Skip to main content
Log in

Personalized Finite Element Analysis of an Endo-Exo Prosthetics System under Conditions of Osseointegration

  • Published:
Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope

A method for personalized analysis of the stress−strain curve of the endo-prosthetics subsystem of an endo-exo prosthetics system implanted into the femoral medullary canal is presented. The method is based on the analysis of CT scans. The results of test application of the method are presented. The goal of the study is to determine the reliability and the strength margin of the implant−bone system under conditions of osseointegration in a walking patient. The study has shown that the bone density is sufficiently high to meet the requirements for the endo-exo femur prosthesis; the strength margin of the bone is 11.5.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ziegler-Graham, K. et al., “Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050,” Arch. Phys. Med. Rehab., 89, No. 3, 422-429 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Thesleff, A. et al., “Biomechanical characterisation of bone-anchored implant systems for amputation limb prostheses: A systematic review,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 46, No. 3, 377-391 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sherman, R. A., “Utilization of prostheses among US veterans with traumatic amputation: A pilot survey,” J. Rehab. Res. Develop., 36, No. 2, 100-108 (1999).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hagberg, K. and Brånemark, R., “Consequences of nonvascular transfemoral amputation: A survey of quality of life, prosthetic use and problems,” Prosth. Orthot. Int., 25, No. 3, 186-194 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Legro, M. W. et al., “Issues of importance reported by persons with lower limb amputations and prostheses,” J. Rehab. Res. Develop., 36, No. 3, 155-163 (1999).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cowin, S. C. and He, Q. C., “Tensile and compressive stress yield criteria for cancellous bone,” J. Biomech., 38, No. 1, 141-144 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Carpenter, R. D., “Finite element analysis of the hip and spine based on quantitative computed tomography,” Curr. Osteopor. Rep., 11, No. 2, 156-162 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wolfram, U. et al., “Fabric-based Tsai-Wu yield criteria for vertebral trabecular bone in stress and strain space,” J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mat., 15, 218-228 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zysset, P. K. et al., “Finite element analysis for prediction of bone strength,” BoneKEy Reports, 2, 386 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hart, N. H. et al., “Mechanical basis of bone strength: Influence of bone material, bone structure and muscle action,” J. Musculoskelet. Neuronal Interact., 17, No. 3, 114 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Biewener, A. A., “Safety factors in bone strength,” Calcif. Tissue Int., 53, No. 1, 68-74 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. V. Sinegub.

Additional information

Translated from Meditsinskaya Tekhnika, Vol. 56, No. 1, Jan.-Feb., 2022, pp. 28-30.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sinegub, A.V., Lopota, A.V. & Suvorov, V.A. Personalized Finite Element Analysis of an Endo-Exo Prosthetics System under Conditions of Osseointegration. Biomed Eng 56, 40–43 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10527-022-10162-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10527-022-10162-x

Navigation