Abstract
At home self- and partner-testing may reduce HIV and syphilis transmission by detecting undiagnosed infections. Forty-eight cisgender men and transgender women who men who have sex with men were given ten INSTI Multiplex kits and downloaded the SMARTtest app to facilitate self- and partner testing over the next three months. Thirty-seven (77%) participants self-tested using the INSTI (mean = 3.7 times, SD = 3.9); 26 (54%) tested partners (mean = 1.6 times, SD = 2.2). Participants liked the test for its ease of use, quick results, and dual HIV/syphilis testing but its blood-based nature hindered use with partners. Participants with reactive syphilis results always attributed them to a past infection and these results presented a challenge to testing with partners and the ability to accurately assess risk of infection. Most participants stated they would use the INSTI for self-testing (100%) and for partner-testing (89%). Acceptability of the SMARTtest app was high for functionality (M = 4.16 of max 5, SD = 0.85) and helpfulness (M = 6.12 of max 7, SD = 1.09). Participants often used the app as needed, eschewing its use if they felt comfortable conducting the test and interpreting its results. Seventy-eight percent would recommend the app to a friend. Availability of the INSTI Multiplex as a self-test with the accompanying SMARTtest app might increase frequency of HIV and syphilis testing, allowing for earlier detection of infection and reduced transmission.
Resumen
El uso de pruebas rápidas caseras con parejas y como auto-pruebas puede reducir la transmisión del VIH y la sifilis al detectar infecciones no diagnosticadas. Cuarenta y ocho hombres cisgénero y mujeres transgénero que tienen sexo con hombres recibieron diez kits del INSTI Multiplex y descargaron la aplicación SMARTtest para facilitar su uso con parejas y para auto-pruebas durante los próximos tres meses. Treinta y siete (77%) participantes se auto-testearon utilizando el INSTI (media = 3.7 veces, DE = 3.9); 26 (54%) testearon a sus parejas (media = 1.6 veces, DE = 2.2). A los participantes les gustó la prueba por su facilidad de uso, rapidez de los resultados y por ser una prueba dual de VIH/sífilis, pero al ser una prueba basada en sangre dificultó su uso con parejas. Los participantes con resultados de sífilis reactivos siempre atribuyeron éstos a una infección pasada y sus resultados presentaron un desafío para el uso de pruebas con parejas. La mayoría de los participantes afirmaron que utilizarían el INSTI como auto-pruebas (100%) y para testear a sus parejas (89%). La aceptabilidad de la aplicación SMARTtest fue alta para la funcionalidad (M = 4.16 de un máximo de 5, SD = 0.85) y utilidad (M = 6.13 de un máximo de 7, SD = 1.09). Los participantes solían utilizar la aplicación según fuera necesario, evitando su uso si se sentían cómodos realizando la prueba e interpretando sus resultados. El 78% recomendaría la aplicación a un amigo. La disponibilidad del INSTI Multiplex como auto-prueba con la aplicación SMARTtest podría aumentar la frecuencia de las pruebas de VIH y sífilis, lo que permite una detección más temprana de la infección y reduce la transmisión.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Carballo-Diéguez A, Giguere R, Balán IC, Brown W, Dolezal C, Leu CS, Rios JL, Sheinfil AZ, Frasca T, Rael CT, Lentz C. Use of rapid HIV self-test to screen potential sexual partners: results of the ISUM study. AIDS Behav. 2019;18:1–3.
Carballo-Diéguez A, Frasca T, Balan I, Ibitoye M, Dolezal C. Use of a rapid HIV home test prevents HIV exposure in a high risk sample of men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2012;16(7):1753–60.
Rael CT, Giguere R, Lopez-Rios J, Lentz C, Balán IC, Sheinfil A, Dolezal C, Brown W, Frasca T, Torres CC, Crespo R. Transgender women’s experiences using a home HIV-testing kit for partner-testing. AIDS Behav. 2020;19:1.
Giguere R, Lopez-Rios J, Frasca T, Lentz C, Balán IC, Dolezal C, Rael CT, Brown W, Sheinfil AZ, Torres CC, Crespo R. Use of HIV self-testing kits to screen clients among transgender female sex workers in New York and Puerto Rico. AIDS Behav. 2020;24(2):506–15.
Maman S, Murray KR, NapieralaMavedzenge S, Oluoch L, Sijenje F, Agot K, Thirumurthy H. A qualitative study of secondary distribution of HIV self-test kits by female sex workers in Kenya. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(3):e0174629.
Thirumurthy H, Masters SH, Mavedzenge SN, Maman S, Omanga E, Agot K. Promoting male partner HIV testing and safer sexual decision making through secondary distribution of self-tests by HIV-negative female sex workers and women receiving antenatal and post-partum care in Kenya: a cohort study. Lancet HIV. 2016;3(6):e266–74.
Masters SH, Agot K, Obonyo B, NapieralaMavedzenge S, Maman S, Thirumurthy H. Promoting partner testing and couples testing through secondary distribution of HIV self-tests: a randomized clinical trial. PLoS Med. 2016;13(11):e1002166.
Johnson CC, Kennedy C, Fonner V, Siegfried N, Figueroa C, Dalal S, Sands A, Baggaley R. Examining the effects of HIV self-testing compared to standard HIV testing services: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Int AIDS Soc. 2017;20(1):21594.
Witzel TC, Eshun-Wilson I, Jamil MS, Tilouche N, Figueroa C, Johnson CC, Reid D, Baggaley R, Siegfried N, Burns FM, Rodger AJ. Comparing the effects of HIV self-testing to standard HIV testing for key populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med. 2020;18(1):1–3.
Centers for Disease Control. Syphilis & MSM (CDC Fact Sheet). Available at https://www.cdc.gov/std/syphilis/syphilismsm-2019.pdf. Accessed on 2 Feb 2021.
Centers for Disease Control. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines 2015. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/std/tg2015/screening-recommendations.htm. Accessed on 2 Feb 2021.
Gaydos CA, Hsieh Y-H, Harvey L, et al. Will patients ‘“opt in”’ to perform their own rapid HIV test in the emergency department? Ann Emerg Med. 2011;58(1 Suppl 1):S74–8.
Ibitoye I, Frasca T, Giguere R, et al. Home testing past, present and future: lessons learned and implications for HIV home tests. AIDS Behav. 2013;18(5):933–49.
Bilardi JE, Walker S, Read T, et al. Gay and bisexual men’s views on rapid self-testing for HIV. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(6):2093–9.
Balán I, Frasca T, Ibitoye M, Dolezal C, Carballo-Diéguez A. Fingerprick versus oral swab: acceptability of blood-based testing increases if other STIs can be detected. AIDS Behav. 2017;21(2):501–4.
Pai NP, Sharma J, Shivkumar S, Pillay S, Vadnais C, Joseph L, Peeling RW. Supervised and unsupervised self-testing for HIV in high-and low-risk populations: a systematic review. PLoS Med. 2013;10(4):e1001414.
Krause J, Subklew-Sehume F, Kenyon C, Colebunders R. Acceptability of HIV self-testing: a systematic literature review. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):735.
Bilardi JE, Walker S, Read T, Prestage G, Chen MY, Guy R, Bradshaw C, Fairley CK. Gay and bisexual men’s views on rapid self-testing for HIV. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(6):2093–9.
Figueroa C, Johnson C, Verster A, Baggaley R. Attitudes and acceptability on HIV self-testing among key populations: a literature review. AIDS Behav. 2015;19(11):1949–65.
Pai NP, Smallwood M, Desjardins L, Goyette A, Birkas KG, Vassal AF, Joseph L, Thomas R. An unsupervised smart app–optimized HIV self-testing program in Montreal, Canada: cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(11):e10258.
Gous N, Fischer AE, Rhagnath N, Phatsoane M, Majam M, Lalla-Edward ST. Evaluation of a mobile application to support HIV self-testing in Johannesburg, South Africa. South Afr J HIV Med. 2020;21(1):1–7.
Janssen R, Engel N, Esmail A, Oelofse S, Krumeich A, Dheda K, Pai NP. Alone but supported: a qualitative study of an HIV self-testing app in an observational cohort study in South Africa. AIDS Behav. 2020;24(2):467–74.
Wray TB, Chan PA, Simpanen E, Operario D. A pilot, randomized controlled trial of HIV self-testing and real-time post-test counseling/referral on screening and preventative care among men who have sex with men. AIDS Patient Cares STDs. 2018;32(9):360–7.
Balán IC, Lopez-Rios J, Nayak S, Lentz C, Arumugam S, Kutner B, Dolezal C, Macar OU, Pabari T, Ying AW, Okrah M. SMARTtest: a smartphone app to facilitate HIV and syphilis self-and partner-testing, interpretation of results, and linkage to care. AIDS Behav. 2020;24(5):1560–73.
Stoyanov SR, Hides L, Kavanagh DJ, Wilson H. Development and validation of the user version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS). J Med Internet Res. 2016;4(2):e72.
Balán IC, Lopez-Rios J, Giguere R, Lentz C, Dolezal C, Torres CC, Brown W, Crespo R, Sheinfil A, Rael CT, Febo I. Then we looked at his results: men who have sex with men from New York City and Puerto Rico report their sexual partner’s reactions to receiving reactive HIV self-test results. AIDS Behav. 2020;20:1–9.
Balán IC, Lopez-Rios J, Dolezal C, Rael CT, Lentz C. Low STI knowledge, risk perception, and concern about infection among men who have sex with men and transgender women at high risk of infection. Sex Health. 2019;16(6):580.
Funding
This research was supported by grants from the U.S. National Institutes of Health: R01-HD088156 (PI: I. Balán) and P30-MH43520 (PI: R. Remien). Additionally, Dr. Kutner’s work was supported by K23MH124569 (PI: B. Kutner, PhD, MPH) and T32MH019139 (PI: T. Sandfort, PhD). Dr. Rael is supported by K01MH115785 (PI: C. Rael). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
Ethical Approval
The study presented received approval from the Institutional Review Board at the New York State Psychiatric Institute. All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
All participants in the study underwent an informed consent procedure prior to participating.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Balán, I.C., Rios, J.L., Lentz, C. et al. Acceptability and Use of a Dual HIV/Syphilis Rapid Test and Accompanying Smartphone App to Facilitate Self- and Partner-Testing Among Cisgender Men and Transgender Women Who Have Sex with Men. AIDS Behav 26, 35–46 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-021-03322-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-021-03322-9