A “cool-water”, non-tropical, mixed volcaniclastic–carbonate ramp from the Early Cretaceous of southern Chile (45°40’S)

The Aysén-Río Mayo Basin was a back-arc/marginal basin developed in southwestern South America (43°–47°S) between the Tithonian–Aptian. Its sedimentary fill corresponds to the Coyhaique Group, which represents a transgressive–regressive succession. Six lithofacies and five microfacies were defined for three outcrops exposed south of Coyhaique (45°40’S). The outcrops have a mixed calcareous–volcaniclastic composition and were assigned to the early transgressive Toqui Formation, i.e., lowermost part of the Coyhaique Group. These mixed rocks comprise bioclastic–volcaniclastic conglomerate, gravelly allochemic sandstone, and gravelly–sandy allochem limestone. Bedding is sharp to amalgamated, sometimes rippled, depicting a wave- and storm-influenced, mixed inner- to mid-ramp. The ramp developed over a Valanginian, active volcanic terrain (Foitzick Volcanic Complex), source of the volcaniclastic sediments. Limestones are rich in reworked bioclasts, and controlled by calcitic organisms including gryphaeid oysters, non-geniculate red algae, and echinoid fragments, defining a heterozoan association (“maerl”-like sediments); less frequent are ahermatypic corals, serpulids, and carbonized wood. Based on their inferred paleolatitude (south of 45°–50°S), fossil assemblage (heterozoan), and kind of carbonate platform (ramp-type), these calcareous rocks of the Toqui Formation depict a “cool-water” (sensu lato), non-tropical setting. The fossil assemblage includes oysters (Aetostreon spp.), and abundant calcareous red algae attributed to Archamphiroa jurassica Steinmann (1930), a taxon previously known from the upper Tithonian Cotidiano Formation of Argentina. A. jurassica is here reported for the first time for the Lower Cretaceous of Chile, suggesting a broader upper Tithonian—Valanginian-Hauterivian? range for the species. The facies model presented here contrasts with the depositional environments depicted for correlative reefal rocks in Argentina (Tres Lagunas Formation), which reflect a “warm-water” setting. In the Aysén-Río Mayo Basin, the influence of sea-water key physical variables in the carbonate sedimentation, as well as the position and hydraulic regime of the carbonate platforms within the basin, and their interaction with the volcanism are still unclear.


Introduction
Mixed calcareous-volcaniclastic rocks are common constituents in the Late Jurassic-Early Cretaceous of southwestern South America (Central Patagonia, 43°-47°S); these deposits represent the early transgressive phase in the Aysén-Río Mayo Basin, whose marine stage developed during the Tithonian-Aptian (e.g., Aguirre-Urreta and Ramos 1981;Ramos 1981;Scasso 1987;1989;Bell et al. 1996;Folguera and Iannizzotto 2004;Suárez et al. 2010a, b;Fig. 1A, B). In Chile, these mixed rocks are exposed as scattered outcrops in the Los Lagos and Aysén regions Welkner et al., 2004) and have been referred to as the Toqui Formation (Bell et al. 1994;Suárez and De la Cruz 1994a, b;Fig. 1A, B). This unit comprises two members (sensu Rivas et al. 2021): the mixed, calcareous-volcaniclastic Manto Member conforming the basal portion of the Toqui Fm., and the volcaniclastic San Antonio Member which overlies and interfingers the Manto Member. Both members display marked lateral-and latitudinal facial changes, reflecting strong diachronism during the Tithonian-Valanginian interval (Suárez et al. 2005;2010a, b), and the development of mixed, shallow-marine platforms over an irregular extensional topography (Scasso 1989;Hechem et al. 1993;Folguera and Iannizzotto 2004;Rivas et al. 2021).
Given the discrete, discontinuous, and diachronic exposure of these mixed calcareous-volcaniclastic units, they have been studied and interpreted separately (see review in Rivas et al. 2021;Fig. 1C), and several regional models for its sedimentation have been proposed (e.g., Skarmeta 1976;Aguirre-Urreta and Ramos 1981;Scasso 1989;Hechem et al. 1993;Bell et al. 1994;Townsend 1998;Folguera and Iannizzotto 2004;Suárez and De la Cruz 1994a, b). Here, a sedimentological and microfacial analysis is presented of three mixed volcaniclastic-calcareous sections, assigned to the Toqui Formation, and exposed south of Coyhaique in southern Chile (45°40°S; Fig. 1D). This study improves the understanding of the depositional environments of mixed rocks included in the Toqui Formation, and their relationship with the Argentinian exposures is also discussed. The outcrops presented here provide new insight into non-tropical or "cool-water" carbonate sedimentation as well as the development of carbonate ramps in volcanic arc settings. Stratigraphy and location. A Regional chronostratigraphic chart (modified from Rivas et al. 2021). Some formational names have been abbreviated: Fm Formation, APB Arroyo Pedregoso Beds, ABB Arroyo Blanco Beds, BNVC Baño Nuevo Volcanic Complex, FVC Foitzick Volcanic Complex, TLF Tres Lagunas Formation (see "Stratigraphy and correlations"). B Regional map displaying the location of the Aysén-Río Mayo Basin, the Austral Basin, and localities mentioned in the text. Aysén-Río Mayo basin: dotted outline sensu Aguirre-Urreta and Ramos (1981); dashed outline sensu Suárez et al. (2010a); Austral Basin outline sensu Cuitiño et al. (2019). C Local geological map of the La Plata Lake and Coyhaique areas (simplified from Lizuaín et al. 1995;De la Cruz et al. 2003;Suárez et al. 2007).
Given the small areal exposures of the early transgressive, mixedand calcareous rocks, all the formations are represented as part of the Coyhaique Group (undifferentiated). D Study area: Close-up of the area south of Coyhaique, displaying the outcrops studied here (modified from De la Cruz et al. 2003). ab Arroyo Blanco, ac Arroyo Cotidiano (type locality of the Cotidiano Fm.), ap Arroyo Pedregoso, eh Estero La Horqueta, gl General Carrera/Buenos Aires Lake, pa Palena (town), R7 Route 7 (Carretera Austral), tl Tres Lagunas (Laguna Salada, type locality of the Tres Lagunas Fm.), tm El Toqui Mine (type locality of the Toqui Fm.). Outcrops here addressed: MCH Muralla China, LRO La Rosita, SRP2 Salto Río Pollux
The former three were regarded by Olivero (1987) as sedimentary alternations within the Lago la Plata Formation; this approach was followed by Covacevich et al. (1994) for some calcareous outcrops exposed north of the town of Ñireguao, including them within the Ibáñez Formation. In the Chilean side, these mixed-and calcareous outcrops were later grouped together in the Toqui Formation (e.g., Bell et al. 1994;De la Cruz et al. 1996;Suárez and De la Cruz 1994a, b). The Toqui Formation was redefined by Rivas et al. (2021;after Bell et al. 1994;Suárez et al. 1996;Suárez and De la Cruz 1994a, b), as conformed by two members: the mixed calcareous-volcaniclastic Manto Member, interbedded and overlied by the volcaniclastic San Antonio Member. In the area south of Coyhaique (45°35'S; Fig. 1D), these members appear discretely as mixed, either calcareous-or volcaniclastic-rich outcrops, depicting an upper Berriasian/lower Valanginian -Hauterivian? range (see "Age of the deposits").

Age of the deposits
In the study area, the age of the Toqui Formation is interpreted to be late Berriasian/early Valanginian-Hauterivian? South of "Laguna Foitzick", a late Berriasian age is based on a faunal association including Neocomitidae indet., and the similarity of this fauna with Berriasian outcrops exposed north of Ñireguao, at the "Estero La Horqueta" (Covacevich et al. 1994;Suárez et al. 1996;De la Cruz et al. 2003;Fig. 1C). In Laguna Foitzick, the Toqui Formation overlies the Foitzick Volcanic Complex, a local member of the Ibáñez Formation, with an erosion-angular unconformity, but locally displaying a peperitic contact (Bell et al. 1994;Suárez et al. 1996;Suárez and De la Cruz 1994a, b;Fig. 1A). There, rocks from the uppermost volcanic strata, below the unconformity, were dated to U-Pb 138.3 ± 1.3 Ma (Pankhurst et al. 2003), providing a "Valanginian or even younger" lower range limit for the sedimentary succession in the Coyhaique area (Suárez et al. 2005). A broader Berriasian-Hauterivian age ("Neocomian") was inferred by Rubilar (2000) near the "Salto del Pollux", based on a tentative new species of Aetostreon sp. In the same locality, Cecioni and Charrier (1974) reported findings of "Belemnopsis patagoniensis", commonly found in the Lower Cretaceous of southernmost South America (Riccardi 1977;Aguirre-Urreta 2002;Ippolitov et al. 2015).
The top of the Toqui Formation is not exposed in the study area; however, in its type locality (El Toqui Mine), it pass transitionally to tuffaceous-and black mudstone of the Katterfeld Formation (Bussey et al., 2010;Rivas et al. 2021). At the Salto del Pollux locality (outcrop SRP2; Fig. 1D), the Toqui Formation is in tectonic contact with black mudstone of the Katterfeld Formation. There, the marine succession is confined by a post-depositional basaltic andesite sill dated to Ar-Ar 61 ± 0.4 Ma ("Muralla China Sill"; Petford and Turner 1996;De la Cruz et al. 2003), intruding both the Toqui-and Katterfeld Formations (Fig. 1D). Regionally, the Katterfeld Formation provides a Valanginian-Barremian upper range limit for the Toqui Formation (Masiuk and Nakayama 1978;Aguirre-Urreta et al. 2000;Olivero and Aguirre-Urreta 2002;Kesjár et al. 2017).

Materials and methods
This study comprises three sedimentary sections exposed between south of the Laguna Foitzick and the waterfall of the Pollux River (known as "El Salto", Fig. 1D), between 8 and 11 km south of Coyhaique, capital of the Aysén Region, Chile (45°34'S; Fig. 1B-C). They are accessed via Route 7. The three outcrops define a ca. 67 m-thick composite log (outcrops LRO, MCH, SRP2; Fig. 1D), and they have been assigned to the Toqui Formation (Suárez and De la Cruz 1994a, b;De la Cruz et al. 2003). Based on their lithology, these stratified rocks are here arranged in six lithofacies (Table 2); five microfacies were additionally defined based on the petrographic analysis of fourteen thin sections (Table 1). The outcrop LRO has been previously addressed (Bell et al. 1994;Townsend 1998;Suárez and De la Cruz 1994a, b) as well as outcrop SRP2 (Katz 1961).
Grain-size categories used here follow Blair and McPherson 1999, and modal compositions of sandstone are based on Garzanti 2019. Lithological description of limestone is after Wright (1992), whereas non-genetic schemes were preferred for mixed- (Mount 1985), and volcaniclastic sediments (Fisher 1961;1966;Fisher and Schmincke 1984;Cas and Wright 1987). A brief glossary of the volcanic terms applied here can be found as supplementary material; the term "volcaniclastic" was preferred (instead of "volcanic"), to highlight the epiclastic nature of the volcanic material (e.g., volcaniclastic sandstone). Given the mixed nature of most of rocks analyzed here, depositional models for the interpretation of siliciclastic (e.g., Clifton 2006;Plint 2010), and for carbonate environments were required (e.g., Burchette and Wright 1992;Flügel 2010). Raw lithological data taken in the field are presented as supplementary material (Tables SM-1 to SM-3).
Measurements of microfossils were registered with the software ImageJ, using micro-photographs taken with an Olympus camera, model PEN Lite E-PL7. SEM images of thin sections were taken with a microscope ZEISS WITec RISE EVO MA15 at the Universität Heidelberg, following the procedure of Munnecke et al. (2000). Calculations were made in Microsoft Excel. Chronostratigraphic categories used here correspond with the ICS International Stratigraphic Chart v2022/02 (Cohen et al. 2013;updated). Illustrations were created with Adobe Illustrator CS6. Rocks and fossils samples are kept in the Geology Department of the Universidad Mayor in Santiago, Chile, as a temporary repository.

Facies analysis
The litho-and microfacies of the Toqui Formation analysed here have a mixed volcaniclastic-bioclastic composition. Rocks were classified into six lithofacies (see "Lithofacies"; Table 2), supported by the characterization of five microfacies (Table 1), presented below.

Microfacies
Five microfacies were defined (microfacies Mf-1 to Mf-5); they are briefly described below and summarized in Table 1. These will be referred to in the following sections, linked to their associated lithofacies and outcrops. Detailed compositional information of each thin section can be found as supplementary material (Table SM-4).
Terrigenous-rich microfacies indicate a submarine-settled, volcaniclastic sedimentation. For microfacies Mf-4, rounded lithics and abundant shell debris reflect epiclastic transport or coastal reworking. Non-vesicular volcanic rock fragments, and their core-margin differential alteration may be related to phreatomagmatism or quenching, respectively (Fisher and Schmincke 1984;Cas and Wright 1987). Allochems are analog to the ones found in the calcareous microfacies (Mf-1 to Mf-3), Mixed, pack-rudstone wit oysters and encrusted serpulids; note oxidation of the argillaceous-calcareous matrix (microfacies Mf-1). B Intraclasts type 1: bioclastic wackestone bearing the same fossils found discretely in the framework; note compaction, pressure solution and organic-rich matrix (microfacies Mf-4). C Intraclasts type 2: reworked clasts formed of radiaxial calcite (microfacies Mf-2, 3). D Fragment of carbonized wood (microfacies Mf-3a). E Left: calcisphere from microfacies Mf-1; right: phosphatic algal cysts (acritarch?) from organic matter-rich microfacies Mf-4om. F Several benthic foraminifers from microfacies Mf-2, 3 and 4. G Reworked and strongly bioeroded bryozoan colony, from a devitrified volcaniclasticrich sample (microfacies Mf-4); zoecia have been filled with clayand silica cements. H Organic matter-rich matrix from microfacies Mf-4om; note pressure solution and concentric alteration of volcanic lithics. I Similar composition observed in volcaniclastic-rich microfacies Mf-4; note difficult differentiation of lithics and matrix as well as formation of clay and chert cements, likely after devitrification. J Compositional variability of volcanic lithics. Left: intermediate clast with trachytic texture (microfacies Mf-4); right: rhyolitic clasts with micropoikilitic texture (devitrified; microfacies Mf-4c). K Common marine calcareous cements found in the mixed rocks: isopachous dogtooth around a bioclast (black arrow); porosity subsequently filled by blocky-type cement. L Pseudo-grainstone with a strong neomorphic texture; note the presence of mud peloids, not clear if primary of secondary (pseudomatrix; microfacies Mf-1). M-O close-up of volcaniclastic-rich lithofacies Mf-4 (quartzo-feldspatho-lithic sandstone); note similar composition of volcanic lithics and matrix. M-N Compaction of matrix forming pressure solution seams (white arrow); note possible devitrified-replaced relict pumice clasts (vesicular? black arrow), and formation of argillaceous cements around clasts (sericite). O Picture displaying similar composition between volcanic lithics (dotted lines) and matrix, interpreted as originally vitreous (pyroclastic?); note white mica in the central part (white arrow) ◂ they were most likely swept off-(shell debris) or eroded from near-coast areas (cemented?). Given their poor textural maturity (matrix-rich) and devitrified matrix, these microfacies are interpreted as formed after remobilization of non-consolidated deposits. However, organic-rich samples (e.g., phosphatic algal cysts in Mf-4om; Fig. 3E) indicate sedimentation in a poorly oxygenated setting or during a period of high productivity (Capelli et al. 2021). Microfacies Mf-5 depicts remobilization of crystal-rich volcaniclastics, likely fractionated during the eruption or concentrated during the epiclastic transport (see Chapter 11 in Cas and Wright 1987). Its parallel lamination, and the incorporation of bioclasts is linked to current-transport. Calcareous cements are interpreted as diagenetical, while fractured crystals and titanite might reflect burial diagenesis and circulation of high-T pore fluids.

Lithofacies
Six lithofacies were defined in the study area; they are presented in decreasing grain-size order ( Table 2). The main lithology is shown in upper case (e.g., R: rudstone; SG: sandstone > conglomerate, also sandy conglomerate), whereas lower case prefixes indicate composition (e.g., b: bioclastic; v: volcaniclastic). Suffixes refer to structures (e.g., p: planar bedding; m: massive). Sedimentary logs and their associated lithofacies can be found in Fig. 4.

Mixed bioclastic-volcaniclastic, sandy conglomerate (bGSm)
This lithofacies is formed of bioclastic-volcaniclastic, sandy conglomerate, arranged in tabular beds (Fig. 5). Bedding is 0.3-0.4 m-thick, with sharp contacts, usually marked by changes in gravel content (Fig. 5I). The framework of lithofacies bGSm is matrix-supported (locally clast-supported), conformed by pebble-sized clasts (diameter: max = 2.5 cm, average = 1 cm), embedded in a coarse-to very coarsegrained, sandy-muddy calcareous matrix (Fig. 5E, I, J). Exceptionally, a singular bed of lithofacies bGSm bears cobble-sized lithics (sub-facies bGSm-g; clasts-size up to 15 cm, average 2-5 cm; Fig., 5G). Gravel is formed of massive to diffusely graded, volcanic rocks and frequent bioclasts (Fig. 5E, G, J). Lithics are poorly-sorted, rounded-to sub-angular, light-colored and mono-oligomictic. Fossils are reworked, highly fragmented, and poorly packed; bioclasts are dominated by bedding-concordant, platy oyster shells (length up to 10 cm; Fig. 5E), though some beds also bear in situ and reworked colonial corals (Fig. 5J) as well as scarce carbonized wood remains.   Fig. 4A. B Panoramic view of the mixed calcareous outcrops, including the one here studied at the lower-right margin (white rectangle). C Close-up of the upper part of the outcrop, displaying a decreasing bed-thickness upwards (white arrow), and the alternation of sharp-sinuous and amalgamated contacts. D Crudely/diffusely bedded strata of the LRO section, showing decreasing bed-thickness (white arrow) and differential weathering of beds forming overhangs (close-up of the white square from B); person as scale (black arrow). E Coarse-grained lithofacies composed of gravel-sized oyster fragments and volcanic lithics (lithofacies bGSm). F Erosive contact between the mixed lithofacies of the Toqui Formation (Manto Member) and the Foitz-ick Volcanic Complex, a local member of the Ibáñez Formation. In G, I, J: Coarse-grained mixed lithofacies showing terrigenous material (black arrows: gravel-sized volcanic clasts) and bioclasts (white arrows). G Bioclastic-volcaniclastic, pebble-cobble-sized sandy conglomerate (lithofacies bGSm-g). H Reworked and bioeroded, bigsized gryphaeid oyster (Aetostreon sp.1) I Contact between lithofacies bGSm (mixed bioclasticvolcaniclastic, sandy conglomerate) and bSGm (mixed bioclastic-volcaniclastic, gravelly sandstone); white arrows point to reworked corals. J Close-up of lithofacies bGSm; note the preservation of colonial corals in life position (white arrows) between the gravel (black arrows). Scale bar = 1 cm. Legend for all pictures and sedimentary logs is presented in Fig. 4 Page 13 of 31 14 The matrix of lithofacies bGSm consists of sandy-gravelly, volcaniclastic-bioclastic, packstone-rudstone, with grainstone patches (microfacies Mf-1; Fig. 2A, B).
Interpretation: Based on its mixed volcaniclastic-calcareous composition, coarse-grained and poorly sorted components, and reworked sessile and free-living epifauna, lithofacies bGSm represents deposition in a relatively high-energy coastal environment Plint 2010). Coarse-grained coastal sediments are usually linked to the reworking of fluvial mouth-bar deposits Hart and Plint 1995), though the monooligomictic composition of the volcanic clasts suggests erosion of a local source, as observed in some volcanic islands (Felton 2002;Felton et al. 2006). The tabular beds, poor sorting, and matrix-supported fabric, may indicate a rapid settling, likely occurring during storms ; the latter is also supported by the packstone and rudstone microfacies (Flügel 2010). Mixture of subrounded and sub-angular clasts might indicate abrasion in the beachface, during storm swells ("swash area"; Hart and Plint 1989;1995).
Interpretation: This lithofacies corresponds to a basal lag formed by shell debris (Collinson et al. 2006). Based on its coarse grain-size, dense packing, and bedding-concordant bioclasts, it is interpreted as a "sedimentologic concentration" deposit, conforming proximal tempestites settled over the normal-weather wave base (Kidwell et al. 1986), and likely transported by storm-induced bottom flows (Flügel 2010).
Interpretation: Analog to bGSm, lithofacies bSGm depicts a subtidal environment. Better sorting of clasts and oriented shell debris reflect current-influenced hydraulic sorting. Sinuous-topped, amalgamated beds depict periodic erosiondeposition pulses (Collinson et al. 2006), and subsequently wave-or current reworking (Walker and Plint 1992;Clifton 2006); whereas sharp contacts might represent reactivation surfaces. These tabular beds could represent the formation of gravelly-sandy low relief bedforms linked to alongshore currents (similar to Fig. 14 in Hart and Plint 1995; also "bedload-sheets" sensu Carling 1999; or "carbonate sandbodies" sensu Wright and Burchette 1996). These bedforms are typically developed on the shoreface (Hart and Plint 1995).

Rippled, bioclastic (volcaniclastic) limestone (bLr)
The lithofacies bLr is composed of gravelly-sandy, bioclastic limestone, with a minor volcaniclastic content. It is arranged in tabular layers with sinuous bed boundaries,  Fig. 4B). C Closeup of the MCH outcrop from A (Jacob's staff as scale within white circle, 1.5 m-length); red circles with capital letters are linked to the pictures D-N. D megarippled bioclastic limestone (lithofacies bLr-m); note decimeter wave-length and amalgamated contacts. Black arrows: sharp erosive contacts (sinuous). E Gravelly-sandy bioclastic limestone (bSGm) with amalgamated contacts (dotted line) from the lowermost part of the outcrop; note sinuous contacts (black arrows) and scattered bioclasts. F Several parallel beds conformed of oscillation-rippled, sandy bioclastic limestone (lithofacies bLr-o); note some amalgamated contacts and parallel-arranged tafoni (white and black arrow, respectively). . Light-blue arrows: calcareous beds; grey arrow: tuffaceous sandstone (lithofacies tSp-b); white arrow: decreasing bed-thickness upsection. D Overhang of carbonate-cemented bed of lithofacies bSp-c, exposed between brittle bedsets of lithofacies bSp; note the sinuous internal, amalgamated surfaces (hammer as scale). This layer corresponds to the lowermost light-blue arrow in B-C. E Close-up of lithofacies bSp (bioclastic, muddy sandstone); note its dark-colour and matrix-rich composition as well as abundant comminuted shell debris (pencil as scale). F Reworked (convex-up) and bioeroded specimen of Aetostreon sp.2 within lithofacies bSp. G Complete, well-preserved specimen of Belemnopsis sp. H Close-up of C, displaying the middle position of the tuffaceous strata (lithofacies tSp-b); note diffuse cross-bedded? beds of calcareous sandstone (bSp-c) above. I Aetostreon sp.2 sampled from lithofacies tSp-b; the fossil stills bear sediments. J Gryphaeid oysters (Aetostreon sp.2) in life position conforming a small cluster. Scale bar (white) = 1 cm usually amalgamated (Fig. 6C-E). Based on the grain-size and scale of ripples, two subtypes were defined: (i) bLr-m: "mega-rippled" (sensu Swift et al. 1983), or coarse-grainedrippled (sensu Leckie 1988), gravelly, bioclastic limestone (Fig. 6D, E); and (ii) bLr-o: oscillation-rippled, sandy, bioclastic limestone (Fig. 6F, G).
Interpretation: This lithofacies depicts a shallow marine environment emplaced above the fair-weather-wave base (Burchette and Wright 1992;Flügel 2010). Mega-ripples (bLr-m) have been regarded as the equivalent of hummocky cross-stratification for coarse-grained sediments, which are typically linked to storm-surge deposits (Leckie 1988;Cummings et al. 2009). Based on the previous, and on their poorly sorted microfacies (Mf-2), they are interpreted here as calcareous proximal tempestites (analog to "Facies A" of Pérez-López and Pérez-Valera 2012). On the other hand, given its grain size, better sorted microfacies (Mf-3), and symmetrical rippled-beds, lithofacies bLr-o reflects an oscillatory flow typical of fair-weather wave action, and minor influence of near-coast unidirectional currents (Collinson et al. 2006;Plint 2010).
Interpretation: Based on its composition and alteration, this lithofacies is interpreted as a submarine-settled, tuffaceous sandstone (remobilized tuffaceous deposits sensu McPhie et al. 1993). Given its grain size, lamination, and fossil content, it may reflect sedimentation by currents.

Sedimentary logs and facies associations
This section describes three sedimentary logs (Fig. 1D) as well as their facies associations and paleoenvironmental interpretation. Outcrops have mixed composition varying from calcareous-rich (LRO, MCH) to volcaniclasticrich lithofacies (SPR2); they are described from north to south. The detailed description of each sedimentary log and their beds, compiled in the field, has been provided as supplementary material (Tables SM-1 to SM-3).
At the base, mixed rocks overlie meter-sized, volcanic boulders of the Foitzick Volcanic Complex with an erosive unconformity  Fig. 5F). In addition, an angular unconformity, and local peperitic contact have been reported from adjacent, correlative outcrops (Bell et al. 1994;Suárez et al. 1996;Suárez and De la Cruz 1994a, b). The top of the LRO section is not exposed (Fig. 5B-D).
Macrofossils are reworked and fragmented, dominated by reworked oysters (rarely big-sized specimens of Aetostreon sp.1; Fig. 5H), but colonial corals were also found in the lowermost beds, some of them in life position (Bell et al. 1994;Townsend 1998; and here, see  Bell et al. 1994;Townsend 1998), but they were not observed during this work.
Interpretation: The La Rosita outcrop depicts a relatively shallow marine environment, placed above the fair-weather wave-base. Its sub-environments comprise a deepeningupwards succession from a storm-influenced, gravelly upper shoreface towards a sandy lower shoreface (Hart and Plint 1995). These are here interpreted to represent a mixed volcaniclastic-carbonate inner ramp (sensu Burchette and Wright 1992;Fig. 14.3 in Flügel 2010). The fragmented fossil content, including sessile and free-living epifauna, reflects the development of local communities, though not forming reefs ("ahermatypic corals" sensu De la Cruz et al. 2003), and rather grew as discrete small crusts over the coastal gravel deposits.
These gravelly deposits represent the marine erosion over a rocky shoreline (coastal cliff), eroding an older volcanic terrain . Based on the inferred "onlap" contact of these rocks above the volcanic complex (illustrated in Fig. 5 in Suarez and De La Cruz 1994a; also in  Fig. 5B here), also reported as locally peperitic (Bell et al. 1994;Suarez and De La Cruz 1994a, b), these rocks might reflect transgressive deposits settled over a volcanic flank Bell et al. 1994;Suárez et al. 1996;Suárez and De la Cruz 1994a, b). In particular, the gravelly facies (bGSm) may represent transgressive conglomerates .

Muralla China Section (MCH)-waveand storm-dominated inner-ramp
This section is located 2.8 km to the south-southeast of section LRO, near the northern end of a sub-horizontal sill, locally known as "Muralla China" (Figs. 1D; 4B; 6B-C). The succession comprises a wedge-shaped, steep outcrop formed of ca. 34 m of gravelly-sandy, bioclastic limestone dipping to the southeast (strike/dip = 060/20; Fig. 6A). The limestone conformably overlies pale grey-green-colored, diffusely bedded, volcanic rocks of the Foitzick Volcanic Complex (sensu Bell et al. 1994; Suárez and De la Cruz 1994a, b, see Fig. 6A). Gravel-sized volcanic clasts found within the calcareous beds suggest erosion over this basal unit. The top of the MCH succession is not exposed (Fig. 6A).
The fossil content is fragmentary, though reworked, but articulated big-sized oysters (Gryphaeidae indet; Aetostreon sp.1.; Fig. 6M, N) and other small pectinids (Entolium? sp.; Fig. 6K), as well as bulb-shaped fish teeth (Pycnodontidae indet.), were found scattered in the middle part of the section (Fig. 6A, C). Near the top, complete, small-and medium-sized, oyster left-valves assigned to Aetostreon sp. and A. sp.2 (Fig. 6H) are abundant in mixed, gravelly floatstone beds. The latter were also found as small clusters, but detached from its original bed (ex situ; Fig. 6J). Exceptionally, some lenses of carbonized wood were observed (Fig. 6L) and, at the northern end of the outcrop, a lenticular bed of oyster-rich rudstone/coquinite was found (bRp; Fig. 6I).
This outcrop is described here for the first time. Regarding composition, thickness, and inferred age (Sect. "Stratigraphy and correlations"), the Muralla China limestone corresponds to one of the most remarkable Lower Cretaceous calcareous outcrop reported from the Aysén-Río Mayo Basin.

Salto Río Pollux Section (SRP2)-mixed, distal mid-ramp
This outcrop is located about 1 km to the south of the Muralla China Section (MCH), at the northern hand of Route 7, just before reaching the Pollux River (Fig. 1D). It is composed of ca. 9 m of dark-colored, bioclastic muddy sandstone dipping towards the southeast (strike/dip = 041/10; Figs. 4C; 7A, B). Its base and top are not exposed; however, the outcrop is capped by the Muralla China sill (see 1.2; Fig. 7A-C) and, about 100 m to the east, this outcrop is separated from the black mudstones of the Katterfeld Formation by an inferred fault (Fig. 1D).
These tempestites show grain size differences between gravelly-grained shelly fragments and sandy-sized volcaniclastics, indicating a turbulent hydraulic sorting (Kidwell and Bosence 1991;Immenhauser 2009;Figs. 3I;7E). The abundant comminuted shelly fragments were most likely swept off from the breaker-or swash area and were offshore-transported during storm-surges (Flügel 2010). As shown from the muddy matrix and well-preserved complete fossils, storm currents interrupted the relatively quiet background sedimentation, rapidly burying (or mildly reworking) the small, thin-shelled, recliner oysters in life position (Aetostreon sp.2; Fig. 7F, I-J) as well as other corporal fossils (e.g., belemnites; Fig. 7G). These small-sized Aetostreon sp.2 likely proliferated in a water-sediment interface affected by sporadic events of eutrophication, inferred from its organic matter content (Nori and Lathuilière 2003).
The high terrigenous content of the Salto Río Pollux beds reflects a major volcaniclastic supply (Table 1 McPhie et al. 1993;Schneider 2000). Previously, these volcanic deposits were classified as "volcanic coquinas" by Katz (1961). This author inferred a poorly-oxygenated, marine environment for these rocks, linked to a coeval, subaerial-and submarine volcanic eruptions. The former is supported by the fetid-odor and organic matter content of these rocks (microfacies Mf-4;O'Brien and Slatt 1990;Ulmer-Scholle et al. 2014), and it could be linked to settling in a restricted environment or during a period of high biological productivity (Capelli et al. 2021). Regarding the volcanism, there is not enough evidence to support a subaqueous source.

Systematic paleontology
Oysters and red algae are the most abundant fossils found in the outcrops analyzed here. This section presents a detailed description of newly found fragments of the calcareous red alga Archamphiroa jurassica, identified here for the first time in the Lower Cretaceous of Chile (see "Calcareous-rich microfacies"; Fig. 2E, F; 8A-I). In addition, some oysters of the Aetostreon genus are also described (Fig. 9).
Type material: The neotype was designated by Bucur et al. (2009) in algal wackestone of the Cotidiano Formation (see Fig. 1A, C). According to these authors, a neotype was required given the loss of the original material, in which no holotype had been defined (see Steinmann 1930).
Type locality: Puesto Cotidiano (44°50'S; 71°39'W), at the isthmus connecting the La Plata and Fontana lakes in the Chubut province of Argentina (Fig. 1C). Originally defined by Steinmann (1930)  Description: Because of their small size, fragmentary preservation, strong cementation, and similar color to that of the calcareous matrix-cement, thalli of A. jurassica are difficult to identify in hand samples. The following characteristics were used here for the assignation in thin section (based on Steinmann 1930;Bucur et al. 2009).
External: Thallus fragments are singular or frequently bifurcated, with rounded margins (Fig. 8A, C, E, F-I). Their cross-sections are circular, or ellipsoidal when obliquely cut (Fig. 8E, G, I); longitudinal views are ellipsoidal or sub-rectangular ( Fig. 8A-C, H). When bifurcated, thalli are lambda-shaped, branches appear parallel-arranged, showing no hinge-like structure or constriction at the point of bifurcation (i.e., non-geniculate; Fig. 8F-H). Given their size and "dotted", internal cell arrangement, thalli fragments might be confused with echinoids, though red algae display a clear fan-like extinction (Fig. 8H, I).
Internal: Thalli of A. jurassica are two-layered, with a central hypothallium covered by an outer perithallium (Fig. 8A, C, F-I). The hypothallium is multilayered coaxial, conformed of an alternation of dark-and pale-colored arched cellular layers, convexly-oriented towards the apical part (Fig. 8A, C, F). Internally, the arches comprise elongated filaments, which diverge in an acute fan-shaped fashion (Fig. 8F, H). Filaments of the perithallium are oriented perpendicular to the thallus margin (Fig. 8A, E-G, I). In cross-section, the hypothallium appears darker or with a structureless cell arrangement, contrasting with the radial pattern observed in the perithallium (Fig. 8E, G, I).
In order to confirm peripheral cellular fusion, regarded as a diagnostic feature of this taxon, samples were observed using SEM, but without successful results. This may be linked to diagenetical alteration or incorrect preparation of the samples (see SEM-images as supplementary material).  Steinmann (1930) A Longitudinal view displaying the internal hypothallium-perithallium contrast; note the alternation of dark-light arched layers in the hypothallium (apical part to the right). B Red algae-rich grainstone (microfacies Mf-3a), including several fragments of A. jurassica; note the bioerosion of bioclasts and dissolution-refill of the hypothallium. C Similar to A, longitudinal view of A. jurassica displaying the alternated layering (dark-coloured arches convex to the left). D Reworked, bioeroded, and micritized red algae fragments, possible source of the calcareous sediments (microfacies Mf-3a); note compaction (concave-convex contacts). E Club-shaped cavities in the peripheral zone of a reworked alga (cross-section), interpreted as bioerosion (white arrow). F Longitudinal view of A. jurassica displaying its non-geniculate ramification. G Cross-section of A. jurassica displaying the ramification (bifurcation) and hypothallium-perithallium contrast. H Longitudinal view displaying non-geniculate ramification, and the fan-shaped cell-arrangement in the hypothallium. I Circular crosssections of thalli from A. jurassica are easy to confuse with echinoid spines; however, the red alga shows a fan-like extinction. J Reworked specimen of Parachaetetes sp. K Reworked specimen of "Solenopora" sp. Photographs from C, E, J, K courtesy of Prof. Dr. Ioan Bucur. Scale: black = 0.5 mm, white = 1 mm ◂ Nevertheless, the assignation was confirmed by the Prof. Dr. Bucur (pers. com., 2020), with whom an algae-rich sample was shared.
Dimensions: The main size parameters for A. jurassica are summarized in Table 3 (n = 128, single measures are presented in Table SM-5 as supplementary material): Remarks: Reproductive structures are absent. However, many thallus fragments show occasional circular, clubshaped, and irregular cavities as well as small, marginal   Fig. 8A-B, E).
Based on its cylindrical thallus shape and non-geniculate bifurcation, a fruticose to arborescent growth form is inferred for Archamphiroa jurassica (sensu classification of Woelkerling et al. 1993; see Fig. 10A, A').
Stratigraphic range: An early Callovian age was inferred for the beds bearing Archamphiroa jurassica in Central Argentina by Steinmann (1930), based on its association with Upper Jurassic brachiopods ("Rhynchonella acuticosta") and corals (Thamnasteria sp.). In Southern Argentina, a late Tithonian age was suggested for the Cotidiano Formation by Bucur et al. (2009), unit bearing the A. jurassica neotype, type specimen defined by the same authors. The latter was based on the presence of Steinmanella (Macrotrigonia sp.) and Megatrigonia cf. fontanaensis, and on the close similarity of this fauna with the one found at Arroyo Pedregoso, which has been ammonite-dated to late Tithonian by Olivero (1982; based on Berriasella sp. and Micracanthoceras ruedai).
Outside southern Argentina, Archamphiroa jurassica Steinmann (1930) is now described from Coyhaique, Chile. This red alga is abundant in the mixed-calcareous outcrops here presented (see Sects. "La Rosita Section (LRO) -gravelly, mixed inner ramp"-"Muralla China Section (MCH)wave and storm-dominated inner-ramp" above). The age of these outcrops is restricted to the late Berriasian/early Valanginian -Hauterivian? (see "Age of the deposits"). Therefore, this extends the range of A. jurassica to the Early Cretaceous, in particular, between the Tithonian-Valanginian (Hauterivian?).
Diagnosis (modified from Stenzel 1971;Cooper 1995;Toscano and Lazo 2020): Medium-to large-sized, thick-shelled, inequivalve. Opisthogyrate umbo, gyrostreoid or exogyroid ligament area. Left valve: convex and deep; right valve: flat or slightly concave. Left valve thickened in the crest zone of umbonal ridge, displaying a keel in the posterior third. Keel is rounded to acute, commonly surmounted by knobs. Shallow groove parallel to the keel separates a slightly more convex posterior flank. No ornamentation except for growth lines or occasionally radial wrinkles. Internally, adductor muscle scar usually subtruncate antero-dorsally, but sometimes rounded; paradontal apparatus well developed; chomata lacking.
Description: Oysters assigned to Aetostreon in this study display a marked morphological variation, interpreted here as evidence of the occurrence of at least two different species. Morphs are discernable based on their size and general shape of the valves, but specific relevant taxonomic information is unfortunately not preserved. Shells of Aetostreon sp.1 are big-sized, thick, with a subtrigonal outline and a keel more pronounced in the dorsal third (Figs. 5H; 9A-B); internally, lack of an umbonal cavity, and the rounded adductor muscle scar is dorsally truncated (Fig. 9B). Overall, Aetostreon sp.1 resembles A. latissimum from the northern Neuquén Basin in Argentina (e.g., Lazo 2007;Rubilar and Lazo 2009;Aguirre-Urreta et al. 2011;Toscano and Lazo 2020). The lack of key diagnostic traits (i.e., ligament area, umbo), presently demands the use of an open nomenclature for them.
Specimens of Aetostreon sp.2 are smaller, and thinner than A. sp.1, their left valves are globular with a subovate outline, and the umbo is opisthogyrate, with a small-to bigsized attachment area (Fig. 9J-R), and well-preserved growth lines (Fig. 9M, O, P). The keel is more pronounced in the umbonal area, changing to a slightly more convex posterior flank in the rest of the valve (Fig. 9L-R). Internally, Aetostreon sp.2 displays a moderate umbonal cavity (Fig. 9L, R), a narrow, linear paradontal recess, a subcircular adductor muscle scar, and the lack of chomata (Fig. 9L, R); these features are very similar to "Aetostreon sp. nov." of Rubilar (2000). A third type of Aetostreon displays intermediate size between both Aetostreon sp.1 and A. sp.2, with left valves elongated in a ventral or ventro-posterior direction (Fig. 9C, E), a subovate-to subtriangular outline (Fig. 9C, E, G), and a keel in the posterior third, more pronounced near the opisthogyrate umbo ( Fig. 9D-E, G). Given their poor preservation and sediment-coverage, it is not clear whether these oysters represent juveniles of Aetostreon sp.1, bigger morphotypes of Aetostreon sp.2, or a third different species. Therefore, they are presented conservatively as Aetostreon sp. (Fig. 9C-I).
Stratigraphic range: Globally, Aetostreon have been reported from the Oxfordian-Albian, but mainly from the  Rivas et al. 2021). Given the different composition and possible tectonic contacts between outcrops, which may reflect different timing of sedimentation (see "Discussion" in text), they are presented separated between calcareous-rich (LRO, MCH) and volcaniclastic-rich (SRP2). A Mixed, calcareous-volcaniclastic ramp model, during sedimentation of the LRO-and MCH beds. A' Cross-section displaying the shoreline-offshore arrangement of the facies associations, and the hypothetically, original habitat (communities) of the taxa here described as a fossil assemblage. B Mixed, calcareous-volcaniclastic ramp model, during sedimentation of the SRP2 beds. B' Crosssection displaying the shoreline-offshore arrangement of the facies associations. I-R inner ramp, M-R mid-ramp, O-R outer ramp, ad non-genicular algal debris, as the result of near-coast wave and storm-reworking, bioerosion, and grazing; they might resemble the current "maerl-type" deposits; ap algal pavements/meadows developed in the inner ramp, likely conforming non-geniculate rhodoliths; cc coastal carbonates; source of the eroded and crushed material, offshore-transported towards the deeper facies (SPR2); dt distal tempestites, formed by the offshore transport (mid-ramp) of shell-debris and sand-sized volcaniclastics during major storm-surges; ol small-sized, gryphaeid oysters in life position (isolated or in clusters; see Figs. 6, 7); rc rocky coast (source of gravel and encrusting organisms); ro reworked gryphaeid oysters; rv paralic/coastal resedimented volcaniclastics, interpreted as the main source of siliciclastic material in mixed lithofacies; sv syneruptive volcaniclastic input, eruption-fed (syneruptive) or after costal reworking of non-consolidated tuffaceous deposits. Scales are approximate, based on the current position of the outcrops (fossils not to scale) Berriasian-Aptian range (Cooper 1995;Toscano and Lazo 2020, and references therein
Nevertheless, based on composition, common fossil assemblages, inferred sedimentary environments, and contact relationship with the volcanic units, the outcrops La Rosita (LRO) and Muralla China (MCH) appear to be laterally correlative, and part of the same carbonate-rich, mixed inner ramp setting (Figs. 4A, B; 10A-A'). Volcaniclastic-rich strata from the uppermost LRO outcrop show a sporadic clastic input, whereas thicker bedded limestones of the MCH outcrop reflects a relatively stable carbonate sedimentation, either located in a more distant setting from the coastal volcaniclastic source, or deposited during a phase of quiescent terrigenous supply (Nelson 1988;James 1997;Dorobek, 2008; Fig. 10A). Both outcrops are carbonate-rich and assigned here to the Manto Member of the Toqui Formation (sensu Rivas et al. 2021).
The relationship between the previous outcrops (LRO, MCH) and the Salto Río Pollux (SRP2) section is unclear (Fig. 4B, C), given their contrasting lithologies, structural attitude, and inferred tectonic contacts. Although they share the same fossil content (but in different proportions, see Table 1), which may support a lateral correlation, the SRP2 succession bear intraclasts type 1 (reworked bioclastic limestone; Fig. 3B), and its composition reflects a deeper setting and a major volcaniclastic supply. Alternatively, based on the volcaniclastic-rich facies of the SRP2 outcrop, more compatible with the San Antonio Member of the Toqui Formation (sensu Rivas et al. 2021), it might represent a vertical transition in the facies, with sediments deposited in a (younger) period controlled by a terrigenous and probably syneruptive input (tuffaceous beds of lithofacies tSpb; Fig. 10B-B'). An increased clastic supply may also be related to enhanced run-off, triggered by the change from dry to humid (and hotter?) conditions (Capelli et al. 2021).

Paleoenvironmental interpretation "Cool-water" carbonate setting
Following the "cool-water" criteria of James (1997), and based on paleolatitude (non-tropical), platform morphology (ramp-type), and mode of life of benthic organisms (heterozoan association), a non-tropical, "temperate" or "cool-water" (sensu lato, Schlager 2003) setting is inferred for the study area, i.e., an open marine environment with water temperatures of < 18°-20 °C ("temperate-type" sensu Simone and Carannante 1988;James 1997;Schlager 2005). However, since factors other than temperature may strongly affect carbonate ecosystems and their grain associations (e.g., terrigenous input, trophic conditions, water chemistry, CO2 saturation, among others, Kindler and Wilson 2010;Westphal et al. 2010;Michel et al. 2018), a "cool water" setting is used here in a broad sense (see contrasting examples in "Regional comparison"). Criteria supporting a cool-water setting for the rocks studied here are explained below.
As shown in "Age of the deposits", the mixed rocks studied here appear to be restricted to the Lower Cretaceous. For that period, paleotectonic reconstructions of South America place the study area to south of 45°-50°S (e.g., Leinfelder et al. 2002;Scasso and Kiessling 2002;Seton et al. 2012;Matthews et al. 2016), i.e., in a non-tropical, high paleolatitude (Scasso and Kiessling 2002).
Facies, sedimentary structures and reworked bioclasts depict a shallow-marine environment for the mixed outcrops of the Toqui Formation (refer to Sects. "Sedimentary logs and facies associations"). Wave-and storm-related structures reflect a relatively high-energy and a hydrodynamic control (Figs. 5C, 6C-G; 7D, E) regarded as typical for open shelves and ramp-type carbonate platforms lacking physical barriers (i.e., reefs, sand shoals; Burchette and Wright 1992;Wright and Burchette 1996;James 1997;Pedley and Carannante 2006;Flügel 2010).
Red algae are the most remarkable photo-autotrophic organisms found in these rocks of the Toqui Formation (Fig. 8); they might represent the main source of carbonate (Wray 1977;Flügel 2010; abraded-bioeroded algae in Fig. 8B, D). Algal content is reworked and found as broken branches or rounded bioclasts, abundant in waveinfluenced sediments (inner ramp; lithofacies bLr). An original shallow-water setting in the photic zone is inferred for them (Michel et al. 2018), encrusting submerged rocky blocks ("solenoporoids"), or conforming semi-protected?, low-relief meadows or "pavements" in coastal areas (see Fig. 5 in Henrich et al. 1995 ; Fig. 10A, A' here). The latter, rich in ramified non-geniculate algae (A. jurassica), is considered as wave-reworked and offshore-transported (Fig. 10A, A'). Red algae-rich grainstones like the ones described resemble the current "maerl-type" deposits, conformed by broken branches of non-geniculate, unattached rhodoliths, typically found today in high-latitude, shallow and cool-water settings of the North East Atlantic (Henrich et al. 1995;Ehrhold et al. 2021).
Ahermatypic corals flourished during the incipient transgression, encrusting subtidal gravel in a shallow-water setting; they disappeared upsection likely due to sediment stress (Risk and Edinger 2011; see Fig. 10A, A'). Echinoid plates and spines are rich in wave-and storm-reworked sediments. An epifaunal or semi-infaunal habit in the sandy sediments, grazing on the algal meadows is commonly recognized for them (Nebelsick and Bassi 2000;Kroh 2003; see Fig. 10A, A').
In Gryphaea, their relatively heavy shells are unlikely to be distantly transported, serving as a good paleoecological indicator (Bayer et al. 1985). In addition, wider morphotypes may reflect an ecophenotypic adaptation to firmer substrates (e.g., sand-rich); this is also supported by the presence of bioeroded and reworked shells, more exposed to erosional events (Bayer et al. 1985). Therefore, in the MCH outcrop, small-and mid-sized Aetostreon spp. were likely transported from low-energy, muddy-sandy shallow-marine settings (see paragraph above), or they were adapted to bioclastic sandy bottoms of the carbonate inner ramp (Fig. 10A, A'). In the SPR2 beds, dominant small-sized Aetostreon sp.2 thrived in mud-rich soft-bottoms (LaBarbera 1981), with tendency to eutrophication (rich in organic matter; Nori and Lathuilière 2003), interpreted here as part of the mid-ramp (Fig. 10B, B').

Paleoclimate
The calcareous sedimentation in the Aysén-Río Mayo Basin was strongly diachronic, likely ranging from the Tithonian-Valanginian, or even Hauterivian (see Sect. "Stratigraphy and correlations"). Paleoclimate models for the Jurassic-Cretaceous transitions are usually contrasting. Some authors infer an equable warm climate, with a lower temperature gradient and absence of polar ice caps (Hay 2008;Föllmi 2012), while others depict episodic cooling or "cool-snaps" (Price 1999;Kessels et al. 2006;Donnadieu et al. 2011), or even seasonal growth of polar ice (Price 1999(Price , 2009Price et al. 2000;McArthur et al. 2007;Mutterlose et al. 2009;Hay and Floegel 2012;Tennant et al. 2017 among many others). Globally, the most remarkable J-K cool-spans are depicted as occurring during the late Tithonian, the mid-Valanginian, and across the Aptian-Albian boundary (Price 1999), though they have being called into question in more recent studies (Föllmi 2012;Jenkyns et al. 2012). This paradox is also extended to southern South America, where some models infer warm (> 25 °C), sea-surface temperatures in the Southern Ocean during the J-K transition (ca. 52°S; Jenkyns et al. 2012;Vickers et al. 2019); while other propose episodic cool intervals in the late Tithonian-earliest Berriasian, Valanginian, earliest Hauterivian, late Barremian, Aptian, and earliest Albian (Salazar and Stinnesbeck 2015;Brysch 2018).
In the Aysén-Río Mayo Basin (Fig. 1B), the paleoclimatic evidence for the existence of cold snaps is inconclusive. Overall, warm and humid conditions have been inferred for the deposition of the Coyhaique Group (Tithonian-Aptian), but only based on the presence of limestone (Skarmeta 1976;Bell et al. 1994Bell et al. , 1996Townsend 1998). However, as presented in "Paleoecology", mixed rocks of the Toqui Formation exposed south of Coyhaique, and assigned to the late Berriasian/early Valanginian-Hauterivian? (see "Age of the deposits"; "Stratigraphy and correlations"), display typical features of "cool water" carbonates (see ""Cool-water" carbonate setting").
Two events of global cooling are known from this period and are supported by evidence from Patagonia (Brysch 2018). The first one, across the Berriasian-Valanginian boundary, is marked by a glacioeustatic, long-term sea-level fall (Pucéat et al. 2003;Haq 2014). The second, in the Valanginian (Weissert and Erba 2004;Cavalheiro et al. 2021), corresponds to a positive carbon isotope excursion ("Weissert Event"; e.g., van de Schootbrugge et al. 2000;Meissner et al. 2015;Price et al. 2018), linked to a high rate of organic carbon burial Price et al. 2018). Alternatively, these "episodes of environmental change" (sensu Föllmi 2012), among others during the Early Cretaceous, may represent short-termed humid periods alternated with long-termed arid greenhouse conditions (Föllmi 2012). For example, to the north, in the Neuquén basin (ca. 37°S), a shift to more humid conditions have been inferred during the early Berriasian-latest early Valanginian, prior to the onset of the Weissert Event (Capelli et al. 2021). There, humid conditions would have led to an enhanced runoff, triggering a shift from calcareous-rich to clastic-rich sedimentation (Capelli et al. 2021) as observed here (see ""Cool-water" carbonate setting").
However, given the several unresolved problems regarding the global J-K paleoclimate models (Hay 2017), and the ambiguous, broad age range inferred for these outcrops of the Toqui Formation, more analytical data are required, to incorporate them in the global paleoclimatic scheme.

Regional comparison
The Toqui formation has been correlated with the upper Tithonian Cotidiano Formation, and with the Tithonian? -Hauterivian Tres Lagunas Formation from Argentina (45°S; see Sect. "Stratigraphy and correlations"). Archamphiroa jurassica has been reported from both the Cotidiano Fm. and from the outcrops presented here (Toqui Fm.), though both units differ in their carbonate depositional settings and inferred ages (see "Age of the deposits"). The Cotidiano Formation consists of biohermal limestone ("coral-stromatoporoid patch reefs"; Ramos 1978), analog to the "Photozoan Association" of James (1997), likely settled in a tropical-subtropical environment (T > 22 °C sensu Ramos 1976;1978), or in a warm-water ocean (T > 18 °C sensu Kiessling et al. 1999;Leinfelder et al. 2002;Leinfelder et al. 2005). This contrast may be explained by the marked temporal gap between both deposits (Tithonian versus upper Berriasian-Hauterivian?), and potential deposition under differing paleoenvironmental conditions. A similar problem arises when comparing the present outcrops of the Toqui Formation with those from the Tres Lagunas Formation. Even though both units display a mixed carbonate-clastic composition and partly coeval ages, their calcareous facies and depositional environments are clearly different. At its type locality (Laguna Salada), the Tres Lagunas Formation includes conglomerates, limestones (coquinites and coral-bioherms), tuffaceous beds, and sandstone-mudstone alternations (some calcareous or bioclastic); these rocks are discretely exposed showing abrupt vertical and lateral facies changes (Scasso 1987;1989;Scasso and Kiessling 2002). Carbonate facies of the Tres Lagunas Fm. have been interpreted as coral patch-reefs and associated fore-reef deposits (Olivero 1983;Scasso 1987;1989), likely developed in a warm-water setting during the Berriasian-Valanginian (Scasso 1989;Scasso and Kiessling 2002). These rocks depict a rimmed carbonate shelf (bioherms), contrasting with the wave-and storm-influenced, openmarine ramp deposits presented here (see Sects. 4, and 6.1).
The cause behind these opposing depositional environments is not clear. Paleolatitude and temporality do not seem to be the controlling factors, and other variables must be considered; for example, their position within the basin (see paleo-reconstructions in Scasso 1989;Folguera and Iannizzotto 2004), but also coast morphology and hydraulic settings (rimmed shelf vs ramp profile), coeval volcanism (Scasso and Kiessling 2002), and terrigenous input or trophic conditions (e.g., coastal upwelling; Michel et al. 2018). The latter could have played a role in reef growth (Scasso and Kiessling 2002), as observed repeatedly in volcanic islands (Ramalho et al. 2013). Several other factors may favor the development of photozoan versus heterozoan benthic communities (e.g., temperature, salinity, water depth, CO 2 concentration, etc.; Nelson 1988;Pomar et al. 2004;Kindler and Wilson 2010; and references therein); their role in the study area is still unclear and needs to be addressed in future studies.

Conclusions
Three sections assigned to the Lower Cretaceous Toqui Formation, the lowermost member of the Coyhaique Group, are here investigated from an area south of Coyhaique in southern Chile (45°40'S). These rocks overlie the volcanic Ibáñez Formation, regarded to represent the early Valanginian in the study area, and their top is not exposed. In the study area, the sedimentological and microfacial analysis of the Toqui formation reveals a mixed calcareous-volcaniclastic composition, rich in reworked bioclasts conforming a heterozoan-type fossil assemblage. Mixed lithofacies and associated sedimentary structures reflect the development of a wave-and storm-influenced mixed ramp. Based on their lithologies, two outcrops were assigned to the Manto Member (calcareous-rich LRO, MCH sections) and one to the San Antonio Member of the Toqui Formation (volcaniclastic-rich SRP2 section). The calcareous sedimentation is depicted as part of a retrograding coast above an active volcanic terrain with sporadic activity.
Bioclastic, mixed calcareous rocks of the Toqui Formation conform a "heterozoan" association (heterotrophic organisms + red algae), bearing gryphaeid oysters (Aetostreon spp.), non-geniculate calcareous red algae, and echinoids as major constituents. Red algae are controlled by Archamphiroa jurassica, identified here for the first time in the Lower Cretaceous of Chile and previously reported only from the Tithonian of Argentina.
Based on the inferred high paleolatitude of these rocks (south of 45°-50°S), their heterozoan fossil assemblage, and depicted depositional setting (open-marine, ramp-type), a "cool-water" non-tropical setting is inferred for the Aysén-Río Mayo Basin in the Coyhaique area during the late Berriasian/early Valanginian-Hauterivian? This contrasts with the depositional environments inferred for correlative reefal rocks in Argentina (Tres Lagunas Formation), which reflect "warm-water" settings. In the Aysén-Río Mayo Basin, the influence of sea-water key physical variables in the carbonate sedimentation, as well as the position of the carbonate platforms within the basin, and their interaction with the volcanism are still unclear.

Data availability statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available as supplementary material of this article. This additional information includes: i) description of each sedimentary log and their beds, compiled in the field (Table SM-1 to SM-3); ii) description and modal composition of each thin section (Table SM-4); measurement of exemplars of Archamphiroa jurassica under the microscope (Table SM-5).

Conflict of interest
The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http:// creat iveco mmons. org/ licen ses/ by/4. 0/.