Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Development and Validation for the Estimation of Assay and Forced Degradation Impurities of Goserelin Acetate Sustained-Release Implant Using HPLC and LC–MS

  • Original
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forced degradation studies aim to systemically characterize the degradation products of an active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) and its formulations under harsh conditions that accelerate degradation. These studies are especially valuable for sustained-release products in selecting appropriate packaging materials and storage conditions in the field of pharmaceutics. To demonstrate the degradation pathways and degradation products of the API and products, mass spectrometry is used for further characterization of the degradation products. Goserelin acetate sustained-release implant, which is prepared by hot melt extrusion using biodegradable material polylactic acid-glycolic acid copolymer as a carrier, is used for the treatment of early breast cancer in premenopausal and perimenopausal women. In this study, a simple and sensitive high-performance chromatography method was established following the ICH guidance. We conducted forced degradation experiments to determine the conditions of the product. The forced degradation studies of the goserelin acetate sustained-release implant showed the presence of a single impurity during thermal degradation, as observed in the HPLC analysis. To elucidate the structure of the impurity and characterize its degradation pathway, we performed further characterization using LC–MS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Baum M (2001) A vision for the future? Br J Cancer 85:15–18. https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2001.1984

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Goldhirsch A, Glick JH, Gelber RD et al (2005) Meeting highlights: international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2005. Ann Oncol 16:1569–1583. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdi326

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Emens LA, Davidson NE (2003) Adjuvant hormonal therapy for premenopausal women with breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 9:486S-S494

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Eifel P, Axelson JA, Costa J et al (2001) National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: adjuvant therapy for breast cancer, November 1–3, 2000. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:979–989. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/93.13.979

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Budäus L, Leyh-Bannurah S-R, Salomon G et al (2016) Initial experience of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT imaging in high-risk prostate cancer patients prior to radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 69:393–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Strope SA, Andriole GL (2010) Prostate cancer screening: current status and future perspectives. Nat Rev Urol 7:487–493. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2010.120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaufmann M, Jonat W, Schachner-Wünschmann E et al (1991) The depot GnRH analogue goserelin in the treatment of premenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer—a 5-year experience and further endocrine therapies. ORT 14:22–30. https://doi.org/10.1159/000216940

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Plosker GL, Brogden RN (1994) Leuprorelin. Drugs 48:930–967. https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-199448060-00008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brogden RN, Faulds D (1995) Goserelin. Drugs Aging 6:324–343. https://doi.org/10.2165/00002512-199506040-00007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Guideline IHT (1996) Photostability testing of new drug substances and products Q1B, current step 4, pp 1–12

  11. Reynolds D, Facchine KL, Mullaney JF et al (2002) Available guidance and best practices for conducting forced degradation studies. Pharm Technol 26:48–56

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bajaj S, Singla D, Sakhuja N (2012) Stability testing of pharmaceutical products. J App Pharm Sci. https://doi.org/10.7324/JAPS.2012.2322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Guideline IHT (2003) Evaluation for stability data Q1E, current step 4, pp 1–19

  14. Waterman KC, Adami RC (2005) Accelerated aging: prediction of chemical stability of pharmaceuticals. Int J Pharm 293:101–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2004.12.013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Guideline IHT (2003) Stability testing of new drug substances and products Q1A(R2), current step 4, pp 1-24

  16. Guideline IHT (2005) Validation of analytical procedure: text and methodology Q2(R1), current step 4, pp 1–17

  17. Guideline IHT (2006) Impurities in new drug products. Q3B (R2), current step 4, pp 1–16

  18. Singh R (2012) Current trends in forced degradation study for pharmaceutical product development. J Pharm Educ Res 3(1):324

  19. Casalini T, Rossi F, Lazzari S et al (2014) Mathematical modeling of PLGA microparticles: from polymer degradation to drug release. Mol Pharm 11:4036–4048. https://doi.org/10.1021/mp500078u

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hengsawas Surasarang S, Keen JM, Huang S et al (2017) Hot melt extrusion versus spray drying: hot melt extrusion degrades albendazole. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 43:797–811. https://doi.org/10.1080/03639045.2016.1220577

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shi L, Wu T, Sheng N et al (2017) Characterization of angiotensin-I converting enzyme inhibiting peptide from Venerupis philippinarum with nano-liquid chromatography in combination with orbitrap mass spectrum detection and molecular docking. J Ocean Univ China 16:473–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11802-017-3201-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Morris HR, Williams DH (1972) The identification of a mutant peptide of an abnormal haemoglobin by mass spectrometry. J Chem Soc Chem Commun. https://doi.org/10.1039/C39720000114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sforza S, Tedeschi T, Corradini R et al (2003) Direction control in DNA binding of chiral D-lysine-based peptide nucleic acid (PNA) probed by electrospray mass spectrometry. Chem Commun. https://doi.org/10.1039/B212718K

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shirangi M, Hennink WE, Somsen GW, van Nostrum CF (2016) Acylation of arginine in goserelin-loaded PLGA microspheres. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 99:18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2015.11.008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Loo SCJ, Tan HT, Ooi CP, Boey YCF (2006) Hydrolytic degradation of electron beam irradiated high molecular weight and non-irradiated moderate molecular weight PLLA. Acta Biomater 2:287–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2005.10.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fan Y, Nishida H, Shirai Y et al (2004) Thermal degradation behaviour of poly(lactic acid) stereocomplex. Polym Degrad Stab 86:197–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.03.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mori T, Nishida H, Shirai Y, Endo T (2004) Effects of chain end structures on pyrolysis of poly(L-lactic acid) containing tin atoms. Polym Degrad Stab 84:243–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2003.11.008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hoitink MA, Beijnen JH, Boschma M et al (1998) Degradation kinetics of three gonadorelin analogues: developing a method for calculating epimerization parameters. Pharm Res 15:1449. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011966024778

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Peng T, Su J, Lin G et al (2006) Synthesis and characterization of poly-α, β-[N-(2-hydroxyethyl)-L-aspartamide]-g-poly(glycolide) amphiphilic graft copolymers as potential drug carriers. Colloid Polym Sci 284:834–842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00396-005-1432-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kang SW, Lee SJ, Kim JS et al (2011) Effect of a scaffold fabricated thermally from acetylated PLGA on the formation of engineered cartilage. Macromol Biosci 11(2):267–274

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to Shi-Yu Guo from the Science Communication program at the University of Edinburgh for providing language editing services for this article.

Funding

The authors have not disclosed any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DH: Conceptualized the research idea, designed the study, collected and analyzed the data, wrote the main manuscript text, reviewed and edited the manuscript. ML: Assisted in data collection, conducted statistical analysis, contributed to writing and editing of the manuscript. YT: Conducted literature review, assisted in data collection and analysis, contributed to writing and editing of the manuscript. YZ: Conducted data analysis, contributed to writing and editing of the manuscript. XX: Assisted in data collection, conducted qualitative analysis, contributed to writing and editing of the manuscript. HC: Provided critical feedback on the study design. WR: Provided overall guidance and supervision throughout the study, contributed to writing and editing of the manuscript, secured funding for the project.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hongyuan Chen or Wen Rui.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have not disclosed any competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, D., Tian, Y., Zheng, Y. et al. Development and Validation for the Estimation of Assay and Forced Degradation Impurities of Goserelin Acetate Sustained-Release Implant Using HPLC and LC–MS. Chromatographia 86, 595–603 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-023-04272-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-023-04272-1

Keywords

Navigation