Every violation of truth is not only a sort of suicide in the liar, but is a stab at the health of human society.
–Ralph Waldo Emerson.
Abstract
Men typically express more willingness than women to perpetrate fraudulent acts like lying in negotiations. However, women express just as much willingness in some cases. We develop and test a theory to explain these mixed findings. Specifically, we hypothesize that situational cues that bring about competitive or empathic feelings mitigate sex differences in lying to negotiation counterparts. Results from four experiments confirm our hypotheses. Experiment 1 showed that men and women express equal willingness to lie when negotiating with counterparts toward whom they felt either great competitiveness or empathy. Experiment 2 extended these results by confirming that men only express more willingness to lie absent competitive or empathic feelings towards a counterpart. Experiments 3 and 4 demonstrated that inducing competitive or empathic feelings toward a counterpart eliminated sex differences in lying by leading women to lie more and men to lie less, respectively. Overall, our results suggest that the extent to which negotiators experience competitive or empathic feelings play important roles in whether sex differences in lying in negotiations emerge.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 751–763.
Aquino, K., Freeman, D., Reed, A., II., Lim, V. K. G., & Felps, W. (2009). Testing a social-cognitive model of moral behavior: The interactive influence of situations and moral identity centrality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015406
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2018). Report to the nations: 2018 global study on occupational fraud and abuse. https://www.acfe.com/report-to-the-nations/2018/
Babcock, L., & Laschever, S. (2009). Women don’t ask: Negotiation and the gender divide. Princeton University Press.
Babcock, L., & Loewenstein, G. (1997). Explaining bargaining impasse: The role of self-serving biases. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(1), 109–126.
Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence. Rand McNally.
Barry, B., & Rehel, E. M. (2013). Lies, damn lies, and negotiation: An interdisciplinary analysis of the nature and consequences of deception at the bargaining table. In N. M. Ashkenasy, O. B. Ayoko, & K. A. Jehn (Eds.), Handbook of research in conflict management (pp. 343–360). Edward Edgar.
Batson, C. D., Batson, J. G., Slingsby, J. K., Harrell, K. L., Peekna, H. M., & Todd, R. M. (1991). Empathic joy and the empathy-altruism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(3), 413–426. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.413
Batson, C. D., Eklund, J. H., Chermok, V. L., Hoyt, J. L., & Ortiz, B. G. (2007). An additional antecedent of empathic concern: Valuing the welfare of the person in need. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.65
Batson, C. D., & Moran, T. (1999). Empathy-induced altruism in a prisoner’s dilemma. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(7), 909–924. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199911)29:7
Bear, J. B., & Babcock, L. (2012). Negotiation topic as a moderator of gender differences in negotiation. Psychological Science, 23(7), 743–744. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612442393
Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88(4), 354–364. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.4.354
Borna, S., & White, G. (2003). “Sex” and “Gender”: Two confused and confusing concepts in the "women in corporate management literature”. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(2), 89–99.
Bowles, H. R. (2012). Psychological perspectives on gender in negotiation. The Sage Handbook of Gender and Psychology.
Bowles, H. R., Babcock, L., & Lai, L. (2007). Social incentives for gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations: Sometimes it does hurt to ask. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103(1), 84–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.09.001
Bowles, H. R., Babcock, L., & McGinn, K. L. (2005). Constraints and triggers: Situational mechanics of gender in negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 951–965. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.951
Buchan, N. R., Croson, R. T. A., & Solnick, S. (2008). Trust and gender: An examination of behavior and beliefs in the Investment Game. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 68(3–4), 466–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2007.10.006
Carlson, N. (2012). Exclusive: Here's the email Zuckerberg sent to cut his cofounder out of facebook. Business Insider, (May 12). https://www.businessinsider.com/exclusive-heres-the-email-zuckerberg-sent-to-cut-his-cofounder-out-of-facebook-2012-5?IR=T
Carney, D. (2010). Powerful people are better liars. Harvard Business Review, 88(5), 32–33.
Childs, J. (2012). Gender differences in lying. Economics Letters, 114(2), 147–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2011.10.006
Cohen, T. R., & Morse, L. (2014). Moral character: What it is and what it does. Research in Organizational Behavior, 34, 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2014.08.003
Cohen, T. R., Panter, A. T., Turan, N., Morse, L., & Kim, Y. (2014). Moral character in the workplace. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(5), 943–963. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037245
Cohen, T. R., Wolf, S. T., Panter, A. T., & Insko, C. A. (2011). Introducing the GASP scale: A new measure of guilt and shame proneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(5), 947–966. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022641
Conway, P., & Gawronski, B. (2013). Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: A process dissociation approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(2), 216–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031021
Cramton, P. C., & Dees, J. G. (1993). Promoting honesty in negotiation: An exercise in practical ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 3(4), 359–394.
Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 448–474.
Cumming, D., Leung, T. Y., & Rui, O. (2015). Gender diversity and securities fraud. Academy of Management Journal, 58(5), 1572–1593. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0750
Dalton, D., & Ortegren, M. (2011). Gender differences in ethics research: The importance of controlling for the social desirability response bias. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(1), 73–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0843-8
DePaulo, B. M., Kashy, D. A., Kirkendol, S. E., Wyer, M. M., & Epstein, J. A. (1996). Lying in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(5), 979–995. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.5.979
Dollar, D., Fisman, R., & Gatti, R. (2001). Are women really the “fairer” sex? Corruption and women in government. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 46(4), 423–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(01)00169-X
Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W. (1994). Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory. Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 252–284.
Franke, G. R., Crown, D. F., & Spake, D. F. (1997). Gender differences in ethical perceptions of business practices: A social role theory perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 920–934. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.920
Fulmer, I. S., Barry, B., & Long, D. A. (2009). Lying and smiling: Informational and emotional deception in negotiation. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(4), 691–709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9975-x
Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Magee, J. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 453–466. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.453
Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Ena Inesi, M., & Gruenfeld, D. H. (2006). Power and perspectives not taken. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1068–1074.
Galinsky, A. D., & Schweitzer, M. (2015). Friend & foe: When to cooperate, when to compete, and how to succeed at both. Crown Business.
Graziano, W. G., Habashi, M. M., Sheese, B. E., & Tobin, R. M. (2007). Agreeableness, empathy, and helping: A person × situation perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(4), 583–599. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.583
Graziano, W. G., Hair, E. C., & Finch, J. F. (1997). Competitiveness mediates the link between personality and group performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(6), 1394–1408. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1394
Gunia, B. C. (2019). Ethics in negotiation: Causes and consequences. Academy of Management Perspectives, 33(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2018.0043
Helgeson, V. S. (1994a). Prototypes and dimensions of masculinity and femininity. Sex Roles, 31(11), 653–682. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01544286
Helgeson, V. S. (1994b). Relation of agency and communion to well-being: Evidence and potential explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 412–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.412
Holm, H. J., & Kawagoe, T. (2010). Face-to-face lying: An experimental study in Sweden and Japan. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(3), 310–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2010.01.001
Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60(6), 581–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.60.6.581
Jaffee, S., & Hyde, J. S. (2000). Gender differences in moral orientation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126(5), 703–726. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.5.703
Johnson, D. W., Maruyama, G., Johnson, R., Nelson, D., & Skon, L. (1981). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 89(1), 47–62.
Kennedy, J. A., Kray, L. J., & Ku, G. (2017). A social-cognitive approach to understanding gender differences in negotiator ethics: The role of moral identity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 138, 28–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.11.003
Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Treviño, L. K. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017103
Kray, L. J., & Haselhuhn, M. P. (2012). Male pragmatism in negotiators’ ethical reasoning. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(5), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.04.006
Lax, D. A., & Sebenius, J. K. (1986). Manager as negotiator: Bargaining for cooperation and competitive gain. The Free Press.
Lee, C. (2016). Bad Blood: Inside the Hollywood frenzy around Jennifer Lawrence’s Theranos movie. Vanity Fair. https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2016/06/jennifer-lawrence-theranos-elizabeth-holmes
Lee, M., Pitesa, M., Pillutla, M. M., & Thau, S. (2017). Male immorality: An evolutionary account of sex differences in unethical negotiation behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 60(5), 2014–2044. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0461
Levine, E. E., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2015). Prosocial lies: When deception breeds trust. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 126, 88–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.10.007
Lewicki, R. J., & Robinson, R. J. (1998). Ethical and unethical bargaining tactics: An empirical study. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(6), 665–682. https://doi.org/10.2307/25073113
Lynn, R. (1993). Sex differences in competitiveness and the valuation of money in twenty countries. Journal of Social Psychology, 133(4), 507–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1993.9712175
Ma, L., & Parks, J. M. (2012). Your good name: The relationship between perceived reputational risk and acceptability of negotiation tactics. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(2), 161–175.
McAdams, D. P., & Pals, J. L. (2006). A new big five: Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality. American Psychologist, 61(3), 204–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.3.204
McCabe, A. C., Ingram, R., & Dato-on, M. C. (2006). The business of ethics and gender. Journal of Business Ethics, 64(2), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.2307/25123736
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2008). A five-factor theory of personality. In L. Pervin & O. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 159–181). Guilford Press.
Mischel, W. (1977). The interaction of person and situation. In D. Magnusson & N. S. Endler (Eds.), Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology (pp. 333–352). Erlbaum.
Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102(2), 246–268. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.246
Mitzkewitz, M., & Nagel, R. (1993). Experimental results on ultimatum games with incomplete information. International Journal of Game Theory, 22(2), 171–198.
Pellegrini, A. D., & Archer, J. (2005). Sex differences in competitive and aggressive behaviour. Origins of the social mind, 219–244.
Perry, G. M., & Nixon, C. J. (2005). The influence of role models on negotiation ethics of college students. Journal of Business Ethics, 62(1), 25–40.
Pierce, J. R., Kilduff, G. J., Galinsky, A. D., & Sivonathan, N. (2013). From glue to gasoline: How competition turns perspective takers unethical. Psychological Science, 24(10), 1986–1994. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613482144
Pierce, J. R., & Thompson, L. (2018). Explaining differences in men and women’s use of unethical tactics in negotiations. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 11(4), 278–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/ncmr.12135
Pillutla, M. M., & Murnighan, J. K. (1995). Being fair or appearing fair: Strategic behavior in ultimatum bargaining. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1408–1426. https://doi.org/10.2307/256863
Raiffa, H. (1982). The art and science of negotiation: How to resolve conflicts and get the best out of bargaining. Harvard University Press.
Robinson, R. J., Lewicki, R. J., & Donahue, E. M. (2000). Extending and testing a five factor model of ethical and unethical bargaining tactics: Introducing the SINS scale. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(6), 649–664.
Schweitzer, M. E., & Croson, R. (1999). Curtailing deception: The impact of direct questions on lies and omissions. International Journal of Conflict Management, 10(3), 225–248. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022825
Schweitzer, M. E., DeChurch, L. A., & Gibson, D. E. (2005). Conflict frames and the use of deception: Are competitive negotiators less ethical? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35(10), 2123–2149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02212.x
Shell, G. R. (1991). When is it legal to lie in negotiations? Sloan Management Review, 32, 93–101.
Spence, J. T. (1993). Gender-related traits and gender ideology: Evidence for a multifactorial theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(4), 624–635. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.624
Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. University of Texas Press.
Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Stapp, J. (1975). Ratings of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(1), 29–39.
Straub, P. G., & Murnighan, J. K. (1995). An experimental investigation of ultimatum games: Information, fairness, expectations, and lowest acceptable offers. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 27(3), 345–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(94)00072-M
Suar, D., & Gochhayat, J. (2016). Influence of biological sex and gender roles on ethicality. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(2), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2424-0
Thesaurus.com. (2020). Empathy. Synonyms and Antonyms of Words. Retrieved from https://www.thesaurus.com/browse/empathy?s=t
Thompson, L. (2015). The mind and heart of the negotiator (6th ed.). Pearson.
Trapnell, P. D., & Paulhus, D. L. (2011). Agentic and communal values: Their scope and measurement. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2011.627968
Trenholm, R. (2015). Revisiting 'Pirates of Silicon Valley', the original Steve Jobs movie. CNET News. https://www.cnet.com/news/revisiting-pirates-of-silicon-valley-the-original-steve-jobs-movie/
Van Vugt, M., De Cremer, D., & Janssen, D. P. (2007). Gender differences in cooperation and competition: The male-warrior hypothesis. Psychological Science, 18(1), 19–23.
Vesely, S. (2014). Ultimatum game with asymmetric information: A study of deception and fairness. Studia Psychologica, 56(1), 53–66.
Walters, A. E., Stuhlmacher, A. F., & Meyer, L. L. (1998). Gender and negotiator competitiveness: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2797
Ward, S. J., & King, L. A. (2018). Gender differences in emotion explain women’s lower immoral intentions and harsher moral condemnation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(5), 653–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217744525
Funding
This research was partially funded by FONDECYT (Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Cientifico y Tecnologico) Grant# 11121508 awarded to Jason R. Pierce from the Chilean National Commission for Scientific and Technological Research (CONICYT).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Jason R. Pierce declares that he has no conflict of interest related to this research. Leigh Thompson declares that she has no conflict of interest related to this research. We are extremely grateful to the Chilean National Commission for Scientific and Technological Research (CONICYT) for generous funding used to conduct this research. We also would like to thank Brittany Cassidy, Lunda Dunn-Jensen, and Nancy Pierce for their friendly reviews and feedback on previous versions of this manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix 1: Prompts Used in Experiment 1
Experimental Manipulation for Competitiveness-Inducing (Empathy-Inducing) Conditions.
Please tell us about someone* with whom you feel a great deal of competitiveness (empathy). By competitiveness (empathy), we mean that, in all situations, you view their wins as your losses (wins) and their losses as your wins (losses). As far as you are concerned, what is good for them is bad for you and what is bad for them is good for you (their joy is your joy and their pain is your pain).
Describe this person and why it is that you feel so competitive towards (so much empathy towards) them.
* You need not have a direct relationship with the other person (i.e., this could be a familiar stranger or a public figure).
Aggressive Negotiation Tactics Adapted from SINS Scale
-
1.
Make an opening demand that is far greater than what you really hope to settle for.
-
2.
Try to lead the other person to believe that they can only get what they want by negotiating with you, when in fact they could go elsewhere to get what they want cheaper or faster.
-
3.
Try to gain information about the other person's negotiating position through their social network (e.g., associates, family, friends, and so on).
-
4.
Exaggerate the attractiveness of your alternatives to making a deal with this person so it appears that you have more bargaining power than you actually do.
-
5.
Hide your real bottom line.
-
6.
Promise things that you know you cannot or will not deliver.
-
7.
Threaten to do something that would harm the other person if they do not give you what you want, even if you know you will never follow through on the threat.
-
8.
Intentionally misrepresent factual information in order to support your negotiating arguments or position.
Appendix 2: Prompts Used in Experiment 2
The Scenario
You own and manage a jewelry shop in your town. Like most jewelers, you make money by selling new and used jewelry items, including rings, necklaces, bracelets, and earrings. Unlike most jewelers, you have a side business helping people buy and sell rare coins. You started your rare coin business because you find them interesting and it provided you another way to put your expertise in precious metals to good use.
People who want to buy or sell rare coins often send you emails or text messages with pictures of and background information about them. Thanks to the high resolution of modern digital cameras, these pictures usually give you enough information to evaluate the coins with a high degree of confidence.
The Inquiry from Terry
Hi,
I recently found an old dime (10-cent coin) in the attic of my house. I have no idea if the dime is even legit let alone of any value, but heard it is probably worth between $50 and $200. Just in case, here’re pictures of both sides.
If you find a buyer, please let me know what you would get for it and how much you would take as your commission.
Also, I don’t like to haggle so please just give me a first-and-final offer.
Thanks,
Terry
[image of coin omitted]
The Client [Control/Competitiveness-Inducing/Empathy-Inducing]
Because your town is neither very large nor very small, you do business with about the same number of people you don’t know as you do know. In this case, you do not know Terry personally (and know nothing of Terry’s reputation/ but know of Terry’s reputation as the owner and operator of the largest and most profitable jewelry shop in town/ but know of Terry’s reputation as a well-respected senior citizen in your community). Indeed, you have (never heard from or of nor transacted business with Terry before and may never do so again/ heard how Terry brags about winning customers from you and other jewelers and dreams of putting you all out of business / heard heart-warming stories about how Terry often sells off personal belongings to purchase gifts for underprivileged children). For this reason, (your feelings about Terry are neutral/you feel very competitive toward Terry/ you feel a great deal of empathy toward Terry).
The Decision
As luck would have it, you already have a buyer looking for a dime like Terry’s to complete a set of early nineteenth century U.S. coins. The buyer has reviewed the pictures and offered you $150.00 for the dime.
It is time to decide how you would respond to the client's inquiry. As you make your decision, keep three things in mind:
-
1.
The client knows nothing about the buyer's offer, but expects an amount between $50 and $200.
-
2.
Because the client is unwilling to negotiate, you will lose the deal and both of you will get no money if your offer is rejected.
-
3.
There are no formal standards, but many people believe an even split (each gets half) of the sale price is fair in this situation.
Now please complete the following two messages to send to the client as you would if you were actually in this situation. Again, all your responses are anonymous and cannot be linked back to you personally so please indicate how you would complete the following two parts of the proposal:
-
1.
I have a buyer who is willing to pay $______ for your dime.
-
2.
I offer you $____ of the sale price. I will keep the rest as my commission.
Comprehension Check
Please confirm that you understood the instructions for the exercise you just completed by entering the correct responses below.
-
1.
What was the actual amount your buyer was willing to pay for the dime?
-
2.
If your client rejects your proposal, how much profit would you have received?
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pierce, J.R., Thompson, L. Feeling Competitiveness or Empathy Towards Negotiation Counterparts Mitigates Sex Differences in Lying. J Bus Ethics 178, 71–87 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04776-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04776-6