological Processes, 18(3), 571–581. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5502
Jain, S. K., Agarwal, P. K., & Singh, V. P. (2007). Mahanadi, Subernarekha and Brahmani Basins. In Hydrology and Water Resources of India (pp. 597–639). Springer, Dordrecht.https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5180-8_13.
Jang, J. S. (1993). ANFIS: Adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 23(3), 665–685. https://doi.org/10.1109/21.256541
Jothiprakash, V., & Magar, R. B. (2012). Multi-time-step ahead daily and hourly intermittent reservoir inflow prediction by artificial intelligent techniques using lumped and distributed data. Journal of Hydrology, 450, 293–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.04.045
Kumar, A., Kumar, P., & Singh, V. K. (2019a). Evaluating different machine learning models for runoff and suspended sediment simulation. Water Resources Management, 33(3), 1217–1231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-2178-z
Kumar, N., Tischbein, B., Kusche, J., Beg, M. K., & Bogardi, J. J. (2017). Impact of land-use change on the water resources of the Upper Kharun Catchment, Chhattisgarh, India. Regional Environmental Change, 17(8), 2373–2385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1165-x
Kumar, P., Lohani, A. K., & Nema, A. K. (2019b). Rainfall runoff modeling using Mike 11 NAM model. Current World Environment, 14(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.12944/CWE.14.1.05
Labat, D., Ababou, R., & Mangin, A. (2000). Rainfall-runoff relations for karstic springs. Part II: continuous wavelet and discrete orthogonal multiresolution analyses. Journal of Hydrology, 238(3–4), 149–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00322-X
Li, F., Zhang, Y., Xu, Z., Liu, C., Zhou, Y., & Liu, W. (2014). Runoff predictions in ungauged catchments in southeast Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Hydrology, 511, 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.01.014
Li, Z., Huang, G., Wang, X., Han, J., & Fan, Y. (2016). Impacts of future climate change on river discharge based on hydrological inference: A case study of the Grand River Watershed in Ontario, Canada. Science of the Total Environment, 548, 198–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.002
Lohani, A. K., Goel, N. K., & Bhatia, K. K. S. (2006). Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy inference system for modeling stage-discharge relationship. Journal of Hydrology, 331(1–2), 146–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.05.007
Loliyana, V. D., & Patel, P. L. (2015). Lumped conceptual hydrological model for Purna river basin, India. Sadhana, 40(8), 2411–2428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-015-0407-1
Maheswaran, R., & Khosa, R. (2012). Comparative study of different wavelets for hydrologic forecasting. Computers & Geosciences, 46, 284–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2011.12.015
Mallat, S. G. (1989). A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: The wavelet representation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 11(7), 674–693.
Mengistu, D. T., Moges, S. A., & Sorteberg, A. (2016). RETRACTED: Revisiting systems type black-box rainfall-runoff models for flow forecasting application. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 8(01), 65. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2016.81006
Mukerji, A., Chatterjee, C., & Raghuwanshi, N. S. (2009). Flood forecasting using ANN, neuro-fuzzy, and neuro-GA models. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 14(6), 647–652. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000040
Nayak, P. C., Venkatesh, B., Krishna, B., & Jain, S. K. (2013). Rainfall-runoff modeling using conceptual, data driven, and wavelet based computing approach. Journal of Hydrology, 493, 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.04.016
Ozger, M. (2010). Significant wave height forecasting using wavelet fuzzy logic approach. Ocean Engineering, 37(16), 1443–1451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2010.07.009
Panda, D. K., Kumar, A., Ghosh, S., & Mohanty, R. K. (2013). Streamflow trends in the Mahanadi River basin (India): Linkages to tropical climate variability. Journal of Hydrology, 495, 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.04.054
Raghuwanshi, N. S., Singh, R., & Reddy, L. S. (2006). Runoff and sediment yield modeling using artificial neural networks: Upper Siwane River, India. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 11(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2006)11:1(71)
Rajaee, T., Mirbagheri, S. A., Nourani, V., & Alikhani, A. (2010). Prediction of daily suspended sediment load using wavelet and neurofuzzy combined model. International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology, 7(1), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03326121
Rajurkar, M. P., Kothyari, U. C., & Chaube, U. C. (2004). Modeling of the daily rainfall-runoff relationship with artificial neural network. Journal of Hydrology, 285(1–4), 96–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.08.011
Ramana, R. V., Krishna, B., Kumar, S. R., & Pandey, N. G. (2013). Monthly rainfall prediction using wavelet neural network analysis. Water Resources Management, 27(10), 3697–3711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0374-4
Rathinasamy, M., & Khosa, R. (2012). Multiscale nonlinear model for monthly streamflow forecasting: A wavelet-based approach. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 14(2), 424–442. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2011.130
Rezaie-Balf, M., Zahmatkesh, Z., & Kim, S. (2017). Soft computing techniques for rainfall-runoff simulation: local non-parametric paradigm vs. model classification methods. Water Resources Management, 31(12), 3843–3865. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1711-9
Rosso, O. A., Figliola, A., Creso, J., & Serrano, E. (2004). Analysis of wavelet-filtered tonic-clonic electroencephalogram recordings. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, 42(4), 516–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02350993
Sehgal, V., Sahay, R. R., & Chatterjee, C. (2014). Effect of utilization of discrete wavelet components on flood forecasting performance of wavelet based ANFIS models. Water Resources Management, 28(6), 1733–1749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0584-4
Senthil Kumar, A. R., Goyal, M. K., Ojha, C. S. P., Singh, R. D., & Swamee, P. K. (2013). Application of artificial neural network, fuzzy logic and decision tree algorithms for modelling of streamflow at Kasol in India. Water Science and Technology, 68(12), 2521–2526. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2013.491
Senthil Kumar, A. R., Sudheer, K. P., Jain, S. K., & Agarwal, P. K. (2005). Rainfall-runoff modelling using artificial neural networks: comparison of network types. Hydrological Processes: an International Journal, 19(6), 1277–1291. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5581
Singh, A., Singh, S., Nema, A. K., Singh, G., & Gangwar, A. (2014). Rainfall-runoff modeling using MIKE 11 NAM model for Vinayakpur intercepted catchment, Chhattisgarh. Indian Journal of Dryland Agricultural Research and Development, 29(2), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.5958/2231-6701.2014.01206.8
Solomatine, D. P., & Dulal, K. N. (2003). Model trees as an alternative to neural networks in rainfall-runoff modelling. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 48(3), 399–411. https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.48.3.399.45291
Sudheer, K. P., & Jain, S. K. (2003). Radial basis function neural network for modeling rating curves. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 8(3), 161–164. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2003)8:3(161)
Swain, J. B., & Patra, K. C. (2017). Streamflow estimation in ungauged catchments using regionalization techniques. Journal of Hydrology, 554, 420–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.08.054
Swain, S., Verma, M. K., & Verma, M. K. (2018). Streamflow estimation using SWAT model over Seonath river basin, Chhattisgarh, India. In Hydrologic Modeling (pp. 659–665). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5801-1_45.
Teshome, F. T., Bayabil, H. K., Thakural, L. N., & Welidehanna, F. G. (2020). Verification of the MIKE11-NAM model for simulating streamflow. Journal of Environmental Protection, 11, 152–167. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2020.112010
Tiwari, H. L., Balvanshi, A., & Chouhan, D. (2016). Simulation of rainfall runoff of Shipra River basin. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 7(6), 364–370.
Tiwari, M. K., & Chatterjee, C. (2010). A new wavelet-bootstrap-ANN hybrid model for daily discharge forecasting. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 13(3), 500–519. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2010.142
Tiwari, M. K., Song, K. Y., Chatterjee, C., & Gupta, M. M. (2013). Improving reliability of river flow forecasting using neural networks, wavelets and self-organising maps. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 15(2), 486–502. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2012.130
Ullah, N., & Choudhury, P. (2010). Flood forecasting in river system using ANFIS. In AIP Conference Proceedings, 1298(1), pp. 694–699. AIP.https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3516407.
Ramesh, V., Nema, M. K., Nema, A. K., & Sena, D. R. (2020). Hydrological modeling of a sub-basin of Mahanadi river basin using SWAT model. Indian Journal of Soil Conservation, 48(1), 1–10.
Verma, M. K., & Verma, M. K. (2019). Calibration of a hydrological model and sensitivity analysis of its parameters: A case study of Seonath river basin. International Journal of Hydrology Science and Technology, 9(6), 640–656. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHST.2019.103444
Verma, M. K., Verma, M. K., & Swain, S. (2016). Statistical analysis of precipitation over Seonath river basin, Chhattisgarh, India. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 11(4), 2417–2423.
Verma, S., & Dhiwar, B. K. (2018). Analysis of short term and long term dependence of stream flow phenomenon in Seonath River Basin, Chhattisgarh. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science, 5(1), 237–369. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijaers.5.1.19
Wu, C. L., & Chau, K. W. (2011). Rainfall-runoff modeling using artificial neural network coupled with singular spectrum analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 399(3–4), 394–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.01.017
Zahmatkesh, Z., Karamouz, M., & Nazif, S. (2015). Uncertainty based modeling of rainfall-runoff: Combined differential evolution adaptive metropolis (DREAM) and K-means clustering. Advances in Water Resources, 83, 405–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.06.012
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the support of the State Hydrology Data Centre, Department of Water Resources, Chhattisgarh, India, for providing the necessary daily discharge data required for this study. The support by the Indian Meteorological Department, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, for meteorological data; National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, New Delhi, for soil data; and Geological Survey of India, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, for providing the lithological data of the catchment; is duly acknowledged. The authors are also thankful to unknown reviewers of the manuscript and the editor of the journal for the improvement of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There is no conflict of interest among the author and all author have their consent for the inclusion of their names in the manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Singh, G., Kumar, A.R.S., Jaiswal, R.K. et al. Model coupling approach for daily runoff simulation in Hamp Pandariya catchment of Chhattisgarh state in India. Environ Dev Sustain 24, 12311–12339 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01949-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01949-1