Silica nanostructures against fungal growth: design and preparation of antifungal cotton fabrics

The preparation of antifungal-functionalized silica nanoparticles by covalent attachment of several silylated derivatives based on the topical antifungal agent Micozanole is described. Grafting and co-condensation procedures are used to obtain mesoporous or dense nanoparticles. Cotton fabrics have been coated with these antifungal-functionalized silica nanoparticles under ultrasonic conditions. The characterization of the functionalized nanoparticles and coated cotton fabrics is performed by microscopic and spectroscopic techniques. The antifungal activity of all the modified cotton textiles is tested against Trichophyton mentagrophytes CECT 2783, Aspergillus brasiliensis CECT 2091, Penicillium chrysogenum CECT 2307 and Candida albicans CECT 1001, resulting to be highly dependent on the microorganism. Remarkably, all of the modified fabrics are active against Candida albicans and Trichophyton mentagrophytes, with up to 75 and 90% effectiveness, respectively. High expectations arise for topical cutaneous applications in wound dressings (bandages, gauzes, strips).


Introduction
In our daily life, it is inevitable to encounter a variety of microorganisms, which may rapidly grow and cause damage to people's health. Fungal infections represent a huge global problem resulting in over 1.7 million of deaths every year in humans and over one billion people suffer from severe fungal diseases (Brown et al. 2012). Some hosts for the fungi proliferation are food crops, animal species and textiles (Almeida et al. 2019). Focusing in the last one, textiles are excellent substrates for microbial proliferation under appropriate moisture, nutrients, and temperature conditions (Lim and Hudson 2004). In the hospital environment, contaminated cottonbased materials can infect patients and professionals. Moreover, contamination of these textiles in clinical atmospheres can contribute to the spread of airborne pathogens, which then fall by gravity and infect the environment.
Besides, in 2020 the World Health Organization developed the first meeting of the WHO antifungal expert group for the identification of priority fungal pathogens to develop a priority pathogens list for fungal infections of public health importance and to define the R&D priorities (Getahun et al. 2020). So, antifungal drug was loaded on the surface of a wound dressing and a controlled release of Ketoconazole to skin was achieved (Hedayatia et al. 2020). Moreover, application of 1,3-bis[(furan-2-yl)methylene] thiourea (Jabar et al. 2020) and curcuma (Gargoubi et al. 2020) dyes resulted in excellent finished textiles against some fungi. The uniform dispersion of guanazole-metal complexes on cotton fabrics surface (Ag + and Zn 2+ ) via self-assembly resulted in antifungal and flame retardant materials (Nabipour et al. 2020).
Among the antifungal agents, several nanostructures have been intensively studied, including organic molecules-based nanoparticles (NPs), metal NPs and metal oxide NPs. An effective ultrasound assisted deposition of vanillin NPs, raspberry ketone NPs and camphor NPs on textiles was reported by Gedanken's group (Tzhayik et al. 2017). These nanomaterials were coated on cotton fabrics and showed excellent antifungal activity on cotton bandages. Recently, carbon quantum dots, nucleated from a pyrimidine-based compound or from carboxymethyl cellulose, were immobilized within a textile matrix possessing microbial inhibition Emam et al. 2021).
Among metals, Ag NPs are the most explored. Most of the recent publications use a green route for their preparation and stabilization. It has been described the biosynthesis of Ag NPs using the corn grain contaminant (Nigrospora oryzae) (Dawoud et al. 2020), an endophytic actinomycete strain of Streptomyces laurentii previously isolated from the roots of the plant Achillea fragrantissima (Eid et al. 2020), Ulva lactuca extracts (Sahayaraj et al. 2019), Citrus sinensis peel juice (AnwarKhalid and Alghamdi 2020), Moringa oleifera extracts (El-Sayed et al. 2020) and Mikania micrantha leaves extracts (Fajar et al. 2020). All these Ag NPs were coated onto cotton fabrics by different techniques and then studied with good results against several common fungi strains. Another approach was based on coating, by pad-dry-cure process, Ag NPs previously formed on siliceous matrixes dopped with carbon including a calcination step (Igal et al. 2019). Furthermore, bimetallic Ag/Cu NPs exhibited a pronounced antimycotic activity (Eremenko et al. 2016;Paszkiewicz et al 2016).
Among nanostructures of metal oxides, ZnO and TiO 2 nanoparticles are the most studied. Gafur and co-workers prepared ZnO NPs and coated them on cotton fabrics using the dip coating technique (Roy et al. 2020). El-Nahhal's group used ultrasound irradiation for the deposition of ZnO NPs on cotton fibers (El-Nahhal et al. 2017). Gowri and collaborators described the obtention of antimicrobial TiO 2 nanoparticles from titanium tetraisopropoxide and extracts derived from Aloe vera plant, after calcination at 500 °C (Gowri et al. 2016). In 2019, functional antimicrobial cotton was prepared applying TiO 2 NPs and green walnut shell dye to modify the metal oxide NPs and achieve natural dye coloration (Nazari 2019). Djamaan and collaborators dispersed TiO 2 -SiO 2 / chitosan NPs on cotton fabrics surface (Rilda et al. 2016). The hybrid TiO 2 -SiO 2 /chitosan (2:1) NPs presented high ability to generate hydroxyl radicals and the superoxide anion, which can destroy the fungi's cell membranes.
In some cases, mixtures of metal and metal oxide NPs have been used for multifunctional thincoating textile finishing. The use of hybrid Al 2 O 3 / SiO 2 modified with Ag/Cu NPs and TiO 2 P25 was described in 2017 (Kowalczyk et al 2017). Gao's research group prepared silver/zinc oxide (Ag/ ZnO) NPs with different molar ratios by chemical precipitation method observing a synergism between ZnO and Ag NPs in the antimicrobial properties of coated cotton fabrics (Gao et al. 2020).
Considering the mentioned precedents, we envisaged the development of a different approach to achieve modified cotton fabrics with antifungal properties. Taking advantage of the long experience of the group in carrying out sol-gel processes for the preparation of hybrid silicas (Trilla et al. 2009;Bernini et al. 2010;Boffi et al. 2011;Monge-Marcet et al. 2012;Borja et al. 2012);Fernández et al. 2014;Ferré et al. 2016) and in the coating of textiles (Soler et al. 2011;Salabert et al. 2015;Montagut et al. 2017;Montagut et al. 2019a, b;Li et al. 2020a), we envisioned the covalent anchoring of well-known antifungal agents on silica nanoparticles (either dense or mesoporous), which have deserved great attention as a biocompatible form of silica (Tang et al. 2012;Tarn et al. 2013;Croissant et al. 2015;Ni et al. 2018). Miconazole core was chosen as a model structure because it has been traditionally used to topically treat superficial infections caused by fungi. Like other azole antifungals, Miconazole exerts its effect by disrupting the cell membrane of the fungus. Miconazole inhibits ergosterol synthesis by interacting with 14-alpha demethylase, a cytochrome P-450 enzyme that is required for the conversion of lanosterol to ergosterol, an essential membrane component. Inhibition of ergosterol synthesis results in increased cell permeability, causing filtration of cell contents. Miconazole does not have the same effect on human cholesterol synthesis. Other antifungal effects of imidazole derivatives have been proposed that include inhibition of endogenous respiration, interaction with membrane phospholipids, and inhibition of yeast transformation to mycelial forms. Other mechanisms may involve inhibition of uptake and impairment of triglyceride and phospholipid biosynthesis (Sheehan et al. 1999).
For this purpose, the drug must be derivatized by adding a terminal group of the triethoxysilyl type that allows condensation with tetraethoxysilane (TEOS) in the presence of a catalyst. Alternatively, the grafting of the silylated derivatives to previously formed mesoporous silica nanoparticles of MCM-41 type would also be performed. The functionalized nonporous or mesoporous silica nanoparticles would be dispersed onto cotton fabrics surfaces and studied for potential topical anti-fungal applications in medical textiles (bandages, gauzes or strips). Furthermore, the presence of functionalized silica nanoparticles in dressings would increase the roughness of the surface of the fabric and, consequently, its hydrophobicity and durability (Wang et al. 2008;Xue et al. 2009;Zhang et al. 2013). The moisture rejection is advantageous for keeping dry the gauze, acting as a barrier to the microorganisms.

Characterization techniques
The 1 H and 13 C NMR spectra were recorded at 298.0 K on a Bruker DPX-360 or 400 MHz Bruker Advance-III equipped with a BBFO probe with an automatic tuning. All the spectra were calibrated using the residual solvent signal (CDCl 3 , δ H , 7.26 and δ C , 77.16 ppm and CD 3 OD, δ H , 3.31 and δ C , 49.0 ppm). Chemical shift data were expressed in ppm and coupling constant (J) values in Hz. Multiplicity of peaks was abbreviated as s (singlet), d (doublet), t (triplet), q (quartet), and dd (doublet of doublets). The 29 Si and 13 C CP-MAS NMR spectra were obtained from a Bruker AV400WB, the repetition time was 5 s with contact times of 2 ms and the number of scans acquired was between 800 and 1600. This NMR instrument belongs to the Servicio de Resonancia Magnética Nuclear de Sólidos del Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Madrid-CSIC. FTIR spectroscopy was recorded with a Bruker Tensor 27 spectrometer using a Golden Gate ATR module with a diamond window. High resolution mass spectra were obtained by direct injection of the sample with electrospray techniques in Hewlett-Packard 5989A and microTOF-Q instruments, respectively. Elemental analysis of C, N, and H were performed using Flash 2000 Organic Elemental analyzer of Thermo Fisher Scientific with BBOT as an internal standard. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analyses were performed on a JEM-2011 Electron Microscope at 200 kV. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), and element line scans mapping were taken on a SEM Zeiss Merlin with and INCA detector from Oxford Instruments. Thus, microscopic investigations of the specimens were carried out using a ZEISS MERLIN scanning electron microscope (SEM). The specimens were mounted on conductive carbon adhesive tabs and images were taken after the specimens had been sputter-coated (K550X EMITECH) with a very thin layer of gold. For the elemental composition of the fabric surface, an INCA energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) detector from Oxford Instruments was used. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) and zeta potential measurements have been performed using a Zetasizer Nano ZS (Malvern Instruments) with 8 mg of silica NPs in 8 mL of Milli-Q water, and the pH of the solution was measured by CRISON pH meter Basic 20. The surface areas were determined by the Brunauer − Emmett − Teller (BET) method from N 2 adsorption − desorption isotherms obtained with a Micromeritics ASAP2000 analyzer after degassing samples for 55 h at 30 °C under vacuum. Powder X-ray diffraction (P-XRD) was performed with X'Pert Power (PANalytical, Almelo, Netherlands), 45 kV/40 mA, Kα 1.5419 Å with a cooper anode. For contact angle (CA) measurements, the hydrophobic tests performed were the measurement of the contact angle of a water droplet (4 µL) deposited on top of each fabric. These experiments were carried out at ICMAB installations with a Contact Angle Measuring System DSA 100 from KRÜSS, which is located in a physico-chemical laboratory (humidity and temperature control). (Chevreuil et al. 2006), 2 (Oh et al. 2011), 5 and 7)

General procedure for the preparation of 4-
In a flame dried Schlenck the benzylic alcohol derivative (1 equiv) was dissolved in 10 mL of anhydrous THF under argon atmosphere. Then, sodium hydride (60% in mineral oil, 4 equiv) was added to the solution and the mixture was stirred at rt for 15 min. Then, the corresponding benzylic bromide (1.23 equiv) was added and the mixture was stirred at rt until completion of the reaction (3 h). When the reaction was over, 10 mL of cold water was added, followed by the addition of 20 mL of dichloromethane. The organic phase was separated, and the aqueous layer was extracted with more dichloromethane. The organics were combined, dried over anhydrous sodium sulphate and evaporated under reduced pressure. The products were purified by flash column chromatography (Rf for product 1 = 0.3; Rf for product 2 = 0.28; Rf for product 5 = 0.25; Rf for product 7 = 0.45 (hexane: AcOEt 1:4)).
General procedure for the preparation of imidazolium iodides (3, 4 and 10) A solution of the corresponding imidazole derivative (1 equiv.) and triethoxy(3-iodopropyl)silane (1 equiv.) in dry acetonitrile (20 mL) was refluxed under argon overnight. After completion of the reaction, the solvent was removed under high vacuum. The final oil was washed with anhydrous pentane, affording the corresponding imidazolium iodide in excellent yield.
Procedure for the preparation of 6 Step 1:

-ch lor o-4 -(( 1-( 2,4 -di chl oro phe nyl )-2 -(1 H-i mid azo l-1 -yl )et hox y)methyl)benzaldehyde (5a)
To a stirred solution of compound 5 (1 mmol, 0.41 g) in dry toluene at 0 °C was added 1.5 mL of a DIBAL solution in toluene (1 M). The reaction was stirred at 0 °C for 60 min. Afterwards, hydrochloric acid 10 M (10 mL) was added to the mixture, and when the solution turned a white slurry, 20 mL of HCl 1 M was added. Then, a solution of 5% NaHCO 3 was added until the pH of the aqueous solution was 10. The organic phase was separated, and the aqueous phase was further extracted with dichloromethane. The organics were combined, dried over anhydrous Na 2 SO 4 and the solvent removed under high vacuum. The titled compound 5a was purified as an oil from the crude by flash column chromatography using hexane:ethyl acetate (1:9) as eluent (Rf = 0.3 (hexane:ethyl acetate (1:9)) (69% yield, 285 mg, 0.69 mmol).
Step 2: (3-chloro-4-((1-(2,4- To a stirred solution of compound 5a (2.9 mmol, 1.2 g) in methanol (20 mL) at rt was added in one portion 0.22 g (5.8 mmol) of NaBH4. After 3 h, the methanolic solution was poured into 100 mL of water. The solution was transferred into a separatory funnel, and extractions with dichloromethane were performed. The organics were collected, dried over anhydrous sodium sulphate, and the solvent removed under high vacuum. The titled compound 5b (0.96 g, 2.35 mmol, 81% yield) was obtained as oil after purification from the crude by flash column chromatography using ethyl acetate as eluent.
Step 3: To a stirred solution of compound 5b (0.61 mmol, 250 mg) in dry THF (5 mL) was added triethoxy(3isocyanatopropyl)silane (0.15 mL, 0.24 mmol) and 0.01 mL of dibutyltin dilaureate. The reaction was led to proceed overnight under reflux. Next, the solvent was evaporated under high vacuum. The crude was purified by flash column chromatography using ethyl acetate as eluent to obtain 6 as a colorless oil (Rf = 0.43 (ethyl acetate) (81% yield,324 mg, 0.50 mmol).
Procedure for the preparation of 9 Step 1: (8) Compound 7 (0.50 g, 1.08 mmol) was dissolved in a degassed mixture of 3 mL of water and 3 mL of 1,2-dimethoxyethane under nitrogen atmosphere. To the solution were added K 2 CO 3 (375 mg, 2.71 mmol), CuI (8.3 mg, 0.04 mmol), PPh 3 (23 mg, 0.08 mmol) and Pd/C (23 mg, 0.02 mmol). The mixture was stirred for 30 min at rt and then the alcoholic alkyne was added through syringe (0.26 mL, 2.74 mmol). The reaction was stirred overnight at 80 °C under inert atmosphere, then the mixture was cooled to room temperature, filtered through Celite® and extracted with dichloromethane three times. The organics were washed with water, dried, and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by flash column chromatography (AcOEt 100%) to afford 8 as a white solid (Rf = 0.2 (ethyl acetate) (78% yield,393 mg, 0.84 mmol).
Step 2: 1-(2- ((2-chloro-4-ethynylbenzyl) The alcohol 8 (720 mg, 1.44 mmol) was dissolved in dry toluene (30 mL) in a round-bottom flask. Then NaH (60% in mineral oil, 0.6 mg, 0.014 mmol) was added and a distillation system was adapted. The system was heated at 130 °C for 2 h. After this time, the TLC showed full conversion and most of the toluene has been distilled. The crude mixture was directly poured into a flash silica gel column chromatography and eluted with pure AcOEt. Terminal alkyne 8a was obtained as a colorless solid in 93% yield (586 mg, 1.33 mmol).
General procedure for the preparation of functionalized silica nanoparticles by co-condensation method (dN1-dN5) Tetraethoxysilane (2.08 g, 10.0 mmol) and the corresponding silylated antifungal (3, 4, 6, 9 or 10) (0.75 mmol) were dissolved in absolute EtOH (35 mL). Then, an ammonium hydroxide-ethanol solution was added (9 mL of 28% NH 3 H 2 O in 35 mL EtOH). The mixture was magnetically stirred intensively (1400 rpm) at room temperature for 12 h. The functionalized nanoparticles were collected by centrifugation (12,000 rpm for 10 min) and washed with ethanol until neutral pH was reached. Then, the obtained white solid was washed successively with Milli-Q water and 96% ethanol, and the nanomaterials were dried under high vacuum.
General procedure for the preparation of functionalized silica nanoparticles by grafting method (mN6-mN8) The corresponding silylated antifungal derivative (0.30 mmol) and mesoporous silica nanoparticles of MCM-41 type (360 mg) were refluxed in anhydrous toluene (60 mL) for 24 h in a 250 mL round bottom flask equipped with a Dean-Stark apparatus. Then the suspension was centrifuged (13,500 rpm at 25 °C for 45 min). The solid was washed successively with ethanol (3 × 30 mL), acetone (2 × 30 mL) and dichloromethane (2 × 30 mL) (30 min at 50 °C under sonication, 30 min for centrifugation), and further dried under high vacuum to give the grafted material as a white solid.
General procedure for the one-step coating of cotton fabrics with antifungal nonporous silica nanoparticles (Fabric dN1-Fabric dN5) Tetraethoxysilane (2.08 g, 10.0 mmol) and the corresponding silylated antifungal (3, 4, 6, 9 or 10) (0.75 mmol) were dissolved in absolute EtOH (35 mL). Then, an ammonium hydroxide-ethanol solution was added (9 mL of 28% NH 3 H 2 O in 35 mL EtOH). The mixture was magnetically stirred intensively (1400 rpm) at room temperature for 12 h and then ultrasonicated for 30 min. Afterwards, a piece of white clean 100% cotton (3 × 3 cm) previously washed with soap and sodium carbonate and dried as previously reported in our group (Salabert et al. 2015), was immersed in the prepared coating solution and the whole system was ultrasonicated for 30 min. After this period of time, the cotton fabric was removed from the solution, washed with water several times and dried in a vacuum oven at 50 °C for several hours.
General procedure for the coating of cotton fabrics with antifungal mesoporous silica nanoparticles (Fabric mN6-Fabric mN8) The corresponding silylated antifungal derivative (0.30 mmol) and mesoporous silica nanoparticles of MCM-41 type (360 mg) were refluxed in anhydrous toluene (60 mL) for 24 h in a 250 mL round bottom flask equipped with a Dean-Stark apparatus. The resulting mixture was ultrasonicated for 30 min and then a piece of clean cotton fabric (3 × 3 cm) was immersed in the prepared coating solution. The whole system was ultrasonicated for 30 min. After this period of time, the cotton fabric was removed from the solution, rinsed with toluene and dried in a vacuum oven at 50 °C for several hours.

Antifungal activity of the modified cotton fabrics
With the coated fabrics with nanoparticles in hand, their effectiveness against four microorganisms (filamentous fungi and yeast) was measured (Trichophyton mentagrophytes CECT 2783, Aspergillus brasiliensis CECT 2091, Penicillium chrysogenum CECT 2307 and Candida albicans CECT 1001). A suspension of known concentration was prepared by titration (by preparation of serial dilutions and seeding) of the order of 106 CFU / mL (Colony Forming Units) of each fungal culture. In addition, two assays were performed where sterile Petri dishes were prepared and fragments of the fabrics were deposited (each containing a different type of nanoparticle) and each type of nanoparticle had four replicated impregnated each with one of the four types of fungus. One of the trials was at time 0 and another with a 24-h exposure (during this period they were kept at 25 °C and in aerobiosis). Immediately after impregnating the fabrics, in the time trial 0, the deposited culture was recovered using a sterile swab and reseeded in Petri dishes containing Agar Saboureaud (a suitable culture medium for the correct growth of the fungi). The results of this test correspond to the maximum number of CFU that can be recovered per plate just after the direct contact of the fungi with the studied fabrics. The inoculated plates were kept in an oven for 3-5 days at 25 °C in aerobiosis and then proceed to the reading of CFU developed at time 0 (CFU 0 ). By contrast, the second group of fabrics was kept in contact with fungi for 24 h. After this time, the same procedure was done as with time group 0, obtaining in this case the CFU in 24 h (CFU 24 ). Once the results were obtained, the effectiveness of the antifungal can be expressed in % effectiveness as [(CFU 0 − CFU 24 )/ CFU 0 ] × 100.

Synthesis of silylated derivatives of antifungals
As we have mentioned, Miconazole core was chosen as a model structure. In order to covalently attach the antifungal units onto silica nanoparticles, the presence of a triethoxysilyl moiety on its structure was selected. Different linkers to attach this silylated unit were evaluated (such as carbamate and triazole). Additionally, as Miconazole is pharmacologically used as a nitrate salt, the alkylation of the imidazole ring with a silylated alkyl iodide was also considered (Scheme 1).
First, we developed a bimolecular nucleophilic substitution between Miconazole (1) and 3-iodopropyltriethoxysilane in dry acetonitrile, yielding the corresponding imidazolium iodide 3 (95% yield). As we also wanted to check the importance of the position of the chlorine atoms in the benzyloxy moiety, we prepared the silylated imidazolium iodide 4 from 2 by an analogous procedure (94% yield). Then, we replaced the chlorine atom in position 4 of the aryl ring of the benzyloxy moiety present in Miconazole by a silylated carbamate (6) or by a silylated triazole ring (9) (Scheme 1).
The preparation of 6 was undertaken from the nitrile 5. First, the nitrile was reduced to the corresponding aldehyde (69%) by DIBAL at 0 °C in dry toluene. Then, the carbonyl group was reduced to the primary alcohol (81% yield) with sodium borohydride. Finally, the alcohol reacted with the silylated isocyanate efficiently in refluxing THF using dibutyltin dilaureate as catalyst to afford the carbamate 6 (81% yield). Thus, compound 6 was prepared in three steps in 45% overall yield from 5 (Scheme 1). On the other hand, compound 9 was synthesized from the bromoarene 7 through a Sonogashira coupling with 2-methylbut-3-yn-2-ol as a first step, yielding alkyne 8 in a 78% yield. This alkyne was deprotected under catalytic NaH to afford the corresponding terminal alkyne (92% yield), which was coupled with (3-azidopropyl)triethoxysilane giving 9 (92% yield) through a click Cu-catalyzed azide-alkyne Huisgen reaction (Breugst and Reissig 2020;Hettegger et al. 2015b) under microwave and anhydrous conditions (Bürglová et al. 2011). Thus, the silylated triazole derivative 9 was prepared in a 66% global yield in three steps from 7 (Scheme 1). Finally, the silylated imidazolium iodide 10 was prepared from 7 (95% yield) to check the effect of the change of the chlorine by a bromine atom in the antifungal activity (Scheme 1).

Preparation and Characterization of Antifungal-Functionalized Silica Nanoparticles
With the modified silylated antifungal molecules (3, 4, 6, 9 and 10, Scheme 1) in hand, we turned to the covalent anchoring of these drugs to silica nanoparticles. We followed two different approaches. First, we prepared nonporous nanomaterials dN1-dN5 by co-condensation of silylated precursors (3, 4, 6, 9 or 10) with TEOS using a 28% aqueous ammonia solution in ethanol (Li et al. 2020a;Wang et al. 2008) (Scheme 2). The mixed solution was stirred at room temperature for 12 h and then the dense nanoparticles were collected by centrifugation (13,500 rpm) and washed successively with ethanol, Milli-Q water, and ethanol until neutral pH.
On the other hand, functionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticles mN6-mN8 (Scheme 2) were prepared by grafting the corresponding silylated drugs to previously synthesized mesoporous silica nanoparticles of MCM-41 type (Théron et al. 2014) in refluxing toluene for 24 h. The NPs were collected by centrifugation (13,500 rpm) and then washed successively with ethanol, acetone, and dichloromethane.
These nanomaterials were characterized by elemental analysis, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), dynamic light scattering (DLS), zeta-potential, infrared spectroscopy, powder XRD and nitrogen-sorption measurements when appropriate.
In Table 1 are summarized some physical data obtained after characterization. First, the nanometric size and morphology of these materials were analysed by TEM and DLS. Materials dN1, dN2 and dN3 prepared by co-condensation of silylated imidazolium iodides 3, 4 and 10 in basic medium in the absence of template appeared as nonporous dense aggregates and they showed high polydispersity in the dynamic light scattering measurements (Table 1).
Contrarily, dN4 and dN5 prepared from neutral silylated precursors 6 and 9 under analogous conditions exhibited spherical morphology, with diameters around 136 ± 31 nm and 206 ± 45 nm (see the TEM image of dN5 in Fig. 1, left, as an example) and showed a good polydispersity index in DLS (Table 1 and Supplementary Information).
Besides, mN6-mN8 nanomaterials prepared by grafting appeared as mesoporous spherical nanoparticles with average diameters of 86 ± 24, 140 ± 17 and 147 ± 31 nm (see Table 1 and Supplementary Information). A selected TEM image of mN6 is given in Fig. 1, right). The BET surface area of mN6 and mN8 were 313 and 192 m 2 g −1 , respectively. The p-XRD analyses showed the organized porosity for the MCM-41 materials, typical for a hexagonal 2D symmetry (see Fig. 2 for the p-XRD of mN8).
In these cases, DLS measurements showed hydrodynamic diameters that are in agreement with the TEM size of the corresponding dried nanoparticles if we consider the likely adsorption of water molecules onto the nanoparticle surface (Table 1). The drug loading in the NPs was determined from the nitrogen elemental analysis (Table 1).
The stability of all nanoparticles in milli-Q water suspension (1 mg/mL) was checked by zeta potential. The nanomaterials (dN1, dN2, dN3, mN6 and mN7) prepared from the imidazolium salts presented positive values from + 35.6 to + 50.2 mV, which are in good agreement with a good stability in water suspension and the presence of cationic imidazolium moieties on the surface of the particles. On the other hand, the nanoparticles (dN4, dN5 and mN8) synthesized from neutral silylated derivatives showed negative zeta potential values (from − 21 to − 64.7 mV) also indicative of a good stability. The negative sign in these samples is in consonance with the non-protonation of the basic imidazole ring and the residual deprotonated silanol groups.
Solid state 29 Si and 13 C NMR spectra ensured the presence of the corresponding organic moiety in Scheme 2 Preparation of drug functionalized silica nanoparticles The presence of T signals suggested that the integrity of the Si-C bond was maintained during the formation of the nanomaterials, which was also confirmed by a signal between 8 and 10 ppm in the solid state 13 C NMR spectra (see the Supplementary Information for the solid-state NMR spectra of the nanoparticles).
Preparation and characterization of cotton fabrics coated with antifungal-functionalized silica nanoparticles The preparation of cotton fabrics coated with drugfunctionalized silica nanoparticles was performed as represented in Scheme 3. On one hand, once the grafting procedure for the preparation of mesoporous functionalized nanoparticles was finished, a piece of 3 × 3 cm of clean cotton fabric was immersed into the previously sonicated solution (30 min) and further sonicated for 30 min. After this time, the cellulose material was removed, washed with toluene, and dried under high vacuum at 50 °C. On the other hand, a piece of 3 × 3 cm of clean cotton fabric was added to a previously sonicated (30 min) milky solution resulting from the co-hydrolysis of TEOS with organosilanes in aqueous ammonia in ethanol, and further sonicated for 30 min. Afterwards, the cotton fabric was removed from the solution, washed with distilled water, and then dried under high vacuum at 50 °C.
The cotton textiles coated with the nanostructures were analysed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). In Fig. 3 the SEM image of Fabric-dN5 is presented (see Supplementary Information for the other modified cotton fabrics). In the SEM image the cotton fabrics appears covered by functionalized silica nanoparticles. The surface composition was checked by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) and element mapping. The presence of Si, C, O, N and in some cases Cl and Br atoms were clearly observed (see Fig. 3 for the element mapping for Fabric-dN5 and the Supplementary Information for the other modified textiles). The cotton fabrics (Fabric-dN1-Fabric-dN3) coated with dense nonporous nanoparticles prepared from silylated imidazolium iodides presented cauliflower like structures, in agreement with the high polydispersity index observed in the DLS measurements of the corresponding nanoparticles (dN1-dN3). On the contrary, cotton fabrics (Fabric-dN4 and Fabric-dN5) coated with dense nanoparticles prepared from the non-charged imidazole-containing organosilanes presented high homogeneity regarding the particles size. This last feature was also observed in cotton fabrics (Fabric-mN6-Fabric-mN8) coated with functionalized mesoporous nanoparticles, regardless of the chemical nature of the employed organosilane. The measured contact angle for Fabric-dN3 and Fabric-dN5 were 131 and 148°, respectively, indicative of hydrophobic surfaces. Contrarily, Fabric-mN7 and Fabric-mN8 were not hydrophobic as the water drop was absorbed by the modified fabrics after a few seconds.
Antifungal activity of the fabrics coated with anti-fungal-functionalized silica nanoparticles  Colosi et al. 2012) to study the production of inhibition halos using fragments of the impregnated cotton fabrics (Fabric-dN2 and Fabric-dN3) and confronting them with the fungal strains.
Small pieces of the cotton fabrics were deposited on the surface's plate and inoculated with each of the microorganisms. They were incubated for 24-48 h and the inhibition halos were observed (see Supporting information). Considering these initial positive results, then we carried out a quantitative study of the activity of these impregnated fabrics, mimicking its application on the surface of the skin of the affected organism. The methodology used was a modification of that indicated in international standards (UNE  Table 2. The activity of the modified fabric has been expressed in % effectiveness as [(CFU 0 -CFU 24 )/ CFU 0 ] × 100, where CFU 24 is the number of fungal cells that are viable after the fabric is kept in contact with fungi for 24 h and CFU 0 is the number of viable fungal cells at time 0 (CFU = Colony Forming Units). To our delight, all the fabrics were found to be moderately (25%) or highly active (90%) against Trichophyton mentagrophytes. The effectiveness against the yeast Candida albicans varies from 25 to 75%. Whereas Fabric-dN4 and Fabric-mN8 were not active against Aspergillus brasiliensis, the other modified cotton fabrics exhibited low (10%), moderate (25%) or high (90%) activity. Excellent antifungal properties (90% effectiveness) were found for Fabric-dN1, Fabric-mN6 and Fabric-mN7 against Penicillium chrysogenum, and moderate activity (25%) in the case of Fabric-dN4 and Fabric-mN8. Thus, the antifungal activity of the coated fabrics was found to be highly dependent on the microorganism. That allows specific fungal treatments for each microorganism. Within the same fungal or yeast strain, some influence of the structural features of the organic moiety or the type of nanoparticles was also observed, although no clear general rule can be inferred from the results. Within Trichophyton mentagrophytes the higher % effectiveness of Fabric-mN7 over Fabric-dN3 and of Fabric-mN8 over Fabric-dN5 (see Table 2) could be attributed to the differences in the hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity of the corresponding surfaces. As the microorganisms are grown in aqueous medium, a hydrophobic antifungal cotton surface would make more difficult the interaction with the fungus. It is noteworthy that Fabric-dN1, Fabric-mN6 and Fabric-mN7 are good candidates to be used as topical antifungal agents in cotton medical textiles for the remarkable results.

Conclusions
In summary, several silylated derivatives have been prepared taking the topical antifungal agent Miconazole as a model. Different linkers to attach the silylated unit have been employed (carbamate and triazole). Additionally, as Miconazole is used as a nitrate salt, the alkylation of the imidazole ring with a silylated alkyl iodide has also been performed. The covalent anchoring of these silylated derivatives to mesoporous or dense silica nanoparticles has been achieved by grafting and co-condensation procedures, respectively. Furthermore, cotton textiles have been coated with these antifungal-functionalized silica nanoparticles under ultrasonic conditions. The characterization of the functionalized nanoparticles and coated cotton fabrics has been carried out by microscopic and spectroscopic techniques. The antifungal activity of all the modified fabrics has been tested against three filamentous fungi and a yeast (Trichophyton mentagrophytes CECT 2783, Aspergillus brasiliensis CECT 2091, Penicillium chrysogenum CECT 2307 and Candida albicans CECT 1001) and has been found to be highly dependent on the microorganism. Some influence of the structural features of the organic moiety, the type of nanoparticles and the hydrophobicity of the cotton surface has been also observed, although no general rule can be deduced. Remarkably, all of them have shown activity against Candida albicans and Trichophyton mentagrophytes, with up to 75 and 90% effectiveness, respectively, being Fabric-dN1, Fabric-mN6 and Fabric-mN7 the best candidates to combat general fungal growth. High expectations arise for topical cutaneous applications in wound dressings (bandages, gauzes, strips).