The indirect effect of nectar‑inhabiting yeasts on olfactory responses and longevity of two stink bug egg parasitoids

Adult parasitoids are well known to feed on sugar-rich resources such as floral nectar. Recently, an increasing body of evidence has shown that nectar is ubiquitously colonized by microorganisms and, as a consequence, microbial metabolic activity can affect several traits of floral nectar. Yet, how the fermentation of nectar by yeasts impacts the olfactory responses and performance of parasitoids is largely understudied, especially in the case of egg parasi-toids. In this study, we investigated whether fermentation by the nectar yeasts Metschnikowia gruessii and M. reukaufii affects the olfactory responses of Trissolcus basalis and Ooencyrtus telenomicida, two egg parasitoid species associated with the southern green stink bug Nezara viridula . We also investigated how yeast fermentation affects the longevity and survival of the egg parasitoids. Results of static four-chamber olfactometer tests showed that nectar fermented by M. gruessii (but not by M. reukaufii ) was attractive to both egg parasitoid species, whereas no significant yeast-mediated effects were found in terms of wasp longevity. Gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS) showed a clear separation of the volatile profiles among M. gruessii , M. reukaufii and non-fermented control nectar supporting the results of the insect bioassays. The


Introduction
In agroecosystems, flowers represent essential niches that are frequently visited by a multitude of insect species that play different ecological functions (pests and beneficials) (Olesen et al. 2007;Géneau et al. 2012;Vannette 2020).Hymenopteran parasitoids are among the common insect visitors of flowers because they largely feed on nectar as adults (Jervis et al. 1993).In fact, adult parasitoids depend highly on floral nectar to sustain their energetic requirements (Winkler et al. 2009;Sobhy et al. 2018), as nectars are rich in sugars, amino acids, vitamins, and essential minerals (Lievens et al. 2015).Highly energetically demanding activities, such as host location and oviposition, require a continuous provision of sugar-rich resources to support parasitoid fitness and enhance efficiency (Takasu and Lewis 1995;Araj et al. 2011;Nafziger and Fadamiro 2011).In agricultural landscapes, flowers can be scarce, and, therefore, resident parasitoids may be starved (van Rijn and Wäckers 2016;Sentil et al. 2022).Thus, it is a common practice in conservation biological control to incorporate non-crop flowering plants along peripheries or within crop rows in the field enabling easy-access floral nectar for the parasitoids (Foti et al. 2017;Kowalska et al. 2022).
Despite the clear importance of floral nectar from a biological control perspective, we still have a long way to go in order to fully understand floral nectar ecology (Colazza et al. 2023).Floral nectars are rich in resources, and thus they also represent alluring habitats for diverse microorganisms (Pozo et al. 2014;Lievens et al. 2015;Vannette 2020).Nectarinhabiting microbes are regarded as omnipresent colonizers of flowers, yet their role in conservation biological control is largely overlooked (Klaps et al. 2020).Nectar yeasts and bacteria are among the most frequently reported microbes that colonize floral nectars where they could grow into high densities (Herrera et al. 2009;Lievens et al. 2015).Nectar-inhabiting microbes generally modify various nectar traits including, but not limited to, the nectar volume ( Vannette and Fukami 2018), nectar acidity (Vannette et al. 2013), sugar or amino acid ratios and compositions (Herrera et al. 2008;de Vega and Herrera 2013; Vannette et al. 2013), or even the occurrence of secondary metabolites (Vannette and Fukami 2016) and shifts in nectar temperature (Herrera and Pozo 2010).Nectar microbes are also thought to influence the scent profile of flowers due to the production of microbial volatile organic compounds (mVOCs) emitted from the fermented nectar (Golonka et al. 2014;Rering et al. 2018;Sobhy et al. 2018;Cusumano et al. 2022a).All these microbe-mediated effects on flower nectar could alter the foraging behavior of insect parasitoids and also their performance (Sobhy et al. 2018).
To date, there are only a few studies that have illustrated how fermentation by nectar microbes affects the foraging behavior and performance of insect parasitoids.These studies have focused on yeasts of the ascomycete genus Metschnikowia which are specialist nectar-inhabiting microbes documented to be associated with nectar globally (Brysch-Herzberg 2004;de Vega et al. 2009;Pozo et al. 2011;Canto and Herrera 2012), and thus they are of particular interest when studying plant-parasitoid interactions.mVOCs from nectar fermented by M. gruessii and M. reukaufii were found to be attractive to Aphidius ervi, a generalist parasitoid of aphids (Sobhy et al. 2018(Sobhy et al. , 2019)).Also, fermentation by these nectar specialist yeasts enhanced adult parasitoid performance compared to the generalist yeast species isolated from floral nectar (Sobhy et al. 2018).However, our current knowledge on the role of microbial fermentation by nectar-inhabiting yeasts in plant-parasitoid interactions is restricted to only this case study with an aphid parasitoid species.Therefore, further research efforts must be conducted to generalize parasitoid responses to microbe-fermented nectar.
In order to start filling this gap, we investigated the indirect effects of fermentation by the nectar yeasts M. gruessii and M. reukaufii on the olfactory responses, longevity, and survival of two egg parasitoids, Trissolcus basalis and Ooencyrtus telenomicida, both of which are associated with eggs of the southern green stink bug, Nezara viridula.The southern green stink bug is a cosmopolitan pest species responsible for serious economic losses in a wide variety of vegetable crops.Trissolcus basalis is the main biological control agent of N. viridula worldwide, which co-occurs together with O. telenomicida in southern Italy (Peri et al. 2014).These two egg parasitoids are known to feed on floral nectar and engage in intrinsic and extrinsic interspecific competition for possession of host resources (Peri et al. 2011;Cusumano et al. 2022b).Interestingly, the two egg parasitoid species also display divergent nutritional needs because O. telenomicida performs concurrent host feeding while T. basalis does not (Cusumano et al. 2015).Such behavior, which consists of feeding on host resources before laying an egg (Jervis and Kidd 1986), is displayed by some parasitoid species like O. telenomicida, which produce yolk-rich eggs and are expected to have high nutritional demands, particularly in terms of proteins necessary for egg development and maturation (Cusumano et al. 2015).Thus, we could hypothesize that these two stink bug egg parasitoids would have different responses toward yeast-fermented nectar.
To shed light on whether microbial fermentation by the nectar yeasts M. gruessii and M. reukaufii mediates preference behaviors and performances of egg parasitoids of insect pests, we produced synthetic nectar, inoculated with the individual yeast species, and underwent fermentation.Following removal of the yeast cells, we conducted a two-choice bioassay to assess the indirect yeastmediated effects on the olfactory responses of the egg parasitoids when exposed simultaneously to yeast-fermented synthetic nectar and unfermented, non-inoculated control nectar.We also carried out a no-choice feeding bioassay to investigate whether consuming yeast-fermented synthetic nectar impacted the longevity and survival of the two stink bug egg parasitoids.The results of these experiments provide an assessment of the impact that microbial fermentation by specialist yeasts may have on the nectar selection behavior and fitness of stink bug egg parasitoids with potential application for biological control of insect pests.
Parasitoids.The egg parasitoids Trissolcus basalis (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) and Ooencyrtus telenomicida (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) were reared on egg masses of the southern green stink bug, Nezara viridula (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae).Southern green stink bug populations were initially established from field-collected adults throughout Palermo, Sicily, Italy (38°03′57″N, 13°28′10″E).Colonies were maintained in insect netted cages (47.5 × 47.5 × 47.5 cm, BugDorm-44545 Meg-aView Science Co. Ltd, Taichung, Taiwan) inside an experimental chamber (24 ± 2 °C, 70 ± 5% RH, and a L:D 16:8 photoperiod).Nymphs of different instars and adults were reared in separate cages.Fresh seasonal vegetables supplemented with sunflower/soybean seeds were provided ad libitum, and replenished every 2-3 days.Water dispensers in Petri dishes with cotton pads were also provided and crumpled or stripped tissue papers were either hung or scattered inside the adult cages to serve as the substrate for oviposition.The presence of eggs was checked every 2-3 days and collected when present for the maintenance of the stink bug population and the egg parasitoids.
Egg masses of N. viridula were individually exposed to five females of T. basalis or O. telenomicida for two days.Then, parasitized egg masses were isolated and incubated in 55 ml glass tubes (25 × 150 mm) closed with cotton plugs until parasitoid emergence.Drops of diluted organic honey (proportion honey:water 80:20 v:v) on parafilm were used to feed the parasitoids.Female egg parasitoids used in the olfactometer bioassay were between two and five days old and considered naïve (i.e., with no prior exposure to synthetic nectar odors).Female egg parasitoids used for the longevity and survival bioassays were newly emerged (≈ 24 h old) and fed only with water.

Inoculation and fermentation of synthetic nectar
To produce yeast-fermented synthetic nectar (referred to as 'YFSN' hereafter), synthetic nectar solutions were inoculated with either of the nectar yeasts, M. gruessii or M. reukaufii.We used synthetic nectar that mimicked the composition of many natural nectars and was produced by mixing sucrose and casamino acid, as described by Vannette and Fukami (2014).Specifically, synthetic nectar was prepared by mixing filter sterilized 50% w/v sucrose solution (Carlo Erba Reagents S.A.S., Val-de-Reuil, France) and 3.16 mM casamino acid (OmniPur, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) (Vannette and Fukami 2014).
For the inoculation and fermentation of synthetic nectar, following the procedures described in Sobhy et al. (2018), yeast isolates were streaked on YPDA (Yeast Potato Dextrose Agar) and incubated for two days at 25 °C.Next, a single colony was inoculated in 10 ml YPDB (Yeast Potato Dextrose Broth) in a sterile 50 ml conical centrifuge tube and incubated overnight in a rotary shaker (150 rpm) with a temperature set at 25 °C.Then, cultures were washed twice with sterile physiological water (sodium chloride solution 0.9%) and suspended in the same buffer to obtain an optical density of 1 (OD600).Twenty milliliters of sterile synthetic nectar in 50 ml centrifuge tubes were then inoculated with 100 µl of cell suspension of either yeast strain and subjected to static incubation at 25 °C for five days.The incubation period was based on the approximate floral lifespan of many plant species (Peay et al. 2012;Vannette and Fukami 2014;Lenaerts et al. 2016Lenaerts et al. , 2017)).Non-inoculated sterile synthetic nectar was also included during the fermentation to represent the control treatment.After fermentation, YFSN and the control were centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 15 min and filtered using a 0.20-µm syringe filter to obtain cell-free cultures.Aliquots of filtered YFSN were streaked on YPDA to check potential yeast growth or contamination.Cell-free YFSN was then aliquoted to 1 ml amber glass vials and stored at − 80 °C until the subsequent bioassays.The freezing method is regarded to have no adverse effects on the general chemistry and quality of the YFSN (Peay et al. 2012).

Impact of yeast-fermented nectars on parasitoid olfactory responses
A static olfactometer with four equally divided chambers was used to assess the olfactory response behavior of the egg parasitoids toward the YFSN.The olfactometer was made of acrylic glass formed into a cylinder-shaped enclosure with a height of 4.5 cm and 20 cm in diameter, as described by Steidle and Schoeller (1997).The static four-chamber olfactometer was fitted with a removable gauze cover (0.5 mm mesh) supported by an acrylic glass rim (0.9 mm high), which served as a walking arena for the insects.A netted lid was also laid on the top of the olfactometer to prevent the insects from escaping while ensuring vertical diffusion of odor in order to prevent saturation of volatiles inside the chamber.Two hundred µl of either test solution (YFSN, fermented by either M. gruessii or M. reukaufii) or control solution (non-fermented synthetic nectar) was pipetted on a filter paper disc (3.8 cm diameter, Whatman No. 1) placed in a Petri dish.The same test treatments were placed in two diagonal olfactometer chambers, while the other two chambers were for the control.About 24 h before performing the bioassays, female parasitoids were individually put in small vials (1.5 × 5.0 cm) without food to induce starvation.One insect was released in the center of the walking arena in every run, and the insect was given one minute to be acclimatized.After that, the insect olfactory response was evaluated, and the residence time spent in each chamber was recorded for 5 min with the aid of a video camera (Logitech C920 HD Pro Webcam) using JWatcher V 0.9 software (https:// www.jwatc her.ucla.edu/).In each assay, 40 naïve female parasitoids for each species were used, and each of them was only used once and assigned as one independent replicate.The olfactometer was rotated quarterly after one replication to avoid positional bias.The filter paper disc with synthetic nectar was replaced with every replicate.After each bioassay, the olfactometer was cleaned with 90% ethyl alcohol and tap water and left overnight to dry up at room temperature.The experiment was performed in a rack covered with a black curtain with a white fluorescent lamp (Philips, TLD 58 W/640) situated approximately 0.5 m just above the center of the static four-chamber olfactometer.Windows in the olfactometer room were also covered with cardboard to eliminate any visual bias due to light coming from the outside.The experiments were carried out between 09h00 and 17h00 with a room temperature maintained at 21 ± 5 °C and 50 ± 10% RH.

Impact of yeast-fermented nectars on parasitoid longevity and survival
To determine whether the changes in synthetic nectar due to microbial fermentation affect parasitoid fitness, a longevity and survival bioassay was carried out.Longevity was considered as the length of time that the adult parasitoid lived from emergence up until the point of death, while survival was considered as the percentage of parasitoid individuals that are still alive in a given time after being exposed or fed on the different synthetic nectars.Egg parasitoids were isolated individually in 5 ml glass vials.Drops of YFSN (fermented by M. gruessii or M. reukaufii) were provided ad libitum at the glass vial's side and regularly replenished.As a comparison, unfermented synthetic nectar was included in the experiment, while water was included as a negative control.The bioassay was conducted at 24 ± 2 °C, 70 ± 5% RH, and a L:D16:8 photoperiod.For each treatment, 15 mated female parasitoids were used.Dead insects were scored daily, and the experiments were concluded when all insects had died.

Chemical analysis of yeast-fermented nectars
To assess whether yeast fermentation affected the VOC profiles, nectars were analyzed by headspace solid phase micro extraction gas chromatography followed by mass spectrometry detection (HS--SPME-GC-MS) as described previously (Goelen et al. 2020).Briefly, GC-MS analyses were performed with a Thermo Trace 1300 GC system equipped with a MXT-5 column (30 m length × 0.18 mm inner diameter × 0.18 μm film thickness; Restek Bellefonte, Pennsylvania, USA) and compounds were subsequently detected by a ISQ mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific).The HS-SPME volatile collection was conducted using a 50/30 μm DVB/CAR/PDMS coating fiber (Supelco, Bellefonte, Pennsylvania, USA).After five min of equilibration, the SPME fiber was exposed to the headspace sample for 30 min.Splitless injection was used with an inlet temperature of 320 °C, a split flow of 9 ml min -1 , a purge flow of 5 ml min -1 and an open valve time of 3 min.To obtain a pulsed injection, a programmed gas flow was used whereby the helium gas flow was set at 2.7 ml min -1 for 0.1 min, followed by a decrease in flow of 20 ml min -1 to the normal 0.9 ml min -1 .The GC oven was programmed as follows: the temperature was initiated at 30 °C, held for 3 min and then raised to 80 °C at 7 °C min -1 .Next, the temperature was raised to 125 °C at 2 °C min -1 , and finally the temperature was raised to 270 °C at 8 °C min -1 for 15 min to thermally desorb the compounds that were trapped on the fiber in the injection port of the chromatograph.Mass spectra were recorded in centroid mode using a mass acquisition range of 33-550 atomic mass units, a scan rate of 5 scans s -1 and an electron impact ionization energy of 70 eV.A mix of linear n-alkanes (from C7 to C23; Supelco) was injected into the GC-MS under identical conditions to serve as external retention index markers.Compounds were identified and quantified as described in Reher et al. (2019).Chromatograms were analyzed with AMDIS 32 to deconvolute overlapping peaks.Obtained spectra were subsequently annotated using the NIST MS Search v2.0 g software, using the NIST2011, FFNSC and Adams libraries.Peak areas were compared to the background signal, which was identified by running a GC-MS with a sample obtained from demineralized water.The background signal was then subtracted from the peak areas of the corresponding tentatively identified compounds.When the difference in peak area fell below a set threshold of 1,000, compounds were eliminated from further analysis.To further extract and integrate the compound elution profiles, a file was used with all our target compounds containing the expected retention times and spectrum profiles.Extraction was performed for every compound in every chromatogram over a time-restricted window using weighted non-negative least square analysis (Lawson and Hanson 1995), and for every compound, the peak areas were computed from the extracted profiles.

Statistical analysis
Olfactometer, longevity and survival data were analyzed with the R software, version R 4.1.3(R Core Team 2022).Initially, the normality assumption of the data on parasitoid residence time above the static olfactometer chambers was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test.The analysis revealed that the normality assumption was not violated (p > 0.05).Consequently, a parametric analysis was performed using a t-test for dependent samples.
Longevity data were analyzed using Generalized Linear Models (GLMs), fitting a gamma error distribution and a reciprocal link function (Crawley 2007).Tukey's test was used for post-hoc comparisons of means, given that means among different treatments were significantly different.The survival of the adult egg parasitoids fed on the different nectars was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier estimator with the log-rank test of the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure for pairwise comparisons.Consequently, survival probability curves were generated for both egg parasitoids.
Multivariate data analysis (Principal Component Analysis-PCA) was used to analyze peak areas of the VOCs detected.Therefore, peak areas were first log-transformed, mean-centered and subsequently scaled to unit variance before they were subjected to the analysis using MetaboAnalyst (Xia et al. 2009).The results of the analysis were visualized in score plots, which reveal the sample structure according to model components, and loading plots, which display the contribution of the variables to these components.

Impact of yeast-fermented nectars on parasitoid longevity and survival
When testing the effects of the different YFSNs, nonfermented synthetic nectar and water (control) on the longevity of T. basalis, only water had a statistically significant effect among all treatments (F = 112.25,df = 3,56 p < 0.001) (Fig. 2a).Parasitoids provided only with water died after 3-5 days.No differences were found when wasps were fed with unfermented synthetic nectar compared with wasps fed with synthetic nectar fermented by the two Metschnikowia strains.Longevity of wasps was above 90 days in the three treatments.The same pattern was found for the survival curves of T. basalis (χ 2 = 78.1,df = 3, p < 0.0001) (Fig. 2b).Likewise, only the water treatment had a significant effect on the longevity of O. telenomicida when compared with the synthetic nectars (F = 72.064,df = 3,56 p < 0.001).No differences were detected between parasitoid wasps fed on synthetic nectar fermented by the two Metschnikowia strains and wasps fed on unfermented synthetic nectar (Fig. 3a).The same trend was found for the survival curves of O. telenomicida (χ 2 = 70.4,df = 3, p < 0.0001) (Fig. 3b).

Discussion
In this study, we investigated the indirect effect of two nectar specialist yeasts in the genus Metschnikowia on the olfactory responses and longevity and survival of two egg parasitoids, T. basalis and O. telenomicida.Results revealed that both parasitoids responded positively to the odors of the synthetic nectars fermented by the yeast M. gruessii, while no significant differences were found in the case of M. reukaufii in the two-choice bioassays.Despite the differential Interestingly, it has been demonstrated that a variety of insects prefer flowers colonized by

See Table 1 for the full list of compound IDs
The indirect effect of nectar-inhabiting yeasts on olfactory responses and longevity of two… Metschnikowia yeasts and that they forage and remove more nectar from yeast-colonized flowers than from uncolonized flowers (Herrera et al. 2013;Schaeffer et al. 2014;Schaeffer and Irwin 2014;2017).Specialized nectar microbes, such as Metschnikowia yeasts, are thought to alter nectar traits to lure flower-visiting insects, which then serve as vectors for fungal dispersion to new environments (Christiaens et al. 2014;Rering et al. 2018).So far, it is only widely known that nectar-inhabiting yeasts attract pollinators (Pozo et al. 2014), but interestingly, a few recent studies also suggest that carnivorous insects are similarly attracted to the volatiles emitted by specialist yeasts.In fact, we found that synthetic nectar fermented by M. gruessii attracted both T. basalis and O. telenomicida, and the mVOCs from the same Metschnikowia strains were also found to attract the aphid parasitoid A. ervi (Sobhy et al. 2018(Sobhy et al. , 2019)).The fact that only fermentation by M. gruessii (but not M. reukaufii) elicited a behavioral response in both egg parasitoids suggests that the nectar odors between the two closely related yeasts would be different although it is not clear, from an evolutionary perspective, why the egg parasitoids displayed such preferences.The GC-MS analyses showed that nectar fermentation strongly affected the chemical composition of the nectar odors and the PCA clearly separated the two different yeast treatments, corroborating our findings in the olfactometer.According to the PCA model, the compounds that are mostly responsible for the chemical differences are ethyl-(E)-cinnamate, 2-butanone, 3-methyl-2-hexanol, propyl acetate and pentyl-octanoate.Further experiments with the aid of synthetic standards are required to confirm the role of these compounds in mediating egg parasitoid attraction towards odors from yeast-fermented nectars.
Up to now, it is not clear how microbes affect the nectar quality for parasitoids (Cusumano and Lievens 2023).On one hand, it is reasonable to assume that microbial fermentation may remove, or reduce the amount of key sugars/amino acids (Vannette and Fukami 2018) and thus reduce nectar quality for parasitoids (Colazza et al. 2023).On the other hand, microbial fermentation cannot simply be considered a mere removal of key sugars/amino acids because microbes can also produce compounds, including vitamins, in the nectar media, and there are studies showing that microbial fermentation can positively affect parasitoid longevity (Lenaerts et al. 2017).Our study supports the latter hypothesis since we found that fermentation by Metschnikowia spp.did not reduce the longevity and survival of T. basalis and O. telenomicida compared with unfermented synthetic nectar.
Surprisingly, the two egg parasitoid species performed in a way contrary to our expectations, despite their differential dietary requirements.Given that female O. telenomicida must produce yolk-rich eggs and therefore have high protein requirements (Cusumano et al. 2015), we hypothesized that O. telenomicida females would perform poorly when fed on YFSN.However, results revealed otherwise, suggesting that yeast fermentation could yield nectar that is capable of fulfilling diverse nutritional needs across parasitoid species.It is worth noting that our study aimed at assessing the indirect effects that microbial fermentation per se may have on egg parasitoids.Future research efforts should a Values on the table are means of absolute peak areas (× 10 9 ) ± SE of three biological replicates (n = 3) of synthetic nectars fermented by two nectar specialist yeasts (M.g.Metschnikowia gruessii; M.r.; M. reukaufii) or unfermented control (Cont.).Volatile organic compound(s) in each chemical class are ordered in accordance with their increasing retention time (RT) in a gas chromatograph.VOCs were tentatively identified based on spectra, Kovats retention index, and NIST 17 library matches.ND: not detected The indirect effect of nectar-inhabiting yeasts on olfactory responses and longevity of two… be directed towards understanding the role played by the yeast cells themselves since microbes may have a direct contribution to insect nutrition and well-being (Crotti et al. 2009;Sobhy et al. 2018).This could be particularly important in the case of O. telenomicida which requires more protein and microbes can act as an additional protein source to floral visitors.
Our results corroborate the findings of previous reports, showing that nectar specialist yeasts are unlikely to affect the performance of floral visitors and may provide honest signals for food resource location.For example, A. ervi parasitoids fed on synthetic nectar fermented by M. gruessii and M. reukaufii did not reduce their longevity and survival compared with unfermented synthetic nectar (Sobhy et al. 2018).While we found no effects of yeast fermentation on the longevity and survival of egg parasitoids, we cannot exclude that other fitness-related traits, such as egg-laying capacity, can be negatively affected, because there are parasitoid species that may require more proteins for egg development, such as the O. telenomicida.Although it has been reported that M. reukaufii did not negatively affect egg laying and the number of eggs produced by pollinators (Schaeffer et al. 2017), to date, no studies have looked at the effect of microbial fermentation on the reproductive capacity of egg parasitoid species.
In summary, we have demonstrated that fermentation by nectar yeasts can positively influence the olfaction of two stink bug egg parasitoids without any detectable negative effect on their longevity and survival.Our findings indicate that specialist nectar yeasts hold the potential to develop ecological strategies that can attract parasitoids in the field or help in locating high-quality resources through honest microbial signaling which could lead to improved parasitoid fitness and effectiveness in pest control.However, in order to fully understand the potential applications that nectarinhabiting microbes such as Metschnikowia spp.may have for biological control, future research should be carried out to evaluate not only the indirect effects due to microbial fermentation, but also the direct effects due to microbial cells naturally thriving in floral nectar.Once both direct and indirect effects on parasitoids will be unraveled, we believe that microbe-mediated approaches targeting floral nectar could represent additional tools that biological control practitioners may use to improve insect pest management programs based on conservation biological control.Jay Darryl L. Ermio is a PhD student at the Department of Mediterranean Agro-Food and Forestry Systems, University of Palermo, Italy.His doctoral project focuses on the role of nectar-inhabiting microbes for biocontrol agents in the context of conservation biological control.
Ezio Peri is a professor in agricultural entomology at University of Palermo, Italy.His research focuses on the behavioral and chemical ecology of insect egg parasitoids in multitrophic systems.Over the last few years, his research interests are also in the fields of the chemical ecology and biological control of stored product insect pests.
Patrizia Bella is an associate professor of plant pathology at University of Palermo, Italy, and her research activity is focused on diversity of plant pathogens and development and application of innovative methods for sustainable management of plant biotic stresses.
Michael Rostás is a professor in agricultural entomology at the University of Göttingen, Germany.His research focuses on the chemical ecology of multitrophic interactions in arable cropping systems.He studies how plant-fungus associations affect beneficial and pest insects in the context of classical, augmentative and conservation biological control.
Islam S. Sobhy is currently a lecturer in plant ecology at Cardiff University, UK.His research interests are in the fields of applied plant biology, chemical ecology of plant-microbeinsect interactions, and exploitation of induced plant defense for crop protection.
Tom Wenseleers is professor in biology at KU Leuven, where he leads the Laboratory of Socioecology and Social Evolution.His current research mainly revolves around the study of chemical communication systems in social insects (ants, bees and wasps) and the factors that drive their social behaviour.Over the last few years, a particular focus has been the study of social insect queen pheromones and identification of compounds that stop social insect workers from reproducing, but he also has more applied lines of research focusing e.g. on the use of semiochemicals for the integrated management of pest insects.
Stefano Colazza is a professor in agricultural entomology at University of Palermo, Italy.He has research experience in biological control of insect pests, chemical ecology and behavioral ecology of insect parasitoids in a multitrophic context, ecology of infochemical use in foraging behavior of egg parasitoids.
Bart Lievens is a professor at KU Leuven, Belgium, working on the role of microbes in plant-insect interactions and in the multi-trophic interactions that occur between plants, herbivores, natural enemies and secondary natural enemies Vol:.(1234567890) (hyperparasitoids) aiming to understand and predict how microorganisms influence interactions between plants and insects and among insects.Ultimately, this knowledge aids in enhancing plant pollination and advancing biological pest control strategies.
Antonino Cusumano is an associate professor of entomology at the University of Palermo, Italy, with research experience on plant-insect-microbe interactions, chemical ecology of parasitoids (and hyperparasitoids) and biological pest control.

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Olfactory responses of the female egg parasitoids a Trissolcus basalis and b Ooencyrtus telenomicida assessed in terms of residence time in two-choice assays over an observation time of 300 s.Test treatments represent synthetic nectars fermented by the yeasts Metschnikowia gruessii (black bars)

Fig. 2 a
Fig. 2 a Boxplot illustrating the distribution of longevity for the adult female egg parasitoid Trissolcus basalis fed on synthetic nectar fermented by Metschnikowia gruessii (M.g.), synthetic nectar fermented by Metschnikowia reukaufii (M.r.), unfermented/uninoculated synthetic nectar (SN, reference) and water (negative control).The box represents the interquartile range (IQR), with the median indicated by the bolded hori-

Fig. 3 aFig. 4
Fig. 3 a Boxplot illustrating the distribution of longevity for the adult female egg parasitoid Ooencyrtus telenomicida fed on synthetic nectar fermented by Metschnikowia gruessii (M.g.), synthetic nectar fermented by Metschnikowia reukaufii (M.r.), unfermented/uninoculated synthetic nectar (SN, reference) and water (negative control).The box represents the interquartile range (IQR), with the median indicated by the bolded horizontal line inside the box.Whiskers extend to the minimum