Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Push-out bond strength and SEM fractographical analysis of hollow fibre posts used with self-adhesive resin cement: a pilot study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Odontology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Detachment is the major cause of failure of endodontic fibre posts. Hollow posts have been recently introduced to overcome such issue. The primary aim of this pilot study was to compare the push-out bond strength of hollow posts and traditional solid posts. Eight round-shaped single-canal premolars extracted for periodontal reason were selected as sample and equally randomized into two groups: (i) traditional solid fibre posts-TECH21xop and ii) hollow fibre posts-TECHOLE. A dual-curing self-adhesive cement (new TECHCEM) was used for posts placement. Six horizontal sections—two from each portion of the root (coronal, middle and apical)—were obtained from each sample root, yielding a total of 24 sections for each group. Push-out test was performed on the sections and bond strength values were compared between groups and within each group. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) fractographical analysis was conducted on each section. Additional SEM and EDX analyses were performed on new samples of both posts, to assess fibres density and distribution, and the chemical composition of the fibres and the matrix. Hollow posts showed a significantly higher push-out bond strength (6.36 ± 1.22 MPa) than solid posts (3.64 ± 1.62 MPa). Among the three root portions of the same group, there was no significant difference in bond strength. In both groups, the most frequent type of fracture was a mixed adhesive failure with the cement covering 0 to 50% of the post perimeter. Hollow post fibres appear more similar in size and have a more homogeneous distribution, compared to solid posts. The two post types also have different chemical compositions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Reeh ES, Messer HH, Douglas WH. Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures. J Endod. 1989;15(11):512–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(89)80191-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lambjerg-Hansen H, Asmussen E. Mechanical properties of endodontic posts. J Oral Rehabil. 1997;24(12):882–7. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1997.00598.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tsintsadze N, Margvelashvili-Malament M, Natto ZS, Ferrari M. Comparing survival rates of endodontically treated teeth restored either with glass-fiber-reinforced or metal posts: a systematic review and meta-analyses. J Prosthet Dent. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.01.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sonkesriya S, Olekar ST, Saravanan V, Somasunderam P, Chauhan RS, Chaurasia VR. An in vitro comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of custom made, metal, glass fiber reinforced and carbon reinforced posts in endodontically treated teeth. J Int Oral Health. 2015;7(5):53.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhou L, Wang Q. Comparison of fracture resistance between cast posts and fiber posts: a meta-analysis of literature. J Endod. 2013;39(1):11–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.09.026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cheung W. A review of the management of endodontically treated teeth. JADA. 2005;136(5):611–9. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2005.0232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Parisi C, Valandro LF, Ciocca L, Gatto MRA, Baldissara P. Clinical outcomes and success rates of quartz fiber post restorations: a retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;114(3):367–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.03.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cecchin D, Farina AP, Vitti RP, Moraes RR, Bacchi A, Spazzin AO. Acid etching and surface coating of glass-fiber posts: bond strength and interface analysis. Braz Dent J. 2016;27(2):228–33. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201600722.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lo Giudice G, Ferrari Cagidiaco E, Lo Giudice R, Puleio F, Nicita F, Calapaj M. Evaluation of mechanical properties of a hollow endodontic post by three point test and SEM analysis: a pilot study. Materials. 2019;12(12):1983. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12121983.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Dietschi D, Duc O, Krejci I, Sadan A. Biomechanical considerations for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review of the literature, part II (evaluation of fatigue behavior, interfaces, and in vivo studies). Quintessence Int. 2008;39(2):117–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bovolato L, Tonini R, Boschi G, Cavalli G, Salgarello SA. Novel hollow fiber sandwich composite post system: mechanical characteristics. Minerva Stomatol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4970.19.04235-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. De-Deus G, Reis C, Beznos D, de Abranches AMG, Coutinho-Filho T, Paciornik S. Limited ability of three commonly used thermoplasticized gutta-percha techniques in filling oval-shaped canals. J Endod. 2008;34(11):1401–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.08.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee OYS, Khan K, Li KY, Shetty H, Abiad RS, Cheung GSP, et al. Influence of apical preparation size and irrigation technique on root canal debridement: a histological analysis of round and oval root canals. Int Endod J. 2019;52(9):1366–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Costa TS, Brandão RMR, Farias Vajgel BC, SoutoMaior JR. CAD-CAM glass fiber compared with conventional prefabricated glass fiber posts: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.01.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Soares CJ, Pereira JC, Valdivia ADCM, Novais VR, Meneses MS. Influence of resin cement and post configuration on bond strength to root dentine: effect of post configuration on bond strength. Int Endod J. 2012;45(2):136–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01953.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Türker SA, Özçelik B, Yilmaz Z. Evaluation of the bond strength and fracture resistance of different post systems. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2015;16(10):788–93. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1758.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Goracci C, Tavares AU, Fabianelli A, Monticelli F, Raffaelli O, Cardoso PC, et al. The adhesion between fiber posts and root canal walls: comparison between microtensile and push-out bond strength measurements. Eur J Oral Sci. 2004;112(4):353–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2004.00146.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhu L, Li Y, Chen Y-C, Carrera CA, Wu C, Fok A. Comparison between two post-dentin bond strength measurement methods. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):2350. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20891-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Amaral M, Rippe MP, Bergoli CD, Monaco C, Valandro LF. Multi-step adhesive cementation versus one-step adhesive cementation: push-out bond strength between fiber post and root dentin before and after mechanical cycling. Gen Dent. 2011;59(5):e185-191.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Durski M, Metz M, Thompson J, Mascarenhas A, Crim G, Vieira S, et al. Push-out bond strength evaluation of glass fiber posts with different resin cements and application techniques. Oper Dent. 2016;41(1):103–10. https://doi.org/10.2341/14-343-L.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pereira JR, da Abreu RR, do Lins ValleGhizoniReis Só Shiratori AJSMVFK. The influence of different cements on the pull-out bond strength of fiber posts. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(1):59–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.10.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Amiri EM, Balouch F, Atri F. Effect of self-adhesive and separate etch adhesive dual cure resin cements on the bond strength of fiber post to dentin at different parts of the root. J Dent (Tehran). 2017;14(3):153–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Goracci C, Corciolani G, Vichi A, Ferrari M. Light-transmitting ability of marketed fiber posts. J Dent Res. 2008;87(12):1122–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910808701208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Abo-Hamar SE, Hiller K-A, Jung H, Federlin M, Friedl K-H, Schmalz G. Bond strength of a new universal self-adhesive resin luting cement to dentin and enamel. Clin Oral Invest. 2005;9(3):161–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-005-0308-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Baldea B, Furtos G, Antal M, Nagy K, Popescu D, Nica L. Push-out bond strength and SEM analysis of two self-adhesive resin cements: An in vitro study. J Dent Sci. 2013;8(3):296–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2013.01.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mohammadi Z, Yaripour S, Shalavi S, Palazzi F, Asgary S. Root canal irrigants and dentin bonding: an update. Iran Endod J. 2017;12(2):131–6. https://doi.org/10.22037/iej.2017.27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Calixto L, Bandéca M, Clavijo V, Andrade M, Lg Vaz, Campos E. Effect of resin cement system and root region on the push-out bond strength of a translucent fiber post. Oper Dent. 2012;37(1):80–6. https://doi.org/10.2341/11-035-L.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Scotti N, Forniglia A, Bergantin E, Paolino DS, Pasqualini D, Berutti E. Fibre post adaptation and bond strength in oval canals. Int Endod J. 2014;47(4):366–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12156.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pereira JR, Pamato S, Santini MF, Porto VC, Ricci WA, Só MVR. Push-out bond strength of fiberglass posts cemented with adhesive and self-adhesive resin cements according to the root canal surface. Saudi Dent J. 2021;33(1):22–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.11.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gu X-H, Mao C-Y, Liang C, Wang H-M, Kern M. Does endodontic post space irrigation affect smear layer removal and bonding effectiveness? Eur J Oral Sci. 2009;117(5):597–603. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00661.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Giachetti L, Scaminaci Russo D, Baldini M, Bertini F, Steier L, Ferrari M. Push-out strength of translucent fibre posts cemented using a dual-curing technique or a light-curing self-adhering material. Int Endod J. 2012;45(3):249–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01969.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Cekic-Nagas I, Shinya A, Ergun G, Pk Vallittu, Lvj Lassila. Biomechanical behavior of cavity configuration on micropush-out test: A finite-element-study. Med Oral. 2011. https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.16.e119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rezende EC, Gomes GM, Szesz AL, da Silveira Bueno CE, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Effects of dentin moisture on cementation of fiber posts to root canals. J Adhes Dent. 2016;18(1):29–34. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a35516.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Arora J, Talwar I, Sahni D, Rattan V. Morphology and age-related changes in calcospherites of human teeth: an ultrastructural study. Ann Hum Biol. 2017;44(4):349–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014460.2016.1270353.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Karkera R, Raj APN, Isaac L, Mustafa M, Reddy RN, Thomas M. Comparison of the solubility of conventional luting cements with that of the polyacid modified composite luting cement and resin-modified glass lonomer cement. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016;17(12):1016–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Goracci C, Ferrari M. Current perspectives on post systems: a literature review: post systems. Aust Dent J. 2011;56:77–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01298.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Carek A, Dukaric K, Miler H, Marovic D, Tarle Z, Par M. Post-cure development of the degree of conversion and mechanical properties of dual-curing resin cements. Polymers. 2022;14(17):3649. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14173649.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Niitsuma A, Shinya A, Shiratori S, Kuroda S, Hatta M, Gomi H. Effects of filling technique and light irradiation distance on the push-out bond strength of dual and light cured core materials in a direct core build-up. J Mol Eng Mater. 2017;05(04):1740008. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2251237317400081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ferreira R, Prado M, de Jesus Soares A, Zaia AA, de Souza-Filho FJ. Influence of using clinical microscope as auxiliary to perform mechanical cleaning of post space: a bond strength analysis. J Endod. 2015;41(8):1311–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.05.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Li H, editor. Fiberglass science and technology: chemistry, characterization, processing, modeling, application, and sustainability. Cham: Springer; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luigi Generali.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Generali, L., Veneri, F., Forabosco, E. et al. Push-out bond strength and SEM fractographical analysis of hollow fibre posts used with self-adhesive resin cement: a pilot study. Odontology 112, 158–168 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-023-00820-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-023-00820-1

Keywords

Navigation