Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Application of a hybrid improved sparrow search algorithm for the prediction and control of dissolved oxygen in the aquaculture industry

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dissolved oxygen is a critical water quality factor, and its prediction and control have long been a research hotspot in the aquaculture industry. This study aims to address the limitations of poor population diversity and the ease of falling into local optima in the basic sparrow search algorithm (SSA). Herein, we improved this methodology in many aspects and proposed a hybrid improved SSA (HISSA) to enhance optimization performance. First, in the global search process of the sparrow producer, the position update strategy is modified to enhance the global search ability of the algorithm. Second, a butterfly algorithm is incorporated to replace the position update strategy in the escape stage of the producer to promote information exchange between individuals. Third, the Cauchy mutation strategy and greedy rule are used to perturb and update the current optimal solution to improve the algorithm’s ability to jump out of local optima. The performance of the proposed HISSA was verified on 10 benchmark functions. The experimental results illustrate that the proposed algorithm outperformed the four intelligent algorithms evaluated herein. In addition, the proposed HISSA was separately applied to the parameter optimization of the two most commonly used engineering methods: the back propagation neural network (BPNN) and proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller. Compared with other intelligent algorithm-optimized methods, the error evaluation index values of the HISSA-BPNN and HISSA-PID controllers are small, indicating that the proposed HISSA is highly effective and practical for engineering parameter optimization, and can be competent for the prediction and control of dissolved oxygen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Missaghi S, Hondzo M, Herb W (2017) Prediction of lake water temperature, dissolved oxygen, and fish habitat under changing climate. Clim Chang 141(4):747–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ren Q, Zhang L, Wei Y, Li D (2018) A method for predicting dissolved oxygen in aquaculture water in an aquaponics system. Comput Electron Agr 151:384–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Saber A, James DE, Hayes DF (2020) Long-term forecast of water temperature and dissolved oxygen profiles in deep lakes using artificial neural networks conjugated with wavelet transform. Limnol Oceanogr 65(6):1297–1317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Duan Q, Liu Y, Zhang L (2018) State-of-the-art review for application of big data technology in aquaculture. Trans Chin Soc Agricult Mach 49(6):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rozario APR, Devarajan N (2020) Monitoring the quality of water in shrimp ponds and forecasting of dissolved oxygen using fuzzy C means clustering based radial basis function neural networks. J Amb Intel Hum Comp 12(5):4855–5862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhou XH, Wang JP, Cao XK, Fan YX, Duan QL (2021) Simulation of future dissolved oxygen distribution in pond culture based on sliding window-temporal convolutional network and trend surface analysis. Aquac Eng 95:102200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cao XK, Ren N, Tian GL, Fan YX, Duan QL (2021) A three-dimensional prediction method of dissolved oxygen in pond culture based on attention-GRU-GBRT. Comput Electron Agr 181:105955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu YQ, Zhang Q, Sun LQ, Chen YY (2019) Attention-based recurrent neural networks for accurate short-term and long-term dissolved oxygen prediction. Comput Electron Agr 165:104964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yin BA, Wang R, Qi SB, Yu JD, Jiang WL (2021) Prediction model of dissolved oxygen in marine pasture based on hybrid gray wolf algorithm optimized support vector regression. Desalin Water Treat 222:156–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wu Y, Sun L, Sun X, Wang B (2021) A hybrid XGBoost-ISSA-LSTM model for accurate short-term and long-term dissolved oxygen prediction in ponds Environ Sci Pollut R

  11. Xiang Z, Ji D, Zhang H, Wu H, Li Y (2019) A simple PID-based strategy for particle swarm optimization algorithm. Inform Sci 502:558–574

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Cao F (2020) PID controller optimized by genetic algorithm for direct-drive servo system. Neural Comput Appl 32(1):23–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rad AB, Lo WL, Tsang KM (1997) Self-tuning PID controller using Newton-Raphson search method. IEEE T Ind Electron 44(5):717–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Raj R, Mohan BM, Lee DE, Yang JM (2022) Derivation and structural analysis of a three-input interval type-2 TS fuzzy PID controller. Soft Comput 26(2):589–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang GM, Yuan XF, Shi K, Wu XR (2019) A BP-PID controller-based multi-model control system for lateral stability of distributed drive electric vehicle. J Franklin I 356(13):7290–7311

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Pugazhenthi PN, Selvaperumal S, Vijayakumar K (2021) Nonlinear PID controller parameter optimization using modified hybrid artificial bee colony algorithm for continuous stirred tank reactor. B Pol Acad Sci-Tech 69(3):e137348

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kashyap AK, Parhi DR (2021) Particle swarm optimization aided PID gait controller design for a humanoid robot. ISA T 114:306–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rahman M, Ong ZC, Chong WT, Julai S, Ng XW (2019) Wind turbine tower modeling and vibration control under different types of loads using ant colony optimized PID controller. Arab J Sci Eng 44(2):707–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mousakazemi SMH (2021) Comparison of the error-integral performance indexes in a GA-tuned PID controlling system of a PWR-type nuclear reactor point-kinetics model. Prog Nucl Energ:132

  20. Feng H, Ma W, Yin CB, Cao DH (2021) Trajectory control of electro-hydraulic position servo system using improved PSO-PID controller. Automat Constr 127:127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang Y, Yuan LJ, Zhang Q, Sun XY (2020) Multi-objective optimization of building energy performance using a particle swarm optimizer with less control parameters. J Build Eng 32

  22. Gao YK, Xie LB, Zhang ZD, Fan QG (2020) Twin support vector machine based on improved artificial fish swarm algorithm with application to flame recognition. Appl Intell 50(8):2312–2327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang X, Zhang C, Wei Z (2019) Carbon price forecasting based on multiresolution singular value decomposition and extreme learning machine optimized by the moth-flame optimization algorithm considering energy and economic factors. Energies 12(22):4283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Haghnegahdar L, Wang Y (2020) A whale optimization algorithm-trained artificial neural network for smart grid cyber intrusion detection. Neural Comput Appl 32(13):9427–9441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shams I, Mekhilef S, Tey KS (2021) Maximum power point tracking using modified butterfly optimization algorithm for partial shading, uniform shading, and fast varying load conditions. IEEE T Power Electr 36(5):5569–5581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang SL, Fernandez C, Yu CM, Fan YC, Cao W, Stroe DI (2020) A novel charged state prediction method of the lithium ion battery packs based on the composite equivalent modeling and improved splice Kalman filtering algorithm. J Power Sources 471:471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bajaj A, Sangwan OP (2021) Discrete cuckoo search algorithms for test case prioritization. Appl Soft Comput 110:107584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Xue J, Shen B (2020) A novel swarm intelligence optimization approach: sparrow search algorithm. Syst Sci Control Eng 8(1):22–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gai JB, Zhong KY, Du XJ, Yan K, Shen JX (2021) Detection of gear fault severity based on parameter-optimized deep belief network using sparrow search algorithm. Measurement 185:185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang C, Ding S (2021) A stochastic configuration network based on chaotic sparrow search algorithm. Knowl-Based Syst 220:220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhu Y, Yousefi N (2021) Optimal parameter identification of PEMFC stacks using adaptive sparrow search algorithm. Int J Hydrogen Energ 46(14):9541–9552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ouyang CT, Zhu DL, Wang FQ (2021) A learning sparrow search algorithm. Comput Intel Neurosc 2021:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Li XJ, Gu JA, Sun XH, Li J, Tang SX (2022) Parameter identification of robot manipulators with unknown payloads using an improved chaotic sparrow search algorithm. Appl Intell

  34. Arora S, Singh S (2019) Butterfly optimization algorithm: a novel approach for global optimization. Soft Comput 23(3):715–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sadeghian Z, Akbari E, Nematzadeh H (2021) A hybrid feature selection method based on information theory and binary butterfly optimization algorithm. Eng Appl Artif Intel:97

  36. Wang WC, Xu L, Chau KW, Xu DM (2020) Yin-Yang firefly algorithm based on dimensionally Cauchy mutation. Expert Syst Appl 150:150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Tang AD, Zhou H, Han T, Xie L (2022) A chaos sparrow search algorithm with logarithmic spiral and adaptive step for engineering problems. CMES-Comp Model Eng 130(1):331–364

    Google Scholar 

  38. Chen Y, Xu J, Yu H, Zhen Z, Li D (2016) Three-dimensional short-term prediction model of dissolved oxygen content based on PSO-BPANN algorithm coupled with Kriging interpolation. Math Probl Eng:2016

  39. Das S, Halder K, Gupta A (2018) Performance analysis of robust stable PID controllers using dominant pole placement for SOPTD process models. Knowl-Based Syst 146:12–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Feng H, Yin CB, Weng WW, Ma W, Zhou JJ, Jia WH, Zhang ZL (2018) Robotic excavator trajectory control using an improved GA based PID controller. Mech Syst Signal Pr 105:153–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Royer E, Faccenda F, Pastres R (2021) Estimating oxygen consumption of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in a raceway: a precision fish farming approach. Aquac Eng 92:102141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Azali S, Sheikhan M (2016) Intelligent control of photovoltaic system using BPSO-GSA-optimized neural network and fuzzy-based PID for maximum power point tracking. Appl Intell 44(1):88–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Perng J, Kuo Y, Lu K (2020) Design of the PID controller for hydro-turbines based on optimization algorithms. Int J Control Autom 18(7):1758–1770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhou XH, Li DL, Zhang L, Duan QL (2021) Application of an adaptive PID controller enhanced by a differential evolution algorithm for precise control of dissolved oxygen in recirculating aquaculture systems. Biosyst Eng 208:186–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the project of Ningbo Public Welfare Science and Technology (Grant No. 2021S207), Shandong Province Major Scientific and Technological Innovation Project-Integration and Demonstration of Key Technology for Land and Sea Relay Fish Precision Farming (Grant No. 2019JZZY010703), and Jiangsu Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Fund (Grant No. CX(19)1003). We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.cn) for English language editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Information and Electrical Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100083, China

    Xinhui Zhou, Hongxu Zhang & Qingling Duan

  2. National Innovation Centre for Digital Fishery, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100083, China

    Xinhui Zhou, Hongxu Zhang & Qingling Duan

  3. Ningbo Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, Zhejiang, 315000, China

    Jianping Wang

Authors
  1. Xinhui Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jianping Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hongxu Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qingling Duan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qingling Duan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, X., Wang, J., Zhang, H. et al. Application of a hybrid improved sparrow search algorithm for the prediction and control of dissolved oxygen in the aquaculture industry. Appl Intell 53, 8482–8502 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-03870-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-03870-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation