Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reactive Water Sorbents for the Sorption-Enhanced Reverse Water–Gas Shift

  • Published:
Catalysis Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sorption-enhanced reverse water–gas shift (SE-RWGS, here designated as ‘COMAX’) was studied with bifunctional reactive sorbents. First proof-of-concept is presented of the successful design of a multifunctional reactive sorbent, which combines CO2 activation and water adsorption functionalities in an integrated reactive sorbent, i.e. the active phase is loaded on the carrier that provides surface area for dispersion of the active (Pt, Cu) phase as well as H2O sorption capacity. Near complete selectivity to CO was achieved from atmospheric pressure up to at least 29 bar, i.e. the highest pressure studied in the experimental campaign. This selectivity was obtained with stoichiometric and excess quantities of hydrogen in the (RWGS) COMAX feed, the latter in view of the potential use of syngas mixtures. The newly developed bifunctional material bears important additional advantage for scaling up of the COMAX process, because it avoids the mixing of catalyst and adsorbent materials that differ in properties such as hardness. Evidently, the key parameter for optimizing the COMAX process is the working adsorption capacity of the system and (multi-column) cycle design. Improving the capacity can be done by optimizing the reactive adsorption conditions and by optimizing the regeneration method.

Graphic Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig.2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yu KMK, Curcic I, Gabriel J, Tsang SCE (2008) Chemsuschem 1:893–899

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Detz RJ, Reek JNH, van der Zwaan BCC (2018) Energy Environ. Sci. 11:1653–1669

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Os P (2018) Greenhouse Gases: Sci Technol 8:994–997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kätelhön A, Meys R, Deutz S, Suh S, Bardow A (2019) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116:11187–11194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Skorikova G, Saric M, Sluijter S, van Kampen J, Sánchez-Martínez C, Boon J (2020) Front Chem Eng 2:e594884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Park SH, Kim HJ, Lee CS (2010) Fuel Proc Techn 91:504–513

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Porosoff MD, Yan B, Chen JG (2016) Energy Environ Sci 9:62–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Carvill BT, Hufton JR, Anand M, Sircar S (1996) AIChE J 42:2765–2772

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. van Kampen J, Boon J, van Berkel F, Vente JF, van Sint Annaland M (2019) Chem Eng J 374:1286–1303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Campbell JA (1985) J Chem Ed 62:231–232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ghodhbene M, Bougie F, Fongarland P, Iliuta MC (2017) Can J Chem Eng 95:1842–1849

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. van Kampen J, Boon J, van Sint Annaland M (2020) Adsorption 12:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  13. Arunajatesana V, Subramaniama B, Hutchenson KW, Herkes FE (2007) Chem Eng Sci 62:5062–5069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dietz L, Piccinin S, Maestri M (2015) J Phys Chem C 119:4959–4966

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Boon J, Cobden PD, van Dijk HAJ, Hoogland C, van Selow EV, van Sint Annaland M (2014) Chem Eng J 248:406–414

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Klier K, Young CW, Nunan JG (1986) Ind Eng Chem Fundam 25:36–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Klier K (1984) Appl Surf Sci 19:267–297

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. van Kampen J, Boon J, Vente JF, van Sint Annaland M (2020) J CO Util 37:295–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. van Kampen J, Booneveld S, Boon J, Vente JF, van Sint Annaland M (2020) Chem Comm 56:13540–13542

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Dr. Alfons Brandt of Chemiewerk Bad Köstritz GmbH is kindly acknowledged for providing 13X BFK sample. The authors thank Rick Broers for discussions on material selection. The project has received funding from ACT ALIGN-CCUS (No 271501) that received funding from RVO (NL), FZJ/PtJ (DE), Gassnova (NO), UEFISCDI (RO), BEIS (UK) and is co-funded by the European Commission under the Horizon 2020 programme ACT, Grant Agreement No 691712.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johannis A. Z. Pieterse.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pieterse, J.A.Z., Elzinga, G.D., Booneveld, S. et al. Reactive Water Sorbents for the Sorption-Enhanced Reverse Water–Gas Shift. Catal Lett 152, 460–466 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-021-03645-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-021-03645-1

Keywords

Navigation