Skip to main content
Log in

Acute Pancreatitis in Pregnancy: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis and Dynamic Nomogram for Risk Assessment

  • Research
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Acute pancreatitis is easily confused with abdominal pain symptoms, and it could lead to serious complications for pregnant women and fetus, the mortality was as high as 3.3% and 11.6–18.7%, respectively. However, there is still lack of sensitive laboratory markers for early diagnosis of APIP and authoritative guidelines to guide treatment.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to explore the risk factors of acute pancreatitis in pregnancy, establish, and evaluate the dynamic prediction model of risk factors in acute pancreatitis in pregnancy patients.

Study Design

Clinical data of APIP patients and non-pregnant acute pancreases patients who underwent regular antenatal check-ups during the same period were collected. The dataset after propensity matching was randomly divided into training set and verification set at a ratio of 7:3. The model was constructed using Logistic regression, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression, R language and other methods. The training set model was used to construct the diagnostic nomogram model and the validation set was used to validate the model. Finally, the accuracy and clinical practicability of the model were evaluated.

Results

A total of 111 APIP were included. In all APIP patients, hyperlipidemic pancreatitis was the most important reason. The levels of serum amylase, creatinine, albumin, triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and apolipoprotein A1 were significantly different between the two groups. The propensity matching method was used to match pregnant pancreatitis patients and pregnant non-pancreatic patients 1:1 according to age and gestational age, and the matching tolerance was 0.02. The multivariate logistic regression analysis of training set showed that diabetes, triglyceride, Body Mass Index, white blood cell, and C-reactive protein were identified and entered the dynamic nomogram. The area under the ROC curve of the training set was 0.942 and in validation set was 0.842. The calibration curve showed good predictive in training set, and the calibration performance in the validation set was acceptable. The calibration curve showed the consistency between the nomogram model and the actual probability.

Conclusion

The dynamic nomogram model we constructed to predict the risk factors of acute pancreatitis in pregnancy has high accuracy, discrimination, and clinical practicability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Li J, Chen J, Tang W. The consensus of integrative diagnosis and treatment of acute pancreatitis-2017. J Evid Based Med 2019;12:76–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Luthra AK, Patel KP, Li F et al. Endoscopic intervention and cholecystectomy in pregnant women with acute biliary pancreatitis decrease early readmissions. Gastrointest Endosc 2019;89:1169–1177.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gupta M, Liti B, Barrett C, Thompson PD, Fernandez AB. Prevention and management of hypertriglyceridemia-induced acute pancreatitis during pregnancy: a systematic review. Am J Med 2022;135:709–714.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou D, Sun G, Hu J, Gan Q. Efficacy of insulin in treating severe hypertriglyceridaemia in the third trimester of pregnancy. Front Med 2022;9:977620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sheng C, Xu Z, Wang J. Nomogram for predicting persistent organ failure with acute pancreatitis in pregnancy. Front Endocrinol 2022;13:863037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Liao W, Tao G, Chen G et al. A novel clinical prediction model of severity based on red cell distribution width, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and intra-abdominal pressure in acute pancreatitis in pregnancy. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2023;23:189.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Zachariah SK, Fenn M, Jacob K, Arthungal SA, Zachariah SA. Management of acute abdomen in pregnancy: current perspectives. Int J Womens Health 2019;11:119–134.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Hughes DL, Hughes A, White PB, Silva MA. Acute pancreatitis in pregnancy: meta-analysis of maternal and fetal outcomes. Br J Surg 2021;109:12–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Geng Y, Li W, Sun L, Tong Z, Li N, Li J. Severe acute pancreatitis during pregnancy: eleven years experience from a surgical intensive care unit. Dig Dis Sci 2011;56:3672–3677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-011-1809-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C et al. Classification of acute pancreatitis–2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut 2013;62:102–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Luo L, Zen H, Xu H et al. Clinical characteristics of acute pancreatitis in pregnancy: experience based on 121 cases. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2018;297:333–339.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Berger Z, Mancilla C, Tobar E et al. Acute pancreatitis in Chile: a multicenter study on epidemiology, etiology and clinical outcome. Retrospective analysis of clinical files. Pancreatology 2020;20:637–643.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Revision Committee of Chinese Guidelines on Hypertension Prevention and Treatment. The 2018 revision of Chinese Guidelines for Hypertension Prevention and Treatment. Manag. Dis. 2019;19:6–49.

  14. Diabetology Branch of Chinese Medical Association, National Basic Diabetes Management Office. National grass-roots diabetes control. Chin J Internal Med. 2018; 57:885–893.

  15. Tang M, Xu J-M, Song S-S et al. What may cause fetus loss from acute pancreatitis in pregnancy: analysis of 54 cases. Medicine 2018;97:1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhao L, Zuo T, Shi Q et al. A preliminary study on fetal lung injury in a rat model of acute pancreatitis in pregnancy. Pathol Res Pract. 2017;213:1370–1377.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Guo ZD, Zhao L, Wang P et al. Fetal liver injury ameliorated by migration inhibitory factor inhibition in a rat model of acute pancreatitis in pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2018;44:374–383.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mei F, Zuo T, Zhao L et al. Differential JNK, p38 and ERK response to renal injury in a rat model of acute pancreatitis in pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018;297:933–942.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang DJ, Lu HM, Liu Y et al. Development and validation of a prediction model for moderately severe and severe acute pancreatitis in pregnancy. World J Gastroenterol. 2022;28:1588–1600.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Yang Z, Guo G, Li H. Predicting fetal loss in severe acute pancreatitis during pregnancy: a 5-year single-tertiary-center retrospective analysis. Postgrad Med. 2020;132:473–478.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Huang JL, Chen WK, Lin CL, Kao CH, Shih HM. Preeclampsia and the risk of pancreatitis: a nationwide population-based cohort study. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2020;2020:3261542.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Ong M, Jerreat L, Hameed A. Familial hypertriglyceridaemia and type 2 diabetes in pregnancy: prevention of acute pancreatitis with diet control and omega-3 fatty acids. BMJ Case Rep 2019;12:e227321.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Subramanian S, Chait A. Hypertriglyceridemia secondary to obesity and diabetes. Biochim Biophys Acta 2012;1821:819–825.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wan J, He W, Zhu Y et al. Stratified analysis and clinical significance of elevated serum triglyceride levels in early acute pancreatitis: a retrospective study. Lipids Health Dis 2017;16:124.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang L, Wang Y, Han J, Shen H, Zhao M, Cai S. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, lipase, high-density lipoprotein as a panel of factors to predict acute pancreatitis in pregnancy. Medicine 2018;97:e11189.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Jin D, Tan J, Jiang J, Philips D, Liu L. The early predictive value of routine laboratory tests on the severity of acute pancreatitis patients in pregnancy: a retrospective study. Sci Rep 2020;10:10087.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang D-L, Huang Y, Yan L, Phu A. Thirty-eight cases of acute pancreatitis in pregnancy: a 6-year single center retrospective analysis. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technol 2013;33:361–367.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Guo L, Rong L, Xu X. The changes of triacylglycerol and inflammatory factors during dialysis treatment of hypertriglyceridemia during pregnancy and analysis of nursing countermeasure. Am J Transl Res 2021;13:6745–6751.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Ilhan M, Ilhan G, Gok AF, Bademler S, Verit Atmaca F, Ertekin C. Evaluation of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-lymphocyte ratio and red blood cell distribution width-platelet ratio as early predictor of acute pancreatitis in pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2016;29:1476–1480.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mauri M, Calmarza P, Ibarretxe D. Dyslipemias and pregnancy, an update. Clin Investig Arterioscler 2021;33:41–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ghio A, Bertolotto A, Resi V, Volpe L, Di Cianni G. Triglyceride metabolism in pregnancy. Adv Clin Chem 2011;55:133–153.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Gok F, Koker S, Kilicaslan A, Sarkilar G, Yosunkaya A, Otelcioglu S. Acute pancreatitis due to hypertriglyceridaemia in pregnancy. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim 2015;43:116–118.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Li HB, Jin C, Chen Y, Flavell RA. Inflammasome activation and metabolic disease progression. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2014;25:699–706.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sharif R, Dawra R, Wasiluk K et al. Impact of toll-like receptor 4 on the severity of acute pancreatitis and pancreatitis-associated lung injury in mice. Gut 2009;58:813–819.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Global BMIMC, Di Angelantonio E, Bhupathiraju Sh N, et al. Body-mass index and all-cause mortality: individual-participant-data meta-analysis of 239 prospective studies in four continents. Lancet 2016;388:776–86.

  36. Tada H, Kawashiri MA, Nakahashi T et al. Clinical characteristics of Japanese patients with severe hypertriglyceridemia. J Clin Lipidol 2015;9:519–524.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Igbinosa O, Poddar S, Pitchumoni C. Pregnancy associated pancreatitis revisited. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2013;37:177–181.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Zuo T, Yu J, Zhao KL et al. Mitogen-activated protein kinases are activated in placental injury in rat model of acute pancreatitis in pregnancy. Pancreas 2016;45:850–857.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sheng C, Wang Y, Xu Z et al. The effect of admission serum triglyceride level on the prediction of severity of acute pancreatitis in pregnancy. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021;14:3209–3222.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Sheng C, Xu Z, Wang J. Nomogram for predicting persistent organ failure with acute pancreatitis in pregnancy. Front Endocrinol. 2022;13:863037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Nature Science Foundation of Sichuan Province (No. 2022NSFSC1378).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study conception and design: Xiaowei Tang, Yuan Chen, and Shu Huang. Drafting of manuscript: Yuan Chen, Jiao Jiang, Bei Luo, Wensen Ren, and Xueqin Zhou. Acquisition of data and critical revision: Xiaomin Shi, Wei Zhang, Lei Shi, and Xiaolin Zhong. Revision of manuscript and final approval of manuscript: Muhan Lü.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhan Lü.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

This study was granted ethical approval by the Ethics Committee of Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University. The need for written informed consent was waived by the Ethics Committee of Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University due to the retrospective nature of the study. Administrative permissions were required to access and use medical records from the corresponding author and were granted by the data protection officers of the hospital. All methods were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tang, X., Chen, Y., Huang, S. et al. Acute Pancreatitis in Pregnancy: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis and Dynamic Nomogram for Risk Assessment. Dig Dis Sci (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08415-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08415-8

Keywords

Navigation