Skip to main content
Log in

Ambient vibration testing and seismic behavior of historical arch bridges under near and far fault ground motions

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of near and far fault ground motion on the seismic behavior of historical arch bridges through a combined numerical and experimental evaluation. The approach undertaken begins with finite element modeling of the arch bridge and identification of the most significant vibration modes of the bridge through ambient vibration testing. Uncertain parameters of the finite element model are then revised through systematic comparisons of the measured vibration models to those that are predicted by the model. The revised finite element model is used to predict the time history response for displacements and stresses through which the effect of the finite element model updating on model predictions are evaluated. Furthermore, displacements and stresses obtained considering both near and far fault ground motions are then compared. Results indicate that near fault ground motion imposes higher seismic demand on the arch bridge observed in both higher displacements and stresses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adanur S, Altunisik AC, Bayraktar A, Akkose M (2012) Comparison of near-fault and far-fault ground motion effects on geometrically nonlinear earthquake behavior of suspension bridges. Nat Hazards 64:593–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ANSYS (2014), Swanson Analysis System, USA

  • Atamturktur S, Laman J (2012) Finite element model correlation and calibration of historic monuments: review. J Struct Design Tall Spec Build 21(2):96–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atamturktur S, Sevim B (2011) Seismic performance assessment of masonry tile domes through non-linear finite element analysis. J Perform Constr Facil 26(4):410–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atamturktur S, Pavic A, Reynolds P, Boothby T (2009) Full-scale modal testing of vaulted gothic churches: lessons learned. J Exp Tech 33(4):65–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atamturktur S, Fanning P, Boothby T (2010) Traditional and operational modal testing of masonry vaults. ICE Eng Comput Mech 163(3):213–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bathe KJ (1996) Finite element procedures in engineering analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayraktar A, Altunisik AC, Turker T, Sevim B (2007) The model updating of historical masonry bridges using operational modal analysis method. In: Proceedings of the 1st national conference reinforcement and transfer into the future of historical structures, Ankara, Turkey, 429–440

  • Bayraktar A, Altunışık AC, Sevim B, Türker T, Domaniç A, Taş Y (2009a) Vibration characteristics of Kömürhan highway bridge constructed with balanced cantilever method. J Perform Constr Facil 23(2):90–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayraktar A, Altunışık AC, Sevim B, Kartal ME, Türker T, Bilici Y (2009b) Comparison of near and far fault ground motion effects on the nonlinear response of dam–reservoir–foundation systems. Nonlinear Dyn 58(4):655–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendat J, Piersol A (1986) Random data: analysis and measurement procedures, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bensalem A, Fairfield CA, Sibbald A (1998) Damping effects on the NDT of soil backfilled arch bridges. J Br Inst NDT 40(2):107–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Brencich A, Sabia D (2008) Experimental identification of a multi-span masonry bridge: the Tanaro Bridge. Constr Build Mater 22(10):2087–2099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brincker R, Zhang L, Andersen P (2000) Modal identification from ambient responses using frequency domain decomposition. In: 18th international modal analysis conference, San Antonio, TX, vol 4062(2), pp 625–630

  • Brown A, Saiidi MS (2011) Investigation of effect of near-fault motions on substandard bridge structures. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 10(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caetano E (2000) Dynamic of cable-stayed bridges: experimental assessment of cable-structure interaction, PhD Thesis. Engineering Faculty of University of Porto, Portugal

  • Choi H (2007) Effects of near-fault ground motion and fault-rupture on the seismic response of reinforced concrete bridges, PhD Thesis, University of Nevada, Reno

  • Chopra AK, Chintanapakdee C (2001) Comparing response of SDF systems to near-fault and far-fault earthquake motions in the context of spectral regions. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 30:1769–1789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreger D, Hurtado G, Chopra A, Larsen S (2007) Near-fault seismic ground motions. EERC 2007-033 Report, University of California, Berkeley

  • Fanning PJ, Boothby TE (2001) Three-dimensional modelling and full-scale testing of stone arch bridges. Comput Struct 79(29):2645–2662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frunzio G, Monaco M, Gesualdo A (2001) 3D FEM analysis of a roman arch bridge. Hist Constr 591–598

  • Gentile C (2006) Ambient vibration-based model updating of similar R. C. arch bridges, Conference: 2006 IMAC-XXIV: conference and exposition on structural dynamics, St. Louis, Missouri

  • Jia JF, Ou JP (2008) Seismic analyses of long-span cable-stayed bridges subjected to near-fault pulse-type ground motions. In: 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China

  • Li T, Atamturktur S (2014) fidelity and robustness of detailed micromodeling, simplified micromodeling and macromodeling techniques for a masonry dome. J Perform Constr Facil 28(3):480–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ling-Kun CL, Li-Zhong J, Wei G, Wen-Shuo L, Zhi-Ping Z, Ge-Wei C (2004) The seismic response of high-speed railway bridges subjected to near-fault forward directivity ground motions using a vehicle-track-bridge element. Shock Vib. doi:10.1155/2014/985602

    Google Scholar 

  • OMA (2006) Release 4.0. Structural Vibration Solution A/S, Denmark

  • Orozco GL, Ashford SA (2002) Effects of large velocity pulses on reinforced concrete bridge columns, PEER Report 2002/23. University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • PEER (Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Centre) (2014). http://peer.berkeley.edu/smcat/data

  • Peeters B (2000) System identification and damage detection in civil engineering, PhD thesis. KU Leuven, Belgium

  • Prabhu S, Atamturktur S, Brosnan D, Dorrance R, Messier P (2014) Foundation settlement analysis of fort Sumter National Monument: model development and predictive assessment. Eng Struct 65:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PULSE (2006) Analyzers and Solutions, Release 11.2., Bruel and Kjaer, sound and vibration measurement A/S, Denmark

  • Ramos JLFS (2007) Damage identification on masonry structures based on vibration signatures, PhD thesis, University of Minho, Portugal

  • Ribeiro D, Calçada R, Delgado R, Brehm M, Zabel V (2012) Finite element model updating of a bowstring-arch railway bridge based on experimental modal parameters. Eng Struct 40:413–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez O (2012) Bridge design for earthquake fault crossings: synthesis of design issues and strategies, California Polytechnic State University, MSc thesis. San Luis Obispo

  • Sarhosis V, Oliveira DV, Lemos JV, Lourenco PB (2014) The effect of skew angle on the mechanical behaviour of masonry arches. Mech Res Commun 61:53–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sevim B, Bayraktar A, Altunışık AC, Atamtürktür S, Birinci F (2011) Assessment of nonlinear seismic performance of a restored historical arch bridge using ambient vibrations. Nonlinear Dyn 63(4):755–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somerville PG, Smith NF, Graves RW, Abrahamson NA (1997) Modification of empirical strong ground motion attenuation relations to include the amplitude and duration effects of rupture directivity. Seismic Res Lett 68:199–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toker S, Unay AI (2004) Mathematical modelling and finite element analysis of masonry arch bridges. J Sci Gazi Univ 17(2):129–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Ural A (2005) Finite element analysis of historical arch bridge. International Earthquake Symposium, Kocaeli, pp 408–413

    Google Scholar 

  • WSTC (2007) Dynamic response of bridges to near-fault, forward directivity ground motions, Washington state transportation center (TRAC), Research Report, Washington State University

  • Zordan T, Briseghella B, Liu T (2014) Finite element model updating of a tied-arch bridge using Douglas-Reid method and Rosenbrock optimization algorithm. J Traffic Transp Eng 1(4):280–292

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the TUBITAK and Karadeniz Technical University under Research Grant Nos. 106M038 and 2005.112.001.1, respectively.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barış Sevim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sevim, B., Atamturktur, S., Altunişik, A.C. et al. Ambient vibration testing and seismic behavior of historical arch bridges under near and far fault ground motions. Bull Earthquake Eng 14, 241–259 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9810-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9810-6

Keywords

Navigation