Abstract
Pulsed electric fields are extensively utilized in clinical treatments, such as subthalamic deep brain stimulation, where electric field loading is in direct contact with brain tissue. However, the alterations in brain tissue’s mechanical properties and microstructure due to changes in electric field parameters have not received adequate attention. In this study, the mechanical properties and microstructure of the brain tissue under pulsed electric fields were focused on. Herein, a custom indentation device was equipped with a module for electric field loading. Parameters such as pulse amplitude and frequency were adjusted. The results demonstrated that following an indentation process lasting 5 s and reaching a depth of 1000 μm, and a relaxation process of 175 s, the average shear modulus of brain tissue was reduced, and viscosity decreased. At the same amplitude, high-frequency pulsed electric fields had a smaller effect on brain tissue than low-frequency ones. Furthermore, pulsed electric fields induced cell polarization and reduced the proteoglycan concentration in brain tissue. As pulse frequency increased, cell polarization diminished, and proteoglycan concentration decreased significantly. High-frequency pulsed electric fields applied to brain tissue were found to reduce impedance fluctuation amplitude. This study revealed the effect of pulsed electric fields on the mechanical properties and microstructure of ex vivo brain tissue, providing essential information to promote the advancement of brain tissue electrotherapy in clinical settings.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data and materials used in this study are not publicly available due to ongoing research using the same materials, but they are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Antonopoulos CN, Kadoglou NPE (2016) Biomarkers in silent traumatic brain injury. Curr Pharm Des 22:680–687. https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612822666151204000458
Antonovaite N, Hulshof LA, Hol EM, Wadman WJ, Iannuzzi D (2021) Viscoelastic mapping of mouse brain tissue: relation to structure and age. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104159
Aum DJ, Tierney TS (2018) Deep brain stimulation: foundations and future trends. Front Biosci-Landmark 23:162–182. https://doi.org/10.2741/4586
Avila-Chavez E, Torres-y-Torres N, Tovar-Palacio A (1997) Transport of zwitterionic amino acids in mammalian cells Revista de investigacion clinica. Organo Del Hospital De Enfermed De La Nutricion 49:323–338
Baizabal-Carvallo JF, Kagnoff MN, Jimenez-Shahed J, Fekete R, Jankovic J (2014) The safety and efficacy of thalamic deep brain stimulation in essential tremor: 10 years and beyond. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 85:567–572. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2013-304943
Bechtereva NP, Bondartchuk AN, Smirnov VM, Meliutcheva LA, Shandurina AN (1975) Method of electrostimulation of the deep brain structures in treatment of some chronic diseases. Confinia Neurol 37(1–3):136–140
Benabid AL, Pollak P, Hoffmann D, Gervason C, Hommel M, Perret JE, Gao DM (1991) Long-term suppression of tremor by chronic stimulation of the ventral intermediate thalamic nucleus. The Lancet 337(8738):403–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(91)91175-t
Boulet T, Kelso ML, Othman SF (2013) Long-term in vivo imaging of viscoelastic properties of the mouse brain after controlled cortical impact. J Neurotrauma 30:1512–1520. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2012.2788
Budday S et al (2020) Towards microstructure-informed material models for human brain tissue. Acta Biomater 104:53–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.12.030
Bullard AJ, Hutchison BC, Lee J, Chestek CA, Patil PG (2020) Estimating risk for future intracranial, fully implanted, modular neuroprosthetic systems: a systematic review of hardware complications in clinical deep brain stimulation and experimental human intracortical arrays. Neuromodulation 23:411–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.13069
Choo YJ, Boudier-Reveret M, Chang MC (2021) The essentials of brain anatomy for physiatrists magnetic resonance imaging findings. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 100:181–188. https://doi.org/10.1097/phm.0000000000001558
DeCarli C (2013) Clinically asymptomatic vascular brain injury: a potent cause of cognitive impairment among older individuals. J Alzheimers Disease 33:S417–S426. https://doi.org/10.3233/jad-2012-129004
Doshi PK, Rai N, Das D (2021) Surgical and hardware complications of deep brain stimulation-a single surgeon experience of 519 cases over 20 years. Neuromodulation 25:895–903. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.13360
Dougherty DD (2018) Deep brain stimulation clinical applications. Psychiatr Clin North Am 41:385–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psc.2018.04.004
Elkin BS, Morrison B (2013) Viscoelastic properties of the P17 and adult rat brain from indentation in the coronal plane. J Biomech Eng-Trans Asme. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4025386
Eskandari F, Rahmani Z, Shafieian M (2021) The effect of large deformation on Poisson’s ratio of brain white matter: an experimental study. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H-J Eng Med 235:401–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954411920984027
Feng Y, Gao Y, Wang T, Tao L, Qiu S, Zhao X (2017) A longitudinal study of the mechanical properties of injured brain tissue in a mouse model. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 71:407–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.04.008
Gelpi E, Haberler C, Micko A, Polt A, Amon A, Rossler K, Alesch F (2021) Focal subthalamic atrophy after long-term deep brain stimulation in parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 36:1987–1989. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.28653
Haslach HW Jr, Leahy LN, Hsieh AH (2015) Transient solid-fluid interactions in rat brain tissue under combined translational shear and fixed compression. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 48:12–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.04.003
Hayes WC, Keer LM, Herrmann G, Mockros LF (1972) A mathematical analysis for indentation tests of articular cartilage. J Biomech 5:541–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(72)90010-3
Huang H, Zhao H, Shi C, Zhang L, Wan S, Geng C (2013) Randomness and statistical laws of indentation-induced pop-out in single crystal silicon. Materials 6:1496–1505. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma6041496
Huang Z, Pan C, Huang P, Zhou J, Li X (2022) Effects of cyclic loads on viscoelastic behavior of brain tissue on the implanting trajectory of STN-DBS. J Mech Sci Technol 36:2149–2159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-022-0347-8
Jung I-H, Chang KW, Park SH, Chang WS, Jung HH, Chang JW (2022) Complications after deep brain stimulation: a 21-year experience in 426 patients. Front Aging Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.819730
Karimi A, Navidbakhsh M, Haghi AM, Faghihi S (2013) Measurement of the uniaxial mechanical properties of rat brains infected by Plasmodium berghei ANKA. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H-J Eng Med 227:609–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954411913476779
Lau LW, Cua R, Keough MB, Haylock-Jacobs S, Yong VW (2013) OPINION Pathophysiology of the brain extracellular matrix: a new target for remyelination. Nat Rev Neurosci 14:722–729. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3550
Lind NM, Moustgaard A, Jelsing J, Vajta G, Cumming P, Hansen AK (2007) The use of pigs in neuroscience: modeling brain disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 31:728–751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.02.003
Lyons KE, Koller WC, Wilkinson SB, Pahwa R (2001) Long term safety and efficacy of unilateral deep brain stimulation of the thalamus for parkinsonian tremor. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 71:682–684. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.71.5.682
MacManus DB, Pierrat B, Murphy JG, Gilchrist MD (2015) Dynamic mechanical properties of murine brain tissue using micro-indentation. J Biomech 48:3213–3218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.06.028
MacManus DB, Pierrat B, Murphy JG, Gilchrist MD (2017) A viscoelastic analysis of the P56 mouse brain under large-deformation dynamic indentation. Acta Biomater 48:309–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.10.029
MacManus DB, Menichetti A, Depreitere B, Famaey N, Vander Sloten J, Gilchrist M (2020) Towards animal surrogates for characterising large strain dynamic mechanical properties of human brain tissue. Brain Multiphys. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brain.2020.100018
Malone DA Jr (2010) Use of deep brain stimulation in treatment-resistant depression. Clevel Clin J Med 77(Suppl 3):S77-80. https://doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.77.s3.14
McConnell GC, So RQ, Hilliard JD, Lopomo P, Grill WM (2012) Effective deep brain stimulation suppresses low-frequency network oscillations in the basal ganglia by regularizing neural firing patterns. J Neurosci 32:15657–15668. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2824-12.2012
Moro E, Esselink RJA, Xie J, Hommel M, Benabid AL, Pollak P (2002) The impact on Parkinson’s disease of electrical parameter settings in STN stimulation. Neurology 59:706–713. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.59.5.706
Nair NN, Schreiner E, Marx D (2008) Peptide synthesis in aqueous environments: the role of extreme conditions on amino acid activation. J Am Chem Soc 130:14148–14160. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja802370c
Patz S et al (2019) Imaging localized neuronal activity at fast time scales through biomechanics. Sci Adv. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aav3816
Podolska A, Kaczkowski B, Busk PK, Sokilde R, Litman T, Fredholm M, Cirera S (2011) MicroRNA expression profiling of the porcine developing brain. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014494
Prevost TP, Balakrishnan A, Suresh S, Socrate S (2011) Biomechanics of brain tissue. Acta Biomater 7:83–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.06.035
Proces A, Luciano M, Kalukula Y, Ris L, Gabriele S (2022) Multiscale mechanobiology in brain physiology and diseases. Front Cell Develop Biol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2022.823857
Pycroft L, Boccard SG, Owen SLF, Stein JF, Fitzgerald JJ, Green AL, Aziz TZ (2016) Brainjacking: implant security issues in invasive neuromodulation. World Neurosurg 92:454–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.05.010
Qian L, Zhao H (2018) Nanoindentation of soft biological materials. Micromachines. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi9120654
Qian L, Sun YF, Tong Q, Tian JY, Ren Z, Zhao HW (2019) Indentation response in porcine brain under electric fields. Soft Matter 15:623–632. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8sm01272e
Qian L, Wang S, Zhou S, Sun Y, Zhao H (2022) Influence of pia-arachnoid complex on the indentation response of porcine brain at different length scales. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104925
Qiao R et al (2012) Receptor-mediated delivery of magnetic nanoparticles across the blood-brain barrier Acs. NANO 6:3304–3310. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn300240p
Sauleau P, Lapouble E, Val-Laillet D, Malbert CH (2009) The pig model in brain imaging and neurosurgery. Animal 3:1138–1151. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1751731109004649
Semrud-Clikeman M, Griffin JD (2000) Cognitive neuroscience: the biology of the mind. Sch Psychol Q 15:106–110. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0088773
Shulyakov AV, Cenkowski SS, Buist RJ, Del Bigio MR (2011) Age-dependence of intracranial viscoelastic properties in living rats. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 4:484–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.12.012
Sjostedt E et al (2020) An atlas of the protein-coding genes in the human, pig, and mouse brain. Science 367:1090–2006. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay5947
Sneddon IN (1965) The relation between load and penetration in the axisymmetric boussinesq problem for a punch of arbitrary profile. Int J Eng Sci 3:47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7225(65)90019-4
Toda H, Saiki H, Nishida N, Iwasaki K (2016) Update on deep brain stimulation for dyskinesia and dystonia: a literature review. Neurol Medico-Chirurgica 56:236–248. https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.ra.2016-0002
Vappou J, Breton E, Choquet P, Willinger R, Constantinesco A (2008) Assessment of in vivo and post-mortem mechanical behavior of brain tissue using magnetic resonance elastography. J Biomech 41:2954–2959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.07.034
Vedam-Mai V et al (2021) Proceedings of the eighth annual deep brain stimulation think tank: advances in optogenetics, ethical issues affecting dbs research, neuromodulatory approaches for depression, adaptive neurostimulation, and emerging DBS technologies. Front Human Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.644593
Veno MT et al (2015) Spatio-temporal regulation of circular RNA expression during porcine embryonic brain development. Genome Biol. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-015-0801-3
Verkhratsky A, Zorec R, Parpura V (2017) Stratification of astrocytes in healthy and diseased brain. Brain Pathol 27:629–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/bpa.12537
Wardell K, Nordin T, Vogel D, Zsigmond P, Westin C-F, Hariz M, Hemm S (2022) Deep brain stimulation: emerging tools for simulation, data analysis, and visualization. Front Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.834026
Weickenmeier J, Kurt M, Ozkaya E, Wintermark M, Pauly KB, Kuhl E (2018) Magnetic resonance elastography of the brain: a comparison between pigs and humans. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 77:702–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.08.029
Yang WH (1966) The contact problem for viscoelastic bodies. J Appl Mech 33:395–401. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3625055
Zhang C, Zhao H (2022) The effects of electric fields on the mechanical properties and microstructure of ex vivo porcine brain tissues. Soft Matter 18:1498–1509. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1sm01401c
Zhang MG, Chen JJ, Feng XQ, Cao YP (2014) On the applicability of sneddon’s solution for interpreting the indentation of nonlinear elastic biopolymers. J Appl Mech-Trans Asme 10(1115/1):4027973
Zhang C, Li Y, Huang S, Yang L, Zhao H (2022a) Effects of different types of electric fields on mechanical properties and microstructure of ex vivo porcine brain tissues. Acs Biomater Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c00456
Zhang C, Liu C, Zhao H (2022b) Mechanical properties of brain tissue based on microstructure. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104924
Funding
This study was funded by the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (51925504), the Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52021003), the Instrument Combining Micro/nano-Indentation with Confocal Raman for Synchronous and Cooperative Test (52227810), and the Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province (20200201231JC).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
YL, QZ, CZ, and HZ designed research; YL, JZ, and XZ performed research; YL and CZ contributed analytic tools; YL, ZW, CZ, and HZ wrote the paper.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
The Animal Center of Jilin University approved all animal protocols and procedures according to the Chinese Science and Technology Committee guidelines.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, Y., Zhang, Q., Zhao, J. et al. Mechanical behavior and microstructure of porcine brain tissues under pulsed electric fields. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 23, 241–254 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-023-01771-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-023-01771-w