Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of banner ad type, web content type and theme consistency on banner blindness: an eye movement study

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Cognitive Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During the epidemic, online advertising became more important, and several studies have suggested that internet users tend to avoid viewing online ads, such as banner ads. Previous studies have shown that product items that use animation lead to increased visual attention to all items on a webpage at the expense of attention to nonanimated items on the same webpage. However, few studies have compared the impact of the picture and text forms taken by static banners on the effectiveness of banner ads. At the same time, whether semantic factors (theme consistency) moderate the influence of structural factors (picture and text forms) on banner advertising remains unknown. The aim of this paper is to examine the influence of structural factors and semantic factors of ads on participants' visual attention to and memory of banner ads. The participants (twenty-seven males and forty females aged 18–26 years) were divided into two groups, one for consistent ad-web content themes and the other for inconsistent ad-web content themes. Then, the participants were asked to browse 16 complete pages (4 pages each of text-type web content and text-type banner ads, picture-type web content and picture-type banner ads, text-type web content and picture-type banner ads, and picture-type web content and text-type banner ads), and their eye movements were recorded to measure the participants' level of attention to the banner ads. A recognition task was used to measure the participants' memories of the banner ads. The results showed that the text-type banner ad had a lower blindness rate and exerted better attention and memory effects than the picture-type banner ad, and the text-type banner ad had a lower blindness rate and better attention and memory effects when positioned in the background of picture-type web content than when positioned in the background of text-type web content. A significant interaction effect among banner ad type, web content type and theme consistency showed that ad-web content theme consistency moderated the effect of web content type and banner ad type on ad effectiveness. Taken together, the results of these tasks demonstrate that theme consistency moderates the effect of web content type and banner ad type on ad effectiveness in a top-down manner. To reduce the negative effect of banner blindness, placing text-type banner ads in picture-type web content and setting a consistent theme between the banner ad and the web content is the more effective choice. The findings from this study can be used to assist advertising agencies in designing more effective and efficient banner ads from the perspective of basic psychology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

None of the data or materials for the experiments reported here is currently available, but will be provided upon request. None of the experiments was preregistered.

References

  • Alslaity A, Tran T (2020) The effect of personality traits on persuading recommender system users. In: Conference on recommender systems

  • Benway JP (1998) Banner blindness: the irony of attention grabbing on the world wide web. Proc Human Factors and Ergon Soc Annual Meeting 42(5):463–467. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193129804200504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beuckels E, Hudders L, Cauberghe V, Bombeke K, Durnez W, Morton J (2021) To fit in or to stand out? an eye-tracking study investigating online banner effectiveness in a media multitasking context. J Advert 50(4):461–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2020.1870053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke M, Hornof A, Nilsen E, Gorman N (2005) High-cost banner blindness: ads increase perceived workload, hinder visual search, and are forgotten. ACM (4)

  • Calisir F, Karaali D (2008) The impacts of banner location, banner content and navigation style on banner recognition. Elsevier Science Publishers B. V

  • Chan YY, Kim K, Stout PA (2004) Assessing the effects of animation in online banner advertising. J Interact Advert 4(2):49–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2004.10722087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee P (2008) Are unclicked ads wasted? enduring effects of banner and Pop-Up Ad exposures on brand memory and attitudes. J Electron Commer Res 9(1):51–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu YP, Lo SK, Hsieh AY (2017) How colour similarity can make banner advertising effective: insights from Gestalt theory. Behav Inf Technol 36(4–6):606–619. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2016.1267264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury R, Olsen GD, Pracejus JW (2008) Affective responses to images in print advertising: affect integration in a simultaneous presentation context. J Advert 37(3):7–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG (2009) Statistical power analyses using G*power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods 41:1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gagne ED (1985) The cognitive psychology of school learning. Little, Brown, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Güner H, İnal Y (2015) The effect of banner location on banner recognition in a Turkish Government Website: an eye tracking study. human-computer interaction, Part III, HCII 2015. LNCS 9171:65–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Hervet G, Guérard K, Tremblay S, Chtourou M (2011) Is banner blindness genuine? eye tracking internet text advertising. Appl Cogn Psychol 25:708–716. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillstrom AP, Chai YC (2006) Factors that guide or disrupt attentive visual processing. Comput Hum Behav 22(4):648–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong W, Thong JYL, Tam KY (2014) How do Web users respond to non-banner-ads animation? The effects of task type and user experience. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 58(10):1467–1482. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh YC, Chen KH (2011) How different information types affect viewer’s attention on internet advertising. Comput Hum Behav 27(2):935–945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.11.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kononova A, Kim W, Joo E, Lynch K (2020) Click, click, ad: the proportion of relevant (vs. irrelevant) ads matters when advertising within paginated online content. Int J Advert 2:1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Köster M, Rüth M, Hamborg K, Kaspar K (2015) Effects of personalized banner Ads on visual attention and recognition memory. Appl Cogn Psychol 29:181–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee WY, Hur Y, Kim DY, Brigham C (2017) The effect of endorsement and consistency on banner ads on sports websites. Int J Sports Mark Spons 18(3):263–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.11.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu CW, Lo SK, Hsieh AY, Hwang Y (2018) Effects of banner ad shape and the schema creating process on consumer internet browsing behavior. Comput Human Behav 86(SEP.):9–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lochbuehler K, Mercincavage M, Tang KZ, Tomlin CD, Strasser AA (2017) Effect of message congruency on attention and recall in pictorial health warning labels. Tobacco Control 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053615

  • McCoy S, Everard A, Polak P, Galletta DF (2007) The effects of online advertising. Commun ACM 50(3):84–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore RS, Stammerjohan CA, Coulter RA (2005) Banner advertiser-web site context congruity and color effects on attention and attitudes. J Advert. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2005.10639189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peker S, Dalveren GGM, Inal Y (2021) The effects of the content elements of online banner ads on visual attention: evidence from an-eye-tracking study. Future Internet 13:1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi13010018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porta M, Ravarelli A, Spaghi F (2013) Online newspapers and ad banners: an eye tracking study on the effects of congruity. Online Inf Rev 37(3):405–423. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-01-2012-0001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portnoy F, Marchionini G (2010) Modeling the effect of habituation on banner blindness as a function of repetition and search type: gap analysis for future work. In: Proceedings of the 28th international conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI 2010, Extended Abstracts Volume, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, April 10–15

  • Resnick M, Albert W (2014) The impact of advertising location and user task on the emergence of banner ad blindness: an eye-tracking study. Int J Humancomput Interact 30(1–3):206–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robert RL, Klein NM (2002) Packaging as brand communication: effects of product pictures on consumer responses to the package and brand. J Market Theory Practice 10(4):58–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2002.11501926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers S (2003) The effects of sponsor relevance on consumer reactions to internet sponsorships. J Advert. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2003.10639141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryu G, Lim EAC, Tan LTL, Han YJ (2007) Preattentive processing of banner advertisements: the role of modality, location, and interference. Electron Commer Res Appl 6(1):6–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamdasani PN, Stanaland A, Tan J (2001) Location, location, location: insights for advertising placement on the web. J Advert Res 41(4):7–21. https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-41-4-7-21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simola J, Kuisma J, Öörni A, Uusitalo L, Hyönä J (2011) The impact of salient advertisements on reading and attention on web pages. J Exp Psychol Appl 17(2):174–190. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simola J, Kivikangas M, Kuisma J, Krause CM (2013) Attention and memory for newspaper advertisements: effects of ad–editorial congruency and location. Appl Cogn Psychol 27(4):429–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg RJ, Mio J (2009) Cognitive psychology. Stamford: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, pp 159

  • Sulikowski P (2019) Evaluation of varying visual intensity and position of a recommendation in a recommending interface towards reducing habituation and improving sales. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulikowski P, Zdziebko T (2020) Horizontal vs. Vertical Recommendation Zones Evaluation Using Behavior Tracking. Applied Sciences 11(56):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Kai HL, Peng JZ (2013) Solving the Distinctiveness - Blindness Debate: A Unified Model for Understanding Banner Processing. J Assoc Inf Syst 14(2):49–71. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang DL, Jhuang SJ (2005) Presented paper at 2005 annual conference of Chinese communication society annual conference. Taiwan: Hsin Chu

  • Theeuwes J, Burger R (1998) Attentional control during visual search: the effect of irrelevant singletons. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24:1342–1353

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Treisman A (1986) Features and objects in visual processing. Sci Am 255(5):114–125. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1186-114b

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van orden KF, Divita J, Shim MJ (1993) Redundant use of luminance and flashing with shape and color as highlighting codes in symbolic displays

  • Wilson RT, Casper J (2016) The role of location and visual saliency in capturing attention to outdoor advertising how location attributes increase the likelihood for a driver to notice a billboard ad. J Advert Res 56:259–273. https://doi.org/10.2501/Jar-2016-020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Q (2014) Should i trust him? the effects of reviewer profile characteristics on ewom credibility. Comput Hum Behav 33(2):136–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang X, Jing Z, Peracchio LA (2010) Understanding the impact of self-concept on the stylistic properties of images. J Consum Psychol 20(4):508–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2010.06.012

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo CY (2008) Unconscious processing of web advertising: effects on implicit memory, attitude toward the brand, and consideration set. J Interact Mark 22(2):2–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the 14th five-year plan of Jiangsu Province Education Science (B/2021/01/87), the Humanities and Social Sciences Research Project of Soochow University (22XM0017), the Interdiscipline Research Team of Humanities and Social Sciences of Soochow University (2022), the Suzhou Science and Technology Development Plan [People’s Livelihood Science and Technology: SKY2022113], the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI (20K04381) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31700939 and 31871092).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AW and MZ were responsible for the experimental design, interpretation of the data and revising the manuscript. BN and SL performed the research. AW, BN and SL were responsible for the data analysis. AW drafted the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Aijun Wang or Ming Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethical approval

All participants gave their informed consent prior to the experiment in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration and were paid afterward. The study was approved by the Academic Committee of the Department of Psychology, Soochow University, China.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Editors: Daniele Nardi (Ball State University), Giulia Liberati (UC Louvain); Reviewers: Simone Borsci (Twente University).

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ning, B., Luo, S., Wang, A. et al. Effects of banner ad type, web content type and theme consistency on banner blindness: an eye movement study. Cogn Process 24, 313–326 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-023-01131-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-023-01131-7

Keywords

Navigation