Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Gender/Sex, Sexual Attractions, and the Specificity of Women's Sexual Arousal: Challenges and Future Directions

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 28 April 2023

This article has been updated

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Change history

Notes

  1. If you click on the link provided in the References, you will be redirected to the same article with a less toxic title “How We Misunderstand Sexual Arousal.” The title was changed after I contacted Cormier and expressed my dismay and concern over the potential impact of a title that essentially called women liars.

References

  • Bloemers, J., Gerritsen, J., Bults, R., Koppeschaar, H., Everaerd, W., Olivier, B., & Tuiten, A. (2010). Induction of sexual arousal in women under conditions of institutional and ambulatory laboratory circumstances: A comparative study. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 7, 1160–1176. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01660.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard, K. N., Timmers, A. D., & Chivers, M. L. (2015). Gender-specificity of genital response and self-reported arousal in women endorsing facets of bisexuality. Journal of Bisexuality, 15, 180–203. doi:10.1080/15299716.2015.1022924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brauer, M., Laan, E., & ter Kuile, M. M. (2006). Sexual arousal in women with superficial dyspareunia. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 191–200. doi:10.1007/s10508-005-9001-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brauer, M., Van Leeuwen, M., Janssen, E., Newhouse, S. K., Heiman, J. R., & Laan, E. (2012). Attentional and affective processing of sexual stimuli in women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 891–905. doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9820-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brody, S. (2007). Intercourse orgasm consistency, concordance of women’s genital and subjective sexual arousal, and erotic stimulus presentation sequence. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 33, 31–39. doi:10.1080/00926230600998458.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brody, S., & Kru, T. H. C. (2006). The post-orgasmic prolactin increase following intercourse is greater than following masturbation and suggests greater satiety. Biological Psychology, 71, 312–315. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.06.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brom, M., Both, S., Laan, E., Everaerd, W., & Spinhoven, P. (2014). The role of conditioning, learning and dopamine in sexual behavior: A narrative review of animal and human studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 38, 38–59. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.10.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brotto, L. A., Chivers, M. L., Millman, R. D., & Albert, A. (2016). Mindfulness-based sex therapy improves genital-subjective arousal concordance in women with sexual desire/arousal difficulties. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 1907–1921. doi:10.1007/s10508-015-0689-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research. (2014). What is gender? What is sex? Retrieved from http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/48642.html.

  • Chivers, M. L. (2016). The specificity of women’s sexual response and its relationship with sexual orientations: A review and ten hypotheses. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi:10.1007/s10508-016-0897-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chivers, M. L., & Brotto, L. B. (2017). Controversies in women’s sexual arousal and desire. European Psychologist, 22(1), 5–26. doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chivers, M. L., Rieger, G., Latty, E., & Bailey, J. M. (2004). A sex difference in the specificity of sexual arousal. Psychological Science, 15, 736–744.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chivers, M. L., Seto, M. C., & Blanchard, R. (2007). Gender and sexual orientation differences in sexual response to sexual activities versus gender of actors in sexual films. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 1108–1121. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.6.1108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chivers, M. L., & Timmers, A. D. (2012). Effects of gender and relationship context in audio narratives on genital and subjective sexual response in heterosexual women and men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 185–197. doi:10.1007/s10508-012-9937-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cormier, Z. (2016). The lies women tell about sexual arousal. Daily Beast. http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/01/31/the-lies-women-tell-about-sexual-arousal.html

  • Dawson, S. J., Huberman, J. S., Bouchard, K. N., McInnis, M. K., Pukall, C. F. & Chivers, M. L. (2017). Is it fair to compare? An examination of the roles of gender and sexual attraction on volunteer bias in sexuality studies. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Dawson, S. J., & Chivers, M. L. (2015, August). The influence of sexually-relevant cues on early and late attentional biases in women and men. Oral presentation in the symposium Women’s Specificity in Sexual Response: Moderations by Measurement. International Academy of Sex Research, Toronto, ON, Canada.

  • Diamond, L. M. (2003). What does sexual orientation orient? A biobehavioral model distinguishing romantic love and sexual desire. Psychological Review, 110, 173–192. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.173.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. M. (2016). Sexual fluidity in males and females. Current Sexual Health Reports, 8, 249–256. doi:10.1007/s11930-016-0092-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. M. (2017). Wanting women: Sex, gender, and the specificity of sexual arousal [Commentary]. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi:10.1007/s10508-017-0967-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. M., & Wallen, K. (2011). Sexual minority women’s sexual motivation around the time of ovulation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 237–246. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9631-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farr, R. H., Diamond, L. M., & Boker, S. M. (2014). Female same-sex sexuality from a dynamical systems perspective: Sexual desire, motivation, and behavior. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 1477–1490. doi:10.1007/s10508-014-0378-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s live experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, H., Janssen, E., & Turner, S. L. (2004). Classical conditioning of sexual arousal in women and men: Effects of varying awareness and biological relevance of the conditioned stimulus. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 43–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, C. L., & Fausto-Sterling, A. (2000). How sexually dimorphic are we? Review and synthesis. American Journal of Human Biology, 15, 151–166. doi:10.1002/ajhb.10122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhle, B. X., & Radtke, S. (2013). Born both ways: The alloparenting hypothesis for sexual fluidity in women. Evolutionary Psychology, 11, 304–323.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lalumière, M. L. (2017). On the concept of category-specificity [Commentary]. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi:10.1007/s10508-017-0965-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, E. A. (2017). Orgasms and objectification [Commentary]. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi:10.1007/s10508-017-0970-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lübke, K. T., Hoenen, M., & Pause, B. M. (2012). Differential processing of social chemosignals obtained from potential partners in regards to gender and sexual orientation. Behavioural Brain Research, 228, 375–387. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2011.12.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luoto, S., & Rantala, M. J. (2017). Specificity of women’s sexual responses: Proximate mechanisms and ultimate causes [Commentary]. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi:10.1007/s10508-017-0961-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lykins, A. D., Meana, M., & Minimi, J. (2011). Visual attention to erotic images in women reporting pain with intercourse. Journal of Sex Research, 48, 43–52. doi:10.1080/00224490903556374.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Masters, W. H., & Johnson, V. (1966). Human sexual response. Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, S. H., & Milhausen, R. R. (2012). Sexual desire and relationship duration in young men and women. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 38, 28–40. doi:10.1080/0092623X.2011.569637.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Z. D., & Janssen, E. (2007). Ambivalent affect and sexual response: The impact of co-occurring positive and negative emotions on subjective and physiological sexual responses to erotic stimuli. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 793–807. doi:10.1007/s10508-006-9145-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Z. D., Janssen, E., & Laan, E. (2010). Women’ s sexual responses to heterosexual and lesbian erotica: The role of stimulus intensity, affective reaction, and sexual history. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 880–897. doi:10.1007/s10508-009-9546-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ponseti, J., Bosinski, H. A., Wolff, S., Peller, M., Jansen, O., Mehdorn, H. M., … Siebner, H. R. (2006). A functional endophenotype for sexual orientation in humans. Neuroimage, 33, 825–833. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.08.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Safron, A., & Hoffmann, H. (2017). What does sexual responsiveness to one’s nonpreferred sex mean? [Commentary]. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi:10.1007/s10508-017-0954-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seto, M. C. (2017). The puzzle of male chronophilias. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 3–22. doi:10.1007/s10508-016-0799-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spape, J., Timmers, A. D., Yoon, S., Ponseti, J., & Chivers, M. L. (2014). Gender-specific genital and subjective sexual arousal to prepotent sexual features in heterosexual women and men. Biological Psychology, 102, 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.07.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strassberg, D. S., & Lowe, K. (1995). Volunteer bias in sexuality research. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 24, 369–382. doi:10.1007/BF01541853.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suschinsky, K. D., Dawson, S. J., & Chivers, M. L. (2016). Assessing the relationship between sexual concordance, sexual attractions, and sexual identity in women. Archives of SexualBehavior, 46, 179–192. doi:10.1007/s10508-016-0874-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tassone, D., Dawson, S. J., & Chivers, M. L. (2017, April). Homonegativity predicts rapidvisual detection and visual avoidance of non-preferred sexual stimuli in gynephilic men. Poster presented at the meeting of the Society for Sex Therapy and Research, Montreal, PQ.

  • Timmers, A. D., Bouchard, K. N., & Chivers, M. L. (2015). Effects of gender and sexual activity cues on the sexual responses of women with multidimensionally defined bisexuality. Journal of Bisexuality, 15, 154–179. doi:10.1080/15299716.2015.1023389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toates, F. (2017). A hierarchical model might cast some light on the anomaly [Commentary]. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi:10.1007/s10508-017-0956-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ussher, J. M. (2017). Unraveling the mystery of “The Specificity of Women’s Sexual Response and Its Relationship with Sexual Orientations”: The social construction of sex and sexual identities [Commentary]. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi:10.1007/s10508-017-0957-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • van Anders, S. M. (2013). Beyond masculinity: Testosterone, gender/sex, and human social behavior in a comparative context. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 34, 198–210. doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2013.07.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Anders, S. M. (2015). Beyond sexual orientation: Integrating gender/sex and diverse sexualities via sexual configurations theory. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 1177–1213. doi:10.1007/s10508-015-0490-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vanwesenbeeck, I. (2009). Doing gender in sex and sex research. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 883–898. doi:10.1007/s10508-009-9565-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Velten, J., Chivers, M. L., & Brotto, L. A. (in press). Does repeated testing impact concordance between genital and self-reported sexual arousal in women? Archives of Sexual Behavior.

  • Velten, J., Scholten, S., Graham, C. A., Adolph, D., & Margraf, J. (2016). Investigating female sexual concordance: Do sexual excitation and sexual inhibition moderate the agreement of genital and subjective sexual arousal in women? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 1957–1971. doi:10.1007/s10508-016-0774-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiederman, M. W. (1999). Volunteer bias in sexuality research using college student participants. Journal of Sex Research, 36, 59–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolchik, S. A., Braver, S. L., & Jensen, K. (1985). Volunteer bias in erotica research: Effects of intrusiveness of measure and sexual background. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 14, 93–107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Many thanks to Samantha Dawson, Katherine Fretz, Jackie Huberman, Michael Seto, and Daniel Tassone for their helpful comments on a previous version of this Commentary. Funding was provided by Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Institute of Gender and Health (New Investigator Award).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada

    Meredith L. Chivers

Authors
  1. Meredith L. Chivers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meredith L. Chivers.

Additional information

The original version of this article was revised: This response to commentaries was originally published without a descriptive title.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chivers, M.L. Gender/Sex, Sexual Attractions, and the Specificity of Women's Sexual Arousal: Challenges and Future Directions. Arch Sex Behav 46, 1213–1221 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1015-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1015-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation