Skip to main content
Log in

Aboveground decomposition dynamics in riparian depression and slope wetlands of central Pennsylvania

  • Published:
Aquatic Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined two types of groundwater-fed wetlands (riparian depressions and slopes) classified using the hydrogeomorphic (HGM) system. These wetland types had previously been shown to differ hydrologically. Our first objective was to determine if HGM was a useful structuring variable when examining aboveground decomposition dynamics (rate of mass loss and rate of nitrogen loss). Our second objective was to determine what soil variables were related to any differences in aboveground decomposition dynamics we might find regardless of HGM subclass. We used the litterbag field bioassay technique, and employed a standard litter type (Phalaris arundinacea) across all wetlands. Our results indicated that HGM would not readily serve as an adequate structuring variable for aboveground decomposition in riparian depressions and slope wetlands of central Pennsylvania. Discriminant analysis and classification and regression tree (CART) modeling found soil cation exchange capacity, soil pH, soil organic matter, and soil % nitrogen to be potentially important soil variables related to mass loss, and soil % nitrogen and soil pH to be potentially important variables related to nitrogen loss rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

HGM:

Hydrogeomorphic

References

  • Aaerts R (1997) Climate, leaf litter chemistry and leaf litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: a triangular relationship. Oikos 79:439–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson RB, Cairns JJ (2001) Plant decomposition and litter accumulation in depressional wetlands: functional performance of two wetland age classes that were created via excavation. Wetlands 21:354–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker TT, Lockaby BG, Conner WH, Meier C, Stanturf JA, Burke MK (2001) Leaf litter decomposition and nutrient dynamics in four southern forested floodplain communities. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65:1334–1347

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Battle JM, Golladay SW (2001) Hydroperiod influence on breakdown of leaf litter in cypress-gum wetlands. Am Midl Nat 146:128–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belyea LR (1996) Separating the effects of litter quality and microenvironment on decomposition rates in a patterned peatland. Oikos 77:529–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg B, McClaugherty A (2003) Plant litter: decomposition, humus formation, carbon sequestration. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg B, McClaugherty A, Johansson M (1993) Litter mass-loss rates in late stages of decomposition at some climatically and nutritionally different pine sites. Can J Bot 71:680–692

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergman I, Svensson BH, Nilsson M (1998) Regulation of methane production in a Swedish acid mire by pH, temperature and substrate. Soil Biol Biochem 30:729–741

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bremner JM (1996) Nitrogen-total. In: Sparks DL (ed) Methods of soil analysis, part 3. Chemical methods. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp 1085–1121

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinson MM (1981) Primary productivity, decomposition and consumer activity in freshwater wetlands. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 12:123–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinson MM (1993a) Changes in the functioning of wetlands along environmental gradients. Wetlands 13:65–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinson MM (1993b) A hydrogeomorphic classification for wetlands. Tech Rep WRP-DE-4, U.S. Army Corps Eng. Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks RP, Wardrop DH, Bishop JA (2002) Watershed-based protection for wetlands in Pennsylvania: levels 1&2: synoptic maps and rapid field assessments. Final report to Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection—Penn State Cooperative Wetlands Center, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA

  • Campbell CR (1991) Determination of total nitrogen in plant tissue by combustion. In: Plank CO (ed) Plant analysis reference procedures in the Southern region of the United States. Southern region coop. ser. bull. 368, Georgia Agric. Exp. Stn., Univ. of Georgia, Athens, pp 21–23

  • Cole CA (2002) The assessment of herbaceous plant cover in wetlands as an indicator of function. Ecol Ind 56:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole CA, Brooks RP (2000) Patterns of wetland hydrology in the Ridge and Valley Province, Pennsylvania, USA. Wetlands 20:438–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole CA, Brooks RP, Wardrop DH (1997) Wetland hydrology as a function of hydrogeomorphic (HGM) subclass. Wetlands 17:456–467

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole CA, Cirmo CP, Wardrop DH, Brooks RP, Peterson-Smith J (2008) Transferability of an HGM wetland classification scheme to a longitudinal gradient of the central Appalachian Mountains: initial hydrological results. Wetlands 28(2) (in press)

  • Couteaux M-M, Bottner P, Bjorn B (1995) Litter decomposition, climate and litter quality. Trends Ecol Evol 10:63–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckert D, Sims JT (1995) Recommended soil pH and lime requirement tests. In: Sims T, Wolf A (eds) Recommended soil testing procedures for the northeastern United States. Northeast regional bulletin #493. University of Delaware, Newark, DE, pp 11–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott WM, Elliott NB, Wyman RL (1993) Relative effect of litter and forest type on rate of decomposition. Am Midl Nat 129:87–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gambrell RP, Patrick WH (1978) Chemical and microbiological properties of anaerobic soils and sediments. In: Hook DD, Crawford MM (eds) Plant life in anaerobic environments. Ann Arbor Science Publications, Inc., Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartley K (1995) Recommended soluble salts tests. In: Sims T, Wolf A (eds) Recommended soil testing procedures for the northeastern United States. Northeast regional bulletin #493. University of Delaware, Newark, DE, pp 70–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner TB, Cardon ZG (2004) Decomposition dynamics in mixed-species leaf litter. Oikos 104:230–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gee GW, Bauder JW (1986) Particle size analysis. In: Klute A (ed) Methods of soil analysis, part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods. Agronomy monograph #9. Amer Soc Agron, Madison, WI, pp 383–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Groffman PM, Axelrod EA, Lemunyon JL, Sullivan WM (1991) Denitrification in grass and forest vegetated buffer strips. J Environ Qual 20:671–674

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Groffman PM, Hanson GC, Kiviat E, Stevens G (1996) Variation in microbial biomass and activity in four different wetland types. Soil Sci Soc Am J 60:662–669

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurtz ME, Tate CM (1988) Hydrologic influences on leaf decomposition in a channel and adjacent bank of a gallery forest stream. Am Midl Nat 120:11–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon NE, Nadelhoffer KJ, Blair JM (1999) Measuring decomposition, nutrient turnover, and stores in plant litter. In: Robertson GP et al (eds) Standard soil methods for long-term ecological research. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 202–240

  • Heal OW, Anderson JM, Swift MJ (1997) Plant litter quality and decomposition: an historical overview. In: Cadisch G, Giller KE (eds) Driven by nature. Plant litter quality and decomposition. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao JT, Titus JE, Wei-Xing Z (2003) Differential nitrogen and phosphorus retention by five wetland plant species. Wetlands 23:979–987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kochy M, Wilson SD (1997) Litter decomposition and nitrogen dynamics in aspen forest and mixed-grass prairie. Ecology 78:732–739

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuperman RG, Edwards CA (1997) Effects of acidic deposition on soil invertebrates and microorganisms. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 148:35–137

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kurka A, Starr M, Karsisto M, Salkinoja-Salonen M (2001) Relationship between decomposition of cellulose strips and chemical properties of humus layer in natural boreal forests. Plant Soil 229:137–146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lockaby BG, Murphy AL, Somers GL (1996) Hydroperiod influences on nutrient dynamics in decomposing litter of a flood plain forest. Soil Sci Soc Am J 60:1267–1272

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McClaugherty CA, Pastor J, Aber JD, Melillo JM (1985) Forest litter decomposition in relation to soil nitrogen dynamics and litter quality. Ecology 66:266–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Grace JB (2002) Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software Design, Oregon, US

    Google Scholar 

  • McLatchey GP, Reddy KR (1998) Regulation of organic matter decomposition and nutrient release in a wetland soil. J Environ Qual 27:1268–1274

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mellilo JM, Aber JD, Muratore JM (1982) Nitrogen and lignin control of hardwood leaf litter decomposition dynamics. Ecology 63:621–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2000) Wetlands, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Neckles HA, Neill C (1994) Hydrologic control of litter decomposition in seasonally flooded prairie marshes. Hydrobiologia 286:155–165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neher DA, Barbercheck ME, El-Allaf SM, Anas O (2003) Effects of disturbance and ecosystem on decomposition. Appl Soil Ecol 23:165–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson JS (1963) Energy storage and the balance of producers and decomposers in ecological systems. Ecology 44:322–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palm CA, Rowland AP (1997) A minimum dataset for characterization of plant quality for decomposition. In: Cadisch G, Giller KE (eds) Driven by nature. Plant litter quality and decomposition. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 379–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy KR, D’Angelo EM (1994) Soil processes regulating water quality in wetlands. In: Mitsch WJ (ed) Global wetlands: old world and new. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp 309–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheinhardt RM, Brinson M, Farley PM (1997) Applying wetland reference data to functional assessment, mitigation and restoration. Wetlands 17:195–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt EL, Ruschmeyer OR (1958) Cellulose decomposition in soil burial beds. I. Soil properties in relation to cellulose degradation. Appl Microbiol 6:108–114

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schulte EE (1995) Recommended soil organic matter tests. In: Sims T, Wolf A (eds) Recommended soil testing procedures for the northeastern United States. Northeast regional bulletin #493. University of Delaware, Newark, DE, pp 47–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer PW, Kentula ME, Gwin SE (1999) Characterization of wetland hydrology using hydrogeomorphic classification. Wetlands 19:490–504

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver WL, Miya RK (2001) Global patterns in root decomposition comparisons of climate and litter quality effects. Oecologia 129:407–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith VC, Bradford MA (2003) Do non-additive effect on decomposition in litter-mix experiments result from differences in resource quality between litters? Oikos 102:235–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • St. John TV (1980) Influence of litterbags on growth of fungal vegetative structures. Oecologia 46:130–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swift MJ, Heal OW, Anderson JM (1979) Decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Blackwell Scientific, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2001) Using multivariate statistics, 4th edn. Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Valk AG, Rhymer JM, Murkin HR (1991) Flooding and the decomposition of detritus in four emergent plant species in a prairie wetland. Wetlands 11:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanner M, Funke I, Funke W (1994) Effects of liming, fertilization and acidification on pH, soil moisture, and ATP content of soil from a spruce forest in southern Germany. Biol Fertil Soils 17:297–300

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wardrop DH, Brooks RP (1998) The occurrence and impact of sedimentation in central Pennsylvania wetlands. Environ Monitor Assess 51:119–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witkamp M, Olson JS (1963) Breakdown of confined and nonconfined oak litter. Oikos 14:138–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrubleski DA, Murkin HR, Van der Valk AG, Nelson JW (1997) Decomposition of emergent macrophyte roots and rhizomes in a northern prairie marsh. Aquat Bot 58:121–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer M (2002) Is decomposition of woodland leaf litter influenced by its species richness. Soil Biol Biochem 34:277–284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank S. Goslee, R. Koide, and D.H. Wardrop for thoughtful suggestions, questions, and comments on this project. A special thanks to Nick Reeder and Earl Hough for countless hours of field help. This research was supported in part by an EPA STAR grant No. R-82949701-0 and a 2004 Society of Wetland Scientists student research grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles Andrew Cole.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hough, Z., Cole, C.A. Aboveground decomposition dynamics in riparian depression and slope wetlands of central Pennsylvania. Aquat Ecol 43, 335–349 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-008-9198-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-008-9198-3

Keywords

Navigation