Abstract
Within the Kyoto Protocol, countries have significant latitude to define a forest. The most important parameter affecting area designated as forest is the minimum crown density which can be set between 10 and 30 percent. The choice will have implications for the amount of land available in a country for afforestation and reforestation (A/R) activities within the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM). In this paper, we used GIS analysis to look at four case studies from countries involved in the EU-funded ENCOFOR project: Bolivia, Ecuador, Uganda and Kenya. We also looked at the effects of other factors that would exclude land from eligibility for A/R projects. A low threshold of 10 percent crown cover resulted in exclusion of 70 to 90 percent of the land area of all countries except Kenya, which differed from the other countries by its large dryland areas. Much less area was excluded when higher thresholds were used. The spatial analyses showed not only the effects of the choice of the crown cover criterion, but also where the land was available for CDM activities within each country at different thresholds. This is the first time that the effect of the crown cover element of the Kyoto forest definition on land availability and distribution for CDM A/R activities has been quantified. While there are a number of reasons to choose different thresholds, this analysis suggests that countries that are considering using CDM finance for rural development might want to select the higher minimum threshold for crown cover in order to maximize their participation and flexibility.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dieterich V (1953) Forstwissenschaftspolitik. Parey, Hamburg, 398pp
Dutschke M (2002) Sustainable Forestry Investment Under The Clean Development Mechanism: The Malaysian Case. Discussion Paper No. 198. Hamburgisches Welt-Wirtschafts-Archiv (HWWA). Hamburg Institute of International Economics. (Available on http://www.hwwa.de/Publikationen/Discussion Paper/2002/198.pdf)
FAO (1967) World symposium on man-made forests and their industrial importance. Unasylva 21:86–87
FAO (2000) On Definitions of Forest and Forest Change, Working Paper 33, Forest Resources Assessment Programme, Rome, Italy. (www.fao.org/forestry/fra)
FAO (2004) Global Forest Resources Assessment Update 2005: Terms and Definitions. Working Paper 83, Forest Resources Assessment Programme, Rome, Italy. (www.fao.org/forestry/fra)
FAO (2005) Report on 3rd Expert Meeting on Forest-related Definitions 17–19 January 2005, Rome, Italy. (www.fao.org/forestry/fra)
Hanna LW (1967) Atlas of Uganda. The Department of Lands and Surveys, Kampala, Uganda
Helms JA (2002) Forest, forestry, forester: What do these terms mean? Journal of Forestry 100:15–19
Hundeshagen JC (1821) Ueber Die Hackwald-Wirtschaft überhaupt und Ihre Einführung In Würtemberg insbesondere. Laupp, Tübingen, 75pp
IPCC (2000) Land-Use, Land Use Change and Forestry. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
JICA (1992) Kenya Rainfall Distribution. Japanese International Co-operation Agency, Nairobi, Kenya
Kindt R, Simons AJ, Van Damme P (2004) Do farm characteristics explain differences in tree species diversity among Western Kenyan farms? Agroforestry Systems 63:63–74
Kindt R., Van Damme P, Simons AJ (2005) Tree diversity in western Kenya: using profiles to characterise richness and evenness. Biodiversity and Conservation In press
Köhl M, Päivinen R (1996) Definition of a System of Nomenclature for Mapping European Forest and for Compiling a Pan-European Forest Information System, EUR 16416 EN, 233pp
Leibundgut (1951) Der Wald, eine Lebensgemeinschaft. Büchergilde Gutenberg, Zürich, 222pp
Lund HG (2002) When is a forest not a forest? Journal of Forestry 100:21–28
Morosov GF (1922) Die Lehre vom Walde. Neumann, Neudamm, 375pp
SIGAGRO (2000a) Mapa de uso y cobertura del suelo, Ministry of Agriculture, Ecuador
SIGAGRO (2000b) Mapa de Precipitacíon, Ministry of Agriculture, Ecuador
Superintendencia Agraria (2001) Mapa de Cobertura y Uso Actual de la Tierra. La Paz, Bolivia
Tromp H (1976) Der Rechtsbegriff des Waldes. Schweizerisches Zeitschrift Forstwesen, Beiheft 39:43–62
Vidal C (2005) Harmonised definitions and measuring practices: State of the Art. Presentation at the COST action E43–WG1 meeting, Geneva 25–27 April 2005 (Available on www.unece.org/trade/timber/FRA%20ToS%20Web/meetings/Geneva%20Apr2005/presentations/Tomppo% 20e43.ppt)
UN – ECE(FAO (1992) 1990 Forest Resource Assessment. United Nations, New York, ECE/TIM/62
UNFCCC (2002a) Report of the Conference of the Parties on its Seventh Session, Held in Marrakech from 29 October-10 November 2001. Addendum Part Two: Action Taken by the Conference of the Parties, Volume I (FCCC/CP/2001/13/Add. 1) United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Secretariat, Bonn, Germany
UNFCCC (2002b) Report of the Conference of the Parties on its Seventh Session, Held in Marrakech from 29 October-10 November 2001. Addendum Part Two : Action Taken by the Conference of the Parties Volume II (FCCC/CP/2001/13/Add. 1) United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Secretariat, Bonn, Germany
Van Miegroet M (1976) Van Bomen en Bossen. Story Scientia, Gent
von Cotta H (1832) Grundriss der Forstwissenschaft. Arnold Verlag, Dresden and Leipzig, 379pp
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Verchot, L.V., Zomer, R., Straaten, O.V. et al. Implications of Country-Level Decisions on the Specification of Crown Cover in the Definition of Forests for Land Area Eligible for Afforestation and Reforestation Activities in the CDM. Climatic Change 81, 415–430 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9111-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9111-9