Abstract
This study investigates the effects of near and far fault ground motion on the seismic behavior of historical arch bridges through a combined numerical and experimental evaluation. The approach undertaken begins with finite element modeling of the arch bridge and identification of the most significant vibration modes of the bridge through ambient vibration testing. Uncertain parameters of the finite element model are then revised through systematic comparisons of the measured vibration models to those that are predicted by the model. The revised finite element model is used to predict the time history response for displacements and stresses through which the effect of the finite element model updating on model predictions are evaluated. Furthermore, displacements and stresses obtained considering both near and far fault ground motions are then compared. Results indicate that near fault ground motion imposes higher seismic demand on the arch bridge observed in both higher displacements and stresses.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adanur S, Altunisik AC, Bayraktar A, Akkose M (2012) Comparison of near-fault and far-fault ground motion effects on geometrically nonlinear earthquake behavior of suspension bridges. Nat Hazards 64:593–614
ANSYS (2014), Swanson Analysis System, USA
Atamturktur S, Laman J (2012) Finite element model correlation and calibration of historic monuments: review. J Struct Design Tall Spec Build 21(2):96–113
Atamturktur S, Sevim B (2011) Seismic performance assessment of masonry tile domes through non-linear finite element analysis. J Perform Constr Facil 26(4):410–423
Atamturktur S, Pavic A, Reynolds P, Boothby T (2009) Full-scale modal testing of vaulted gothic churches: lessons learned. J Exp Tech 33(4):65–74
Atamturktur S, Fanning P, Boothby T (2010) Traditional and operational modal testing of masonry vaults. ICE Eng Comput Mech 163(3):213–223
Bathe KJ (1996) Finite element procedures in engineering analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Bayraktar A, Altunisik AC, Turker T, Sevim B (2007) The model updating of historical masonry bridges using operational modal analysis method. In: Proceedings of the 1st national conference reinforcement and transfer into the future of historical structures, Ankara, Turkey, 429–440
Bayraktar A, Altunışık AC, Sevim B, Türker T, Domaniç A, Taş Y (2009a) Vibration characteristics of Kömürhan highway bridge constructed with balanced cantilever method. J Perform Constr Facil 23(2):90–99
Bayraktar A, Altunışık AC, Sevim B, Kartal ME, Türker T, Bilici Y (2009b) Comparison of near and far fault ground motion effects on the nonlinear response of dam–reservoir–foundation systems. Nonlinear Dyn 58(4):655–673
Bendat J, Piersol A (1986) Random data: analysis and measurement procedures, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
Bensalem A, Fairfield CA, Sibbald A (1998) Damping effects on the NDT of soil backfilled arch bridges. J Br Inst NDT 40(2):107–116
Brencich A, Sabia D (2008) Experimental identification of a multi-span masonry bridge: the Tanaro Bridge. Constr Build Mater 22(10):2087–2099
Brincker R, Zhang L, Andersen P (2000) Modal identification from ambient responses using frequency domain decomposition. In: 18th international modal analysis conference, San Antonio, TX, vol 4062(2), pp 625–630
Brown A, Saiidi MS (2011) Investigation of effect of near-fault motions on substandard bridge structures. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 10(1):1–11
Caetano E (2000) Dynamic of cable-stayed bridges: experimental assessment of cable-structure interaction, PhD Thesis. Engineering Faculty of University of Porto, Portugal
Choi H (2007) Effects of near-fault ground motion and fault-rupture on the seismic response of reinforced concrete bridges, PhD Thesis, University of Nevada, Reno
Chopra AK, Chintanapakdee C (2001) Comparing response of SDF systems to near-fault and far-fault earthquake motions in the context of spectral regions. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 30:1769–1789
Dreger D, Hurtado G, Chopra A, Larsen S (2007) Near-fault seismic ground motions. EERC 2007-033 Report, University of California, Berkeley
Fanning PJ, Boothby TE (2001) Three-dimensional modelling and full-scale testing of stone arch bridges. Comput Struct 79(29):2645–2662
Frunzio G, Monaco M, Gesualdo A (2001) 3D FEM analysis of a roman arch bridge. Hist Constr 591–598
Gentile C (2006) Ambient vibration-based model updating of similar R. C. arch bridges, Conference: 2006 IMAC-XXIV: conference and exposition on structural dynamics, St. Louis, Missouri
Jia JF, Ou JP (2008) Seismic analyses of long-span cable-stayed bridges subjected to near-fault pulse-type ground motions. In: 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China
Li T, Atamturktur S (2014) fidelity and robustness of detailed micromodeling, simplified micromodeling and macromodeling techniques for a masonry dome. J Perform Constr Facil 28(3):480–490
Ling-Kun CL, Li-Zhong J, Wei G, Wen-Shuo L, Zhi-Ping Z, Ge-Wei C (2004) The seismic response of high-speed railway bridges subjected to near-fault forward directivity ground motions using a vehicle-track-bridge element. Shock Vib. doi:10.1155/2014/985602
OMA (2006) Release 4.0. Structural Vibration Solution A/S, Denmark
Orozco GL, Ashford SA (2002) Effects of large velocity pulses on reinforced concrete bridge columns, PEER Report 2002/23. University of California, Berkeley
PEER (Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Centre) (2014). http://peer.berkeley.edu/smcat/data
Peeters B (2000) System identification and damage detection in civil engineering, PhD thesis. KU Leuven, Belgium
Prabhu S, Atamturktur S, Brosnan D, Dorrance R, Messier P (2014) Foundation settlement analysis of fort Sumter National Monument: model development and predictive assessment. Eng Struct 65:1–12
PULSE (2006) Analyzers and Solutions, Release 11.2., Bruel and Kjaer, sound and vibration measurement A/S, Denmark
Ramos JLFS (2007) Damage identification on masonry structures based on vibration signatures, PhD thesis, University of Minho, Portugal
Ribeiro D, Calçada R, Delgado R, Brehm M, Zabel V (2012) Finite element model updating of a bowstring-arch railway bridge based on experimental modal parameters. Eng Struct 40:413–435
Rodriguez O (2012) Bridge design for earthquake fault crossings: synthesis of design issues and strategies, California Polytechnic State University, MSc thesis. San Luis Obispo
Sarhosis V, Oliveira DV, Lemos JV, Lourenco PB (2014) The effect of skew angle on the mechanical behaviour of masonry arches. Mech Res Commun 61:53–59
Sevim B, Bayraktar A, Altunışık AC, Atamtürktür S, Birinci F (2011) Assessment of nonlinear seismic performance of a restored historical arch bridge using ambient vibrations. Nonlinear Dyn 63(4):755–770
Somerville PG, Smith NF, Graves RW, Abrahamson NA (1997) Modification of empirical strong ground motion attenuation relations to include the amplitude and duration effects of rupture directivity. Seismic Res Lett 68:199–222
Toker S, Unay AI (2004) Mathematical modelling and finite element analysis of masonry arch bridges. J Sci Gazi Univ 17(2):129–139
Ural A (2005) Finite element analysis of historical arch bridge. International Earthquake Symposium, Kocaeli, pp 408–413
WSTC (2007) Dynamic response of bridges to near-fault, forward directivity ground motions, Washington state transportation center (TRAC), Research Report, Washington State University
Zordan T, Briseghella B, Liu T (2014) Finite element model updating of a tied-arch bridge using Douglas-Reid method and Rosenbrock optimization algorithm. J Traffic Transp Eng 1(4):280–292
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the TUBITAK and Karadeniz Technical University under Research Grant Nos. 106M038 and 2005.112.001.1, respectively.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sevim, B., Atamturktur, S., Altunişik, A.C. et al. Ambient vibration testing and seismic behavior of historical arch bridges under near and far fault ground motions. Bull Earthquake Eng 14, 241–259 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9810-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9810-6